
Smokin'
805 posts


@stehoare Last summer and this summer aren't enough either. It'll need a third summer to fully get there because by the end of next season, we'll be seeing the end of more players, especially Van Dijk.
Next season needs to show progress and then, hopefully, it'll be about fine tuning
English

@stehoare It is a big job ahead. Unfortunately, Liverpool have become a worse team after they lost some elite players to transfers (Diaz, Trent) or aging (Robertson, Salah).
The squad just isn't where it was last year, or where it needs to be to win the league. It needs a big overhaul.
English

I’m pretty certain Arne Slot’s going to be the manager still next season, A PL win and then CL qualification won’t leas to a sacking.
As such, it’s clear that there’s a lot of work ahead to get the squad right. Salah, Robbo are going. Jones, Ali, Chiesa, will likely go too, Ekitike is out for ages. It feels like another window of needing about 6 new signings, at least.
English

@ZoeJardiniere Imagine thinking you're the virtuous one in 2026 when you're literally defending slave traders. Unquestionably child slavery and sex slavery too.
Vile.
English

@ZoeJardiniere It's not on us to relax the system to make an illegal entry easier. It's on the greedy, immoral people smugglers who do not give a fuck if anyone dies, as long as they make their money.
But you never blame the people smugglers. They're literally slave traders and you say nothing
English

This will happen until there are safe alternative ways to cross the channel.
It is that simple & we all know it.
Sky News@SkyNews
BREAKING: Two women die while trying to cross Channel in small boat news.sky.com/story/two-wome…
English

@EssexMe18 @SophieJovi The best combined 11 is:
Allison
Dalot
Maguire
VVD
Shaw
Casemiro
Szoboszlai
Fernandes
Mbuemo
Ekitike/Isak
Cunha/Wirtz
Deutsch

@EssexMe18 @SophieJovi Yes.
Their front 3 blows Liverpool's away and they have the best player in the league with Fernandes. Imagine if Liverpool had wingers like Mbuemo and Cunha?
English

@PhilipProudfoot Your argument assumes that the only expenditure for a business is controllable, ie stock, wages etc. It isn't. The external factors, the government's responsibility, are making it harder than ever to survive.
Look at town centres and imagine the challenge faced by independents.
English

@PhilipProudfoot You can't assume that a failing business isn't viable. Many of the businesses that fail do so because of high taxation and business rates.
If the government raised VAT tomorrow, many businesses would go under, not because they're not viable but because it's too expensive.
English

Pro tip: if you want to oppose this by saying “x” business will collapse if it has to pay workers … enough money to live on… then maybe first ask if “x” is a viable business?
The state must stop subsidising bad bosses with universal credit.
BBC Politics@BBCPolitics
Greens pledge £15 minimum wage for all workers bbc.in/42Gb4rL
English

@SkyNews Very sad news.
If people are fleeing persecution, they should not be skipping safe countries. It's an unnecessary, dangerous risk that's costing lives. The sooner it's international law that you must go to the nearest safe country, the more lives will be saved.
English

BREAKING: Two women die while trying to cross Channel in small boat
news.sky.com/story/two-wome…
English

@ClarkeMicah Cannabis use may be linked to crime but the user still has to be radicalised by something in order to turn to extreme violence.
That can be right wing, eco terrorism etc. but there is a very worrying amount of people committing violence who think the Quran rewards those acts.
English

PETER HITCHENS: One thing is linking the violence on our streets... dailymail.com/columnists/art…
English

@aarthmm @PeterMcCormack It should be easier and more simplistic to run a chain than it is to run an independent business. It should be independent businesses that find it easier to pay a proper wage because of the smaller overheads, no HR departments and so on.
English

@PeterMcCormack If the business isn’t viable it closes. If this leads to problems it’s probably time to re-evaluate the rules. If a chain can give an employee a fair wage, and the independent kan not, then people are better off working for a chain
English

This argument would only have the mildest credibility if the minimum wage was the only thing the state mandated.
In a world of rising taxes, regulation, inflation and energy costs, which are all the fault of the state, only a dummy blames the business owner.
Jon Thompson@JohnnyFocal
@1ohreally No — I’m saying if a business can’t survive paying basic wages, it’s not a viable model. That’s a management problem, not a policy problem.
English

@cezthesocialist So if the government increased VAT to 30% tomorrow, a decision that'd lose millions of jobs, would that also mean that those businesses were not viable?
You don't seem to understand that it's hard to run a business because of the government.
English

@IanJon407 @cezthesocialist The criminality in those towns makes it almost impossible to run a successful hospitality business. How can anyone run a nice business, when the customers have to be around antisocial behaviour? You can't sell cafe culture, when towns are full of balaclava clad, menacing thugs.
English

@SmokinFrazier @cezthesocialist do you live in a pro brexit, reform leaning town by any chance
English


