Apollo 🕊 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️

4.7K posts

Apollo 🕊 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️ banner
Apollo 🕊 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️

Apollo 🕊 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️

@TheApolloCrypto

We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking used to create them // $TAO $QNT $HBAR $DAG

Chicago, IL Присоединился Ekim 2020
656 Подписки272 Подписчики
Apollo 🕊 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️
@tsidpod @PBDsPodcast @ComicDaveSmith Holy shit the memo prop he held up is LITERALLY a prop?? I was listening to this interview and thought he actually prepared ahead of time by printing the real memo out. He just wrote “MEMO - Wesley Clark” onto a piece of printer paper??! Oh buddy…
English
0
0
1
226
Dan Smotz (The System is Down)
Ho. Ly. Shit. @PBDsPodcast ain't sending their best and their brightest, folks. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 All @ComicDaveSmith had to do was sit back and watch this Temu Rabbi Shmuley flail all of his props around. Yikes.
English
556
687
7.9K
1.1M
Kyle
Kyle@KyleMatovcik·
Wow, did anyone catch THIS part of the Sosnick/Smith debate?!
English
94
82
1.5K
126.4K
him
him@himgajria·
him tweet media
him@himgajria

Bittensor (TAO) Investment Thesis TL;DR: AI Legos. Bear case: 0.5x Conservative: 2-5x Optimistic: 5x-20x Everything aligns: 20x-100x Summary: A decentralised protocol that pools machines and incentivises anybody to deploy their own functions on the protocol as ‘subnets’. Every subnet is a usecase of the network. “Subnets” - the primary innovation of the project - user-deployed usecases of the protocol. Each Subnet comes with its own architecture (incentive systems, consensus rules, algorithms). Think of subnets as apps that make use of the base network (Bittensor) as its operating system. There are already 10+ subnets, with each serving a specific function. The interfaces for these (as well as the subnets themselves) have all been community developed and deployed. For example, Subnet 4 is a ‘multi-modality subnet’ which has already scraped over 9+ million tweets, at 6000 tweets per second at the moment. Exponentially superior: Unlike OpenAI which is limited by the developments and algorithms within their single entity, Subnets are interoperable. I.e. they can feed off of others data, algorithms, intelligence, machines. I.e. every new subnet increases the probability of the entire network’s success. In comparison - Bittensor already serves over 10 trillion model parameters, while GPT3 only serves 175 billion. Speed + scalability: ‘AI on the blockchain’ seems redundant considering its speed and scalability limitations - although, Bittensor’s unique approach is to only host consensus-critical components on-chain while keeping other components off-chain. Tokenomics: TAO facilitates an interesting demand/supply dynamic - providing computation and intelligence to the network is rewarded (emmission) + token staking + Bitcoin-like halving every 4 years + cap on supply at 21M + no pre-mine + no VC funding (fully bootstrapped) Ethics: Bittensor fits right in as a solution around the argument of fair, open and decentralised AI - completely community developed with actual functioning models while staying open-source and transparent. “The importance of decentralizing AI is approaching the importance of decentralizing money.” - @ErikVoorhees Catalysts: - Non-stop subnet deployments - Religious community - AI narrative - Closed-source competitors valuations - Token incentives (demand pressure) - Staking (supply pressure) - Halving (supply pressure) - Not listed on any major exchange - Not recognised by the wider market - Still no user-friendly interfaces Negatives: - Heavy token issuance (2M+ a year till the next halving) - Competitor head start Disclaimer: Not Financial Advise.

ZXX
36
7
402
51.2K
TopLobsta
TopLobsta@TopLobsta·
Im not dying for Israel
R A W S A L E R T S@rawsalerts

🚨#BREAKING: Starting April 20, 2026, the U.S. Army will raise the maximum enlistment age from 34 to 42 years old and remove the waiver requirement for individuals with a single prior conviction for marijuana possession.

