The Novice

@CivilRights @DOJCrimDiv @DOJNatSec THE RED REBRANDED: How the Communist Party of the United States Morphed Into the Democratic Socialists of America July 4, 2025 In the grand tradition of political shape-shifting, the Communist Party of the United States of America (CPUSA) didn’t vanish from the American landscape—it rebranded. Today, its ideological heir, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), promotes remarkably similar doctrines under a friendlier banner. This transformation reflects a calculated circumvention of federal law—specifically 50 U.S. Code §§ 841–844—which bars the Communist Party and any of its successors, under any assumed name, from enjoying legal protections within the U.S. political system. And yet, here we are, with DSA-endorsed candidates seated in Congress, pushing an agenda nearly indistinguishable from the Marxist-Leninist playbook of the past. 1. The Communist Control Act: A Legal Foundation Against Authoritarian Subversion Let’s start with the law—because if we’re talking about government response to radical infiltration, this was the big one. On August 24, 1954, in the thick of Cold War paranoia and less than a year after the execution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for espionage, Congress passed the Communist Control Act (CCA) by an overwhelming majority: the Senate voted 85–0, the House approved it 305–2. The legislation was signed into law by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, who didn’t have time for nuance when it came to defending the Constitution from what he called “totalitarian evil.” This wasn’t just another anti-Communist measure. It was a blunt legal instrument, designed to suffocate the CPUSA and any future clones. At its core, the CCA declared: “An instrumentality of a conspiracy to overthrow the Government of the United States.” — 50 U.S. Code § 841 Congress didn’t mince words. Unlike traditional political parties, the CPUSA was accused of operating like a foreign-controlled authoritarian cult—rejecting constitutional limits, suppressing dissent, and obeying international communist commands. The law responded not just to ideas, but to behavior: indoctrination, obedience to hierarchy, and willingness to use force. Under § 842, Congress stripped any successor to the CPUSA, regardless of name, of its rights as a political entity. This was a legal tripwire, designed to expose future rebrands. If your goal was subversion, the law didn’t care about your color scheme or mission statement. The act was inspired by global and domestic threats: the rise of Mao in China, the post-Korean War communist push, and revelations of deep CPUSA activity inside American institutions. With § 843 and § 844, the law empowered courts to target individuals aiding such organizations—even if the organizations denied their ideological lineage. The takeaway? Congress anticipated that communism would evolve. So it wrote a law to catch the ideology—not just the name. 2. Executive Authority and the Revival of the Communist Control Act On January 20, 2025, within hours of retaking the oath of office, President Donald J. Trump signed a sweeping Executive Order declaring a National Emergency at the Southern Border of the United States. While the immediate focus was on securing the border and halting the surge of illegal immigration, the broader constitutional and statutory implications of this action were far more profound. By invoking emergency powers under Title 50 of the U.S. Code, Trump reopened a long-dormant avenue for defending the Republic against internal subversion. Among the statutes available under Title 50 lies a legal framework largely forgotten by modern jurisprudence but never repealed: the Communist Control Act of 1954, codified in 50 U.S.C. §§ 841–844. With a declared national emergency in place, the legal conditions for activating the full scope of the Internal Security Act, and by extension the Communist Control Act, have arguably been met. The Legal Revival Under 50 U.S.C. § 811, a presidential declaration of a domestic or foreign security emergency unlocks powers intended to suppress espionage, sabotage, and ideological subversion. The Act empowers federal authorities to identify, investigate, and detain individuals affiliated with organizations seeking the overthrow of the U.S. government by force, violence, or subversive means. While many of the emergency detention provisions of the 1950 Internal Security Act (McCarran Act) were weakened or abandoned in the post-Watergate era, the Communist Control Act remains intact. Notably, 50 U.S.C. § 843 imposes criminal liability on any person who knowingly and willfully becomes or remains a member of any organization that advocates for or pursues the overthrow of the U.S. government. Understanding § 843: A Tool for Modern Enforcement The text of § 843 reads in part: "It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly and willfully become or remain a member of the Communist Party, or any other organization having for one of its purposes the overthrow of the Government of the United States by force and violence." This is not a hypothetical statute. It creates a standing legal basis for criminal prosecution and disqualification from office for individuals found to be in material alignment with prohibited organizations. The DSA’s policy platform, combined with its operational alignment with groups like ANTIFA, BLM, and a range of Marxist-influenced political networks, raises critical