HashingZap ✝️

@OMApproach Whatever the reason, its looking nefarious.

Do you think DNA tests were designed to trace certain ancient bloodlines of interest, or are they building genetic datasets that could be used for something nefarious, especially when the civilization collapses?

Even if they have heard about it, your acquaintances are likely skeptical of ECDO. As they should be- extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to quote Carl Sagan. This is the first video installment in a series that I hope will be useful for addressing that skepticism. youtu.be/EPb5_hX-ruw

6,000 years ago? You dont' say... 😎

@OMApproach @MSEdwards30 "Filling a container with dirt from Central Africa and water will generally result in an opaque, murky red, orange, or rusty-brown color."

@MSEdwards30 The Red flood in the 'Destruction of Mankind', is the Geophysical Event...

Why does almost every ancient civilization begin with a story of a great flood? Coincidence... or?

What's the biggest historical event you think we've been lied to about? Mine is the desertification of the Sahara.

@OMApproach That is a good one. I will select the history of civilization in the Americas.

Two professors have corrected my science on the “mantle heaving” aspect of the pole shift. We know which land will rise and which will fall. I should have seen it sooner, but better late than never. Video coming tonight- be sure to catch it on our YouTube channel around 5/6pm mountain time.

@SunWeatherMan I look forward to seeing this!

Happy to adjust the physics. Everything simulated is using precise calculations. I don't simulate fantasy, but I acknowledge there might be missing physics to what is being calculated. The most common disagreement comes from how the water flows over British Columbia, but if you've driven through Nevada you'll see that the water flow does align with geography there and the reason Canada gets hit harder is due to where North America ends up during the tilt. Here's why the inundation is so much worse there than in, say, Mexico. BC is near the old pole and shifts nearly 50° off the new axis, through the equatorial bulge. Being closer to the old pole creates incredible water height. While Mexico, being closer to the equator, does not have to contend with the force and distance to the equator - making the catastrophic inundation phase MUCH shorter in duration. That said, I am constantly working towards accuracy. I don't claim its 100% accurate. I am merely trying to get this simulation program to a state where I feel great confidence in it. Just sharing my work as I ... work. 😅

@HashZappa I think the angle of attack of the water is gonna come from different direction than the ones that you’ve identified.

Ben says my physics is wrong for his simulation. He's probably correct, since I'm using ECDO mechanisms within the mantle and his theory doesn't involve ECDO at all. I am also unable to add his modeling due to much of it being super theoretical and not well-understood. However, the rotation here is correct. x.com/HashZappa/stat…

@HashZappa @EthicalSkeptic Where's the equator in a 72 degree tilt?

Max water heights during @EthicalSkeptic's ECDO State 1 > State 2 transition. As close as I could get given all the motion involved, anyway. One thing stands out vs. Ben Davidson's model. A 104° tilt is quite a bit more catastrophic than a 72° tilt. Absolute carnage is ECDO... 😳

@BigDTwo @ddd1ms Might as well throw the Golden Gate in for free.

@ddd1ms @HashZappa Finally... oceanfront property in Arizona!

This sim project is wearing me down. I'm going to get the ECDO models out, and then publish the simulation calculation data for community feedback... might be good to get some outside opinions here. Going to take a few nights off from there. I feel like all I think about lately is what might be missing or needs further review etc etc. After 4 months of it, I'm tired. 😂

Yeah, I thought the same about why oceans were not moving as I expected. Under a rapid TPW event solid crust cannot reorient quickly, so the ocean must fill the gap of a misaligned solid earth. They don't flood from their own momentum, but rather it floods chasing a reoriented potential the slow forming crust hasn't caught up to yet. I'll be publishing all of the stuff this simulation tool does in the coming days. It certainly goes against what you'd think would happen because there are just so many dynamics at play. I'm at the point where getting feedback and insight from others is going to help me chase down any missed or forgotten pieces of this puzzle.

@HashZappa @EthicalSkeptic But how would that movement affect the oceans of fluid magma in the mantle? They're not as viscous, but much more dense so I'd imagine greater inertia pulling them away from axis. Where would the weak spots on the crust be where the mantle pushes through during this event?

1. A dramatic single month increase in global oceanic temperature, followed by air temps, followed by CO2 2. A shudder in the Earth's Chandler-style wobble 3. Acceleration of the geomagentic north pole into Russia towards the Bay of Bengal 4. Widening of the South Atlantic Anomaly and drop in the overall geomagnetic field strength 5. Schumann Resonance chaos 6. Significant uptick in larger earthquakes and volcanic activity.

@mrckjmsbtch @sunfellow @EthicalSkeptic Yeah, the further away from the rilt angle the worse it gets. North America is in a tough spot for ECDO.

@HashZappa @sunfellow @EthicalSkeptic Water heights aside, how fast would the crust actually move when decoupled? Where i'm at in WA state, its about 710mph. Pretty sure squishies aren't going to survive a 710mph shift.

@weatherwarsinfo I dont think I will advance to that point. I have just enough power to run these locally overnight. So not too bad tbh. Worked a lot on optimizing load too.

@HashZappa I’m curious about the hardware you are running these models on, can the compute load be shared with others?

@Iwo1945 No, I agree. I am quite fascinated with the idea of the Hudson Bay region being a north pole region during the last ice age. I wish to explore that more at some point.

@HashZappa he landed at an upper constraint of about 40 degrees. I think 30 degrees is the maximum, mostly inferred by looking at the physics of Earth's angular momentum. Of course, I could be wrong, but I still love the discussions happening. Just my two cents.

@Iwo1945 I do have interest in Hapgood and a less severe model. Hoping to do more with that once I am done with this software program.

@HashZappa I think the overall severity is limited... Earth does not perform like a free-floating body so I don't think a full Dzhanibekov Effect will be a reality...I do think that the outer body can shift but is more constrained...I am even more conservative than Hapgood (2)

@BraveCatGamer Dang.

6.7/6.9 struck central Indonesia. If this isn't related to the 7.8 that struck South philippines, then seismology be damned. Everything is connected, and the "professionals" are clowns. We should have earthquake forecasting down by now, it is only a matter of who is controlling the data, agencies, and broader academic knowledge.

@SeedOilDsrspctr Agreed. Now I am a grandpa in my 40s. Life is good.

>starting a family in your 20’s