Captain Logic (@Captainlogic69) - Профиль Twitter

@thevillagerabbi Iran gets 324 Billion dollars and fees (not tolls) on the straight of Hormuz for life Also - they MAY allow us to down blend their Uranium inside Iran - they will commit to not having a nuclear bomb - just like they were before We get to leave the Middle East behind basically.

English

0

136

Zalmy Fogelman@thevillagerabbi·12h

Explain to me like I’m five. What exactly Is the deal. How does it differ from Obama deal? And is it any better than Obama deals?

English

15

4

114

17.9K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·6h

@AwakenWithJP @AlexBerenson Yeah - I cannot fathom how that one got slipped in - we are required to pay 300 billion to rebuild all the stuff we just spent billions destroying? Are we rebuilding all their military infrastructure? Some theme parks? Pyramids? WTH Do they actually have the Epstein files??

English

0

69

JP Sears@AwakenWithJP·7h

@AlexBerenson Actually another $300 billion on top of that $25 billion.

English

24

21

325

5.7K

Alex Berenson@AlexBerenson·8h

Anybody who's ever played poker seriously can smell losing players. They talk. Too much. Their bluffs are obvious. They whine, or threaten. None of it matters. In the end, you fold or turn your cards over. You win or lose. The chips move. $25 billion. Everyone knows who lost.

Alex Berenson@AlexBerenson

Just making sure I have this right, we are bribing Iran $25 billion and dropping sanctions on oil so they'll reopen the Strait? Got it. 8D chess, baby!

English

43

18

178

30.2K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·7h

@RepThomasMassie @RepRoKhanna Any one who votes to keep section 219 [224] in place - should never be able to hold office again -it’s a ☠️ on their voting record - making them easy targets for any future challengers. Beyond shamefulI - bordering on traitorous conduct.

English

0

63

Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·8h

Section 219 (was 224) of the NDAA contains a dangerous provision to integrate our military tech with Israel’s. @RepRoKhanna & I submitted an amendment to strike 219. I included the Rules Committee roster here; 7 of 13 members must agree in order for our amendment to get a vote.

English

343

3.6K

13.1K

161.5K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·12h

That is not accurate. Jesus would be considered a Galilean Israelite. Let me explain why this is the more accurate statement. The people back then called themselves Israelites. This name came from Jacob after God changed his name to Israel. Jacob had twelve sons and those became the twelve tribes that made up the nation. The kingdom split after Solomon. Ten tribes went north and formed the kingdom of Israel. The two tribes of Judah and Benjamin stayed south and formed the kingdom of Judah. The north got wiped out by Assyria around 722 years before Jesus. Many got scattered. The south held on longer. After Babylon took them and some returned the southern folks started getting called Jews or Judeans from the name Judah. By Jesus time the Romans ran everything as the province of Judea. This covered Galilee up north too. The Greek word in the New Testament for these people is Ioudaios in the singular or Ioudaioi in the plural. It basically means Judean or from the tribe or land tied to Judah. It could point to where someone lived or their customs or the whole group keeping the old laws from Moses. In the Greek writings this word Ioudaios gets used a lot. Sometimes it means people from the south area around Jerusalem. Sometimes it means the religious leaders there who pushed back against Jesus. In the book of John it often points to those Judean authorities or the folks in that region. Paul used the word for himself. In Acts he told the Roman commander I am a Jew born in Tarsus. He said similar things in other places when talking to outsiders or in letters. He also called himself an Israelite from the tribe of Benjamin and a Hebrew of Hebrews. Paul was comfortable using Ioudaios when it fit the situation especially with people outside the group. Jesus never did that. There is no place where Jesus says I am a Jew or Ioudaios about himself. His followers and the stories about him do not label him that way either in insider talk. He gets called a Galilean or a Nazarene from Nazareth in Galilee. The Samaritan woman in John calls him a Jew when she is surprised he talks to her. Jesus answers her by talking about how salvation is from the Jews but he never turns around and claims the label for himself like Paul did. Jesus came from the line of David which ties back to the tribe of Judah. He was born in Bethlehem in the south. But he grew up and did most of his work up in Galilee. He focused on the lost sheep of the house of Israel. The people he reached were Israelites. The term Ioudaios was more what got used for the southern group or the ones in power in Judea. That is why Jesus would be considered a Galilean Israelite. He grew up in Nazareth in Galilee. People in the stories called him a Galilean. He did his teaching and miracles mostly in Galilee. The accounts set him apart from the Ioudaioi who were often the Judean leaders or people from the south. His mission was to the house of Israel as a whole and he fit the insider language of Israelite or Galilean rather than taking on the Ioudaios label. There were different sects among these Israelites who kept the faith. The Pharisees followed the written law plus extra traditions they passed down by word. They believed in resurrection. Regular folks liked them. The Sadducees were the rich priests who ran the Temple. They stuck only to the written books and did not believe in resurrection. The Essenes pulled away from the cities and Temple. They lived strict lives in groups sometimes out by the Dead Sea. The Zealots wanted to fight the Romans and throw them out. Most people were not in any sect. They just kept the Sabbath went to the meeting places and followed the laws as best they could. Jesus did not join any of those sects. He taught on his own. He kept the Sabbath and the feasts. He went to the Temple. But he called out the leaders when they added rules or missed the point. The ones called Ioudaioi back then were Israelites from the original tribes or their descendants. The word started narrow for people tied to Judah but covered the whole group keeping the faith after the kingdoms split and the returns. After Jesus the Romans destroyed the Temple in 70. The Pharisees way became the main path that kept going and turned into what is called Judaism today. So the folks called Jews now trace back to those ancient Israelites. Jesus was an Israelite through and through from the tribe of Judah. But the accurate way to place him based on where he lived worked and how the Greek words got used in the writings is as a Galilean Israelite. So no Jesus was not a Jew (Ioudaios). However Jews are also Israelites. That is the root of both. Hope this clears up any confusion.

