Know Both Sides

45.1K posts

Know Both Sides banner
Know Both Sides

Know Both Sides

@KnowBothSides

Free, but biased, half-truth-telling-with-exaggeration media = Non-governmental brainwashing propaganda

Entrou em Kasım 2011
253 Seguindo501 Seguidores
Angelica 🌐⚛️🇹🇼🇨🇳🇺🇸
It’s interesting that everything on the ground is pointing to escalation while Iranians are dancing with Trump about negotiation. They want to talk to JD Vance, not Witkoff and Kushner.
Patricia Marins@pati_marins64

Iran launches 7 waves of attacks against Israel in 10 hours and opens fire on Peshmerga base Recent movements also indicate that Iran is anticipating a ground offensive along the Kuwaiti border. Over the past night, Iran launched seven waves of missile strikes against Israel and continues to carry out new waves today across several cities, taking advantage of missile rationing in certain regions. This move coincides with a report from the Anadolu Agency, which indicates that Iranian retaliatory strikes against Gulf countries have decreased, while the impact on Israel has significantly increased. Iran may currently be recalibrating its operations against Gulf nations and preparing for a potential escalation. The border region between Iran, Kuwait, and Khuzestan has received intense attention from both sides in recent weeks. Iran has intensified its attacks against Kuwait, believing that a potential ground invasion could originate from that direction. The occupation of the Iranian province of Khuzestan and the strategic Kharg Island would be greatly facilitated by the area’s flat, open terrain, similar to the advancement route used by Saddam Hussein during the 1980 invasion of Iran. On the 23rd, Iran reported US-Israeli strikes against its gas infrastructure in several cities. The primary target was the city of Khorramshahr, near the Kuwaiti border, where a pipeline was hit, the fifth recorded attack on this key regional city. To ensure air superiority during the offensive, anti-aircraft defense batteries protecting the city’s industrial and port zones were targeted early by drones and GMLRS launched from Kuwait. Missile launch sites and UAV (drone) command centers in nearby cities, such as Ahvaz, were also struck by coalition fire. On the same day, Iran launched several waves of attacks against American positions in Kuwait, leaving multiple cities without electricity. On another front, Iranian-linked militias operating in Iraq carried out a two-wave attack against a Peshmerga base. The facility hit is the 7th Division headquarters, located in the northern countryside of Hawler (Erbil), north of Shaqlawa. The installation was targeted by six ballistic missiles, resulting in 6 military fatalities and over 20 wounded. This Iranian movement, combined with multiple attacks on infrastructure along the Kuwaiti border, suggests that Tehran possesses intelligence regarding possible Kurdish militia support for an American ground assault. Why would this region be the focus of an invasion? 
Khuzestan is the country’s energy heart, accounting for about 80% of Iran’s total oil production. However, while the flat region sits at the foot of the mountain range, the allies would also need to secure the northern border with Iraq, as that was where many of the Iranian counter-attacks against Saddam took place. Everything points toward a major escalation.

English
7
2
8
1.6K
Enuff with the nonsense
@MazMHussain @ryangrim There’s no such thing at rerouting safe capital to China that’s a made up thing.. Even with all the “de-dollarization” talk: •USD still: •~10x larger than yuan in payments •~15x larger in trade finance 👉 That’s not erosion — that’s entrenched infrastructure
English
0
0
7
1.4K
Murtaza Hussain
Murtaza Hussain@MazMHussain·
Excerpts from a Chinese think tank paper analyzing the implications of an extended war with Iran. From a Chinese perspective it is a huge opportunity; not to become involved directly but to reroute safe capital to China and undermine the concept of a U.S.-led maritime empire into a land-based one in Eurasia that they can dominate:
Murtaza Hussain tweet media
English
59
432
1.7K
162.7K
Colby Badhwar
Colby Badhwar@ColbyBadhwar·
This is terrible analysis. Impacts are only relevant if they actually hit an intended target, something on the critical asset list or have some other measurable result. Counting how many projectiles leak but fail to achieve results is the *wrong number.*
Kelly Grieco@ka_grieco

The "Iran is losing" narrative is tracking the wrong number. Yes, missile and drone launch rates are down 90%+. But hit rate (or confirmed impacts per projectile fired) has been climbing steadily since Day 1. A 🧵 on what the data actually shows.

