No King but Christ

@DuaneKnesek @HoppeQuotes It that good or bad?

@Commie_Removal @HoppeQuotes Because nobody randomly brings up Jews in a positive way nowadays. Antisemitism might be at an all time high.

Not an April Fool’s Day joke…

@UnderCoercion @ledit0ut Yes. If we had hard money we would be stronger than the status-quo. How are you defining Nationalism here?

@ledit0ut If we eliminated the fed what would stop another country to take our spot? Could we protect ourselves from advisories economically?

Someone explain to me if it’s possible to be nationalistic and libertarian. In my mind those two ideologies are diametrically opposed.

@DuaneKnesek @HoppeQuotes Why did you imply that was a negative comment?

@Commie_Removal @HoppeQuotes You guys just come right out and say it now, huh? If what I said is somehow what "being Jewish" means, then clearly Jews are smart. No wonder they are the most successful ethnic group in the world. Don't blame others for your failures. Look within. (And cope)

@7fignigg @ComicDaveSmith @sostalksmoney Foreign flags in bio means your opinion on everything is invalid

@ComicDaveSmith @sostalksmoney Hey Mr “comedian” when are you gonna start telling jokes and leave the politics to the adults?

Wise choice @sostalksmoney

@bsteinthorsson @TheLazyFae @liquid2ulu You are like a viking that ate soy and fucked guys your whole life. Like a fagking or something

@TheLazyFae @liquid2ulu Well, those don't really exist. The bible is full of contradictions, so they have to do gymnastics and ignore half of the teachings. There is no way around it if you want a religion based on these texts. Which is also one of the reasons why they never agree with each other.

The homosexual Christians are accusing me of hypocrisy.

@OrcinusWasHere @Joe_drozd Have you exercised? Or would improving yourself be a step towards forming an “aristocratic government”?

I quoted across multiple books and essays, but have never read him at all. Nope. Not all all. I also haven't argued with him in person in the last two years. God, Hoppeans are stupid. I mean, it makes sense, as the inability to have second order thinking is the only way you end up a Hoppean, but it's just so surprisingly dumb every time.

A non-libertarian is no longer a distinguished fellow at a libertarian institute. No tears shed. The idea that because he was part of the late Rothbard nonsense means he's libertarian is similarly silly. As is the idea that Lew Rockwell's even on the libertarian spectrum. Hoppe's your typical post-Marxist tankie with views that are all about how monarchy is the only way and is natural, but "people agree on the monarch, but without Democracy, but also without warlords." If the monarch cares for the state and its people because they're his property, then you're saying that the people are his property. Hoppe can go live in his covenant communist bullshit forever and have his own publications continue wherever he'd like Hoppe doesn't believe in the fundamental libertarian concept of self-authorship. His arguments for "physical removal" are not just distasteful but fully antithetical to libertarianism. He does NOT describe voluntary association but, instead, forceful disassociation. That is a direct attack on self-authorship. He is stating that people should be (and argues that they MUST be) pre-judged and based on identities and beliefs rather than on any actual action. That is assigning a moral status to groups of people just for their existence. That is *despicable.* In Democracy, Hoppe literally argues that monarchies, especially hereditary monarchies, rule better than democracies because of their ownership of the state meaning they have a reason to care for their property. The problem, again, is that is antithetical to libertarianism. Monarchs don't just own the land but also the people of their country. The People are subjects. Those people's self-authorship; their choices, decisions, and property ownership; are held only by the whims of a tyrant. That is wholly and inherently disgusting. Hoppe's own argumentation ethics framework fails him, as well. He built on Habermas's work (which is hilarious for someone who's SO against CRT) and he claims that his work shows that self-ownership (the instantaneous simplification of self-authorship) is presupposed in any rational discourse. If that's the case? Then every person capable of argumentation has INVIOLABLE SELF-AUTHORSHIP, which includes the Democrats, homosexuals, and anyone else he wants physically removed. The framework would lead to radical universalism. Hoppe twists that argument to apply to property rights instead of people, because he's a social conservative hack. He then applies the paleo"libertarian" (paleoconservative) strategy, which is inherently authoritarian. The entire point is to abuse the libertarian movement as a vehicle for exclusionism; he wants his social conservative views to be FORCED upon people by bringing the Republicans into the Libertarian spaces. This is the same reason that hardcore Hoppean founders of the Mises Caucus, MiTox folks like Michael Heise, have no problem with the removal of long-time Libertarians from this party. They are fine stealing the property of those of us who built this party and replacing us with Republicans due to their lack of understanding of their own nigh-theological belief in property rights. The MiTox concept is to destroy the liberty movement and replace it with one that they like involving reactionary conservatism. The problem with that? Conservatism is right-wing bullshit. Libertarians are not, nor have we ever been, reactionaries. Hoppe's bullshit is the "bridge" to the alt-right from Libertarianism, which is recognized even by people like George Hawley. Hoppe is for feudalism hidden behind a veneer of "freedom." His "freedom" is for the "property owners," which exclusively means landowners. He's rebelled against Marxism on the grounds that he believes hierarchy is good, classes are inherent, and that there are people who should not be part of society. He hides that behind Austrian economic citations while fundamentally opposing the core beliefs of the rest of the Austrian school of economics (which is, once again, why basing your political philosophy on a mathematical model of economies is absolutely useless). This is not some mischaracterization for a personal attack on the man. He OPENLY prefers the "ancien régime." Hoppe treats self-authorship as something that is conditional; something to be be earned by the purchase of land. Self-authorship is the precondition for self-ownership. Therefore, ownership cannot be a requisite for authorship. Hoppe proved his entire philosophy wrong and then has continued to scream that it's the only way forward. No one can define your self-authorship for you. Hoppe's bullshit tries to pretend that, if you don't adhere to his ideas? Then you are not deserving of your self-authorship. As Horwitz put it, the approach is, "a fascist fist in a libertarian glove."