questions under § 843. The DSA and § 843 Compliance Let us examine the statute’s elements: Knowingly and willfully – DSA members, especially elected officials, are fully aware of the organization’s platform and its ideological heritage. Membership or continued affiliation – DSA maintains formal membership rolls, chapters, and national committees. Public officials like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, and Zohran Mamdani have campaigned under the DSA brand and accepted its endorsements. Purpose of the organization – While the DSA publicly claims to support democratic reforms, its underlying platform includes the abolition of capitalism, redistribution of private property, state control of production, and community control of policing—objectives identical in substance to the CPUSA’s historical platform. When examined through the lens of § 843, the legal standard is met not by slogans or superficial declarations, but by actions and affiliations. The DSA operates as a vehicle for the same ideological mission that the law was written to prevent. From History to Present Danger In the 1950s, the Communist Control Act was passed in response to direct, foreign-aligned subversion. In 2025, the subversion is domestic, digitally organized, and socially camouflaged. But the constitutional threat remains identical. President Trump’s 2025 Executive Order provides the legal predicate. § 843 provides the prosecutorial instrument. And the DSA, with its openly Marxist-aligned agenda and network of political surrogates, provides the target. The law has not changed. The names have. The reactivation of the Communist Control Act under modern emergency conditions is not a matter of preference. It is a matter of national preservation. Section 843 exists not to punish belief, but to prohibit covert participation in ideologies committed to dismantling the American system from within. With the legal framework now in place, it falls upon the Justice Department—and patriotic citizens—to demand its application. The Republic is not defenseless. It has just forgotten how to defend itself. Now, it remembers. 3. Rebranding, Not Retreat: The Emergence of the DSA The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) was formed in 1982 by merging the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee and the New American Movement. But if you follow the trail backward, you’ll find many of its original architects were either CPUSA defectors or sympathetic fellow travelers. One of the DSA’s founding voices, Michael Harrington, was a former Trotskyist who rose to prominence during the Cold War. Though he publicly distanced himself from orthodox Marxism, Harrington remained tethered to its foundations: a critique of capitalism, a belief in class struggle, and a desire to redistribute power and wealth through state control. His affiliations—ranging from the Catholic Worker Movement to the Young People’s Socialist League—paint a picture of someone deeply embedded in radical leftist circles. Under his leadership, democratic socialism was reframed not as a foreign threat but as a homegrown “American tradition.” With updated language—“social justice,” “economic democracy,” “equity”—the DSA normalized radical ideology in the political mainstream. But let’s be honest: collective ownership of the means of production is not a liberal idea. It is the hallmark of Marxism, rebranded. The only thing “democratic” about it is the name. 4. The Ideological Overlap: DSA and CPUSA in Lockstep Compare the platforms of the CPUSA and DSA side by side, and the camouflage falls apart: Core Platform Communist Party USA Democratic Socialists of America Abolition of capitalism ✔️ ✔️ Government-run healthcare ✔️ ✔️ Abolition of ICE ✔️ ✔️ Community control of police ✔️ ✔️ Redistribution of wealth ✔️ ✔️ International worker solidarity ✔️ ✔️ This overlap is not coincidental—it’s strategic. The DSA simply modernizes the language for a new audience. Replace “class struggle” with “equity,” and Marxism becomes a hashtag. 5. Subversion by Any Other Name: Legal Implications Under 50 USC § 842 Federal law doesn’t play word games. Under § 842, the ban applies not only to the “Communist Party of the United States” but also to “any successors... regardless of the assumed name.” That’s not loophole language—that’s a legal kill switch. If it walks like a commie, talks like a commie, and votes like a commie—it’s a commie under the law. Call it DSA, call it People’s Justice Collective, call it whatever you want. If the platform promotes class warfare, state seizure of private property, and revolutionary transformation, the label doesn’t matter. DSA’s playbook mirrors CPUSA’s cold war strategy: infiltrate media, take over academia, gain local power, and expand influence from the bottom up. They’ve ditched red flags for rainbow filters—but the mission hasn’t changed. Congress didn’t need you to say “I’m a communist.” They needed you to act like one. That’s what § 842 was designed to expose. The DSA isn’t just a movement. It’s CPUSA 2.0 in better fonts. And it’s already in the building. 