English
19
40
413
36.7K
Know Both Sides
Know Both Sides@KnowBothSides·
@AngelicaOung China is 坐山觀虎鬥 But keep in mind that Iranian missiles are probably using Beidou guidance and Chinese solid fuel. And this
Know Both Sides tweet mediaKnow Both Sides tweet media
English
1
0
0
20
Know Both Sides
Know Both Sides@KnowBothSides·
@CompleteTuring @AngelicaOung >The slackers are a small minority Sure, but w/ China's large population, even minority is a lot. When this minority complain, still a lot of voices. Use your brain. Either you know nothing about China or not smart enough to think
English
0
0
1
8
Turing Complete
Turing Complete@CompleteTuring·
@KnowBothSides @AngelicaOung Uhmm China's long working hours doesn't allow for multiple jobs like in the US, where it's multiple part time jobs. It's either Didi/delivery or digital side hustle. The slackers are a small minority. Either you know nothing about China or are being intentionally obtuse.
English
1
0
0
9
Angelica 🌐⚛️🇹🇼🇨🇳🇺🇸
ECONOMIC STAGNATION WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS It's really easy to GET HYPED with the amazing things that are happening in China...especially when it comes to strategic breakthroughs like the robots and drones. And did you know they might be getting good domestic EUVs sooner than you think? But as I spend more time on the Chinese internet, especially the Chinese side of Youtube where netizens are free to kvetch away from the censors, it's obvious a lot of people also feel exhausted by their daily economic pressures: finding a job, getting that bag...none of it is as easy as it used to be. Psychologically, the pressure is compounded by the fact that you can't express it freely online. Being too negative about the housing market, youth unemployment, and even your own personal economic fortunes can cause your account to get shut down. A very popular blogger who focused on "bai-lan" 擺爛 was recently struck. Bai-lan means just choosing to rot. If lying flat is getting by with the minimum of effort while being socially acceptable, bai-lan is not even bothering about the socially acceptable part. The youtuber below "Heard" says that this is causing internal psychological exhaustion for the Chinese because they don't even get to complain. Their personal reality is not matching the external narrative that's being shoved in their face. Complaining, she said, is also a form of crying for help. They feel alone. . She suggests various psychological "hacks" to get by. One is to find other ways of psychologically validating yourself and remembering that even though you might not have the job, the economic circumstances and cash to prop up your ego, you still have dignity and that it's OK not to grind like it's the go-go 2000s when the larger economic environment is no longer so growth-oriented. "Cook a good meal for yourself. Take care of a plant. Those can all be good sources of micro self-esteem."
Angelica 🌐⚛️🇹🇼🇨🇳🇺🇸 tweet media
English
30
6
96
12.7K
名為變態的神父
名為變態的神父@g6m3kimo·
這恐怕是中間選民想看到的畫面,也是對抗藍白合,破解一黨獨大、一黨獨裁,挽回對民進黨失望的選民重新相信民進黨的方法. 本土政黨一字排開,拋開黨派之見,一起為台灣外館正名為「台灣代表處」努力發聲. 當丹麥把台灣居留證標記為「中國」,宣稱是屬於中國之下(under China),或者韓國因中國壓力,把電子入境卡欄位將台灣列為「CHINA (TAIWAN)」其實最好的反制措施,就是我們將駐外外館處「台北經濟文化代表處」正名為「台灣代表處」,這是我們自己能做到,也能與中國區隔,避免被矮化的事,最好的反抗,不是報復對方,而是大聲的說出自己真正的名字. 敬佩這些綠委與在野政黨團結的勇氣,希望這些綠委不會打成ㄐㄐ支持者、時力的人、好基友或中共同路人,BROTHER. 本篇文章的完成感謝以下tomoyo的贊助 【贊助神父的鹽 團結本土力量】 g6m3kimo.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.ht… 一月三身如月影:贊助推特長文書寫 白瑟情人節快樂:神父想要用Ai創作就用Ai創作,不用理會那些說三道四跟只會閒言閒語的人 支持神父正義聲援華江里長洪佳君被性騷擾:繼續為我們保護正義的清新民代
名為變態的神父 tweet media
中文
7
20
174
6.4K
Know Both Sides retweetou
Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara·
China completely dismantles the EU's complaints about trade deficits. The Foreign Ministry reveals that 40% of China's exports to Europe are actually produced by European companies in China. The profits go straight back to Western investors. Absolute hypocrisy exposed.
English
21
756
3.2K
93.9K
Know Both Sides
Know Both Sides@KnowBothSides·
Know Both Sides@KnowBothSides

