Jeremy

3.2K posts

Jeremy

Jeremy

@JeremyAPI

New York City Присоединился Aralık 2009
1.2K Подписки288 Подписчики
Owen Shroyer
Owen Shroyer@OwenShroyer1776·
In this short clip Netanyahu: -Insults Christians & Jesus Christ -Asserts there's no purpose in being a good person -Says we have no choice but to fight Israel's wars -Subtly threatens us if we don't
English
1.2K
6.4K
27.6K
578.1K
Jeremy
Jeremy@JeremyAPI·
@shanaka86 Article 5 should already have been triggered against Iran after iran sent at least 1 drone or missile into Turkey. Meaningless post!
English
0
0
0
417
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
Turkey is a NATO member. South Pars feeds the Tabriz-Ankara pipeline. South Pars phases 3 through 6 are offline after Israeli strikes. Turkey’s industrial and heating gas supply is now directly impacted by a war that NATO classified as “not a mission.” Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty says an armed attack against one shall be considered an attack against all. The treaty was designed for missiles crossing borders. It was not designed for gas molecules that stop crossing borders because the field that produces them was bombed by an ally acting outside the alliance framework. Turkey imports roughly 16 to 20 percent of its natural gas from Iran via the Tabriz-Ankara pipeline. The pipeline runs from the South Pars gas field through Iranian territory to the Turkish border at Bazargan and onward to Ankara. When Israeli bombs hit South Pars processing facilities and fires forced phases 3 through 6 offline, the gas that feeds this pipeline was disrupted at source. Turkey did not choose this disruption. It arrived through 2,577 kilometres of pipe from a target Turkey did not select, in a war Turkey did not join, authorised by an ally that did not consult NATO before striking. European TTF gas prices surged 50 to 85 percent after Qatar’s Ras Laffan was hit. Turkey faces a dual supply shock: Iranian pipeline gas disrupted from the east, and Qatari LNG disrupted from the south via Hormuz. Turkey is the only NATO member that depends on both supply routes simultaneously. The others, Germany, France, and the UK, said Iran is not their war. Turkey did not get to say that. The war came to Turkey through the pipe. Turkey’s industrial sector runs on gas. Steelmaking, glass production, ceramics, chemicals, and fertiliser manufacturing all require continuous gas supply. Turkish agriculture depends on domestically produced fertiliser that requires natural gas as feedstock. A sustained Iranian pipeline disruption does not just raise Turkish heating bills. It contracts industrial output and tightens the same fertiliser supply chain that is already fractured by Hormuz and the Chinese export ban. The strategic irony is architectural. NATO exists to defend member territory. The attack on Turkey’s energy supply originated from Israel, a non-NATO partner, striking Iran, a non-NATO adversary, and damaging gas infrastructure that feeds a NATO member’s economy. No Article 5 consultation occurred. No allied coordination on the energy consequence was conducted. The damage is real, measurable, and ongoing, but it falls outside every mechanism the alliance was built to address. Germany said it is not their war. Japan has Article 9. Pakistan has Article 245. Turkey has a gas pipeline to a burning field and a NATO membership card that does not cover the bill. The irony will not be lost on Ankara. Turkey hosts Incirlik Air Base, a critical American military installation. It controls the Bosporus, the gateway between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean. It manages the southern flank of NATO’s eastern border. And it is now absorbing an energy shock from a war that its own alliance declined to classify as collective defence. The pipeline carries gas. The treaty carries obligations. The gas stopped. The obligations did not activate. And the Turkish factory that needs both to operate has neither. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet mediaShanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
English
15
96
261
37.5K
Jeremy
Jeremy@JeremyAPI·
@piersmorgan Have you said anything about the madness of Iran sending ballistic missiles with cluster munitions into civilian populations - on purpose.
English
0
0
0
18
Jeremy
Jeremy@JeremyAPI·
@Osint613 What exactly are they waiting for?
English
0
0
0
61
Open Source Intel
Open Source Intel@Osint613·
Unfortunately, the Gulf states are taking much of the incoming fire from Iran. The goal? increase pressure on the region and force President Trump to back down and stop the war. But it could backfire. If Gulf states believe they will be hit regardless, they may eventually just decide to step in and began an offensive instead.
English
214
144
1.8K
168.7K
Glenn Greenwald
Glenn Greenwald@ggreenwald·
What makes Tulsi Gabbard's behavior extra pathetic is that not only did Trump publicly state he doesn't give a shit what she thinks, but they have also excluded her from key national security meetings because they don't trust her. Sacrificing all dignity for an empty title.
Glenn Greenwald tweet mediaGlenn Greenwald tweet media
jeremy scahill@jeremyscahill

