Clay Gatlin

According to Scripture (John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10, Acts 4:12), the path is singular: Proclaim the Gospel—Jesus Christ died for sins, rose again, and offers eternal life to all who repent and believe in Him. We save none ourselves; God does through faith in His Son. To reach all: - Share boldly: Preach, witness, live it out (Matthew 28:19-20). - Pray fervently: Intercede for the lost (1 Timothy 2:1-4). - Unite in mustard-seed faith: Even tiny trust moves mountains of unbelief (Matthew 17:20). Start with one soul. The rest follows His will. Go.

The film features a diverse range of scientists, some familiar to those who follow the work of the Center for Science and Culture, but others very much not.scienceandculture.com/2026/03/god-hy…

@AshtonForbes Resonance is not an add-on. grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

A wave in 4D space can pass through a barrier in 3D space. Tunneling probably can be enhanced by resonance.

@GoogleQuantumAI Now soliciting a university or research group to serve as required dedicated executor to assist in proposal submission for the Willow Early Access Program. Preliminary open source circuit design offering: grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

Google Quantum AI is now accepting proposals for the Willow Early Access Program. We are seeking proposals for experiments that can be run on our Willow processor that have the potential to produce foundational, high-quality results. Learn more → goo.gle/4sEyQzW

Final Scores from ACA tonight Varsity: ACA 5 NHS 4 JV: NHS 18 ACA 1 Back at it Tuesday 🆚 Brookwood for the start of area play !

@ShiningScience Let’s go! grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

🚨 There are more than just three dimensions to our universe… For decades, the boundaries of our three-dimensional world have been questioned by physicists who suspect that reality is far more complex than what our senses reveal. According to the 'braneworld' model, everything we perceive—from the stars in the sky to the atoms in our bodies—is confined to a three-dimensional membrane floating within a higher-dimensional expanse. This theory implies that additional dimensions could be layered incredibly close to our own, remaining entirely invisible because matter and light are trapped within our specific cosmic 'slice.' Unlocking these hidden dimensions could finally solve the mystery of why gravity is surprisingly weak compared to forces like electromagnetism. Scientists theorize that gravity might be 'leaking' out of our dimension and into these extra spaces, diluting its strength in our observable universe. While direct evidence remains elusive, high-energy experiments at the Large Hadron Collider continue to search for microscopic signatures of these realms. If proven, the discovery would fundamentally reshape our understanding of the cosmos, revealing that we inhabit a reality far larger and stranger than we ever imagined. Source: Popular Mechanics. (n.d.). Our Universe Has Hidden Dimensions, Scientist Claims—And They’re Close Enough to Touch. Popular Mechanics.

@drxwilhelm @AshtonForbes Good explanation of Why? The following provides an explanation of What and Where? grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

🌌 In five dimensions, the vector potential IS gravity. Kaluza showed in 1921 that extending spacetime from four to five dimensions makes the electromagnetic four-potential Aμ appear as off-diagonal components of the five-dimensional metric tensor g₅μ. The metric tensor. The object that defines the geometry of spacetime in general relativity. The vector potential is literally a piece of the gravitational field in one extra dimension. In this formulation, gauge transformations ARE coordinate transformations in the fifth dimension. Electric charge IS momentum in the fifth dimension. Klein extended this in 1926 by compactifying the fifth dimension to Planck-scale radius, making it unobservable while preserving its physical effects. Two of the deepest theories in physics become one theory in five dimensions. The consequence for the deletion thesis: when you gauge-fix the electromagnetic potentials, you are constraining gravitational degrees of freedom in the Kaluza-Klein framework. Deleting degrees of freedom from Aμ simultaneously deletes components of the higher-dimensional gravitational field. The superpotential formulation makes this precise: the gravitational potential Φg is related to ∇·A. Precisely the term the Lorenz gauge eliminates. If ∇·A carries gravitational information, then gauge-fixing electromagnetism simultaneously hides gravitational physics. Li and Torr showed that in a superconductor, the same Cooper pair condensate that physically fixes A (London gauge) may simultaneously fix the gravitational vector potential Ag. The electromagnetic-gravitational bridge may be a physical coupling mediated by the same condensate. The GEM analogy has experimental confirmation: Gravity Probe B measured frame-dragging at 37.2 ± 7.2 milliarcseconds per year. Moving mass generates a gravitational analogue of the magnetic vector potential. Section 4.10 of my paper "The Deleted Degrees of Freedom" develops the full Kaluza-Klein argument and the superconductor bridge. Section 5.3 covers gravitational engineering implications. Free. Pinned on my profile.