@DuaneKnesek @HoppeQuotes Very Jewish of you

@HoppeQuotes About time more libertarians realize that liberty ≠ non-intervention. Sometimes the protection of liberty requires intervention. Especially against a foreign regime has killed many of our citizens and is surviving to kill MANY more.

@murdadesmaeeli @ComicDaveSmith Im American. We don’t care what some Iranian jew thinks

I’m Iranian. The aggressor is the mullah Nazi regime that has a much worse military industrial complex than US. The only difference is that they’re incompetent fucks that just steal peoples money for their own benefit and expensive cars. Just because they’re incompetent it doesn’t mean they cannot damage and endanger the world.

Ok fair enough, but he was trying to convince him not to launch a stupid war of aggression against Iran.

@kevin_chenault @ThomasEWoods @philthatremains More like a parasite that craws inside the country and slowly corrupts politicians individually through blackmail and financial means. Much of the west has treated this parasite before and we need to again.

@ThomasEWoods @philthatremains Like a drunk friend who constantly pulls you into bar fights, Israel sure makes it hard to support.

only people that hate Israel are upset.

@jeffaccordion @ThomasEWoods @GuntherEagleman You are retarded. Commies and left wing anarchists are not similar to libertarianism.

@Commie_Removal @ThomasEWoods @GuntherEagleman I read the first be where Franco rounded up all the libertarians.

People mad about the strikes on the Iranian terrorists. - Ilhan Omar - Rashida Talib - Thomas Massie

@Msmiff4787 @BTooloud73447 @NickJFreitas @YouKnoImHim I am a Christian. They choose to deny Christ and are therefore me and God’s enemy.

@Commie_Removal @BTooloud73447 @NickJFreitas @YouKnoImHim “The Jews” are your enemy? 🤦🏻 Are you SURE you didn’t make them your enemy?

And there it is… "Do not vote in the midterms, and if you do, VOTE DEMOCRAT! This administration needs to be SHUT DOWN!" - Nick Fuentes Yall stupid mfs let democrats mind fuck you.

@NikDavidYaron @TheQuartering You are gay. Or you are a woman. You are one or the other.

@TheQuartering Dave is an abject moron. Or a very evil grifter. He is one or the other.

Ya being in your mid 40s constantly posting on X is the real measure of manhood...

@Msmiff4787 @BTooloud73447 @NickJFreitas @YouKnoImHim Defining your enemy does not mean you are afraid. It means you are honest and realistic.

@BTooloud73447 @NickJFreitas @YouKnoImHim Maybe the people on the left AND the right who are terrified of the Jews can start their own party. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@jeffaccordion @ThomasEWoods @GuntherEagleman You think Buchanan would like Trump’s jew wars? What book have you read?

@ThomasEWoods @GuntherEagleman Then why are you talking to him? All the boys love Buchanan. It’s the liberals we’re sick of.

@DukeNukem1996 @CptAncapistan @LudwigNverMises Jews are running your country

@CptAncapistan @LudwigNverMises Making bad guys dead guys fills me with simple glee, yes.

FYI guys- when a deadline is over Trump has to bomb something. Blowing up Khameneis house is a good way to maintain the prospect of a real threat without starting something The amount of navy is more about AirPower and deterrence than planning a ground invasion It’s not WW3

@vulpes1 @realDavidBJr @NewReaganCaucus Imperial power run by jews is good?

@realDavidBJr @NewReaganCaucus Islamist dictatorship which murders its citizens is bad. Duh.

They just showed protests in NY on TV against the war in Iran, with white liberals carrying Iranian flags (not the good kind). One person: "Let the Iranians decide their future." There probably weren't many Iranians at that protest... 😒

@tcbaggins @realDavidBJr You’re just doing it wrong

@realDavidBJr seems to be working as intended

@CovidiusNaso @B_Godone @AdinHaykin1 @Alexx_Rosenberg Don’t obfuscate the enemy. It is called Talmudic Judaism.

Because they literally stuck a Star of David on it and called us "the synagogue of Satan"

@Awesome_Jew_ You do know you are going to be deported to Israel, right?

To be clear: yes, his name is mentioned. But he is not in the files in connection with any sex trafficking. That was my point. The community note is misleading.

@nigrasaurus @__CadaVer_ @Wendigoon8 my favorite pastime is also white knighting for jewish pedophiles

@__CadaVer_ @Wendigoon8 None of these pictures show any of this. The shot with the raw chickens and "the human foot" is photoshopped. The shot with the woman laying on the floor does not prove rape in the slightest. And the other two shots show exactly nothing controversial. Do you even use your brain?

Unfathomably evil. You’re not angry enough.