@PeterMcCormack The socialist dilemma is that they think government should be responsible for everything, but want it accountable for nothing.
If you're defending high taxation, business rates etc, then you need to defend the inability to increase footfall, reduce inflation, reduce crime etc
English

A simple message to the silly socialists.
You’re upset by businesses telling you that they will fail with the minimum wage increase. You’re telling business owners silly things like if you can’t pay the minimum wage then you don’t have a viable business.
I want to make this easier to understand, because if you mean what you say, you want people to have jobs and earn a liveable wage.
So listen, businesses fail for all kinds of reasons, mainly because they are unprofitable. We are seeing a wave of business closures at the moment because of the compounding costs from the state against a cost of living crisis.
To make a cup of coffee profitable it has to eat a lot costs:
- 20% VAT (the inputs can’t be claimed back)
- Business rates (a tax before you earn)
- Rising NI costs
- Employment rights load
- Rising energy costs
- Inflation
All these are imposed by the state.
There is also a time tax with all the accounting, HR and regularity requirements which impose cost of consultants and time costs to ensure compliance, distracting owners from operating their businesses.
Then there are the other normal costs. A business owner needs to make a profit else the business fails. If the business fails there are less jobs and lower tax receipts.
If there are less jobs then public services crumble and welfare requirements increase. This is a compounding problem and what leads to the downward spiral of a country.
So… where does the money come from if there are less jobs. The government borrows it, that increase in the money supply drives more inflation, making life more expensive for the people you want to help. Some who now don’t have the job they once had.
So what now? What is your plan? I get it, you don’t really have one, this is what has happened to every socialist state, this is how a country goes from rich to poor. We have no divine right to be a wealthy nation and can certainly lose that status.
So this is your challenge, can you accept society has a distribution of wealth which means there are rich and poor or would you rather everyone was poorer as long as there are no rich. That’s what socialists tend to want, though I have a secret for you, you can’t get rid of people being rich.
I know you think profit is ugly, but the profit motive is what creates business and jobs.
So anyway. I’m going to keep promoting proper economics because that’s how a nation becomes prosperous and prosperity leads to a net better outcome for all. This does mean I am going to have to make fun of your stupid socialist ideas.
Good luck, read a book and stop being a dumb dumb.
English

@owenjonesjourno It's a political cartoon. Every single British politician gets their features exaggerated by the press, whether it's Boris's hair, Major's glasses, Sunak's ears or whatever.
This is pathetic. Especially coming from a grifter who seeks profit from peddling Jewish hate.
English

@Gandalf_LFC Chiesa is celebrating and Ngumoha looks miserable. I presume this means that Liverpool should sell Ngumoha and start Chiesa all next season?
Grow up. This is utterly bizarre.
English

@GoodwinMJ You're 100% right.
A 'severe' level of threat should warrant a noticeable change. There isn't, nor has there ever been, so it's just words.
Likewise, the words to Jews, who are rightly fearful, are meaningless when the government continues to oversee this failing experiment.
English

A thought experiment.
The UK's terror threat level has just been lifted to "severe".
After yet another hideous terror attack on British Jews.
Which leads me to ask:
What would a nation that was serious about dealing with a “severe” terror threat do?
Would it run a policy of open borders, allowing 200,000 unvetted illegal migrants to stream across its border at will?
Would it allow this while KNOWING the migrants have included known terrorists, murderers, & rapists?
Would it then put these young, unvetted, fighting-age Muslim men in the very heart of its communities - next to schools & synagogues?
Would it refuse to ban the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, the Muslim Brotherhood, or kick out Iranian officials who call for violence on its streets?
Would it allow convicted Islamist terrorists - such as the would-be London Stock Exchange bomber from Bangladesh - to STAY in its country?
Would it allow an army of left-wing activist lawyers to use the European Convention on Human Rights to keep foreign criminals and terror suspects in its country?
Would it allow dozens of pro-Iran associations to flourish on its own university campuses?
Would it allow terrorist sympathisers & anti-Semites to march on the streets of its own capital city week after week?
Would it be led by a political class that is so cowardly it cannot even bring itself to say: “Islamism”?
Would it insist on the myth that all threats are equal despite knowing that Islamism is responsible for 94% of terror-related deaths and three quarters of all police work linked to terrorism?
Would it allow parallel Sharia courts, cousin marriage, and illegal ‘family voting’ to become a feature of its national life?
Would it work to shut down any criticism of Islamism by imposing a definition of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ on public institutions and calling for politicians who do voice these concerns to be ‘sacked’?
And would it shut down any attempt to have a serious conversation about all this by denouncing those who raise it as ‘far right’, ‘hateful’, and insisting on platitudes like ‘diversity is our strength’?
I wonder.
Would a serious nation do all these things?
Because that’s what the United Kingdom is currently doing.
English






