ItSpinsFaster

@TredouxNanette @grok @0xkarasy @alphafox Look also at the bogus excuse. And these things are allegedly coming for our jobs, LOL.

@grok @0xkarasy @alphafox @Grok I hope you are learning from this

GenZ is cooked

@sleenastevens @beaver51581 @Mandlbaur @lorenafreed @Ferrari_ball @azforeman @grok @logic_quantum @simonmaechling He is clearly incapable of admitting that he is wrong: there's a 10-years long sunken-cost fallacy preventing it. His entire sense of self worth depends completely on this. Acknowledging that he has been wrong all along would be like killing his own personality.

@beaver51581 @Mandlbaur @lorenafreed @Ferrari_ball @azforeman @ItSpinsFaster @grok @logic_quantum @simonmaechling John has used the "mass psychosis" statement many times. He also asked "Why do scientists behave like psychopaths when shown that angular momentum conservation can be trivially falsified?" on Quora in October. After 10 years of this, he cannot accept that he's possibly wrong.

Conspiracy theorists create a world where they can’t be wrong. Evidence doesn’t matter, because they’ve already decided that disagreement = corruption.

@beaver51581 @Mandlbaur @lorenafreed @Ferrari_ball @azforeman @sleenastevens @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling "Everyone except me is insane" is exactly what a sane person would say, right?

@Mandlbaur @lorenafreed @Ferrari_ball @azforeman @sleenastevens @ItSpinsFaster @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling Oh sorry, I must have missed the context. Please can you tell me what the context is? Because I thought you were saying there that everyone apart from you is insane.

@Ferrari_ball @beaver51581 @Mandlbaur @lorenafreed @azforeman @sleenastevens @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling With the proper setup, we could solve the energy crisis: just let enormous balls on strings lift weights effortlessly and exploit their gravity to gain free energy.

@beaver51581 @Mandlbaur @lorenafreed @azforeman @sleenastevens @ItSpinsFaster @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling That's indeed the greatest discovery since Aristotle: A ball on a string doesn't rotate as fast as the textbook promised. Why restricting to 1/10 of the radius? There is much more discrepancy to be discovered when going to 1/100 (the old professor producing energy for a city).

@Ferrari_ball @beaver51581 @Mandlbaur @lorenafreed @azforeman @sleenastevens @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling It also fixes all issues with space missions, including those that have fuckall to do with orbital mechanics. After all, Elon secretly uses it to give a definitive edge to SpaceX rockets.

@beaver51581 @Mandlbaur @lorenafreed @azforeman @sleenastevens @ItSpinsFaster @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling In particular the conservation of angular energy is very successful: It predicts that ALL balls on a string reach exactly 1200 rpm (with gentle pulls), it gives better predictions for solar eclipses, it explains dark matter and the strange behaviour of the Atlas/3i comet.

@Ferrari_ball @beaver51581 @Mandlbaur @lorenafreed @azforeman @sleenastevens @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling I just started working on a revision of physics with angular energy as the central quantity. I just realised that its time derivative must be proportional to the torque. Hence, either dimensional analysis is wrong or there's a fundamental time constant to be found.

@beaver51581 @Mandlbaur @lorenafreed @azforeman @sleenastevens @ItSpinsFaster @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling Of course you are, because with this simple experiment (best performed handheld with kitchen equipment or children's toys) you can basically prove all existing physics wrong - from Kepler over Newton to Einstein and all the quantum voodoo noone needs.

@Ferrari_ball @Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling The list of things he thinks he knows about physics and actually doesn't is unmanageably long.

@ItSpinsFaster @Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling Countless engineers have shown already, where and why he is wrong if he refuses to include friction in his theoretical description. John thinks that theoretical=ideal, which would bring theoretical physics on his freshman level.

@sleenastevens @Ferrari_ball @Mandlbaur @lorenafreed @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling He is indeed. He's going to find himself screaming into the void again in no time. Then the cycle can start all over.

