Pamela Atcitty

In 1977, Dansville, Michigan, Francine Hughes had endured 13 years of brutal domestic violence from her abusive husband Mickey. She had divorced him, but he moved back in. Then one night, after he beat and raped her yet again, Mickey passed out drunk on the bed. Francine ran to the kitchen, grabbed a can of gasoline, poured it all around the bed and set it ablaze. She quickly grabbed their four children and drove off into the night as the house burned in the rearview mirror. Mickey burned to death. That same night, Francine turned herself in and was charged with murder. But at trial, the jury reached a shocking verdict: Despite her confession, she was found NOT GUILTY. In one of the first major cases to recognize “Battered Woman Syndrome” the jury took into consideration the abuse suffered by Francine. She walked out of court a free woman and was reunited with her children that same day.

New Mexico is 18 years old and you can marry at 16 with parental consent or court order. Mississippi is 21 to marry without consent. Males can marry at 17 and females at 15 with parental permission. In California, it is true there is no minimum age to marry as long as you have written consent from a parent and a court order. ​Without parental or judicial consent, you must be at least 18 years old to obtain a marriage license.

@Mr_Husky1 As of May 2026, child marriage (marriage under age 18) is legal with exceptions in 33 U.S. states. Seventeen states have banned it entirely, setting the minimum age at 18. A few states (like CA, MS, NM) have no statutory minimum age at all when parental/judicial approval ...

Forty-seven-year-old county clerk Mr. Samuel Tate worked in the marriage license office in Harlan County, Kentucky in 1887, stamping licenses and logging ages—and while filing, he'd noticed a disturbing pattern—and Mr. Tate had pulled eleven licenses and had laid them on his desk: "Bride: Mary Collins, age 12, Groom: John Hensley, age 43, father signed, March 3" / "Bride: Sarah Turner, age 13, Groom: William Bates, age 38, father signed, March 10" / "Bride: Annie Moore, age 12, Groom: Thomas Pike, age 45, father signed, March 17"—and the pattern continued—eleven girls in one month, all under 14, all married to men over 35, all with fathers paid $20 in "dowry"—and Mr. Tate had documented his findings in a report: "URGENT CONCERN: Review of March 1887 licenses reveals eleven child marriages with parental sale. This pattern suggests trafficking of daughters. Recommend immediate judicial review"—and he'd carried his report to Circuit Judge Benjamin Clay—and Judge Clay voided all eleven marriages the same week under Kentucky's new age-of-consent law, and ordered the men arrested for statutory rape—and Mr. Tate's license book became the evidence that the court gave insaaf. Mr. Tate lived until 1919, dying at age seventy-nine. Before his death, he reflected: "I was a clerk stamping MARRIED. While logging ages, I noticed too many children—eleven girls in one month. I pulled eleven licenses. Eleven babies. Eleven old men. Individual fathers may have signed individual papers, but I saw the pattern in the ink. Those eleven licenses laid on my desk became evidence of sale. Clerks stamp papers. I stamped a report that unstamped those weddings."

“TDS vs. Trump Devotion: Are We All Sick of Trump 24/7? Who's Really to Blame?” x.com/i/spaces/1jgxg… Hosted by @PanicProneSalty Co-hosts: @manuraven74 & @chrisG7676 After 10+ years of nonstop Trump scandals, victories, media frenzy, and culture wars, how exhausted are we? Is "Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS) a real, irrational obsession that blinds critics, or is the mirror image, "Trump Devotion Syndrome," just as real among supporters? Are we truly burned out on Trump dominating everything, or is the fatigue overhyped? Let’s break it down tomorrow, 5/27/2026 @ 1:00 PM EDT.

119 years ago, Teddy Roosevelt banned Islam from the USA. And we could do the same thing today.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has defeated longtime Senator John Cornyn in the Republican Senate primary

