NYCWelfareStatePolitics

7.6K posts

NYCWelfareStatePolitics

NYCWelfareStatePolitics

@3stddev

Documenting the terminal decline of NYC.

NYC เข้าร่วม Aralık 2014
90 กำลังติดตาม91 ผู้ติดตาม
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@B52Returns @PolicyEngineer This is laughable. For the average Joe, city and state pay , benefits, and pension far outweigh what they could get in the private sector. You think people are choosing between being a cop or a doctor?
English
0
0
0
3
B52Returns
B52Returns@B52Returns·
@PolicyEngineer You do realize many people take these jobs for the pension benefits? Especially city jobs that arent law enforcement. Good luck retaining and hiring anyone worth a damn after the pension benefits are shit and the pay is shit
English
1
0
0
5
Ken Girardin
Ken Girardin@PolicyEngineer·
Part of why NY police unions are pushing to gut the state's 2009/2012 pension reforms: they want to bring back unlimited "pension spiking" where employees would rack up overtime strategically to inflate the pay on which their pension is based. It's a problem at the MTA too.
Ken Girardin tweet media
English
4
2
16
585
Stephanie Fox
Stephanie Fox@smfox·
@PolicyEngineer @nicolegelinas I mean, the overwhelming majority NYC workers make significantly less than that, and less than we are worth in the private sector, and simply want to retire at a decent quality of life when we end our decades of civic service
English
1
0
4
247
Ken Girardin
Ken Girardin@PolicyEngineer·
Little-known fact: NYS has about 10,000 state & local public employees who make >$250,000/year. A growing share are Tier 6, meaning they contribute to their pension (unlike Tier 4 folks). They want to "Fix Tier 6" because they would immediately pocket $7,500/year! #progressive
English
8
13
81
7.7K
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
There is no adequate (aka 100% full proof) air defense against saturation strikes yet. Never has been. Lasers will probably solve that but are a few years away. I will agree that there may be some physical , non kinetic, countermeasures available. The US lost 63 aircraft in the first gulf War with more than 200 damaged and the US military was arguably in tip Top shape and size to fight the USSR back then.
English
0
0
0
3
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
Yes. In war, one takes damage. Major revelation. The fact that people pretend to expect zero damage is another form of anti-American third worlderism in X. The IRGC getting degraded week after week= IRGC winning The US sustaining minor damage in the scheme of things = all is lost. We should pack up and go home.
English
0
0
0
11
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@SamoBurja Agreed but we need events like these to push us along. That’s generally how human nature works. Desperation breeds ingenuity.
English
0
0
0
16
Samo Burja
Samo Burja@SamoBurja·
We have to build more of every type of energy (coal, nuclear, solar, natural gas) while also reducing oil consumption. China has figured out that it has to escape the oil trap. The United States needs to do the same. Forget carbon neutral, this is national security.
English
23
27
261
15.4K
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@myer80066 @CliffordDMay These assholes are literally Just peddling third worlderism at this point where the US is always losing. If you told cretins that the Nazis literally fought until the last day even as they were decimated, they wouldn’t believe you because “only America sucks”.
English
0
0
0
11
Joshua
Joshua@myer80066·
@CliffordDMay It’s telling how shooting 10-15 missiles a day and striking a target every 1-2 days, most relatively unimportant, is viewed as maintaining a strong military If any other military historically was subdued the way Iran is this wouldn’t be a question
English
1
0
0
29
Clifford D. May
Clifford D. May@CliffordDMay·
Perhaps she's right and the U.S. assessment have overstated the degree of degradation of Tehran's military capabilities. Or perhaps Tehran's military capabilities were underestimated prior to this conflict. Either way, it stand to reason: Good that this conflict is taking place now, not a year or two from now when Tehran's military capabilities (and nuclear weapons program) would be significantly advanced.
Nicole Grajewski@NicoleGrajewski

My comments in this @Reuters exclusive: Even after weeks of strikes, Iran continues launching from sites that have been heavily targeted. That suggests U.S. assessments may be overstating degradation.

