Exercise Biology

2.3K posts

Exercise Biology

Exercise Biology

@ExerciseBiology

The Science of Exercise & Nutrition. Evidence-based 'opinions' & 'expertise"

USA เข้าร่วม Aralık 2009
179 กำลังติดตาม1.8K ผู้ติดตาม
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@DrAndyGalpin Or could be the other way: sports injuries were significantly associated with poor sleep!
English
1
0
3
102
Andy Galpin, PhD
Andy Galpin, PhD@DrAndyGalpin·
"Poor Sleepers were significantly more likely to report sports injuries than Steady Sleepers, with 68% injury probability." Study utilized 425 recreational (novice & experienced) runners; 57% male/43% female mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/1…
Andy Galpin, PhD tweet media
English
25
99
831
86.7K
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@drjohnm The question is did they actually 'improve'? Was it simply chance finding that is often the case with sec. outcomes
English
0
0
1
762
John Mandrola, MD
John Mandrola, MD@drjohnm·
Fascinating post 👇🏻 Here is a content expert ignoring the totally null primary endpoint and calling a “negative” trial a “win” b/c the active arm improved important secondary endpoints. Oh the tension!
Anil Makam@AnilMakam

High-flow oxygen for the win in acute hypoxic respiratory failure Trial confirms practice & previous studies Less intubation: -NNT 17 with benefits emerging by day 1 & plateauing by day 4 Less perceived shortness of breath: -NNT 7 for improvement in dyspnea -5 point benefit on a 100-point visual scale nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NE…

English
5
2
32
25K
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@cremieuxrecueil Altman & Bland wrote about tis issue in their 'Statistical Notes' in BMJ back in 2000's!
English
0
0
1
398
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
My latest article is about a common, but under-discussed method of p-hacking. Once you start noticing it, you see it everywhere! Link below.
Crémieux tweet media
English
18
41
419
85.8K
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@Brady_H The debate is similar to 1RM testing vs grip strength in older adults. GS is used primarily due to safety, accessibility, ease of use and such. Importantly, both are just 'markers'.
English
0
0
1
62
Brady Holmer
Brady Holmer@Brady_H·
Another day, another “attack” on VO₂ max. A few friendly reminders: 1. Metabolic equivalents (METs) are NOT “just a measure of exertion.” They are an expression (albeit an estimate) of *oxygen consumption* derived from direct measures. 2. If cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a strong biomarker of longevity, so is VO₂ max—because VO₂ max is *the* gold-standard measure of CRF.
Brady Holmer tweet mediaBrady Holmer tweet media
English
9
1
48
7K
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@theliverdoc @esSENSEGlobal Hopefully, moderator will clearly define what is pseudoscience before the debate..bcos there will be a lot of goal post shifting as usual.
English
1
0
2
548
TheLiverDoc™
TheLiverDoc™@theliverdoc·
Reminder about the upcoming debate with Vaidya Vasundhara. LIVE STREAMING on YouTube tomorrow. 14th March, 2026 (Saturday) at 3PM (India) on Neuronz Channel. Please come for some entertainmemt. I'll be carrying Ibuprofen. @esSENSEGlobal youtube.com/c/neuronz
TheLiverDoc™ tweet media
TheLiverDoc™@theliverdoc

My debate with Ayurveda practitioner Vaidya Vasundhara Sadineni is happening on 14th March, 2026 (this Saturday) at 3PM on Neuronz YouTube channel. youtube.com/c/neuronz I am prepared. But also brushing up on data and studies....while my opponent is also gearing up for the debate like this....🥲 instagram.com/vasuvedaoffici…