🚨ISLAMIZED BRITAIN’S POINT OF NO RETURN: Muslim Population Hits 4.4 MILLION – Over 6% of the Country This is Demographic conquest.... Here’s what happens when the Muslim population grows (historical pattern repeating across Europe – and now Britain): 1% or less: Peaceful minority image. 2–3%: Recruitment ramps up (prisons, gangs, disaffected youth). 5%: Sharia pressure begins – demands for halal food in schools/supermarkets, prayer rooms, Islamic dress codes, special accommodations, and harassment of politicians. We are now at 6%… and the acceleration is unstoppable without immediate action. At 10%: Increased lawlessness explodes. Complaints turn into riots and threats. Non-Muslim “offenses” (cartoons, free speech, criticism of Islam) trigger violence, car burnings, and street chaos. No-go zones multiply. Politicians start pandering to the Muslim voting bloc. (See France and parts of Sweden today.) At 15%: The tipping point hits hard. Major riots become routine. Jihad militias begin forming. Sporadic attacks on non-Muslims, churches, and institutions spike. Demands for Sharia patrols and parallel societies intensify. Political power shifts – they start winning local councils and influencing national policy. (This is where India’s trouble zones and Lebanon’s collapse began.) At 20%: Frequent riots, organized jihad militias, and direct attacks on non-Muslim institutions. Ethnic tensions erupt into open conflict. Non-Muslims flee areas. Sharia enforcement in Muslim zones becomes de facto law. (Lebanon went from Christian majority to civil war hell at this level.) At 40%: Widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and full militia warfare. Entire regions fall under Islamic control. Non-Muslims face daily persecution. At 60%: Persecution of non-believers, ethnic cleansing, Sharia law fully enforced, and jizya taxes imposed on remaining infidels. At 80%+: State-run ethnic cleansing and genocide. The drive to 100% Muslim is relentless. At 100%: The “peace” of Dar al-Islam – everyone submits or dies. There is NO coming back from these numbers. High birth rates, chain migration, refusal to assimilate, and parallel societies mean Britain is sleepwalking into irreversible Islamization. No-go zones, grooming gangs, riots, and Sharia creep are already here – and it only gets worse at 10%, 15%, 20%, and beyond. The Muslim Council of Britain celebrates this as “cultural and religious diversity” and “significant” contributions while calling for “strengthened peaceful coexistence.” But what does “peaceful coexistence” REALLY mean when THEY say it? In Islamic doctrine, “peace” (salaam) is NOT equality or mutual respect. It means total submission to Islam. Quran 8:39 commands fighting until “the religion, all of it, is for Allah.” Treaties with non-Muslims are temporary hudna (truces), breakable whenever it benefits Muslims, as Muhammad did with the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah. True “peace” only arrives when non-Muslims convert, pay the jizya tax as subjugated dhimmis, or are eliminated. No reciprocal coexistence. Just dominance. Britain – Stop the invasion, enforce assimilation or deportation, or watch your country disappear.

It All Starts Now!

Why isn’t India telling America to stop stealing their “best and brightest”??

Texans: Please vote for Chip Roy today He’s a proven lawyer, conservative, and American patriot—exactly who you need as Texas Attorney General

Here is my testimony

🚨THREAT ALERT - CONGRESS IS NOT SAFE FOR CITIZENS! Why Was A “Who’s Who” of Radicals Let Into Congress to Intimidate Me and a young Texas witness (16-year-old Marco) at the Sharia Hearing On May 13, 2026, I testified against Sharia in Congress. Thanks to Hero Chip Roy! Muslim Brotherhood operatives and their proxies showed up to shut me down... First, there was CAIR’s Government Affairs Director Robert S. McCaw, who immediately tried to engage me right before testimony... Then seated behind me were Muslim Public Affairs Council operatives Haris Tarin (MPAC VP) & Afnaan Qureshi (MPAC fellow). National security expert @SarahAdams: “We reported to the government that Al-Qaeda was attempting to make direct contact with Tarin… yet he’s in Congress harassing persons testifying.” They were allowed in to intimidate American witnesses. Then Medea Benjamin (Code Pink co-founder) approached me directly after the hearing. Her group is under active federal investigation for foreign ties. She tried to lure me out of the secured room… straight into the angry mob waiting outside. 🚨Here’s part of our exchange in the video below: (I stayed polite, but firm): ❌Medea: “What really concerns the rights of women all over… but I don't think… what you're saying about the spread of Sharia law… and you say you're against Muslims…” ✖️Me: “I’m against the spread of Islam. Look at the 1991 Muslim Brotherhood memorandum and ‘The Project.’ CAIR, MSA - all under the Brotherhood umbrella. I fight for Muslims oppressed by Sharia, like in Iran. Read the research on RAIRfoundation.com. You could be a powerful advocate against it.” ❌ Medea: “Maybe we could talk to some people out there…” ❓❓ Why try to pull me into a mob? A mob waiting outside with a person who is potentially tied to Al-Qaeda!? I travel with security because of death threats - especially after my friend Salwan Momika was assassinated for speaking out. This was coordinated intimidation: MB fronts with terror-adjacent ties + far-left radicals under federal watch - all welcomed into the Capitol. They thought I’d back down. I didn’t. Thank you to the incredible Chip Roy for taking on these jihadis and running for the Texas Attorney General so you can protect Texans!

Polls are open across Texas! I’d be honored to earn your support for Texas Attorney General as the candidate with the experience and background to deliver for Texas. Turn out for conservative candidates across the state! God bless Texas

40 years in elected office, 888 days of a Covid state of emergency, last state in the union to get kids back in schools without masks, and you released over 4200 violent criminals to North Carolina streets. Count me as NOT INTERESTED!!!

