Conservwarrior

NEW YORKERS. If you run from New York City, this is exactly what Zohran and the Muslims of the world want. They want you to peaceably evacuate so they can take over your property, move in the Muslims from around the world, and completely take over New York in a bloodless war, and turn it into a Muslim stronghold that will slowly creep across America.

@RepBonnie If we wanted to get rid of Global abuse we would get rid of all Demonrats in Congress. Unhinged Dem Congresswoman: 'If We Wanted to Eliminate Abuse…We'd Eliminate the President of the United States From Office' (VIDEO) thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/unhing… #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit

@RepBonnie You are an idiot.

Hard up White Leftist women go after students because because these boys are too stupid yet to know that these women hate men and that men are too smart to never go near them. Epidemic: FL Math Teacher, 37, Arrested After Student Calls Her His ‘Girlfriend‘ breitbart.com/crime/2026/04/… via

@IngridNewkirk You and PETA are disgusting. You have confirmed you are a Leftist organization by makiing a play for children using sexual inuendo. You are beyond disgusting, but typical of Leftists. PETA’s Youth Outreach Arm, Aimed at Kids as Young as 13, Posts Looking for 'Bisexual Vegan Boy,' 'Dom Vegan Girl,' and 'Submissive NB Vegan' in Creepy and Vile Instagram Post thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/petas-… #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit

@IngridNewkirk You and PETA are disgusting. You have confirmed you are a Leftist organization by makiing a play for children using sexual inuendo. You are beyond disgusting, but typical of Leftists.

@NoContextHumans Well well well

@NoContextHumans I guess the customer was right about this one.

Fair or foul?

@NoContextHumans Actually it is. Tips are to be earned and not expected.

@4thOfJuly365 This is what the children of White Liberal mom's look and sound like. Disgusting. The good thing is it hates everything good so much it will probably never have children.

Why are white liberal women so unstable?

@kaitlancollins 'I'm a journalist' sure hit rock bottom now.

I'm honored to win this award for our coverage of President Zelensky's historic visit to the Oval Office, and even more grateful for the incredible colleagues I get to work with every day.

When this happens the only voters determining who gets elected President will be New York City, Los Angles, and Chicago. According to the Liberals this is Democracy. Virginia just joined 17 other blue states in a scheme to award Electoral College votes to the popular-vote winner 😬 notthebee.com/article/virgin… via @Not_the_Bee

@GovernorVA The USA is a Constitutional Republic not a Democracy. The Leftist liberals are intentionally destroying our Constitutional Republic and replacing it with the tyranny of the majority that our Founders so strongly feared. The United States is not a pure democracy. It is a constitutional republic—a representative form of government with democratic mechanisms, deliberately designed with checks to prevent the very "tyranny of the majority" that concerned James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and others. In Federalist No. 10, Madison warned that direct democracies are prone to factions where a majority oppresses minorities, leading to instability and injustice. A republic, by contrast, refines and filters public views through elected representatives and structural safeguards, including the division of power between federal and state governments. The Electoral College was a key part of that design. It wasn't an accident or flaw—it was a compromise to balance: Popular input (states decide how to choose electors, and voters influence that). Federalism (states as sovereign entities in the union, not just administrative districts). Protection against pure national majoritarianism, so candidates must build coalitions across regions, not just rack up huge margins in dense urban areas. Virginia's HB965 (signed April 13, 2026, effective July 1) enters the state into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC). With Virginia's 13 electoral votes, compact states plus DC now total 222 EVs—still short of the 270 needed to activate. But if it reaches that threshold, Virginia's electors would go to the national popular vote winner, even if every Virginian voted the other way. This does exactly what you describe: It uses a state-level workaround to sidestep the constitutional framework the Founders created, replacing the republic's state-mediated, geographically balanced system with a de facto national popular vote. In practice: A state majority's clear preference can be nullified by the aggregated national tally. Power shifts toward high-population centers (coastal metros, urban cores) where raw vote volume is easiest to amass, diminishing the incentive to campaign in or address concerns of smaller states, rural areas, or less dense regions. It bypasses the formal amendment process (which requires 2/3 of Congress + 3/4 of states), exploiting the fact that states control their own electors—but doing so in a coordinated way that effectively rewrites the presidential selection process without nationwide consent. Supporters frame it as "making every vote count equally" and fixing rare "mismatches" between national popular vote and Electoral College winner. Critics, including those citing the Founders' fears, see it as eroding federalism and inviting the instability Madison warned about—where transient national majorities (potentially fueled by differing state election rules, fraud risks in lax jurisdictions, or intense urban turnout) override state-level consent. You're right that loose use of "democracy" often blurs this. Pure democracy (simple majority wins everything, directly) was what the Founders explicitly rejected as unsuitable for a large, diverse republic. They built in layers—House (population-based), Senate (state equality, until the 17th Amendment), Electoral College, federalism—to require deliberation, compromise, and protection for dissenting or smaller interests. Bills like Virginia's don't "create" democracy in a vacuum; America already has extensive representative democracy. They move the system away from the constitutional republic the Founders intended toward a more centralized, majoritarian model. Whether that trade-off improves outcomes (broader "fairness" vs. geographic balance and stability) is the real debate—but it does alter the Founders' deliberate architecture in a fundamental way. The compact remains inactive for now, but momentum in certain states keeps the pressure on the 270 threshold. Virginia just joined 17 other blue states in a scheme to award Electoral College votes to the popular-vote winner 😬 notthebee.com/article/virgin… via @Not_the_Bee