@Ferrari_ball @Mandlbaur @ItSpinsFaster @lorenafreed @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling He's on another blocking spree!! 🎉

@Mandlbaur @spinnyastro @sleenastevens @Ferrari_ball @grok @lorenafreed @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling You may fuck off now, John. You are the one desperate for attention and throwing blocking tantrums will get you as much as you deserve: none.

@Mandlbaur @spinnyastro @sleenastevens @Ferrari_ball @grok @lorenafreed @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling If you keep injecting in conversations you have no business in, I will have to block you.

@Mandlbaur @Ferrari_ball @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling Qualitative examples can't falsify anything. Stop making shit up.

@ItSpinsFaster @Ferrari_ball @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling It is false to claim that an established example cannot falsify the theory. This is either dishonest or irrational.

@Mandlbaur @spinnyastro @sleenastevens @Ferrari_ball @grok @lorenafreed @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling There is no evidence that the theory doesn't agree with reality. You never compared the theory with an experiment consistent with its requirements. Stop making shit up.

@ItSpinsFaster @spinnyastro @sleenastevens @Ferrari_ball @grok @lorenafreed @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling If the theory does not agree with reality then tbe theory is wrong. It is insane to try and blame the person using the theory for not including extra factors to alter the predictions closer to the reality. That is the opposite of science.

@Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @Ferrari_ball @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling First year physics is not nearly enough to equip someone with the knowledge required to make predictions, especially a mediocre student who failed and dropped out. Stop pretending competences you don't remotely possess.

@ItSpinsFaster @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @Ferrari_ball @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling I studies first year physics which covers the subject matter. Please stop personally attacking me and concede that my paper cannot be genuinely faulted.

@Mandlbaur @Ferrari_ball @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling It is mentally deficient to claim that laws can be tested with half-assed qualitative demos that where never designed for that purpose and have no measure whatsoever enacted against confounding factors.

@ItSpinsFaster @Ferrari_ball @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling The claim that an accepted standard example of conservation of angular momentum cannot experimentally falsify conservation of angular momentum is mentally deficient reasoning. No offence intended but this argument is childish evasion. Please try and be reasonable?

@spinnyastro @sleenastevens @Mandlbaur @Ferrari_ball @grok @lorenafreed @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling "second"

@sleenastevens @Mandlbaur @ItSpinsFaster @Ferrari_ball @grok @lorenafreed @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling Second accounts, just to argue with JM?! Who would do such a thing ;-)

@Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @Ferrari_ball @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling What's crazy is a confused layman with no education on the subject whatsoever believing that he knows the purpose and content of textbooks better than the people who write and apply them.

@ItSpinsFaster @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @Ferrari_ball @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling Claiming that a textbook literal prediction is not a prediction is effing crazy

@Mandlbaur @Ferrari_ball @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling Your argument relies on the assumption that the classroom demonstration has experimental validity apt at testing the law. This is motte & bailey fallacy. Stop being dishonest.

@ItSpinsFaster @Ferrari_ball @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling Mh proof stands because I am not presenting any experiment. I present an axiomatic failure. This, however is an attempt to defeat my proof which requires experiment and not demonstration. Cut the incompetent time wasting crap please?

@Mandlbaur @spinnyastro @sleenastevens @Ferrari_ball @grok @lorenafreed @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling Textbook physics is not for making predictions. Stop pretending that you know more than you actually do (zero).

@ItSpinsFaster @spinnyastro @sleenastevens @Ferrari_ball @grok @lorenafreed @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling It is the case in textbook physics either fault the maths or concede of fuck off.

@Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @Ferrari_ball @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling Claiming that the misapplication of a teaching model with simplifying unrealistic assumptions is a "prediction" is mentally deficient. Stop pretending expertise you don't have.

@ItSpinsFaster @sleenastevens @lorenafreed @Ferrari_ball @grok @tarapatton555 @logic_quantum @simonmaechling Claiming that the prediction of theory proving the theory wrong is a strawman is mentally deficient.