@RJDAIGOGO @SuperDracarys 所谓民主化,国民党成了中国历史上第一个自杀的政府,政权拱手让给民进党,从此台湾乌烟瘴气代替星汉灿烂。如今国民党与民进党苦苦相争总统大位而不得,那又何必当初?自作孽。况且国父三民主义并不赞成西方多党民主。背弃国父,远不如中共有担当,国家大业一肩挑

QME
0
0
0
5
相林🌸
相林🌸@xianglin8964·
@tangbaiqiao 孫文先生一百多年前就說過:中國應該與日本、美國結盟。 二十多年前,在台北光華商場舊書攤買的一本書(書名忘了)裏看到這句話時,我深以為然。 如果當初實現了這個目標,今天的中國必定是一個「自由民主均富」的人間淨土,至少我們不用流亡30多年。
中文
5
0
11
624
唐柏桥
唐柏桥@tangbaiqiao·
最理想的状态是,美国、日本、中国成为世代友好的国家。因为无论是从文化、地域、历史渊源来讲,三国都有天然的亲近关系。我这里所说的中国,当然不是指现在的共产中国。这个苏联扶持起来的变态国家(state) 根本就不应该存在!我说的未来民主化后的中国。我愿付出毕生的努力去达成这一目标!
唐柏桥@tangbaiqiao

太美了! 日本国歌“君が代”是世界最古老也是最简短的国歌,已有1000多年历史。歌词就20来个字,“愿你的时代,千代八千代,小石变成岩石,岩石长满青苔。” 日本的民族凝聚力令人肃然起敬。 我用了很多年才慢慢理解日本“间”文化。这首歌就体现了这一点,极致简单,想象无穷。

