ابو عبيدة

@_hazzee @mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid @DisputesOf You must be 13

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid @DisputesOf What an eloquent way to divert attention from talking about the rafidha

@YasinKa64213494 @doctor_rahmeh @TorahJews Not really the Quran doesn’t have genocidal verses whereas the bible doesn’t.

@doctor_rahmeh @TorahJews I completely agree with your points regarding Zionism. However, the problematic theological practices you mentioned can be found in any religion.

Can't sharpen a pencil during Shabbat but can bomb Gaza and invade Lebanon.

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Not really, yours is.

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid maybe start by answering his 3 questions, what would ibn taymiyyahs answer be?

Let me be precise here, for this is the point most often abused. To say that a belief or an act is disbelief in the abstract is one thing; to pronounce a specific, named person a disbeliever is another matter entirely. The latter, takfīr al-muʿayyan, is no verdict for a layman to hand down. It requires that the conditions of takfīr be established and its impediments lifted, that the proof be made plain and that ignorance, misinterpretation, and compulsion be ruled out, and that is the office of qualified scholars and judges, a restraint that Ibn Taymiyyah himself was at pains to observe. So when you pronounced Daniel a disbeliever, you did so as a layman with no authority to do so. You are not qualified to make takfīr of a muʿayyan as you have not studied islamic studies properly and make mistakes when reading juz Amma from the mushaf Now that ive answered your question please answer mine, do you consider the Gulf leaders to be disbelievers on your manhaj or not. Give the same answer you gave me in person otherwise we will both know you do not have the nerve to do so.

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid adnan is asking you about 12vers, why are you asking him about rulers of the gulf, you know fully if he answered you they way you say he will will result in him not being able to travel, do umrah etc. dont be malicious bro.

@syedumar353190 @mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Yasir qadhi is pakistani, im holding accountable yawm a qiyama

@BaneNoname @mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Yasir qadhi went from a najdi to a liberal, hijab was never a najdi nor a liberal you bootlicker

@mannnyboyy @mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid go beat yourself you rafidhi dog

@BaneNoname @mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Fear Allah stop fearing Zionist and yahuudi plants lil bro

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Are you going to threaten him the same way you did to sh Muhammad Tarawneh.

@MrAdnanRashid Adnan, I know what you really think about the Arab Gulf rulers according to your principles of takfir based on our conversations and I also know a lot more. Please hold your tongue and stop provoking me.

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Is it worth burning bridges with all these sunni brothers and siding with a rafidhi. I certainly dont think so.

"Hijab himself becomes a kafir if..." If you hold such strong views based on your strict adherence to the dawah that you follow, why did you refuse my on-camera offer for a face-to-face discussion in Malawi? Why remain cordial in person or on the phone, yet make extreme hypothetical chains of takfir publicly? And if I become a kafir for this, do you make takfir of the Arab leaders who allowed Hindu temples to be built in their country? Answer directly

No. The true people of Tawheed (Ahl ut-Tawheed) are defined by their absolute sincerity to Allah alone, their rejection of Shirk, and their adherence to the Sunnah. Their identity is not defined by a blanket desire to never perform Takfir. If a Muslim upon Tawheed, see’s another person in his actions or beliefs abusing Allah’s Oneness, it is from his very Tawheed and gheerah of Allah’s Lordship that he disassociates himself from that person.

🧵 𝐌𝐞𝐠𝐚 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝: 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐑𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐖𝐚𝐬 𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐤 𝐈𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐏𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐚? 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐖𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐲 A thread containing over 90 different sources, exposing the rampant practice of shirk, superstition and irreligiosity within the Muslim world before, during and after the time of Muḥammad Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhāb. [1] European explorers [2] Muslim scholars, historians & travellers [3] Opponents of Wahhābism [4] Wahhābī testimonies

This rock is older than the religion of Shias.

@5amrevival When you binge watched Sally in Morroco sipping mint tea

There was a time

هذه المرة يرد عليكم مؤسس حماس الشيخ أحمد ياسين وليس بلال البخاري 🌹

perhaps jewish people should stop carving the Star of David into Palestinian people's faces or selling stolen Palestinian land out of synagogues if they want people to not associate zionism with judaism

‘Uqbah ibn al-Ḥārith said: “I saw Abu Bakr — may Allah be pleased with him — carrying Al-Hasan ibn Ali while saying: ‘May my father be sacrificed for him — he resembles the Prophet, not Ali ibn Abi Talib.’ And Ali was laughing.” [Sahih al-Bukhari 3750]

@abuibrahim_mm x.com/KieraDiss/stat… its true 😂

There's no way that ReformUK is running a candidate called "Muhammed Sharia". Can someone verify this? I couldn't find anything through a google search.

British Jews will literally support the genocide of your family with their money and their influence and then have you arrested if you dare speak out against it and actually “name the Jew.” This is the fallacy/psyop that is “anti-Zionism.” Because the second you “conflate Zionism with Judaism” and actually call out the ideological powerhouse behind Zionism, which is Jewish supremacy, the most powerful Jewish organizations on the planet will flex their muscle and destroy your life. Like… have you ever really thought about the mindfuck that is “Zionism” that we’re all expected to navigate? It’s “the Jewish state” In “the Jewish ancestral homeland” That uses the “Jewish language” Under a banner of the “Jewish Star” Butttttt…. It’s not Judaism/Jewishness… it’s “Zionism” which literally means “movement for Jews to return to have their own country” But that still doesn’t mean Jews. And if you conflate the two you’re an antisemite according to “anti-Zionists.” But if you don’t agree with Zionism you’re an antisemite according to “Zionists.” And if you say that Zionism is actually just Jewish supremacy you’re an antisemite according to both Zionists and anti-Zionists. And they will literally debate the nuances of this preposterous conundrum while people are getting slaughtered by the thousands and still have the gall to have you arrested for merely speaking out of tone and turn about the whole thing.