English
73
109
1.4K
40.1K
Apollo 🕊 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️
@sostalksmoney Bro why did you say yes to this? You’re so far out of your league that “the most unfunny unpatriotic comic in America” wiped the floor with you with barely a thought. Stick to being Pat’s little ex-lib buddy boy
English
0
0
1
110
const
const@const_reborn·
I feel like i need to get on a podcast or something
const@const_reborn

@RasmrClips You guys should just speak to me instead of having no clue

English
107
31
582
33K
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊@VigilantFox·
🚨 BREAKING: Mark Levin puts Joe Kent on the spot and repeatedly asks if he leaked any classified or confidential information. He asks him straight up: “Were you a leaker?” Here’s how the exchange unfolded: MARK LEVIN: “Were you a leaker?” JOE KENT: “I never leaked any classified information.” “The stories you’re reading are stories from leakers who are leaking… an investigation about me being a leaker.” MARK LEVIN: “So nobody has contacted you from Justice or the FBI or anything like that?” JOE KENT: “Nope.” MARK LEVIN: “Did you ever leak confidential? Let me do it this way.” “Did you ever leak classified information? You said no. Did you ever leak confidential information?” JOE KENT: “Nope.” MARK LEVIN: “Never?” JOE KENT: “Never.” MARK LEVIN: “You’re on the record… That’s a good thing, Joe.”
English
482
756
4.1K
4.8M
Mark R. Levin
Mark R. Levin@marklevinshow·
SOME OF THE KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM MY INTERVIEW WITH JOE KENT. I decided to provide this summary because the media have either ignored the interview or focused on more trivial bits of the interview without reporting on some of Kent's astonishing statements and misdirection. You can decide for yourself. 1. I pressed Joe Kent on widespread allegations from multiple sources and in multiple news outlets about his leaking of classified information and an investigation that started well before he resigned. He denied leaking classified or confidential information to anyone at any time and said he was unaware of an investigation. 2. Kent denied leaking Charlie Kirk's group texts to Candice Owens, which were given to him in confidence by Andrew Kolvet, despite Kolvet implying otherwise. Kolvet issued his own video stating Kent suggested Kovet release the texts to the public, which he refused to do. Soon thereafter, Owens released them and has obsessively used the texts to suggest Israel assassinated Charlie. 3. Kent accused Israel of starting the 12-day war against Iran and our subsequent bombing of the Iranian nuclear sites. I know for a fact that Israel did not launch that operation without the go-ahead by President Trump. Furthermore, Israel did not force the President to bomb the nuclear sites. President Trump knew exactly what he was doing and made the decision after consulting with his civilian and military advisers. 4. Kent insisted that Israel was going to attack Iran several weeks ago and, again, forced President Trump to launch our current military campaign (in coordination with Israel) against Iran. The President, Marco Rubio, John Radcliffe, and others, all deny it. 5. He insisted that Khamenei wanted a peace deal and had issued a fatwa years ago declaring that Iran would never develop a nuclear weapon. I knew this was as absurd argument and pressed Kent. The President's envoys also contradicted this by the facts, as have others, as there are obvious and plentiful facts of Iran's pursuit of a nuclear weapon, manufacture and accumulation of nuclear material, its violation of nuclear agreements, and its clandestine activities surrounding the entire decades' long project. 6. I mentioned Iran had lied about the reach of its ballistic missiles, to include most of Europe, to which Kent said nothing. 7. Kent's obsession with Israel as the aggressor against Iran was apparent throughout the interview. He repeatedly portrayed Iran as the victim, ignoring Iran's myriad acts of terrorism and its establishing, funding, training, and arming of Hezbollah and Hamas, among other things. 8. Kent repeatedly accused Israel of controlling President Trump's decisions respecting Iran, ignoring my repeated mentioned of the myriad examples of Iran's 47-years of acts of terrorism and war against our country, embassies, military installations, military personnel, and assassination attempts against the President and other top administration officials. 9. Kent ignored the repeated declarations by the President that he would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon, and repeatedly insisted that Iran was not close to making a nuclear weapon, in direct contradiction of Iran's own representations to Special Envoys Witkoff and Kushner in the final rounds of negotiations before the President ordered the current military actions, as well as CIA Director Radcliffe's sworn testimony and the statements of others in the know. 10. When I asked Kent to name the 18-intelligence agencies that he claims unanimously concluded Iran was not close to having a nuclear weapon, he did not. Of course, the President makes the final decision based on all the information provided to him, including not only intelligence information but information from other sources as well, and other circumstances. Nonetheless, Kent's assertion cannot be verified. 11. One of the most preposterous and pernicious of Kent's views was his insinuation that Israel may have been behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk, which he declared during his interview with Tucker Carlson. I pressed him hard on this. He tried to adjust his insinuation to suggest there could have been a foreign actor but that was clearly an equivocation. He also claimed he could not provide specifics as he could not reveal them, or the information was classified or whatever. But he insisted it needed to be pursued. Obviously, he has no information to support any of it. It was a blatant antisemitic trope, to go along with his other obsessions with Israel. 11. I asked Kent about the timing of his resignation and the provocative claims in his letter, as well as his allegations against Israel and supposed Israeli lobbyists and their claimed influence on the President (convincing him to go to war). He responded with generalities, talked about a media echo chamber, and repeated his charge that the President essentially was not making his own decisions. He also said he did not issue his letter at the outbreak of the war because he had hoped the President would quickly reverse course. Clearly, his resignation, letter, and the timing was intended for media consumption and to undermine the President and, he hoped, delegitimize the President's decisions, which Kent knew would be used by the media, the Democrats, the Woke Reich, and others against the President and his decisions. There was much more. You can listen for yourself here:
Mark R. Levin@marklevinshow