English
1
0
10
842
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@TrentTelenko The best way to punish aggressive foes over the ages has been to take away their land. Thats the only way these MFers learn.
English
1
0
0
133
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
But you don’t understand. China is the only one that can build anything anymore and we all must bow down to it. Weapons are like statues. They’re there to be admired and not used. If we do have to use them it’s only when there’s a great power conflict so if there’s something wrong with them we only find out when we’re in really deep shit. You just don’t get it.
English
0
0
0
22
Daniel Friedman
Daniel Friedman@DanFriedman81·
So what? Iran is one of maybe three countries we’d use them on and we aren’t going to war with China anytime soon. And if we had to, we could convert other capacity and ramp up military production.
Kelly Grieco@ka_grieco

Yikes. The US has burned through ~850 Tomahawks in 4 weeks. That's roughly a quarter of the inventory. At ~600 produced/year, that's ~1.5 years of production gone in a month. Hard to see what long-term political goal this buys. washingtonpost.com/national-secur…

English
3
0
15
1.6K
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@myer80066 @ratlpolicy Regular MIL standard are the Russo -UK war where RU couldn’t achieve air superiority even with a 10x larger Air Force and against their own self designed air defense systems.
English
0
0
3
34
Joshua
Joshua@myer80066·
@ratlpolicy Exactly. Argue geopolitical strategy if you want, but don’t pretend that this is anything other than a military ass whooping We’ve just gotten so used to dominance that we forget what regular military standards would feel like
English
2
0
13
566
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
Considering not one F-35 has been downed among US or Israeli Air Force’s and considering it played a substantial role in removing the nuclear threat from Iran, $1.7 trillion amortized over 30+ years seems cheap. If Iran wanted to trade just their nuclear ambitions in a peaceful way for $1.7 trillion, wouldn’t that be a good deal?
English
0
0
9
175
Teachme Chicago
Teachme Chicago@MktAnalysisD·
@ratlpolicy The F-35's $1.7T lifetime cost and chronic delays illustrate acquisition dysfunction. But questioning procurement efficiency isn't the same as proving tech doesn't work.
English
3
0
7
1.2K
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@ratlpolicy Third worlderism on X is very strong. It’s always America sucks but somehow their own country is complete and total shit. This guys from the UK. The UK is a shell of its former self but America sucks is what they want to expound on all day.
English
1
0
95
1.4K
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
You’re right. They supplied a higher percentage of oil and nat gas to the EU which was “only” 20% of global GDP. Even if all of the oil and nat gas gets taken offline in the gulf, it’ll take 6 months - year but the world will adjust. Every major conflict has spiked oil 100%+. This is all the pussified west and anti American third worlderism on social media acting like it’s the end of the world.
English
1
0
0
57
Anna Wong
Anna Wong@AnnaEconomist·
I am not a geopolitical analyst. But my guess (which is as good as anyone’s) is that Trump will escalate. And there will be a point in the next two months when oil will reach $150-$200.
Idrees Ali@idreesali114

Qatar, Oman and Kuwait are pushing behind closed doors for a swift end to the war. The UAE, Saudi ‌Arabia and Bahrain ⁠say they are ready to absorb an escalation of the war and will not accept a post-war Iran that is still able to use the Strait of Hormuz as a bargaining chip.

English
40
45
560
93.1K
lfjncl
lfjncl@lfjncl9891·
@3stddev @constans No, i think every American is a capitalist, and they would never invest without ROI Your only hope is them fleecing your government as they do with defense spending
English
1
0
0
13
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@lfjncl9891 @constans Mining isn’t some leading edge tech. It’s heavy industry. Of course it couldn’t be accomplished in a year but within 5 years we’d be all set. What’s holding things back is regulation and poor ROI for investors.
English
1
0
0
10
lfjncl
lfjncl@lfjncl9891·
@3stddev @constans Not at the scale required, supplying the weapons manufacturing of the biggest producer world wide would be difficult when starting from scratch with no knowledge in the field
English
1
0
0
19
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@lfjncl9891 @constans “Takes a lot of time” is all dependent on resources and attention. Things can be done fast if the necessary resources and attention are directed at them.
English
1
0
0
11
lfjncl
lfjncl@lfjncl9891·
@constans it takes a lot of time to set up the extraction and refinement and the us industry is you know
English
1
0
3
128
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
Exactly. Ignorant retards online just regurgitating the same old “America is finished narrative” by sincerely believing China is the end all, be all on this earth. Of course, we also had US politicians and a US elite who were scumbags that only knew how to play domestic culture war politics so it appeared that the US was/is completely inept.
English
1
0
0
11
PhilosophyDad
PhilosophyDad@PhilosophyDad1·
@constans Minerals aren't rare. The world is massive. The US has all these minerals. We dont mine them because its more expensive than subsidies chinese labor and its environmentally destructive.
English
1
0
1
108
Michael Shurkin
Michael Shurkin@MichaelShurkin·
@LahavHarkov Whether it's the right prism depends on what the objectives are. The problem is that neither the US nor Israel clearly has articulated its objectives.
English
1
0
1
330
Lahav Harkov
Lahav Harkov@LahavHarkov·
The White House said Iran’s missile capability is “functionally destroyed.” Israel says Iran can no longer produce ballistic missiles. So why are Israelis running for shelter multiple times a day? And is missile capability the right prism through which to examine the war?
English
25
18
128
11.4K