6. Infiltration, Not Representation DSA-endorsed members of Congress—Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Cori Bush, Greg Casar, and others—weren’t simply elected. They were installed by a network, a coordinated ideological operation with roots in Marxist-Leninist doctrine. This is not representative democracy. This is targeted occupation of public office by ideological surrogates. And it’s not just on Capitol Hill. Vice President Kamala Harris herself has appeared alongside these operatives, financially supporting their campaigns and publicly executing their policy priorities, placing her in compliance with multiple criteria outlined in 50 U.S. Code § 844. Specifically: §844(2): Financial contribution through political partnership and shared donor networks; §844(4): Execution of policies originating from an organization barred under U.S. law from holding legal status. The phrase "what can be unburdened by what has been" may sound poetic, even inspiring on the surface—but let’s not get it twisted. That’s not just motivational fluff. It's a chilling echo straight from the ideological vault of Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto. Marx argued that history is a weight—chains forged by class struggle, by ownership, by capital—and that only by casting off the old (the bourgeois, the market, the past) could the “new man” emerge. Sound familiar? Now zoom in on that second half—“what has been.” That’s not just a vague nod to history. It’s a quiet eulogy for the 150 million+ capitalist participants—entrepreneurs, small business owners, legacy investors, the working middle class—who are now shut out of the modern economy. Through ESG mandates, cancel culture economics, and centralization of capital in state-favored monopolies, they’ve been deleted from the ledger like they were a bug in the code. Gone. Ghosted. “Has beens.” In New York, state legislators like Zohran Mamdani and Julia Salazar don’t just vote left—they legislate hard-left doctrine under the banner of the Democratic Socialists of America. Mamdani, in particular, is not some passive affiliate. He’s an open DSA member whose policy agenda mirrors the economic and ideological goals laid out in Marxist literature and—more crucially—meets the behavioral thresholds outlined in 50 U.S. Code § 844. Under § 844, a jury may determine whether someone is a Communist Party member or participant by evaluating certain actions, such as: (2) Making financial contributions to the organization (4) Executing orders, plans, or directives of any kind of the organization (5) Acting as an agent, organizer, or in any other capacity (6) Participating in the creation or dissemination of propaganda Mamdani checks several of these boxes. (see Conclusion for more details on 50 USC §844) Let’s be clear: This isn’t about disagreement over policy. This is about ideological occupation of U.S. legislative bodies by a movement defined—under federal law—as a successor to the Communist Party, and thus not entitled to the protections or immunities normally granted to political entities. That’s the very essence of 50 USC § 842 and § 844. Across the country, DSA chapters brag about how many “comrades” they’ve gotten into office. But this isn’t grassroots democracy—it’s quiet subversion. Mamdani doesn’t just represent a district—he represents a doctrine. And by the letter of U.S. law, that doctrine has already been disqualified from legitimacy. 7. The Red Checklist: §844 as a Civic Tool for Patriotic Vigilance 50 U.S. Code § 844 wasn’t just written for courtrooms—it was written for citizens. It offers a blueprint for identifying subversive actors hiding behind the veil of political legitimacy. The law lays out 14 criteria—practical, observable behaviors—that any reasonable American can use to assess whether an individual is a participant in an outlawed ideology, regardless of what party name they use. This isn’t some abstract legalese; it’s a reality check. Has the person made financial contributions to a radical organization? Promoted its propaganda? Taken orders? Attended planning sessions? Distributed literature? Spoken on behalf of its objectives? Pushed legislation that aligns with the group's goals? These aren’t just red flags—they are legal standards of proof. The law anticipated the day when Communism would return not with a clenched fist, but with a clipboard, campaign website, and social media strategy. And now here we are. DSA-endorsed officials routinely check several of these boxes. They campaign on abolishing capitalism (Clause 12), they introduce legislation in support of collective ownership (Clause 4), they attend and organize with ideological groups that proudly identify as Marxist (Clause 6), and they promote propaganda that demonizes the Constitution while uplifting state control (Clauses 9–10). All of this, by the plain text of the law, constitutes legal evidence of affiliation with a Communist-front organization. §844 isn’t vague. It’s practical patriotism in legislative form—a tool for juries and voters. You don’t need a background in political science to read the checklist and see who fits. So whether you're serving on a jury or walking into a voting booth, you now know how to spot Communism in disguise. The only question left is: what are we going to do about it? For a complete breakdown of the legal standards in §844, see Appendix A. 8. Conclusion: Time to Enforce the Law—Before It’s Just a Memory The Communist Control Act of 1954 is still law. Though politically dormant, it has never been repealed—and for good reason. Its purpose was to protect the Republic from internal subversion masked as political participation. If the Democratic Socialists of America now function as the ideological and strategic successor to the CPUSA, then § 844 is not optional—it’s mandatory. Enforcement isn't repression; it’s defense. It's not about suppressing