Prayers please. The fever we have been desperately trying to evade is here with a vengeance. 🙏🙏🙏🙏 givesendgo.com/yolandas

One morning in 1860, Elizabeth Packard said goodbye to her six children and left home as she had done hundreds of times before. She had no idea it would be the last time she would see them for many years. Her husband had already decided her fate: he was going to have her committed to an asylum. Not because she was mentally ill, but because she disagreed with him. Elizabeth was forty-three years old, lived in Illinois, and was married to Theophilus Packard, an influential minister. Tensions had been growing between them for some time. Elizabeth read widely, reflected deeply, and held religious views that differed from those of her husband. She believed that every person had the right to form their own opinions and was not afraid to express them. Under the law at the time, a husband’s declaration alone could be enough to have his wife institutionalized. No thorough medical examination, evidence, or trial was required. As a result, Elizabeth was taken from her home and transferred to a psychiatric hospital in Jacksonville. Once inside, she realized she was far from an isolated case. Many of the women confined there showed no signs of severe mental illness. Some had been committed after challenging their husbands, while others had become victims of family disputes or financial conflicts. In many cases, institutionalization had become a convenient way to remove people who were considered troublesome or difficult to control. Elizabeth observed, listened, and documented everything. For three years, she collected testimonies and recorded what she witnessed each day. She wrote in secret, preserving notes and personal accounts despite the restrictions imposed by the institution. She understood that if she ever managed to regain her freedom, those pages could become evidence of what was happening behind the asylum’s walls. That opportunity came in 1864. A hearing was scheduled to assess her mental condition. Her husband was convinced that the verdict would support his claims. Elizabeth, however, turned the proceeding into her own defense. Before the jury, she explained her religious beliefs, recounted her experiences, and described the circumstances of many of the other women confined in the hospital. She spoke with clarity, intelligence, and composure, systematically dismantling every accusation that had been made against her. The jury retired to deliberate. Only a few minutes later, they returned with their decision: Elizabeth Packard was completely sane. Freedom, however, did not solve all her problems. After returning to civilian life, she discovered that she had lost much of her property and had been separated from her children. Rather than retreat into anonymity, she decided to make her story public. She published books, articles, and firsthand accounts. She traveled across the United States, meeting politicians, judges, and ordinary citizens. She spoke about how a woman could be deprived of her liberty without committing any crime and without having any meaningful opportunity to defend herself. Her advocacy helped spark a national debate about women’s rights and the legal procedures governing involuntary psychiatric commitment. In the years that followed, several states enacted stricter laws, requiring medical evaluations and stronger legal safeguards before authorizing forced institutionalization. Elizabeth continued writing and campaigning for reform for decades. She died in 1897 after dedicating much of her life to a cause that began the moment someone tried to silence her. A husband had used a signature to lock her away. She answered with books, lectures, and years of public advocacy, helping to change the very laws that had made such an abuse possible.

I HAVE GOOD NEWS!!!! Even though a WOKE judge in Asheville NC gave a $5,000 BOND to a 15-TIME ARRESTED VIOLENT CRIMINAL who ATTACKED A WOMAN, tried to DRAG HER INTO THE WOODS, BEAT, AND KIDNAP HER... ...police stacked a kidnapping charge on him. HIS BOND HAS BEEN DENIED!!! According to police, Dillon Curtis followed a young woman, Emily to her car, where he shoved her and tried to hit her. She began calling 911 and he tried ripping her PHONE out of her hand while she was calling 911. Then he told her, in his own words: "I'm going to knock you out and drag you into the woods." Then two mountain bikers, Harvest and Trevor, drove up and the guy ran off. Emily is alive because of those two strangers. Dillon was ALREADY OUT ON BOND FOR FELONY KIDNAPPING when he tried to kidnap Emily off an Asheville trail... ...until today he was only charged with FOUR MISDEMEANORS. And the judge gave him only a $5,000 bond. Today, the police charged him AGAIN, this time with 2nd degree kidnapping. A felony. He will remain in prison and not allowed to terrorize another woman.

Rep. Roy: "These are the most important times we have faced in Texas since 1836 because the march of Islam is real. We've got people in this country that are now wanting us to stop ringing church bells in favor of having Muslim prayer calls pointing towards Mecca."

I wrote a longer article on this subject. x.com/CynicalPublius…

RE: Monetization and Aggregators I have written on this before at length, but given some of Nikita's housecleaning lately, I wanted to raise a key point. Since the dawn of the WWW, content aggregation has been virtuous and good. Think Yahoo! as the original Google, the dawn of the original Drudge Report as a content aggregator and viral memes like the Dancing Baby. "Information wants to be free." THAT was the hacker ethos that fully informed the early WWW. To get some original content by small fry into the hands of a much larger audience was VIRTUOUS. It was how the Internet was SUPPOSED to be. But then people started getting paid on YouTube, TikTok, etc. for original content. That is a relatively recent occurrence. That recent occurrence means that if a big player takes a small player's content and makes money off of it, that no longer is virtuous, it's STEALING. This is the state of play. I'm not saying if it's bad or if it's good, it just IS. The aggregators need to understand that their world has changed, what was once good is now bad, it's not Nikita's fault, and they just need to deal with it.