Martin Bergmann

@XFreeze Still faster than China 🤣

Elon Musk on Robotaxi in Europe: “We’re probably jumping the gun here on robotaxi in Europe, since it has taken us an immense amount of time just to get supervised self-driving approved in Europe We don’t control the regulators. It’s ultimately up to the government in Europe and the EU to decide what to do Supervised FSD has been approved in some countries and we expect more. It goes to Brussels for EU review in May The technology we deployed in the Netherlands and Europe is the same exact architecture and training system - just with added Europe data. The same will be true for unsupervised FSD and robotaxi” Tesla’s tech is ready The regulators are the only thing holding Europe back

@rhensing Why didn’t Tesla make it easier to upgrade from HW3to HW4? It looks like a mistake but maybe there are some limitation in HW3 system?

Good time to remind everyone that Tesla offered retrofits for the HW2.5 cars up to HW3 and Elon has said if that’s not good enough they will retrofit again to HW4. My friend with a 2017 Model S that came with HW2.5 paid for FSD and is currently running HW3 / 12.6.4 on his 9 year old Model S. He’s looking forward to v14 lite soon and/or HW4 retrofit. 🫡💪

@Arpe_DK Tak !

@Bergmann_dk Biltjek dk

Til info, Tesla Danmark sælger stadig LG5M batteriet til Model Y LR RWD Premium. Spændende hvornår der skiftes over til 4680. Vores nye Model Y står til at komme sidst i maj 🤞

Danish Augmented Hearing aims to set global standard in speech understanding with new funding arcticstartup.com/augmented-hear… via @ArcticStartup @Bergmann_dk @Crowbrry #nordicmade #Denmark #funding #audiotech #bigdata #ArtificialIntelligence #machinelearning #Startups #Trending

@wholemars Wish he would stick to that and his companies.

Elon Musk’s “controversial” ideas: 1. Multi trillion dollar deficits are bad 2. We should consider trying to end wars instead of funding forever wars 3. People should be allowed to speak freely without censorship 4. We should have clean air and safe roads 5. We should go to mars

@nerdalert Just make sure you have some money set aside. My son broke his arm in Texas - it cost $100.000.

That's a pretty interesting idea. I pay ~$1,900 per month, yet still have to pay thousands more out of pocket each year for my family's medical expenses. It's hard to imagine that I'd actually be worse off all-in than I am with this insane system.

@elonmusk And what Putin wants?

Zelensky wants a forever war, a never-ending graft meat grinder. This is evil.

@RandyWKirk1 Disagree. Trump is isolating the US from its allies for what- to be allied with Russia? Good luck with that.

TRUMP 1 - Zelensky 0 Who disagrees?

@TSLAFanMtl FSD was not included in launch edition.

Imo it makes perfect sense for the launch edition to be far less appealing in Europe bc FSD in Europe is not nearly as good as FSD is in North America. Not sure it is related to broader demand concerns (which are real) on the continent.

@elonmusk Ukraine: Sorry for not loosing

Russia went too far 3 years ago, now the Ukrainian government has gone too far. Endless death in trenches is wrong and anyone who continues to push that lacks both empathy and a brain.

@WR4NYGov It is only expenses but us seems to love that

I did not have Greenland joining the US on my bingo card I didn’t even imagine such an idea in my wildest dreams I’m sure all the leftist decolonization peeps will appreciate freeing the natives from centuries of European domain

@scottastevenson @thealpharaccoon No it wasn’t

@thealpharaccoon iPhone 1 was garbage, but at least they put it into the world and kept iterating!

Ilya is brilliant but he’s making a Founder 101 mistake by believing he can make a “straight shot” to the product he wants rather than iterating on useful products with customers. The problem with this mentality is that you are always levitating, never really touching the ground of real human problems. Until you finally hit your “straight shot” and realize it has super critical problems and you’ve wasted years. OpenAI *is* taking the straightest possible shot.

@thorborg Glimrende analyse.

Anders Bæk, der uden tvivl er den person i Danmark der ved mest om Tesla. Så hvis du tror at Tyskerne er tæt på Tesla, så bliv hurtigt klogere her: andersbm.dk/tesla-price-ta…

@AutismCapital Skill issue

🚨CHAMATH: "My iPhone does not work. I'm sorry. I just have to say it. Ever since I upgraded to iOS 18 nothing works. The phone doesn't work. I can't call my wife or my kids. The phone bricks constantly. My photos app doesn't work. It is just really bad." FACTS. It is horrible.

@AutismCapital Bro Joe: Nah I’m good in my bubble

🚨 NEW: Joe Rogan shares that Zelenskyy tried to get on the Joe Rogan podcast but Joe turned him down.

@joerogan @elonmusk Like the one with the faking of the moon landing?

@elonmusk If you buy MSNBC I would like Rachael Maddow’s job. I will wear the same outfit and glasses, and I will tell the same lies.

