Pepintor
2.7K posts
@NornQueenKya I really wanna have Malcadors or Valdors for my Krieg army! Think they'll work as Rogal Dorn proxies?
English
Darn GW. Showing off that tank i accidently bought but cant play in 40k...
You can play the other malcador chassis though! Just not this one!!! Grrrr
English
@escobedev @Nickname_BT Please go back to arguing with yourself and never bother me again with your inane retardation
English
@FirstofLeo @Nickname_BT If it’s down to insults, I’ll take that as you not having an argument left. Inmature play only remarks how underdeveloped your prefrontal cortex is.
English
i cant imagine a world where >50% of people would actually choose blue without coordination when their individual life is on the verge
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@escobedev @Nickname_BT I think you might actually be touched in the head
English
@FirstofLeo @Nickname_BT And I’m not arguing against a position you didn’t hold you’re the one insisting against the blues, which only works if you assume red goal is the only valid one. If your point is just that you’d choose red, that’s fine. I’m just desagreeing on your current view of blues.
English
@FirstofLeo @Japaota2025 @Nickname_BT As someone who has met many Chinese Indians, I don’t trust all but I certainly trust the majority
English
@escobedev @Nickname_BT you are arguing against positions i never claimed to hold. And you were the one that said reds were incapable of empathy. I think im wasting my time
English
@FirstofLeo @Nickname_BT No contradiction. I said both are rational depending on the goal.
If your goal is individual survival, red is rational.
If your goal is maximizing total survival, blue is rational.
What you’re doin is assuming only one goal is valid and anything else, irrational. That’s not logic
English
@BenFerber You do realize you lose in a real world scenario right?
English
antisocial freaks on here keep trying to re-run this poll to get their preferred "kill half the planet" choice to win, and it won't. something they can't grasp is that most people would rather be dead than inhabit a world solely filled with selfish freaks like them
English
January 6th. Alex Pretti. Renee Good. Etc etc etc etc. Bitch please.
The Drunk Republican@DrunkRepub
Libs will try to kill Trump 3 times and then be like “the country is more divided than ever under Trump” lmao
English
@RandomSprint Literally doesnt work with that scenario... good job retard!
English
If over 50% of us hold the line, we all live.
"No!!! But if I run away, I'll definitely live! I'm so rational!"
English
@becometheknight Ah yes the virtue earned from a hypothetical. You were never in danger and have risked nothing, good job retard...
English
Because we value human life, and are willing to risk death to avoid harming others. It's called self-sacrificial love. Try it sometime.
Verai@TheRealVerai
@MrBeast I'll never understand why anyone would push the blue button
English
“Everyone.” Children. The elderly. The otherwise incompetent. Those who press red are selfish. Rational, yes, but selfish. In an ideal world, where everyone was rational, everyone would indeed pick Red. But that’s never gonna happen. There will always be someone who picks Blue.
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@escobedev @Nickname_BT You make a habit of contradicting yourself?
English
@FirstofLeo @Nickname_BT Dude, it’s not that blues can’t comprehend red mentality. We do, red guarantees individual survival. It’s reds who can’t compehend blue mentality. There’s collective survival and individual survival, you choose what your goal is and you’ll get opposite answers. Both are rational.
English
@sporadica Just admit you’re not brave enough to save humanity so you think others couldn’t be brave enough either.
English
@MrOvis_ Now model out the 2nd and 3rd order consequences of “winning” if you do.
English
Red is indeed the midwit button. Everything people are posting trying to change the wording of the question, making statistical charts, and trying to make claims of game theory is just crash out cope from those who thought they were virtue signaling their logical prowess.
notsoErudite@notsoErudite
Since everyone was very curious my answer, my answer is obviously blue. Gotta save the naive, the kids, the blue lovers, and the principally hope-pilled people. You red button pickers need therapy.
English
@shunnedmorlock In the real world under threat of death blue is losing 9 out of 10 times
English
If 100% of people vote blue, no one dies. If 100% of people vote red, no one dies. This is true.
If 51% of people vote blue, no one dies. If 51% of people vote red, 49% of people die.
If our goal is to minimize death, it is far easier to get 51% to act in concert than 100%.
essentialsalts@untimelysalts
English
The chance is either:
Blue: More than 50% votes for everyone to live.
or
Red: Exactly 100% votes for everyone to live.
If you vote red then you're objectively a moron and a danger to society.
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@Keegan59992745 Survival of the fittest, you can always have another
English