Tulsi Gabbard has announced she is stepping down from her previously stated principles to spend more time aiding wars she claimed to oppose.

English
484
2.4K
11.6K
273.9K
Jeremy
Jeremy@JeremyAPI·
@TheRightMelissa And he is factually incorrect in the way he telling over the story from the bible.
English
0
0
0
63
Jeremy
Jeremy@JeremyAPI·
Based upon your certainty, yoi must have seen all the information that the decision was made on. Why don't you share so you can convince more people of your truthfulness and level headedness, rather than suffering from an acute case of TDS and IDS, mixed in with a dash of antisemitism.
English
0
0
0
38
Glenn Greenwald
Glenn Greenwald@ggreenwald·
cc: @ADL, @JGreenblattADL, @AIPAC, @benshapiro: Yet another anti-Semitic hater has unmasked himself. Assemble the elders and the denunciation councils. Alert Americans to the Jew-hating menace calling himself Bernard Sanders:
Bernie Sanders@BernieSanders

Joseph Kent, a top counterterrorism official under Trump, just resigned. Kent and I don't agree on much, but he is right: "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby."

English
54
222
2.3K
150K
Jeremy
Jeremy@JeremyAPI·
@_HenryBolton Why is it excellent? It does not specify who you are being replaced with, and who is at fault for it. Not excellent, not brave. Pathetic and defeatist.
English
0
0
2
84
Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧
Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧@_HenryBolton·
Excellent - please read this ⬇️
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC@BishopDewar