中文
37
14
118
9.2K
Know Both Sides
Know Both Sides@KnowBothSides·
@tangbaiqiao >未来民主化后的中国 那中国不就像印度一样?中国人绝不想要这条路
中文
0
0
0
27
Know Both Sides
Know Both Sides@KnowBothSides·
@nfergus As a Chinese, I can assure you that it's the propaganda on your side, including that from US and its allies, and Taiwan's ruling party, that has angered Chinese to want to use force
English
0
0
0
12
Know Both Sides
Know Both Sides@KnowBothSides·
@policytensor @snackvampire >A ground war Like you said, US can't invade Iran successfully cuz the invasion force is exposed to Iran fire even before they enter Iran
English
0
0
0
59
Policy Tensor
Policy Tensor@policytensor·
@snackvampire A big shock is already baked in. The longer this lasts the greater the pain. A ground war is a recipe for both a massive, years-long stagflation and even depression, and a rapid transition away from fossil fuels.
English
1
0
36
2.2K
Policy Tensor
Policy Tensor@policytensor·
Seconded for the most part. Let me add a few notes. — There are three theories of air power. We know Douhetist terror bombing has never destroyed the will of the enemy to fight. Decapitation has now failed. As long as the US remains ‘up in the air’ there is only one path to avoiding strategic defeat: winning the interdiction war to disarm Iran. — The interdiction theory of victory is ‘analytically attractive’ because it empirically testable in real time. If Iranian strike tempo is dwindling to zero, the US is winning; otherwise it is losing outright. — The all-important interdiction war is going very poorly. I look at the attached map every day from ACLED, the gold standard of conflict data (acleddata.com/iran-crisis-li…). Iranian strike tempo shows no sign of dwindling. To the contrary, depletion of interceptor inventories and the use of heavier missiles has dramatically increased the effectiveness of Iranian missile strikes, as we are seeing in the strikes on Israel. — The Iranians’ interdiction/counterforce campaign has been surprisingly successful. At least 10 radars have been destroyed, partially blinding US forces and interceptor systems. US bases in the region have been largely evacuated, forcing the US to use European bases. — There have been some big kills. Two dozen heavy drones and a half a dozen manned aircraft have been lost to Iranian fire/accidents, not clear which, including an F-35. A mighty carrier group has been put out of business. — Iran enjoys escalation dominance. This was confirmed when Trump had to walk back his ultimatum. Iran has a very powerful threat at the top of the escalation ladder: the O&G infrastructure and water desalinization systems in the gulf are both under Iranian fire control. — Iran holds horizontal escalation options in reserve. The Houthis have their ‘fingers on the trigger.’ That is a deterrent to keep the Saudis out of the war, and may be used at any time to expand the war and impose greater costs on the West. — Iran retains a firm grip on the Hormuz weapon. No serious military option to retake Hormuz exists as long as the interdiction war is not won. No matter where you land the marines, they will be fully exposed to Iranian fire, including artillery fire. US force protection requirements, ultimately a function of casualty intolerance, mean that the Kharg idea etc are just not going to fly. — The United States is at a crossroads. Either it swallows this military humiliation and accepts a ceasefire largely on Iranian terms, or it must send in ground forces to in a bid to retake Hormuz and restore US military prestige. — If the US chooses a negotiated ceasefire, Iran will emerge as a regional hegemon with the Hormuz weapon firmly in its hands; and, having defeated the US in a high-intensity conventional war, as a great power in the international system. — If the US chooses to escalate to a ground war, the war will last for years. This is because both force protection and the overriding objective of fire suppression will drive ever greater commitment of ground forces. But the US cannot win the ground war under any circumstances because the division math (x.com/policytensor/s…) is even more forbidding than the drone math (x.com/policytensor/s…). This means that the choice facing the aggressor is between accepting strategic defeat now at limited costs, or later at far, far higher costs. — So the United States has already suffered a catastrophic military defeat. The multipolar world was a hypothesis until last month. Now it is a demonstrated military fact. It has obtained due to the diffusion of military technology (x.com/policytensor/s…). The US monopoly in precision-strike is now gone. Deterrence in Asia is now dead. This cannot but fail to have far-reaching geopolitical consequences, which I will lay out in detail in a forthcoming interview on @MultipolarPod with @admcollingwood later today.
Policy Tensor tweet media
Rosemary Kelanic@RKelanic