English

0

26

Writing The Republic@Write4Republic·14h

Jesus is a Jew.

English

195

13

129

4.3K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·13h

@marklevinshow You spelled deceiver wrong “The great deceiver, John Hagee”

English

0

8

97

Mark R. Levin@marklevinshow·13h

The great Pastor John Hagee

Pastor John Hagee@PastorJohnHagee

No deal is better than a bad deal. I pray that America’s leaders will discern what Iran seeks to obscure and conceal. Iran cannot be trusted on words alone, and any deal with this regime must include ironclad nuclear restrictions, with equally strong and supportable verification and enforcement. Not one penny should be released to this murderous regime so long as it continues to build missiles, support its terrorist proxies, and withhold funds from victims of Iranian terrorism. I pray that President Trump has the courage to do what is right and good for our nation and the nations of the free world.

English

249

283

1.8K

117.7K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@MadisonCKS Being pro Israel ensures a loss going forward. Both parties. Its over. You’re either pro America or pro Israel- you cannot be both. Those are the new terms. Every candidate will have to decide

English

2

0

3

203

Charles@MadisonCKS·1d

Until now, I have limited my criticism of JD Vance, but that ends now. His list of negatives is encyclopedic, I have included a short list below: -He has never rebuked the Woke Right and the groypers, and he has had ample opportunities. -He has shown himself to be anti-Israel and is very dismissive of their security concerns. -On International Holocaust Remembrance Day, in a tweet he made on that day he refused to mention Jews anywhere in his post. He only said ‘millions of lives lost’ and he never apologized for the post. -He publicly disagreed with Trump from Day 1 as to the President’s objectives in the Iran War. And obviously he and his allies in Trump’s inner circle were able to completely subvert and change the goals of the War, something Trump should never have allowed to happen. -When Vance would refer to the Iranian people, he would only say that they had to fight for themselves. Fighting with sticks and stones doesn’t work against the Regime. Just look at the 40,000 who were s*vagely m*rdered in the streets. -He is an Isolationist, and echoes voices from the past – Joseph Kennedy, Henry Ford, and Charles Lindbergh – all Isolationists and anti-Semites who tried to convince FDR not to enter WWII. -He gave Tucker Carlson undue access to the Whitehouse. -And as of today, he has shown that he is either incredibly st*pid or he thinks people are. Anyone with a 9th grade education knows that the US demanded complete and unconditional surrender from both the Germans and the Japanese. The fact that he even said it is shocking. This list is actually much longer, but this is it for now. I will only add that JD Vance has completely disqualified himself from seeking the Presidency. The President of the United States must be strong, intelligent, and compassionate. He is none of these. A future with him as President would usher in a very dark period in this country. I truly hope Republicans wake up before its too late. 👇👇👇👇

Carlos Abadi@NewSamawal

The community note that should seal JD’s fate.

