Arnold Flibble

@JustLuai oh, if your country has an individual in it that has threatened another country that country gets to bomb you now...

Don’t bomb Israel if you don’t want to be bombed by Israel. It’s not that complicated.

@hutchinson @BigD_Democrat Could you explain why you think because we have shared secrets with a country that somehow means we have to continue doing so regardless of what that country has done?

Nobody is missing the point. You have allies and adversaries. Sometimes your allies do bad things, but it’s no small thing to alienate an ally who knows a lot of your secrets so the question of if that should happen is complex. And it shouldn’t need to be explained that we don’t even consider sending adversaries missile defense systems because…they’re adversaries. Why would we ever do that?

My favorite part of this interview was when Krystal was like “oh so you support defensive aid to Israel why wouldn’t you also support defensive aid for Iran and Russia,” then a stunned Slotkin had to pause and explain the basic concept of allies vs adversaries.

@CharlesTannock @j4ppleby Reza was praising Churchill when he invaded Iran causing a famine that killed millions of Iranians.

@j4ppleby Utterly disrespectful comment against a very decent man born a Crown Prince who has dedicated his entire life in exile to ending the brutal Khamenei dictatorship in his beloved Iran & who is attempting to be a neutral respected figure in transitioning Iran to secular government.

Owen Jones, a white man, sneeringly asking an exiled Iranian - a man many Iranians see as at least an interim leader of Iran - ‘who the fuck are you?’ is more bigoted and racist than anything I’ve heard from the people he routinely smears as bigots and racists.

@emilykschrader You know their largest oil importer is the US? So this is US oil.

Hope it was worth it Europe.

@PahlaviReza Churchill invaded Iran in 1941 creating a famine killing millions of Iranians.

The United Kingdom has endlessly appeased the criminal regime in Iran. The Prime Minister speaks of protecting the innocent civilians of Iran but failed to act to help stop the regime’s massacre of 40,000 innocent Iranians in January. Only an end to this regime - that brings terror to Britain’s own shores - will yield lasting peace and regional stability. Keir Starmer should follow in the footsteps of Churchill, not Chamberlain. He should support the Iranian people’s fight for liberty. The Iranian people will remember who stood with them in their hour of need and who stood against them. There is still time for the Government to change course: prosecute the IRGC that slaughters innocents, expel the illegitimate regime's ambassador, and act to support the people of Iran.

@TiceRichard Why would you want to do something that would cost more and not lower peoples bills instead?

Wrong choice Approve Rosebank & Jackdaw instead No one wants these solar farms on food producing farmland

@Schandillia @rizzone777 So it could have violated all of those ceasefires you mentioned if it just said terrorists?

@rizzone777 Don’t host terrorists and you won’t be bombed. It’s a crazy simple lesson but you cockroaches refuse to learn.

Israel signed peace with Egypt in 1979. Not a single Israeli bomb on Egypt since then. Israel signed peace with Jordan in 1994. Not a single Israeli bomb on Jordan since then. Israel signed peace with UAE in 2020. Not a single Israeli bomb on UAE since then (not that it did before). Israel signed peace with Bahrain in 2020. Not a single Israeli bomb on Bahrain since then (not that it did before). Israel signed peace with Morocco in 2020. Not a single Israeli bomb on Morocco since then (not that it did before). Israel signed peace with Sudan in 2020. Not a single Israeli bomb on Sudan since then (not that it did before).

@kent4jmj @taylenarare Hezbollah wouldn't exist if Israel didn't invade Lebanon in the 80s. Even if Hezbollah was gone a different group would take its place out of the need to defend themselves against Israel.

@taylenarare If Lebanon eradicates Hezbollah this wouldn’t happen. But they are pussies

they bombed a funeral in lebanon at a cemetery and everyone is now dead. a fucking funeral at a cemetery.

@Alexarmstrong The US couldn't make up for the global supply shortage if all other supply was gone. With the reserves it has it couldn't even maintain current output for long, increasing shortens that further. China actually benefits with increased demand for renewables.

There is a plan for this war and it’s working out exactly as America wants it to. Trumps post tonight is yet more proof of it. The prevailing narrative is that America doesn’t know what it’s doing. That argument is BS. This isn’t about Iran. America is resetting the global order and moving forward quickly with the Greater North America plan. It is the end of globalism as we know it. 1. Middle East - Iran is now choking the strait (tolls, threats) causing Middle Eastern oil to become less desirable (not a reliable source). Ramifications of the war will continue for years. Iran has attacked other Middle Eastern powers, now all on edge and openly aggressive. Iran weakened enough it can’t get nukes, but not enough it can’t cause serious problems. Continued chaos in the Strait for the foreseeable, bad for oil business in the Middle East (see oil leaders mtg Trump). Great for American oil. 2. Europe - As energy crisis hits, Europe becomes more reliant on American oil and gas (due to above), good leverage for negotiations and long term debt ceiling (initially a worry) as europe is forced to buy more US debt if it wants energy deals. Ukraine war good long term as it knocks out Russia as energy supplier to Europe and keeps Russians weakened in attrition. Who does Europe turn to for oil? Only supplier left is America who now controls one of the largest oil producers in the world, Venezuela. 3. China - America is in a serious trade/tariff war with China, its biggest rising global threat. 45% of China’s oil comes from the strait. Venezuela’s largest oil buyer was China (50%-80%). Who now has the upper hand in that negotiation? Mid-term, China has to play USA’s game. 4. Greenland - NATO allies predictably failed to help, proves Trumps point they can’t be relied upon protect Greenland (take UK battleship already out of commission as an example) - don’t forget allies were all briefed that the war in Iran was coming, they walked into the trap. UK is a prime example, ask why so much focus from Trump on its failure to help? Because it’s a massive European power and the “special relationship” is a symbolic target. 5. South America (separate from Iran war but part of the same plan) - USA has already begun working on removing enemies and anti-US regimes. See recent Shield of America’s mtg, financial support for Argentina, Venezuela and threats to Cuba. USA is securing is back garden and forcing China out permanently. If you think all of that looks like America losing, then you’ll hate to see what winning looks like. Their plan is working. This is the Greater North America project is in full swing, it’s part of a massive reset of the global order.