As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese

English
29
304
1.9K
48K
Jeremy
Jeremy@JeremyAPI·
@shanaka86 Maybe they should assit!
English
0
0
0
88
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
BREAKING: The countries that were supposed to broker a ceasefire are now demanding the United States finish the job. Reuters reported on March 16, citing three Gulf sources and five Western and Arab diplomats, that Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and Oman are actively pressing Washington not to stop short and to fully degrade Iran’s military capability. Abdulaziz Sager, chairman of the Gulf Research Center, said Iran has crossed every red line. The Gulf states did not start this war. They now want it to end with Iran permanently unable to threaten the strait that carries their economic survival. This is not coercion. This is convergence. Trump needs Gulf legitimacy for the coalition. The Gulf needs American firepower to neutralise a threat they have lived under for four decades. The interests aligned the moment Iran struck airports, desalination plants, fuel depots, and commercial hubs across every GCC state. The USS Gerald R. Ford has been extended to an 11-month deployment, with return to Norfolk pushed to late April or early May. The Navy confirmed it through Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jim Kilby. Washington is planning as if the region stays unstable through the entire spring. Now layer what this means for de-escalation. Ali Larijani, confirmed killed, was the last senior Iranian official with credible diplomatic relationships across the Gulf and the ability to negotiate from a position of institutional authority. His death was confirmed by Israel’s Katz and IDF sources. The pragmatic channel is gone. Araghchi told CBS on March 15: “We are ready to defend ourselves as long as it takes.” Mojtaba Khamenei, invisible since March 9, issued one directive: the blockade continues. The Mosaic Doctrine was designed for exactly this moment. Mohammad Ali Jafari restructured the IRGC between 2005 and 2007 into 31 provincial commands, each holding identical sealed contingency packets with uniform standing orders. If central leadership falls, every command continues under the same pre-loaded rules without needing new orders from Tehran. The Hormuz theater is controlled by Hormozgan provincial command as primary lead, with Bushehr in support. Local naval subunits execute VHF radio hails and verify AIS transponder status. Diplomatically cleared vessels pass. Everyone else is a target. A Thai-flagged vessel was struck on March 11 for transiting without prior notification. Indian tankers Pushpak and Parimal passed safely after three Jaishankar-Araghchi calls. A Karachi-bound Aframax became the first non-Iranian vessel to transit with AIS broadcasting on March 15. The system is functioning exactly as designed: decentralised, uniform, and impervious to the leadership strikes that were supposed to break it. The Gulf states pressing for full neutralisation are pressing for something that may take months. The Ford extension confirms the Navy agrees. Larijani’s death confirms there is no one left to negotiate a shortcut. The Mosaic packets confirm the blockade does not require anyone in Tehran to sustain it. And underneath all the diplomacy, underneath the carrier movements, underneath the strikes and the rhetoric, the fertiliser molecules that four billion people depend on remain trapped behind a permissioned chokepoint run by provincial commanders with radios and rules written before the bombs fell. The offramp did not close because someone blocked it. It closed because everyone with the power to use it decided they would rather keep driving. Full analysis: open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet mediaShanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet mediaShanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet mediaShanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
English
144
529
1.4K
1.4M
Dr. Calum Miller
Dr. Calum Miller@DrCalumMiller·
Have received word that the Bishops of Winchester and Norwich are not attending Parliament to vote against ABORTION UP TO BIRTH due to unspecified "diary commitments". This is extremely disappointing.
Dr. Calum Miller tweet mediaDr. Calum Miller tweet media
English
938
1.8K
5.7K
166.2K
David Keyes
David Keyes@DavidMKeyes·
Destroying Iran's nuclear program and ballistic missiles only advanced Iran's nuclear program and ballistic missiles. If they weren't committed to building them before (which they were), they definitely are now. Think, people!
English
26
13
132
34.3K
Talk
Talk@TalkTV·
🚨 "You're a nasty Jew hater! It's not anti-Zionism, it's anti-Jew." Julia Hartley-Brewer calls out The Guardian's "blatantly, openly, anti-semitic" column on GAIL's Bakery. @JuliaHB1
English
151
521
2.7K
124.3K
Jeremy
Jeremy@JeremyAPI·
@BishopDewar Why would you write this while letter without any specificity about what and who its being replaced with, nd who is responsible for it? This letter is written by someone who is scared to address the real issues. Can't win your country back this way.
English
1
0
2
85
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC
As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese
English
5.2K
17.3K
56.2K
2M
Susie Wiles
Susie Wiles@SusieWiles·
Last week, I was diagnosed with breast cancer. Nearly one in eight women in the United States will face this diagnosis. Every day, these women continue to raise their families, go to work, and serve their communities with strength and determination. I now join their ranks. I am grateful to have an outstanding team of doctors who detected the cancer early and are guiding my care, and I am encouraged by a very good prognosis. I am also deeply thankful for the support and encouragement of President Trump as I undergo treatment and continue serving in my role as White House Chief of Staff.
English
18.8K
12.5K
128.2K
4.2M
Jeremy
Jeremy@JeremyAPI·
@ComicDaveSmith You should change your handle to @ constitutionalexpertdavesmith. Since this is the truth as much as you are a comic.
English
0
0
1
38
Dave Smith
Dave Smith@ComicDaveSmith·
I’ve seen people saying Tucker committed treason because he was helping the enemy in a war.. It’s kind of hilarious. Obviously that’s not true at all, but I thought this wasn’t a war. That’s the official regime line, because if it is a war, it’s completely fucking illegal.
English
981
2.3K
22.4K
425.3K