@AOC Eric Swalwell (and apparently another congressman, Tony Gonzales) just resigned from Congress amid multiple credible allegations of sexual misconduct, including at least two women accusing Swalwell of rape—one a former staffer who described being assaulted while heavily intoxicated and left bruised/bleeding, and another (Lonna Drewes) who publicly alleged in a news conference that he drugged, raped, and choked her unconscious in a 2018 hotel room, saying she thought she was going to die. Swalwell denies it all, but the timing of the resignations, House Ethics probes, and law enforcement reports opening up isn't a coincidence. AOC's claim that this (or broader misconduct by members of Congress) happens because Donald Trump is a "convicted rapist" is classic whataboutism and partisan nonsense. It treats serious accusations against Democrats as somehow Trump's fault while ignoring the long history of sexual misconduct scandals across both parties in Congress—Democrats and Republicans alike have had their share over decades (staffers, pages, lobbyists, etc.). Power attracts predators and enablers on all sides; it doesn't require one president as the root cause. On Trump: He was found liable for sexual abuse (and defamation) in the E. Jean Carroll civil case, where the jury determined he forcibly penetrated her with his fingers in the mid-1990s. The judge later clarified that this meets the common understanding of rape, even if it didn't match the narrow technical definition under New York penal law at the time (which required penile penetration). Trump was not criminally convicted of rape or any sex crime—he denies the allegation, calls it a hoax, and the case was civil (lower burden of proof: preponderance of evidence, not beyond reasonable doubt). He's faced many other accusations over the years, but no criminal rape conviction. Blaming one man's civil liability for the behavior of dozens of politicians (including her own colleagues) is a transparent attempt to shield accountability in her party. Real solutions would be consistent standards: investigate all credible claims thoroughly, protect victims regardless of politics, enforce ethics rules without selective outrage, and stop the "our side's bad actors are just reacting to the other side" game. Congress has had a notorious "slush fund" for settling harassment claims for years—bipartisan problem, not a Trump invention. Predators exist because some people in power abuse it and institutions protect their own. Pinning it all on Trump is lazy politics, not serious analysis. AOC: Members of Congress Think They Can Get Away With It Because the President Is a Rapist@AOC

@AOC Eric Swalwell (and apparently another congressman, Tony Gonzales) just resigned from Congress amid multiple credible allegations of sexual misconduct, including at least two women accusing Swalwell of rape—one a former staffer who described being assaulted while heavily intoxicated and left bruised/bleeding, and another (Lonna Drewes) who publicly alleged in a news conference that he drugged, raped, and choked her unconscious in a 2018 hotel room, saying she thought she was going to die. Swalwell denies it all, but the timing of the resignations, House Ethics probes, and law enforcement reports opening up isn't a coincidence. AOC's claim that this (or broader misconduct by members of Congress) happens because Donald Trump is a "convicted rapist" is classic whataboutism and partisan nonsense. It treats serious accusations against Democrats as somehow Trump's fault while ignoring the long history of sexual misconduct scandals across both parties in Congress—Democrats and Republicans alike have had their share over decades (staffers, pages, lobbyists, etc.). Power attracts predators and enablers on all sides; it doesn't require one president as the root cause. On Trump: He was found liable for sexual abuse (and defamation) in the E. Jean Carroll civil case, where the jury determined he forcibly penetrated her with his fingers in the mid-1990s. The judge later clarified that this meets the common understanding of rape, even if it didn't match the narrow technical definition under New York penal law at the time (which required penile penetration). Trump was not criminally convicted of rape or any sex crime—he denies the allegation, calls it a hoax, and the case was civil (lower burden of proof: preponderance of evidence, not beyond reasonable doubt). He's faced many other accusations over the years, but no criminal rape conviction. Blaming one man's civil liability for the behavior of dozens of politicians (including her own colleagues) is a transparent attempt to shield accountability in her party. Real solutions would be consistent standards: investigate all credible claims thoroughly, protect victims regardless of politics, enforce ethics rules without selective outrage, and stop the "our side's bad actors are just reacting to the other side" game. Congress has had a notorious "slush fund" for settling harassment claims for years—bipartisan problem, not a Trump invention. Predators exist because some people in power abuse it and institutions protect their own. Pinning it all on Trump is lazy politics, not serious analysis. AOC: Members of Congress Think They Can Get Away With It Because the President Is a Rapist twitchy.com/brettt/2026/04…

