Tweet fixado

My thoughts on how to value a company:
I don't invest in non-generating assets.
A story is nice, and you can get the companies story from X, the news, or just imagining how their business plays out over time. Ask yourself, how much business can they do? How many competitors could they have? Is the company moving in the direction I would like to see them go? etc. How is the industry doing right now? How strong is it's moat?
The price is just a number until you compare that number with others and can derive a context. You want to compare the company to it's competitors (why buy $HD when you can buy $LOW?). You also want to compare the company to itself (why is $INTU trading at 35PE when over the last 5 years it averages over 60PE?). Then you want to compare it within it's "class."
There are different "classes" of companies. You can define these yourself and they are not hard set. From high growth, to dividend generation. For example: no one invests in $VZ because it's growing like crazy, no one invests in $RKLB because they are profitable. This normally plays into how risky a stock is.
If you are looking for high risk/growth, comparing $SLDP to $F isn't going to do anything for you.
The only way to come up with price targets (besides guessing) is to extrapolate amount of growth (looking at trends and catalysts) and PE expansion(which way the price needs to move to catch up/keep up with the growth[earnings]).
Sometimes all it takes is the story to kick you out of an investment. $PATH has competition from $MSFT, $IBM and others. They aren't doing something these bigger names couldn't do, but the bigger names are not willing to invest in building out what $PATH is building. This makes me hesitant to invest in an already high risk company.
English