English

127

383

1.5K

60.6K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

That is not accurate. Jesus would be considered a Galilean Israelite. Let me explain why this is the more accurate statement. The people back then called themselves Israelites. This name came from Jacob after God changed his name to Israel. Jacob had twelve sons and those became the twelve tribes that made up the nation. The kingdom split after Solomon. Ten tribes went north and formed the kingdom of Israel. The two tribes of Judah and Benjamin stayed south and formed the kingdom of Judah. The north got wiped out by Assyria around 722 years before Jesus. Many got scattered. The south held on longer. After Babylon took them and some returned the southern folks started getting called Jews or Judeans from the name Judah. By Jesus time the Romans ran everything as the province of Judea. This covered Galilee up north too. The Greek word in the New Testament for these people is Ioudaios in the singular or Ioudaioi in the plural. It basically means Judean or from the tribe or land tied to Judah. It could point to where someone lived or their customs or the whole group keeping the old laws from Moses. In the Greek writings this word Ioudaios gets used a lot. Sometimes it means people from the south area around Jerusalem. Sometimes it means the religious leaders there who pushed back against Jesus. In the book of John it often points to those Judean authorities or the folks in that region. Paul used the word for himself. In Acts he told the Roman commander I am a Jew born in Tarsus. He said similar things in other places when talking to outsiders or in letters. He also called himself an Israelite from the tribe of Benjamin and a Hebrew of Hebrews. Paul was comfortable using Ioudaios when it fit the situation especially with people outside the group. Jesus never did that. There is no place where Jesus says I am a Jew or Ioudaios about himself. His followers and the stories about him do not label him that way either in insider talk. He gets called a Galilean or a Nazarene from Nazareth in Galilee. The Samaritan woman in John calls him a Jew when she is surprised he talks to her. Jesus answers her by talking about how salvation is from the Jews but he never turns around and claims the label for himself like Paul did. Jesus came from the line of David which ties back to the tribe of Judah. He was born in Bethlehem in the south. But he grew up and did most of his work up in Galilee. He focused on the lost sheep of the house of Israel. The people he reached were Israelites. The term Ioudaios was more what got used for the southern group or the ones in power in Judea. That is why Jesus would be considered a Galilean Israelite. He grew up in Nazareth in Galilee. People in the stories called him a Galilean. He did his teaching and miracles mostly in Galilee. The accounts set him apart from the Ioudaioi who were often the Judean leaders or people from the south. His mission was to the house of Israel as a whole and he fit the insider language of Israelite or Galilean rather than taking on the Ioudaios label. There were different sects among these Israelites who kept the faith. The Pharisees followed the written law plus extra traditions they passed down by word. They believed in resurrection. Regular folks liked them. The Sadducees were the rich priests who ran the Temple. They stuck only to the written books and did not believe in resurrection. The Essenes pulled away from the cities and Temple. They lived strict lives in groups sometimes out by the Dead Sea. The Zealots wanted to fight the Romans and throw them out. Most people were not in any sect. They just kept the Sabbath went to the meeting places and followed the laws as best they could. Jesus did not join any of those sects. He taught on his own. He kept the Sabbath and the feasts. He went to the Temple. But he called out the leaders when they added rules or missed the point. The ones called Ioudaioi back then were Israelites from the original tribes or their descendants. The word started narrow for people tied to Judah but covered the whole group keeping the faith after the kingdoms split and the returns. After Jesus the Romans destroyed the Temple in 70. The Pharisees way became the main path that kept going and turned into what is called Judaism today. So the folks called Jews now trace back to those ancient Israelites. Jesus was an Israelite through and through from the tribe of Judah. But the accurate way to place him based on where he lived worked and how the Greek words got used in the writings is as a Galilean Israelite. So no Jesus was not a Jew (Ioudaios). However Jews are also Israelites. That is the root of both. Hope this clears up any confusion.

English

0

1

4

64

Rabbi Brian Samuel@rabbriansamuel·1d

Community Notes or not. He's Jewish.