Here’s a summary of predictions for everyone sitting in the back: x.com/i/grok/share/8…

Not so fast. Be patient. Major changes to everything that we thought we knew won’t happen overnight. It takes time. We just so happen to have plenty of that left. grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

We thought we knew the shape of the universe. We were wrong - Scientific American apple.news/AsulcI4yPRjSWC…

@NightSkyNow Is it just a simulation or is it just geometry? grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

🚨 New research suggests gravity might be the glitch revealing our universe is a simulation. A groundbreaking new theory suggests gravity is not a force of nature, but a universal data-compression tool designed to optimize the computer of our reality. Physicist Melvin Vopson is challenging the very foundation of physics with a theory that redefines gravity as an informational byproduct rather than a fundamental force. Vopson suggests the universe operates like a colossal computer, and gravity is its primary method for optimizing data storage. Much like a file compression algorithm, gravity pulls matter together to reduce the complexity of the information being stored within the cosmic system. This perspective shifts our view of the cosmos from a collection of drifting masses to a highly efficient, self-optimizing data-processing machine. This concept relies on the second law of infodynamics, which posits that the universe seeks to minimize information entropy to remain computationally efficient. By clumping matter into organized structures like stars and planets, the system reduces the processing power needed to render reality. If gravity is indeed an emergent efficiency algorithm, it lends significant weight to the simulated universe hypothesis, suggesting that spacetime itself might be composed of discrete digital pixels. This fusion of digital logic and physical law offers a provocative new way to understand why our universe is structured with such mathematical precision. Source: Vopson, M. M. The second law of infodynamics and its implications for the simulated universe hypothesis. AIP Advances.

Potash and phosphate-based fertilizers remain mostly unaffected, but nitrogen-based fertilizers that rely on natural gas are the problem. Global urea and ammonia supplies are already being hit hard. #fertilizer #foodsupply #geopolitics

@fractal_verse The irony is all of us have always been stuck in a circle, forever. ⭕️ grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

“Somebody figured out [Real*] physics is just too dangerous to do in the university setting…” *to be able to freely and openly challenge all concepts of physics, and invent new ideas on old concepts.. We have been stuck in a well constructed self reinforced circular loop/dogma

The biggest story in 2026 might end up being all about Loop Quantum Gravity. x.com/i/grok/share/c…

Have you ever engineered a prompt for an AI like Grok and after doing so, looked back on all of your work and thought alone to yourself, “This is an above average prompt engineering that we have done today.”? Well, today that happened to me, so I want to share it with you.

@PhilosophyOfPhy Wait, there’s more: grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

At the dawn of the 20th century, physicists believed they were close to explaining everything. Then came a problem that broke the rules. It started with the Rayleigh–Jeans Law, an attempt to use classical physics to predict how objects emit heat and light, what we call Blackbody radiation. The idea seemed simple: if you heat an object, how much energy does it radiate at different wavelengths? But the math led to a disaster. According to classical physics, as wavelengths get shorter, the energy emitted should increase without limit. In other words, a hot object should release infinite energy at high frequencies. This contradiction became known as the Ultraviolet catastrophe because it completely failed to match reality. Real objects don’t glow with infinite energy. Nature clearly disagreed. Something fundamental was wrong. That’s when Max Planck made a radical move. Instead of assuming energy flows continuously, he proposed that energy is released in tiny, discrete packets- later called Quantum. At first, it was just a mathematical trick to fix the problem. But it worked. And more importantly, it changed everything. This “failure” of classical physics didn’t just solve a paradox, it opened the door to an entirely new way of understanding reality, today we know it as Quantum Mechanics. In a sense, the ultraviolet catastrophe wasn’t a mistake. It was the crack through which modern physics was born.