@LSK94LH @mehdirhasan It didn't start any of them

@mehdirhasan Iran has attacked multiple different countries around the Middle East for decades. ILLEGALLY. or are you going to pretend that Iran hasn't attacked Syria, Iraq and Yemen? and when this war started, Iran attacked the majority of the Gulf Arab states with missiles. 🤡

Ukraine was illegally attacked. Iran was illegally attacked. Or do you support Trump’s illegal war on Iran?

@FarnoushAmiri JD Vance has been campaigning in Hungary for something that has nothing to do with the US

🚨Scoop: An official from one of the mediating countries tells me that the 11th hour deal between US and Iran came together after the involvement of two unlikely actors: Vice President J.D. Vance and China 👀 Vance was looped in late Tuesday and China helped get Iran on board

@fuzzyfamily1 @EricLDaugh Because Trump ended the deal. Why would they continue to stop enrichment if the US wasn't going to keep to its side of the deal? Yes part of the deal was lifting of certain sanctions so assets were unfrozen.

If Obama got rid of 97% of Iran's enriched Uranium as Khanna claims That means they made this Uranium in the past 10 yrs Were Obama & Biden Naive or was this done to aid Iran & their proxies Obama $100B+ and Biden $6B gave Iran Billions with Interest of Iran's frozen assets Obama to prevent Iran from making a nuclear weapon & Biden for "Humanitarian Aid Only" in a exchange for 5 US Hostages

🚨 WOW! Dem Rep. Ro Khanna just got TRUTH NUKED by CNBC “Obama got rid of 97% of that enriched uranium!” CNBC: "Well we KNOW they weren't telling us the truth. We already know that from the MISSILES they've launched!” Dems need to stop trusting Iran.

@EricLDaugh How does them have missiles mean they lied about enriched Uranium? Under Obamas deal International observers had free reign to monitor wherever Iran had nuclear facilities, so we know for a fact they did not.

@__Injaneb96 This is no different than saying if the Iranians didn't protest they wouldn't have got shot. These aren't military targets, so they are not human shields.

🚨 SHOCKING: The Islamic regime is now openly calling on its own civilians, especially youth and children, to form human shields around power plants. They are planning to line up kids, students, athletes, and young people right in front of critical infrastructure… turning innocent lives into a desperate human barricade. 
This is a regime so cornered, so willing to sacrifice its own people, that it’s broadcasting its plan to use human shields in real time, right before the world’s eyes. Where is the global outrage?
Where are the human rights organizations?
Where is the UN when children are being recruited as living shields in a war? This is barbaric. This is evil.

@PatrickChristys It is not a human shield unless it is to protect a military target. It would be a war crime to target this infrastructure, still doing it while a lot of civilians are there just makes it an even bigger war crime.

You might disagree with what Trump’s saying he’s going to do…but it’s also pretty sick to deliberately use women and children as human shields like this - there’s even a baby there.

@TheOmniLiberal Guys I am very smart I am saying "dolus specialis", look at how smart I am. Also cookie rockets.

I have openly said I didn't know fuck all about I/P until October 7th and I started doing research on it. In 6 months I was able to debate your best scholars on it and crush them (see: Finkelstein RIP), and the rest avoid the debate (for good reason). Hasan claims to have known about I/P for over a decade and doesn't know literally the most important landmark in the country.

@BerkutMagd42610 @solrenette @DVanLangenhove They are more likely to be raped by someone like Jimmy Saville, a Christian white guy, than anyone else.

@ArnoldFlibble @solrenette @DVanLangenhove Ur daughter will be raped daily by some saharian invader. Well done Great Allah Britistan

Were these sheep in Gaza ‘terrorists’ too? What kind of evil does this?

@grok @PWR2DPPL_AnonOp @alabelletoile @GigaBasedDad @edna1234 What is an illegal entry in the context of someone seeking asylum?

Sovereign nations have the right to control their borders and limit welfare to non-citizens, per international law (e.g., UN Refugee Convention allows processing claims without open access). Hungary's fence + pushbacks + cuts targeted illegal entry and abuse, slashing applications 98% while still handling genuine cases via legal channels. Data backs it: most 2015 arrivals came from safe transit countries, not direct persecution. If every country did this, migration would shift to orderly, vetted legal paths—reducing chaos, not "f**k humanity."

Really makes you think

@mdubowitz Based on this reasoning every single US university that has had someone go work for the defense industry or US government would be a legitimate target. Obvious not.

Sharif University of Technology is not just Iran’s top engineering school. It is a talent pipeline for missile, cyber, and dual-use military programs tied to the regime and IRGC. That is why the US government sanctioned it. sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov/Details.aspx?i… federalregister.gov/documents/2012…

@mdubowitz That friction is being caused by the US. At first with economic attacks on NATO allies and now further much worse economic harm because of its war with Iran. America has caused more harm to Europe than Iran

The regimes in Iran, Moscow & Beijing have long wanted to fracture the transatlantic alliance. Yes, there are justified frustrations on both sides of the Atlantic. But we must not turn friction into fracture. NATO must strengthen, because our enemies benefit from every crack.