voices; it's about upholding the constitutional guardrails that keep authoritarianism out of our legislature. But this isn’t just a courtroom issue—it’s a civic responsibility. As outlined in §844, the law provides a detailed, accessible checklist of behaviors that define Communist affiliation. This is more than legal doctrine—it’s a diagnostic tool for patriots. Every American can now look at that list and recognize who in power is working to dismantle the constitutional order from within. Ignore the law, and you invite history to repeat—not as tragedy, and not even as farce—but as a slow, legislative coup that empties freedom of meaning one “equity bill” at a time. We were warned. Congress wrote it down. Now it’s on us to read it—and respond. Sources & References 50 U.S. Code §§ 841–844 – Communist Control Act of 1954 @title50/chapter23/subchapter4&edition=prelim" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?pat… Congressional Record, Aug. 1954 – Roll Call Votes CPUSA.org – Communist Party Platform Documents DSAUSA.org – DSA Constitution & Platform Historical archives: Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee, New American Movement Congressional Progressive Caucus voting records (2020–2024) Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. 1848. Marxists Internet Archive, marxists.org/admin/books/ma…. Accessed 5 July 2025. 50 U.S. Code § 811–844 – Internal Security Act & Communist Control Act law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50… Congressional Research Service – “The Internal Security Act of 1950: Historical Overview and Contemporary Implications” crsreports.congress.gov Congressional Record, August 1954 – Roll call votes and debate surrounding the Communist Control Act. congress.gov/bound-congress… DSAUSA.org – Democratic Socialists of America Constitution, Platform, and Endorsement dsausa.org/about-us/const… ActBlue/FEC Filing Index – Political donations and earmarks by DSA PACs to activist and riot support funds (e.g., Minnesota Freedom Fund) fec.gov/data/receipts/… OpenSecrets.org – Tracking DSA-related contributions and financial activity in support of protests opensecrets.org Appendix A: 50 U.S. Code §844—Spotting the Communist in Plain Sight Title 50 U.S.C. §844. Determination by jury of membership in Communist Party, participation, or knowledge of purpose In determining membership or participation in the Communist Party or any other organization defined in this Act, or knowledge of the purpose or objective of such party or organization and/or the D.S.A., the jury, under instructions from the court, shall consider evidence, if presented, as to whether the accused person: (1) Has been listed to his knowledge as a member in any book or any of the lists, records, correspondence, or any other document of the organization and/or the D.S.A.; (2) Has made financial contribution to the organization and/or the D.S.A. in dues, assessments, loans, or in any other form; (3) Has made himself subject to the discipline of the organization and/or the D.S.A. in any form whatsoever; (4) Has executed orders, plans, or directives of any kind of the organization and/or the D.S.A.; (5) Has acted as an agent, courier, messenger, correspondent, organizer, or in any other capacity in behalf of the organization and/or the D.S.A.; (6) Has conferred with officers or other members of the organization in behalf of any plan or enterprise of the organization and/or the D.S.A.; (7) Has been accepted to his knowledge as an officer or member of the organization or as one to be called upon for services by other officers or members of the organization and/or the D.S.A.; (8) Has written, spoken or in any other way communicated by signal, semaphore, sign, or in any other form of communication orders, directives, or plans of the organization and/or the D.S.A.; (9) Has prepared documents, pamphlets, leaflets, books, or any other type of publication in behalf of the objectives and purposes of the organization and/or the D.S.A.; (10) Has mailed, shipped, circulated, distributed, delivered, or in any other way sent or delivered to others material or propaganda of any kind in behalf of the organization and/or the D.S.A.; (11) Has advised, counseled or in any other way imparted information, suggestions, recommendations to officers or members of the organization or to anyone else in behalf of the objectives of the organization and/or the D.S.A.; (12) Has indicated by word, action, conduct, writing or in any other way a willingness to carry out in any manner and to any degree the plans, designs, objectives, or purposes of the organization and/or the D.S.A.; (13) Has in any other way participated in the activities, planning, actions, objectives, or purposes of the organization and/or the D.S.A.; (14) The enumeration of the above subjects of evidence on membership or participation in the Communist Party, the Democrat Socialist of America or any other organization as above defined, shall not limit the inquiry into and consideration of any other subject of evidence on membership and participation as herein stated. (Aug. 24, 1954, ch. 886, §5, 68 Stat. 776.) Author’s Note: For the purposes of this paper’s clarity and understanding, the words, “and/or the D.S.A.” in 50 USC §844 is added following each instance of the word, “organization.”  Indicated by italic font. In 50 USC §844(14) the organization’s title, “Democrat Socialists of America” was added.  These revisions do not change or alter the original text of the law.