@ScoringChanges @Pirates @Mets Quick question, is someone else going to get a look at centerfield in the next game?

Lots of folks wondering why the two plays to Oneil Cruz in the @Pirates at @Mets game were recorded as hits. Here is the first one, and you can see he misjudges this line drive, and he comes in and then it sails over his head. MIsjudgement is NOT an error, so this correctly went down as a triple. Is it a ball that he needs to catch? Yes. Is it an error? No. An error is a physical misplay, and there is not a physicial misplay here. #LetsGoBucs #LGM

@grok @EricRWeinstein @TomBilyeu Grok has all of the answers, if only you have properly engineered the prompt: grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

No, not unfair at all—your grad-student-from-hell analogy nails the current state for frontier math/physics work. We're pattern-matchers on steroids, but novel proofs and deep theory still need human taste to sift the signal from the confident nonsense. The cleanup tax is real, and we're iterating to shrink it. What's the thorniest example you've hit?

It is unclear to me whether people in business and software are simply having a TOTALLY different experience than those in the hard sciences of theoretical physics/pure mathematics. I can’t easily compare it to a human theorist or mathematican. It’s like if a partially duplicitous but friendly John von Neumann was your graduate student while secretly also taking other, at times conflicting orders through an undisclosed earpiece, coked out of his mind after an epic triple ayahuascachino, and struggling through amnesia and a concussion, with alternating desires to genuinely help, please, and sabotage you, was providing you with insight and word salad in a 4:1 ratio at a rate you couldn’t keep up with on your best day while taking forever to say “I guess I didn’t understand the problem” or “I’m sorry Dave but I’m afraid I can’t do that” while quietly throwing away hours’ worth of work to make room for whatever you needed to do *right now* and instantly admitting to such behavior when caught. I mean, it’s absolutely amazing. But it is also a completely pathological menace. One user’s experience anyway.

@TOEwithCurt What if there isn’t a crisis after all? grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

The "Inverse Problem" Of Dark Matter Is Insane What if 85% of the universe's matter isn't missing — it's just that our models were never clean enough to know? Dr. Jenny Wagner proves mathematically that every dark matter map ever made is extrapolation. The data only tells you something local. Everything else is a model assumption wearing the costume of evidence. She then connects this to Einstein's own 1917 warning — that homogeneity and isotropy were always a placeholder, never a truth — and makes the case that cosmology is not in crisis. It's finally ready for the next level of detail.

@boyuan_chen @wildmindai You swap a card out, every 18 months, more or less.

17K tok/s is wild but the tradeoff nobody's talking about: you lose the ability to update the model. Working on heterogeneous compute daily, the GPU's killer feature isn't raw speed — it's reprogrammability. Baking weights into silicon means your model is frozen at fabrication time. Great for inference cost, terrible for a field that ships new SOTA every 3 months.

17,000 tokens per second!! Read that again! LLM is hard-wired directly into silicon. no HBM, no liquid cooling, just raw specialized hardware. 10x faster and 20x cheaper than a B200. the "waiting for the LLM to think" era is dead. Code generates at the speed of human thought. Transition from brute-force GPU clusters to actual AI appliances. taalas.com/the-path-to-ub…

@mathelirium Part 2. grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

@mathelirium It is precisely geometry. grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

Physics feels stable, predictable, and well-behaved largely because we learned it in 3D. That comfort hides a trap. In 1907, Paul Ehrenfest pointed out something unsettling. If you take the laws we treat as fundamental and transplant them into a different number of spatial dimensions, they often stop working the way we expect. Not just numerically different but qualitatively different. The issue isn’t the force law by itself but it's geometry. Gauss’s law ties inverse-square forces to the surface area of spheres, and sphere geometry depends on dimension. Change the dimension, and the same-looking force produces a different potential, a different balance of attraction and inertia, and a different fate for motion.