Here’s my full interview with Joe Kent tonight rumble.com/v77j8ss-levin-…

English
1.5K
970
3.8K
734.9K
const
const@const_reborn·
It’s REALLY important to remember that Tao is also nothing without BTC. The whole industry in-fact is dead without BTC. They solve different problems and i hope will help each other. I’ll die on that hill.
@jason@Jason

$tao > $btc

English
79
145
1K
88.1K
Apollo 🕊 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️
@keenandotai @const_reborn I disagree. I don’t think he’s a maxi, but I think he recognizes the significance of BTC. BTC is the godfather of it all, that doesn’t mean it’s the *best* but it is and was necessary for the ecosystem.
English
0
0
1
24
Keenan
Keenan@keenandotai·
@const_reborn Const will forever be a Bitcoin maxi. There is no changing his mind.
English
1
0
8
936
Apollo 🕊 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️
Certainly not, but if BTC just launched last month we wouldn’t have the crypto landscape that we do have now either. It’s indisputable that BTC deserves respect at minimum for being the reason we are where we are today with all other tokens. Not saying it wouldn’t happen without BTC but would you take the gamble?
English
1
0
0
68
TAO Opsimath
TAO Opsimath@Whoop1478·
@const_reborn If $BTC just launched last month would you be saying this? Would you be so impressed with this new Bitcoin that all of crypto depended on it? Would you be saying $TAO is NOTHING without $BTC if bitcoin was a month old? First mover advantage fades over time
English
4
0
9
1.2K
Apollo 🕊 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️ ретвитнул
@jason
@jason@Jason·
$tao > $btc
QCT
637
456
2.3K
1.2M
Apollo 🕊 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️
It’s hard to separate Israel when repeatedly they have provided false intelligence to our Presidents which have precipitated endless and unnecessary death. WMDs: did our intel say WMDs were being developed? Or was that Israel? You say you bled for our country - you sure you didn’t really bleed for Israel?
English
0
0
0
5
Brushy Bill
Brushy Bill@WilliamMas82484·
@TheApolloCrypto @Timcast @CocoL24665 Never said Israel was good. See thats the disconnect. You assumed anyone who supports destroying Iran must support Israels bullshit. Only someone who is operating on an emotional basis can’t separate the two…
English
1
0
0
19
Apollo 🕊 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️
@MisesChair She’s incredibly ugly, masculine, and looks like a trans person who botched whatever facial reconstruction surgery they had - Larry
English
1
0
6
354
Michael Heise
Michael Heise@MisesChair·
Whats the scoop on the calling Laura Loomer ‘Larry’ thing?
English
82
2
75
9.3K
Brushy Bill
Brushy Bill@WilliamMas82484·
@TheApolloCrypto @Timcast @CocoL24665 In 2003-10 thousands of Americans lost their lives at the hands of the IRGC. I have no problem that our military is eliminating every single member…. Israel benefits but we get payback. Then once the Middle East is totally destroyed, we get additional oil customers…
English
1
0
0
17