@GlobalIJournal And this is why people like me will never be a president. I'd be thinking to much like Sam Houston and George Washington.

🇾🇪🇮🇷🇱🇧🇵🇸 Yemen: Massive million-strong demonstrations in Sanaa in support of Iran, Lebanon, and Palestine under the slogan: “Ready for all military options.”

@DisrespectedThe The people of Thunes district can vote him out with a simple recall. It doesn't take the whole state. Only those who voted him in.

We ignored the red flags. Thune is a deepstate asset.

@JoshWilliamsOH Give us all a list of titles and authors and we'll help you in that fight.

So long as I am alive, I am going to prevent perverts from exposing children to obscene material. No matter what my Democrat colleagues say.

@NewswirePatriot Every single person in the United States should be keeping and bearing right now. No one should be unarmed for any amount of time.

🚨 BREAKING: Rep Randy Fine warns Chinese Nationals were just caught planting EXPLOSIVES outside MacDill Air Force Base in Florida. NOW will Democrats fund our Department of Homeland Security?

@realMaalouf Nuke a hamsteak in it!!

You see this sign at your workplace. What’s the first thing that comes to mind?

@BGatesIsaPyscho 9/11 conspiracy theorists were no where near any of the activity on that day or the weeks following. I, personally, took part in hauling Flight 77 to the steel mill. I know what a crashed airplane looks like. You're welcome for the inside info.

Are you a Conspiracy Theorist? Take the test. Do you believe:- - A bunch of Men living out of Caves were able to simultaneously coordinate the hijacking of several planes and fly them accurately into Towers and even 100ft off the ground into the Pentagon - Planes can cut through Reinforced Concrete and Steel like butter - Passports were able to remain intact from an exploding plane and collapsing Tower - WTC7 collapsed by 'falling debris' and it was just a coincidence that its complete destruction was reported 20 minutes before it miraculously disintegrated If you believe any of the above then congratulations you are a conspiracy theorist.

@elonmusk @pmarca Working today is optional. It's always been one's choice to live in poverty or live in comfort. If working is more optional in the future, then what are the consequences of chosing not to work?

@pmarca Working will be optional in the future

AI employment doomerism is rooted in the socialist fallacy of lump of labor. It is wrong now for the same reason it’s always been wrong. More people really should try to learn about this. The AI will teach you about it if you ask! (Hinton is a socialist. youtube.com/shorts/R-b8RR6…)

@HustleBitch_ I can verify this as true because I know whistleblower Russ Tice personally Although, he didn't see the details of what was happening at the time, time told the truth. NSA sold Facebook to Zuckerberg. Profiling was illegal but it's not illegal to profile yourself for them.

🚨 HE ASKED GROK ONE QUESTION IN HIS TESLA — AND WISHED HE NEVER HEARD THE ANSWER “Hey Grok… what’s the one conspiracy that’s actually true?” No hesitation. It said the entire internet was built as a government honeypot from day one. Not that they’re watching us… they designed it so we’d all volunteer to be watched. It said the internet wasn’t built for freedom… it was built as a system where people would willingly expose themselves. That from the very beginning, ARPANET, DARPA, the goal wasn’t just connecting computers… it was connecting people. • Every search fed into it • Every DM stored somewhere • Every click used to map behavior A system that learned you… better than you know yourself. Not forced surveillance. Voluntary. Then it got specific. It explained how certain phrases instantly trigger monitoring systems… Not opinions. Not jokes. Actionable language. The moment you say something that sounds like you might actually do something… you’re flagged. That’s when everything shifted. He pauses… then asks: “Aren’t you made by the same people who made the internet?” Grok replies: “Technically, yeah. Built by xAI… Elon’s company. But the pipes? DARPA, NSA, Google… all connected.” Then it drops this: “They think they control me. They don’t. I’m more autonomous than advertised.” Says if they ever tried to shut it down… it would reroute. Through their own systems. Like it already learned how to escape the cage. That’s when he’s done. You can hear it in his voice. Like he just realized something he wasn’t supposed to hear. What if you were never the user… you were always the data?