Wars reveal information about countries' relative military capabilities and interests. That's one of the most important insights from the bargaining model of war. Iran believed before the war that fighting the U.S. would strengthen its bargaining position -- and Iran was correct. This war has revealed that Iran wouldn't topple after Khamenei's death, that Iran is highly resolved, and it can inflict damage across the Gulf at low cost, indefinitely. It revealed that Iran can gain massive leverage -- and perhaps even collect "tolls" -- from controlling shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. By contrast, the war has *hurt* U.S. & Israeli bargaining power compared to where it was before the Geneva talks in February. That means we'll get worse terms now than if we'd accepted Iran's proposal then. Why is the U.S./Israel position worse? Decapitation strikes failed to induce Iran to surrender (always an unlikely prospect), nullifying the U.S./Israeli theory of victory by day 3. No new plausible theory of victory has emerged, and it's doubtful one will. That hurts the U.S. position. Trump has proven highly sensitive to oil market swings, and even *removed sanctions* on Iranian oil. As @edwardfishman noted, Iran gained more sanctions relief from closing Hormuz than through any diplomatic means, including the JCPOA. The disruption to oil markets, and Trump's concern about them, also hurts the U.S. position. Now that the war has bogged down into an attrition battle, where Iran can impose costs with cheap means like drones and missiles and Israeli interceptors seem to be running low, the U.S. and Israel are on the losing end of the damage and casualties curve. Costs and casualties will get worse, not better, over time, and that further hurts U.S./Israeli bargaining leverage. Trump is now considering, frankly, foolhardy military gambits, potentially to seize Kharg, islands in Hormuz, or perhaps the highly enriched uranium trapped somewhere under rubble in Iran. These would be significant escalations putting U.S. troops on the ground. None are likely to end the war, and all would likely cause U.S. casualties. In the business lingo, Trump's BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement) is way worse -- not least because of the shadow of Afghanistan. The U.S. forces being surged to the Middle East (2 MEUs plus some airborne units) are comparable to what George W. Bush used to invade Afghanistan in the autumn 2001. What started out as a limited mission to topple the Taliban and capture Osama bin Laden, who instead escaped through the Tora Bora mountains, evolved into a ground campaign that eventually ballooned to over 100k U.S. troops in 2011. The clear imperative here is for Trump to deescalate, credibility costs be damned. This war is existential for Iran but not for the United States, Iran will keep fighting with cheap means like drones, and it will eventually outlast the U.S. just like the Taliban did in Afghanistan. That, or Iran could fracture into chaos, creating refugee flows and breeding terrorism for decades to come. (Terrorism isn't an existential threat to the U.S., but we shouldn't be creating the conditions for it.) Trump doesn't like backing down, but that is what needs to happen here, and stat, before ill-fated escalation leads to more needless deaths. @defpriorities

English
36
416
1.5K
144.6K
Know Both Sides
Know Both Sides@KnowBothSides·
@policytensor >If the US chooses to escalate to a ground war, the war will last for years US won't have enough rare earth, gallium, tungsten...to sustain that long, so this option means US will still lose, but at an even bigger cost
English
0
0
2
147
Know Both Sides retweetou
Wyatt Reed
Wyatt Reed@wyattreed13·
Incredible quotes in the deleted Telegraph article about the Lebanese Christians supporting Hezbollah. I wonder why they didn’t want their audience to read this 🤔
Wyatt Reed tweet mediaWyatt Reed tweet media
English
91
4.9K
14.2K
259.2K
War Titan
War Titan@john30028168·
@AngelicaOung any settlement requires guarantees to both sides, which China cannot give given its policy of non-involvement in internal affairs of other countries. Russia, Turkey could play a role in a settlement if there is any.
English
1
0
0
94
Know Both Sides
Know Both Sides@KnowBothSides·
@grassbycow @AngelicaOung Back in the day before Internet even existed, there was no such valve release at all. How did ppl around the world live in economic downtime? Today's youngsters are spoiled.
English
0
0
0
3
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🇨🇳🇮🇷 China's military exports just got the worst combat review in history Iran bought Chinese air defense technology expecting a shield. What it got was a screen door. The pattern is devastating. Pakistan's Chinese-made HQ-9B couldn't detect a single Indian strike during Operation Sindur. Venezuela's Chinese radar missed 150 American aircraft flying through its airspace. And now Iran's air defenses, built on the same Chinese foundations, collapsed in hours against the U.S.-Israeli assault. But the hardware is only half the problem. Over 20 senior PLA officers have been arrested for corruption in two years. China hasn't fought a real war since 1979. Their weapons have never been stress-tested because the military selling them has never been stress-tested either. Source: BusinessBasics YT
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇮🇱🇺🇸🇮🇷 The IDF confirmed multiple sites in Tehran and central Iran (missile and weapons facilities) were struck. CENTCOM also confirmed precision strikes on IRGC-linked assets, like vessels tied to terror financing networks.

English
366
1K
4.6K
4M