The most entertaining outcome, especially if ironic, is most likely 😂

@TeslaLarry Larry, No not so ‘shocking’ when you consider Elon cheering on many of David Sacks’ pro-Russian tweets… but good to see Elon reconfirming support for Ukraine- it’s been a while

It's shocking how Ukrainian supporters have turned on Elon, considering his support for Ukraine at the most critical moment in their long history. Easily the largest individual AND corporate contribution to their war effort, literally saving the City of Kiev and (thankfully!) the life of Volodomyr Zelensky. Now they Ukrainian supporters remain hostile despite the fact that the US provide their Starlink system with SpaceX support. Not sure how much Politico contributed to the Ukraine effort, but I daresay it may have been a little less than the 100s of millions of dollars provided by SpaceX and Elon.

@slye Congratulations Andy!

Today I’m officially a debt-free multi-millionaire. A huge goal of mine since I was young. But it doesn’t mean as much as I used to think. When I was a kid, my dad told me I’d become a millionaire someday. Back then in the 90’s, that was a big deal. Especially coming from a lower-class separated family. During the summer, I’d visit him and live in his camper with no running water. But he used to tell me I could do anything in the world. He instilled a confidence in me that had a bigger impact than any amount of money could. My biggest fan. My strongest protector. My hero. It’s been 2 difficult years since I last saw him. At least in real life. He visits me often in my dreams. Sometimes nightmares. I still remember watching him take his last breath. As haunting as that may sound, I’m glad I was with him when he left this world. No love can replace a father’s love. To my dad: all I wanted to do was make you proud. I hope my daughters feel the same way about me. My goal is to make sure they never have financial stress. But to also give them the confidence that was given to me. “True success is when the people who are supposed to love you, actually do” - Warren Buffet I love and miss you, dad. I wouldn’t be where I am today without you.

@heydave7 Worst take I’ve ever seen from you

I believe there’s a strong likelihood that Trump, if elected, could end the Ukraine-Russia war before his term even begins. In contrast, if Harris were elected, there’s a significant chance the war would not only continue but possibly escalate, potentially drawing in more countries. While the Ukraine-Russia conflict is not the sole issue in this election, it is undeniably one of great importance, with profound implications for global stability and U.S. foreign policy. Trump’s Strategy to End the War Trump’s approach to ending the war would likely focus on actions aimed at altering the current incentive structure. First, Trump could pressure Ukraine to formally abandon its aspirations to join NATO. He could make it clear to Zelensky that without this concession, U.S. funding for Ukraine’s defense would end. This would fundamentally shift the dynamic by forcing Ukraine to reconsider its priorities. At the same time, Trump could offer Ukraine a “carrot”—substantial funds for post-war rebuilding, as a way to soften the blow and incentivize negotiations. Further, in exchange for Ukraine abandoning its NATO ambitions, it would receive international security guarantees to protect against potential future Russian aggression. Next, Trump would likely convince Putin that a non-NATO Ukraine is the best deal he can hope for. Putin, having sought assurances against NATO expansion for years, could see this as a victory and a reason to de-escalate. In this context, Trump would negotiate a border settlement, pushing both sides to make some concessions but ensuring that the main focus—Ukrainian neutrality—would be locked in. Harris and the Risk of Escalation On the other hand, Harris would likely continue the Biden administration’s strategy of funding Ukraine’s military and hoping that prolonged support will eventually bring an end to the war. However, this approach risks perpetuating the conflict indefinitely. As long as the U.S. continues to supply military aid, Putin will see this as direct U.S. aggression against Russia, further solidifying his resolve to keep fighting. In turn, Ukraine’s reliance on U.S. military aid and the lingering hope of eventual NATO membership will keep fueling its resistance. Without a fundamental shift in this dynamic, the war could drag on for years, bleeding both nations and possibly escalating to involve neighboring countries. U.S. policymakers seem to be overlooking that this war cannot be won by either side militarily without catastrophic consequences. What’s missing from the Biden-Harris approach is the recognition that this war can be negotiated to an end—and the U.S. has the leverage to make that happen. The Path to Negotiation Contrary to the current administration’s reluctance to fully commit to diplomatic resolution, I believe the Ukraine-Russia war is one that can and should be negotiated to a close. While some wars are indeed beyond negotiation, this is not one of them. The U.S. is in a unique position to pressure both sides into compromise, especially if it’s willing to use its economic and military aid as bargaining chips. It’s crucial to recognize that continuing to support Ukraine militarily without a clear endgame only prolongs the suffering and risks an even larger conflict. Under a Trump administration, we would likely see a more assertive push for negotiations—using hard leverage, but ultimately driving toward peace. In contrast, under Harris, the war might well become a quagmire, with no end in sight and greater risks of escalation. In summary, while the outcome of the Ukraine-Russia war is far from the only issue in this election, it is a significant one. Trump’s strategy offers the best chance for a swift resolution, while Harris’ continuation of current policies may allow the conflict to spiral into something far more dangerous.