English
53
83
581
34.7K
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@drjohnm I do suspect they used standard errors (SE) instead of SD's to calculate effect size. The SD's are way too small!
English
0
0
0
98
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@drjohnm @anish_koka Vinay did have a great pedestal to convince his critics by talking through podcast / You Tube video about his rationale for certain controversial decisions. Even you suggested. FDA even had their own you tube channel. Publishing his thoughts in a NEJM article wont..
English
0
0
0
169
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@dnunan79 @LGHemkens Thanks Lars. A good saying in EBM, "Evidence is not enough". Patient values/preference become more important when evidence certainty is low/very low.
English
0
0
2
31
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@BesuraTaansane Yes and that made it look like it was really close. We should have won by over 20 runs!!
English
0
0
0
22
Sameer
Sameer@BesuraTaansane·
Frankly speaking if Bethell had not got run out, he would have easily clubbed Dube for 5 sixes Even Jofra smashed him for 3 sixes 😩😩😩 #INDvENG
English
430
185
4.8K
264.2K
Leah Pierson
Leah Pierson@leah_pierson·
omg this title, this paper
Leah Pierson tweet media
English
45
1.3K
19.4K
620.1K
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@drjohnm Yes. The famous saying in EBM: Evidence is not enough..
English
0
0
2
677
Exercise Biology รีทวีตแล้ว
Brad Schoenfeld, PhD
Brad Schoenfeld, PhD@BradSchoenfeld·
Big thanks to @theproof for hosting @TheAlanAragon and I for an in depth podcast focusing on building muscle over the lifespan. We delve extensively (over 3 hours!) both into how exercise- and nutrition-related strategies can stave off the aging process. It was particularly fun to be able to interact and exchange ideas with Alan, who I consider one of the world's top minds in sports nutrition. Check out the episode on the link below. youtube.com/watch?v=YQagUs…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
7
10
89
10.6K
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@EricTopol Every study using METs either used a submax or all out max test protocol. METs were then calculated from the FINAL speed/grade! If you are saying you could simply do a sub max test & "estimate" your CRF using time/HR without measuring oxygen, you are spot on.
English
0
0
0
381
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@EricTopol The advice of 1gm is mainly coming from bodybuilders. There might be a benefit to bodybuilders, especially the ones on drugs. But even that conclusion would require a study.
English
0
0
0
51
Eric Topol
Eric Topol@EricTopol·
Is there a basis for very high protein intake, like 1 g per pound per day?
Eric Topol tweet media
English
68
248
1.5K
331.4K
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@fperrywilson "These findings suggest that assessing strength and promoting its maintenance are instrumental for optimal aging." Strong conclusion, but study just on females so half the population excluded! Also, they didn't measure muscle nor resiliency so just speculation at best.
English
0
0
0
70
F. Perry Wilson, MD MSCE
F. Perry Wilson, MD MSCE@fperrywilson·
OK we know exercise saves lives. We know muscle strength predicts survival. But is it the muscle itself that's protective — or just that stronger people move more? A really elegant new study finally disentangles this (in women at least). Thread 👇
English
3
5
18
4.5K
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@foundmyfitness Factually wrong: Calories weren't "matched"... The comparison was just "traditional diet advice". They also compared to NO intervention or waiting list, still no difference in weight loss!
English
0
0
1
135
Dr. Rhonda Patrick
Dr. Rhonda Patrick@foundmyfitness·
A lot of people are sharing this new meta-analysis as proof that “intermittent fasting has no benefits.” I don’t think that’s what it shows. What it does show is pretty straightforward. In controlled trials (where calories are matched), IF produces weight loss similar to standard dietary advice, and generally better than doing nothing. That’s exactly what you’d predict if the driver is energy intake. But for many people (including myself), changing the timing of eating using IF/TRE is a simpler, more sustainable way to achieve a calorie deficit than tracking food. There’s also evidence that fasting can influence glucose regulation, circadian biology, sleep, and even cognitive function. So I wouldn’t read this as “IF doesn’t work.” I’d read it as IF isn’t magic when calories are controlled, but it can be a useful tool for adherence and may have timing-related benefits beyond weight.
Dr. Rhonda Patrick tweet media
English
84
63
887
98.6K
Exercise Biology
Exercise Biology@ExerciseBiology·
@nickmmark Sort of expected considering they spend 750 million & would have taken FDA to court!
English
0
0
0
78