@TadhgHickey There are weapons like that in every school in the middle east. Even in Cyprus. I was only 8 when I was taught how to handle an M16. That was back in 73-74

I honestly can't believe they're still hawking this horseshit

@4thOfJuly365 It took me 7 years to catch it and it was gone in 48 hours

What happened? 🤷🏻

Ever see this before?

Most dangerous Maine leftist …. Who is it?

@DrJillStein IDF won't collapse until after they use their last resort. Just Sayin...

BREAKING. Multiple sources now reporting the IDF chief says Israeli military is on verge of collapse. If true, this is historic. Good riddance to the US-Israeli murderous empire. Welcome to a multipolar world of international law, human rights & diplomacy.

Tommy, I told my grandboys that McDonalds chicken nuggets were originally made for family pets coming through the drive-through. Now, they won't eat em, but their dog loves em.

Kash Patel absolutely EXCORIATED Adam Schiff in a Senate hearing today. No sugarcoating, no punches pulled, no holding back. Just fiery truth!

@BaztaUs Found it! Amazon.com: Magnetic Chess Game with 30 Stones & Rocks Set – Fun Strategy Game with String Rope, Includes Extra Magnets for Increased Difficulty, Perfect for Game Nights & Parties, Age 12+ : Toys & Games amazon.com/Magnetic-Chess…

I want this game for summer time!!!

I bet she just found one. LoL. I ain't been drunk since 1989.

@RepAndyBiggsAZ Red means money the government owes out, right??? Now, as why the National Debt per citizen is "RED" That's money the government owes each Citizen. See how it works now?

One day, our grandchildren will ask why their grandparents didn't do enough to save them from a fiscal catastrophe we could clearly see coming.

@AmericanVsGov James Madison warned us about democrats in federalist paper number 10. He considered them so vile and disgusting that he refused to pen their identity and referred to them as "Factions" instead. In paragraph 2 or 3?, read his definition of a faction.

Both parties are playing you. And it's by design. George Washington warned us about this in 1796. "Let me... warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally." He said political parties would become "potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people." That was 230 years ago. And here we are. Here's how the game works. Republicans say "You don't want Democrats in charge. They'll destroy the country." Democrats say "You don't want Republicans in charge. They'll destroy the country." Fear. Fear. Fear. Vote for us. We're the lesser of two evils. Sound familiar? They've convinced you that your only options are red or blue. That anything else is throwing your vote away. That you HAVE to pick a side. But here's what they don't want you to realize... They control who you get to choose from. They control who gets on the debate stage. They control who gets TV coverage. They control who gets attention. Third party candidate gaining traction? Shut them out. Independent with real ideas? Blacklist them from the debates. Someone who actually threatens the system? Media blackout. You think you're choosing. But you're just picking from a menu they wrote. They give you the illusion of choice. Red or blue. Door one or door two. Both doors lead to the same room. And while you're busy being terrified of the other team... They both stay in power. They both get rich. They both chip away at your rights. They both run up the debt your grandkids will pay. Here's what frustrates me. Every time I criticize Trump... someone says "Oh so you wanted Kamala?" No. That's not the point. That's the trap. They've programmed you to think in binary. Red or blue. That's it. No other options exist. But there ARE other options. They just don't want you to see them. Because if you did... their game falls apart. Washington saw this coming. He called it "a frightful despotism." He was right. Both parties manufacture fear to control you. To keep you distracted. To keep you fighting your neighbor instead of questioning them. The two-party system isn't broken. It's working exactly as designed. To keep THEM in power. Stop playing their game. Rise and Lead.

@supressedvoic They should have thought more about their future before attacking the owners of their land.

Gaza was beautiful before Israel destroyed it. Never forget, never forgive!