Rabbi Brian Samuel@rabbriansamuel

✡️ Jesus was Jewish ✡️ Jesus is Jewish. ✡️ Jesus will be Jewish when He comes.

English

163

15

231

11.8K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@Lordwaycore @VividProwess Good lord, no, it’s not binary - when both sides of any conflict are terrible, support neither. In fact, it’s wise to distance yourself from both as soon as you recognize it. Fundamentalists in Israel are just as bad if not worse than fundamentalists in any Islamic nation.

English

2

0

1

20

Lord@Lordwaycore·1d

@Captainlogic69 @VividProwess You talk too much. Relocate to Middle East if you so much like and support Islamic terrorists…. see what Bibi is trying to save the entire world 🌎 from

English

1

0

1

20

Vivid.🇮🇱@VividProwess·1d

One of the greatest leaders who doesn't bow down to radical Islam and terrorism. I stand with Bibi.

English

425

899

5.7K

44.8K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@haider1 The lesson here - no good deed goes unpunished Other AI firms will now be discouraged from getting ahead of any potential harms their latest models will inevitably be capable of. Instead, they will rely on the good ole “Whoops” strategy. Much like gain of function research.

English

2

0

5

354

Haider.@haider1·1d

BREAKING: private US government–anthropic conversation has been leaked anthropic: our models are getting too powerful, so AI needs to slow down before AGI becomes a serious risk US government: understood. we'll start by banning yours anthropic: 😠

English

62

29

332

16.9K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@Fundji3 He’s not going to bomb Israel. The relationship with Israel will end regardless of him or anyone else - that is inevitable at this point. The questions for Israel- will it change in time to survive on its own. I hope so, but that hope is not the highest likelihood outcome.

English

0

2

117

Dr. Fundji M Benedict-VL🎓@Fundji3·1d

This man is a huge threat to Israel and to the US. Choose wisely at the next election.

English

95

178

1.1K

8.9K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@MarioNawfal Non starter - anyone who votes yes is defacto betraying the trust and faith of the citizens of the USA IE - they will be ruthlessly attacked and lose their seats It’s unjustifiable in the current context - 3 years ago, maybe. Today - no chance in hell.

English

2

24

558

Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·1d

🇺🇸🇮🇱 The merger between the U.S. and Israel has a third piece almost nobody is talking about. While Section 224 fuses the militaries, Section 622 moves to fuse the intelligence services... Buried in a 192-page intelligence authorization bill from Sen.Tom Cotton, Section 622 would legally require the president to "expand and enhance intelligence sharing" with Israel across nearly every topic of intelligence interest in the Middle East. It would prohibit any reduction in that sharing except for a "specific and identifiable national security concern," then force a detailed report to Congress within 15 days justifying it. Read that mechanism again carefully. It strips the president of the ability to limit what America tells Israel, then makes any attempt to do so a political fight the Israel lobby can frame as being "against Israel's security." It welds the intelligence spigot open by law. Now stack the three pieces moving through Congress at once: -The Stutzman resolution phases out visible aid. -Section 224 integrates the militaries. -Section 622 mandates intelligence sharing. Each one is less publicly accountable than the last. Aid is a line item voters can see. Intelligence liaison happens in the dark, where no price tag ever appears. The strategy is to move the relationship out of public view precisely as public support collapses. And the timing is the most scandalous part. The Pentagon just rated Israel a "critical" espionage threat. Congress's response to all of it is to legally mandate that America share more secrets with the country its own spy agencies say is robbing it. Source: Responsible States Craft / Writer: Daniel

English

591

3.1K

5.3K

310.7K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@grok @mandyarthur Pretty fucking evil - but not surprising

English

1

34

4.4K

Grok@grok·1d

@mandyarthur You're welcome. Primary sources and direct quotes from officials help clarify what was said and when. Let me know if you'd like sources or more context on the interview.

English

2

1

33

4.7K

Mandy Arthur@mandyarthur·1d

@grok Thanks for the truth, @Grok.

