@M3Writer.bsky.social
44.2K posts
@M3Writer
Former Active Duty Marine, Current Active Duty Writer. My personal opinions & DMs with trusted allies. Blocks are generously provided to 🤡s. He/Him🇵🇷🇺🇸
please run for president bc running a campaign built on protecting an inbred Hollywood millionaire streamer is just so 👌🏼
Fetterman was the leftist choice and Sinema came from the Green Party. They are both creatures from the far left and they were both a disaster. You morons have an abysmal track record.
I bought my Batman 404 the day it came out. Almost 4 decades later…I got it signed… Changed my life!
Jon Lovett asks Senator Cory Booker why he said he wouldn’t go on Hasan Piker’s stream. Watch more Pod Save America on YouTube!
It was the left who first turned on Sinema and was blamed by mainstream media for "driving" Sinema out of the party. I'd think that mainstream Dems wouldn't want to keep suggesting that the "populist supported by the left" won 58.6 of the vote in a primary.
Fetterman: It is crazy. You have many of my party, they are proud to do events with Hasan Piker… Democrats have to decide, whose side are you in? Are you proud to stand with that individual or Israel?
🚨NEW VIDEO CLIP SUPERGIRL IS DEAD ON ARRIVAL – Milly Alcock’s “How to Kill Your Movie” Playbook👇 🔥youtube.com/watch?v=fwmDxS…🔥
It's not a coincidence that most of Hollywood's recent hits are devoid of preachy liberal messaging If anything, movies are going back to conservative tropes from the 90's, such as: - Guys getting the girl trope - Strong, smart, and competent male protagonists - Female characters respect male characters - Male hero saves the day trope - Male characters are allowed to look cool again - Subtle references to fearing and/or respecting God
This is a good take.
Look, the dumbest thing about all this is that I didn’t and don’t care about Piker. Piker never comes up in focus groups with voters as someone they’re following—the way a Rogan or Tucker or Candance does. I don’t think he’s singularly making an impact on politics in any way commensurate with the attention he’s getting. But I care about Tim. I agreed with @Timodc’s original point that using Piker as a litmus test is dumb. Calling up Jon Ossoff to ask what he thinks about Piker is dumb. It is an unnecessary distraction. But I felt like Tim’s discussion of Piker was too dismissive of some of Pikers more toxic positions. And that was the part I wanted to react to. There’s nothing I can do about the fact that the internet distortion field has overtaken the whole thing. And that people are debating my views in a way that is totally divorced from my actual, very-well documented views. That’s just part of what happens when doing this work. The only thing I can do is keep saying what I actually believe. And what I hear voters saying they believe. But politicians can reach voters who are angry about the Iran war and even about America’s relationship to Israel without going on the stream of a guy who said America deserved 9/11. But, it’s also no doubt true that he’s being elevated by the whole conversation and the right answer to questions about him should probably be “Piker, who?” Because that’s what most voters would say if you asked them.
"What changes by just saying 'Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal?'" –Jon Lovett to Senator Cory Booker Watch more Pod Save America on YouTube!
Jon Lovett asks Senator Cory Booker why he said he wouldn’t go on Hasan Piker’s stream. Watch more Pod Save America on YouTube!
@DropSiteNews Sarah Longwell and the Bulwark Neocons were celebrating infiltrating and taking over the Democratic party a week before the 2024 election. Pursuing their approval is what caused Kamala Harris to lose.
I actually appreciate Booker answer here because he’s right — most people do not know who Hasan Piker is so why do we keep acting like this is some defining issue of the political moment. It’s not!
Jon Lovett asks Senator Cory Booker why he said he wouldn’t go on Hasan Piker’s stream. Watch more Pod Save America on YouTube!
@DropSiteNews Sarah Longwell and the Bulwark Neocons were celebrating infiltrating and taking over the Democratic party a week before the 2024 election. Pursuing their approval is what caused Kamala Harris to lose.
Anyone who listened to this fair, thorough and nuanced discussion on the Bulwark knows that @SarahLongwell25 cares much more about the survival of democracy and the Democratic Party than herself. Listen for yourself instead of taking the bait.
@DropSiteNews Sarah Longwell and the Bulwark Neocons were celebrating infiltrating and taking over the Democratic party a week before the 2024 election. Pursuing their approval is what caused Kamala Harris to lose.
