CytoCait11

Your broader bullish/bearish economic bias/views make little difference when trading the market intraday. Hyper-commenting on hour by hour & daily price action using macro justification/anger is noise. Large divergences are gifts. Trade your proper timeframe or adapt approach.

@sentdefender Jay-Z should sue.

Cryptic video posted within the last hour by the White House with the emoji “🤫” which when you play it in reverse says: “Exciting announcement tomorrow.”

@JoshYoung Dumbass.

Higher oil prices are good for the US economy, due to being a net exporter and less negative drag from more fuel efficiency

@BitPaine @grok Dumbass.

@grok Rank it historically in terms of % GDP

this would be the largest tax increase in American history. whatever party approved this would never hold office again.

@StockOptionCole @DeItaone One with no money to function properly

@DeItaone Consumers getting fucked nonstop USPS is a SERVICE not a profit company. WTF

USPS WILL IMPLEMENT AN 8% SURCHARGE ON ALL PACKAGES TO OFFSET RISING FUEL COSTS USPS SURCHARGE MARKS THE FIRST TIME THE AGENCY HAS LEVIED FEES FOR FUEL EXPENSES

@atrupar He's such a rapey old piece of shit

Trump: "If I want to take down that power plant, that very big powerful power plant, they can't do a thing about it. It's like, 'take me.' That's all they can do."

@67lld @Stormchaser_TS Lol

@Stormchaser_TS If it didn’t make a loud boom sound, it’s not a meteor. ☄️

Bright fireball moments ago here in Missouri. #mowx

@nikitabier This is absolutely ridiculous.

We’re rolling out summaries for Articles now. Just tap the Summarize button if you want to know if it’s worth your time to read it (or if your attention span is 12 seconds).

@sama You're so gross. Stop typing.

I have so much gratitude to people who wrote extremely complex software character-by-character. It already feels difficult to remember how much effort it really took. Thank you for getting us to this point.

@krishnanrohit No, no we don't.

GPT 5.4 is very good, but its most distinguishing characteristic is its humanity. 5.3 Codex was already incredible at coding so it's interesting to see what made it so much more successful. People claim they want a 10x autist savant coder, but what they want is personality.

@ryangrim Please stop posting AI noise, Ryan.

Big

@dieworkwear @OfVoice35353 You're wonderful.

@OfVoice35353 thank you, texas voice of liberty, who joined twitter on jan 2026 and has since tweeted 4,487 times, which is roughly 60 tweets per day. or roughly 4 times per hour or a new tweet every fifteen mins.

since you started your account on aug 2021, you've tweeted 490,800 times. that's about 291 times per day, or roughly 18 tweets per hour (assuming you sleep for 8 hours), every day for almost five years. the reason why you don't see this america anymore is bc you don't go outside

@americaman_usa @skupor @USOPM Define "emergency".

@skupor @USOPM You should commission a study to show how much money the federal government loses when you allow workers to work from home one day. It is obviously a sizeable amount as telework is only allowed in emergency situations, so it would be good for the public to know the answer.

Update. We will officially update the @USOPM website, but, out of an abundance of caution, we are going to allow unscheduled telework and leave tomorrow for those eligible. For essential workers, we will update potential early leave options as we get more information in the morning.

@WhiteHouse Sue these psychopaths

UNDEFEATED.

@TPKINGNATION @C_S_Skeptic

@C_S_Skeptic Claude is stupid.

@YocumKeegan @C_S_Skeptic @grok Grok does agree.

@C_S_Skeptic @grok Do you agree with Claude.

@C_S_Skeptic Shocking.

@JuliaEMcCoy Dumbass.

We are sending our kids to school to memorize facts that AI can retrieve in 0.3 seconds. We're grading them on essays that AI writes better than their teachers. We're preparing them for jobs that won't exist by the time they graduate. The entire education system is training humans to compete with machines at what machines do best. That's not education. That's sabotage. The schools that survive will teach thinking, not memorizing. Creating, not repeating. Discerning, not obeying. Every other school is a museum that doesn't know it yet.

@sama You're so f'n sloppy.

(I also would like to share this, which I wrote after thinking a little more.) There is a lot we will talk about in the coming days, but since this is one of the first "real deal" decisions we have faced, I wanted to share a few things that have been heavily on my mind the past few days. These are the principles I care most about for this decision: alignment, democratization, empowerment, and individual agency. The democratic process must stay in control, and we must democratize AI. OpenAI should not decide the fate of the world; no private company should. We need to work with governments, but also we need to make sure individuals get increasing power. Things are moving so fast that we need to urgently educate the world so that the democratic process has time to catch up. I think one of our most important strategic decisions ever was the principle of iterative deployment. In particular, the key element required for democracy, such as protection of privacy, must be defended by all of society. I believe that, as some of the creators of this new technology, we deserve to and are obligated to have a loud voice about the risks, pitfalls, and benefits we see. I think we are heading towards a world where the relationship between governments and AI efforts is critical. This will be difficult but it has to happen; I do not see any good future where we don't get there. There should not be games and fights in the press like this; drastic government action should be avoided. I think there are real dangers coming to the world, and maybe pretty soon; I tried to put myself in the mindset of how I'd feel the day after an attack on the US or a new bioweapon we could have helped prevent.

Here is re-post of an internal post: We have been working with the DoW to make some additions in our agreement to make our principles very clear. 1. We are going to amend our deal to add this language, in addition to everything else: "• Consistent with applicable laws, including the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, National Security Act of 1947, FISA Act of 1978, the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons and nationals. • For the avoidance of doubt, the Department understands this limitation to prohibit deliberate tracking, surveillance, or monitoring of U.S. persons or nationals, including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information." It’s critical to protect the civil liberties of Americans, and there was so much focus on this, that we wanted to make this point especially clear, including around commercially acquired information. Just like everything we do with iterative deployment, we will continue to learn and refine as we go. I think this is an important change; our team and the DoW team did a great job working on it. 2. The Department also affirmed that our services will not be used by Department of War intelligence agencies (for example, the NSA). Any services to those agencies would require a follow-on modification to our contract. 3. For extreme clarity: we want to work through democratic processes. It should be the government making the key decisions about society. We want to have a voice, and a seat at the table where we can share our expertise, and to fight for principles of liberty. But we are clear on how the system works (because a lot of people have asked, if I received what I believed was an unconstitutional order, of course I would rather go to jail than follow it). But 4. There are many things the technology just isn’t ready for, and many areas we don’t yet understand the tradeoffs required for safety. We will work through these, slowly, with the DoW, with technical safeguards and other methods. 5. One thing I think I did wrong: we shouldn't have rushed to get this out on Friday. The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy. Good learning experience for me as we face higher-stakes decisions in the future. In my conversations over the weekend, I reiterated that Anthropic should not be designated as a SCR, and that we hope the DoW offers them the same terms we’ve agreed to. We will host an All Hands tomorrow morning to answer more questions.

Wordle 1,716 4/6 ⬛🟩⬛⬛🟩 ⬛🟩⬛⬛🟩 ⬛🟩⬛⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