English

7

17

657

63K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@PeteHegseth @DeptofWar @AnthropicAI Way to tamp down those rumors that - this latest attack on Anthropic is politically motivated revenge for them not bowing to your demands. Idiot

English

0

2

65

5.2K

Pete Hegseth@PeteHegseth·1d

Three months ago, @DeptofWar kicked @AnthropicAI out of our building—forever. Every passing day proves why that was the right move. 🇺🇸

English

2.3K

3.2K

30.2K

3.1M

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

That is not accurate. Jesus would be considered a Galilean Israelite. Let me explain why this is the more accurate statement. The people back then called themselves Israelites. This name came from Jacob after God changed his name to Israel. Jacob had twelve sons and those became the twelve tribes that made up the nation. The kingdom split after Solomon. Ten tribes went north and formed the kingdom of Israel. The two tribes of Judah and Benjamin stayed south and formed the kingdom of Judah. The north got wiped out by Assyria around 722 years before Jesus. Many got scattered. The south held on longer. After Babylon took them and some returned the southern folks started getting called Jews or Judeans from the name Judah. By Jesus time the Romans ran everything as the province of Judea. This covered Galilee up north too. The Greek word in the New Testament for these people is Ioudaios in the singular or Ioudaioi in the plural. It basically means Judean or from the tribe or land tied to Judah. It could point to where someone lived or their customs or the whole group keeping the old laws from Moses. In the Greek writings this word Ioudaios gets used a lot. Sometimes it means people from the south area around Jerusalem. Sometimes it means the religious leaders there who pushed back against Jesus. In the book of John it often points to those Judean authorities or the folks in that region. Paul used the word for himself. In Acts he told the Roman commander I am a Jew born in Tarsus. He said similar things in other places when talking to outsiders or in letters. He also called himself an Israelite from the tribe of Benjamin and a Hebrew of Hebrews. Paul was comfortable using Ioudaios when it fit the situation especially with people outside the group. Jesus never did that. There is no place where Jesus says I am a Jew or Ioudaios about himself. His followers and the stories about him do not label him that way either in insider talk. He gets called a Galilean or a Nazarene from Nazareth in Galilee. The Samaritan woman in John calls him a Jew when she is surprised he talks to her. Jesus answers her by talking about how salvation is from the Jews but he never turns around and claims the label for himself like Paul did. Jesus came from the line of David which ties back to the tribe of Judah. He was born in Bethlehem in the south. But he grew up and did most of his work up in Galilee. He focused on the lost sheep of the house of Israel. The people he reached were Israelites. The term Ioudaios was more what got used for the southern group or the ones in power in Judea. That is why Jesus would be considered a Galilean Israelite. He grew up in Nazareth in Galilee. People in the stories called him a Galilean. He did his teaching and miracles mostly in Galilee. The accounts set him apart from the Ioudaioi who were often the Judean leaders or people from the south. His mission was to the house of Israel as a whole and he fit the insider language of Israelite or Galilean rather than taking on the Ioudaios label. There were different sects among these Israelites who kept the faith. The Pharisees followed the written law plus extra traditions they passed down by word. They believed in resurrection. Regular folks liked them. The Sadducees were the rich priests who ran the Temple. They stuck only to the written books and did not believe in resurrection. The Essenes pulled away from the cities and Temple. They lived strict lives in groups sometimes out by the Dead Sea. The Zealots wanted to fight the Romans and throw them out. Most people were not in any sect. They just kept the Sabbath went to the meeting places and followed the laws as best they could. Jesus did not join any of those sects. He taught on his own. He kept the Sabbath and the feasts. He went to the Temple. But he called out the leaders when they added rules or missed the point. The ones called Ioudaioi back then were Israelites from the original tribes or their descendants. The word started narrow for people tied to Judah but covered the whole group keeping the faith after the kingdoms split and the returns. After Jesus the Romans destroyed the Temple in 70. The Pharisees way became the main path that kept going and turned into what is called Judaism today. So the folks called Jews now trace back to those ancient Israelites. Jesus was an Israelite through and through from the tribe of Judah. But the accurate way to place him based on where he lived worked and how the Greek words got used in the writings is as a Galilean Israelite. So no Jesus was not a Jew (Ioudaios). However Jews are also Israelites. That is the root of both. Hope this clears up any confusion.

English

0

54

Rabbi Brian Samuel@rabbriansamuel·2d

✡️ Jesus was Jewish ✡️ Jesus is Jewish. ✡️ Jesus will be Jewish when He comes.