@GovernorVA The USA is a Constitutional Republic not a Democracy. The Leftist liberals are intentionally destroying our Constitutional Republic and replacing it with the tyranny of the majority that our Founders so strongly feared. The United States is not a pure democracy. It is a constitutional republic—a representative form of government with democratic mechanisms, deliberately designed with checks to prevent the very "tyranny of the majority" that concerned James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and others. In Federalist No. 10, Madison warned that direct democracies are prone to factions where a majority oppresses minorities, leading to instability and injustice. A republic, by contrast, refines and filters public views through elected representatives and structural safeguards, including the division of power between federal and state governments. The Electoral College was a key part of that design. It wasn't an accident or flaw—it was a compromise to balance: Popular input (states decide how to choose electors, and voters influence that). Federalism (states as sovereign entities in the union, not just administrative districts). Protection against pure national majoritarianism, so candidates must build coalitions across regions, not just rack up huge margins in dense urban areas. Virginia's HB965 (signed April 13, 2026, effective July 1) enters the state into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC). With Virginia's 13 electoral votes, compact states plus DC now total 222 EVs—still short of the 270 needed to activate. But if it reaches that threshold, Virginia's electors would go to the national popular vote winner, even if every Virginian voted the other way. This does exactly what you describe: It uses a state-level workaround to sidestep the constitutional framework the Founders created, replacing the republic's state-mediated, geographically balanced system with a de facto national popular vote. In practice: A state majority's clear preference can be nullified by the aggregated national tally. Power shifts toward high-population centers (coastal metros, urban cores) where raw vote volume is easiest to amass, diminishing the incentive to campaign in or address concerns of smaller states, rural areas, or less dense regions. It bypasses the formal amendment process (which requires 2/3 of Congress + 3/4 of states), exploiting the fact that states control their own electors—but doing so in a coordinated way that effectively rewrites the presidential selection process without nationwide consent. Supporters frame it as "making every vote count equally" and fixing rare "mismatches" between national popular vote and Electoral College winner. Critics, including those citing the Founders' fears, see it as eroding federalism and inviting the instability Madison warned about—where transient national majorities (potentially fueled by differing state election rules, fraud risks in lax jurisdictions, or intense urban turnout) override state-level consent. You're right that loose use of "democracy" often blurs this. Pure democracy (simple majority wins everything, directly) was what the Founders explicitly rejected as unsuitable for a large, diverse republic. They built in layers—House (population-based), Senate (state equality, until the 17th Amendment), Electoral College, federalism—to require deliberation, compromise, and protection for dissenting or smaller interests. Bills like Virginia's don't "create" democracy in a vacuum; America already has extensive representative democracy. They move the system away from the constitutional republic the Founders intended toward a more centralized, majoritarian model. Whether that trade-off improves outcomes (broader "fairness" vs. geographic balance and stability) is the real debate—but it does alter the Founders' deliberate architecture in a fundamental way. The compact remains inactive for now, but momentum in certain states keeps the pressure on the 270 threshold.

@SpanbergerForVA So if every Virginian voted against the person winning the national popular vote, then all the votes of Virginians do not count in determining the election. Virginians votes would be null and void. Where is the democracy that liberals scream for. Tell me again who is destroying Democracy. Democrats Just Got One Step Closer to Seizing Presidential Elections townhall.com/tipsheet/josep…

The only thing confirmed here is that Canadian's are still loony liberal lunatics. Mark Carney secures absolute majority in Canada after decisive snap election gatewayhispanic.com/2026/04/mark-c… #gatewayhispanic via @gatewayhispanic

Everyone using the N word are disgusting people. Unfortunately, over my life I have heard more 'Black celebrities' on TV, in media, and in music use the N word than White people. Sounds like you are living amoungst a lot of White people who "Because its shows how ignorant, arrogant, and of a low human you are!" I agree with you on that.

@Conservwarrior2 @Rainyn3m @TheRabbitHole It just astounds me that how many white people can say that N word without any care or anything that has meaning to it. Like, I really look down upon and feel bad for white people who say that word. Because its shows how ignorant, arrogant, and of a low human you are!

South African politicians openly chant for the death of Whites.

This is what happens when you feed people liberalism, they develop mental illness, and then you leave them untreated. Far-Left Canadian MP Introduces Insane 15-Letter Acronym in Tirade at PM Mark Carney (VIDEO) thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/far-le… #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit

@ProjectLincoln Hahahahahahah. Nice investment you made there in Swallwell. The good thing about it is he spent your money on prosititues and you don't have it any more.