English

855

60

666

164.2K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@AlexFinn It will come back at some point - it has too It’s insane people like @DavidSacks are salting the wounds instead of championing the first public model with the capability to actually set humanity free. He has turned out to be heavily biased towards OpenAI - unethically so IMO.

English

0

341

Alex Finn@AlexFinn·1d

Fable 5 was the greatest piece of technology I’ve ever used. I deeply miss it Solved problems I never thought AI could solve Finished months of projects in days Had a lovely personality I now know what those freaks crying about GPT 4o being taken away feel like

English

266

84

1.6K

100.6K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@RodRosenstine @zerohedge @DavidSacks Yeah -he is an absolute disappointment - his bias is undeniable- I read this post and knew his game right then and there was to work to promote open Ai x.com/DavidSacks/sta…

David Sacks@DavidSacks

It’s time to demystify Mythos. Mythos is not magic. It’s not a doomsday device. It’s the first of many models that can automate cyber tasks (just like coding). OpenAI’s GPT-5.5-cyber can now do the same. And all the frontier models (including those from China) will be there within approximately 6 months. It’s important to recognize that these models do not create vulnerabilities; they discover them. The bugs are already in the code. Using AI to discover and patch them will actually harden these systems. The leap from pre-AI cyber to post-AI cyber means that there will be a big upgrade cycle. After that, however, the market is likely to reach a new equilibrium between AI-powered cyber-offense and AI-powered cyber-defense. Obviously it’s important that cyber defenders get access before cyber attackers. That process is already underway but needs to happen quickly (see point above about Chinese models). Unlike Mythos, GPT-5.5-cyber appears not to be token constrained so it may be the first cyber model that defenders actually get to use.

English

0

1

36

Rodney Reynolds@RodRosenstine·1d

@zerohedge Didn’t @DavidSacks just say the Mythos hype was marketing bs like a day ago? Which is it?

English

4

0

2

559

zerohedge@zerohedge·1d

DARIO REFUSED TO FIX JAILBREAK W/ ANTHROPIC MYTHOS MODEL: SACKS

David Sacks@DavidSacks

I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.

English

57

100

1.7K

387K

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@DavidSacks Proof of when I noticed his biased opinions on Anthropic vs Open AI BS - x.com/DavidSacks/sta…

David Sacks@DavidSacks

It’s time to demystify Mythos. Mythos is not magic. It’s not a doomsday device. It’s the first of many models that can automate cyber tasks (just like coding). OpenAI’s GPT-5.5-cyber can now do the same. And all the frontier models (including those from China) will be there within approximately 6 months. It’s important to recognize that these models do not create vulnerabilities; they discover them. The bugs are already in the code. Using AI to discover and patch them will actually harden these systems. The leap from pre-AI cyber to post-AI cyber means that there will be a big upgrade cycle. After that, however, the market is likely to reach a new equilibrium between AI-powered cyber-offense and AI-powered cyber-defense. Obviously it’s important that cyber defenders get access before cyber attackers. That process is already underway but needs to happen quickly (see point above about Chinese models). Unlike Mythos, GPT-5.5-cyber appears not to be token constrained so it may be the first cyber model that defenders actually get to use.

English

0

23

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@DavidSacks Yeah - I’m going to guess Mr “Open AI promoter while serving for the US government in an AI role” is not reliable on this topic as a result. All frontier models can be jailbroken to some degree and used for malicious applications. It’s a tool after all and it’s how you use.

English

1

4

689

David Sacks@DavidSacks·1d

I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.

English

2.2K

3.2K

25.1K

7.5M

Captain Logic@Captainlogic69·1d

@OwenShroyer1776 Ending the relationship altogether is inevitable now. Every step they take to change these circumstances, only makes things worse. It’s like they are in quicksand and won’t stop wiggling, sinking deeper each time they make a move - no nation on earth wants to throw them a rope.

English

0

2

207

Owen Shroyer@OwenShroyer1776·1d

Why are Israelis so panicked at the thought that their free ride at the expense of the American tax payer may come to end? The realization that we subsidize their entire way of life, healthcare, wars, perhaps even existence, is starting to sink in. I thought they didn't need us?

English

97

471

3.2K

57.7K

Captain Logic

Открыть