Jamie GillGuyan

25.1K posts

Jamie GillGuyan banner
Jamie GillGuyan

Jamie GillGuyan

@JamieGuyan

Host and producer of @tlkopod - available on all good podcast providers 👌

Aberdeen เข้าร่วม Aralık 2010
665 กำลังติดตาม411 ผู้ติดตาม
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
@NathSalt1 The KMI panel agreed with both the on field official and VAR not intervening. The independent panel that has 3 ex-players on it.
English
0
0
0
418
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
@Jackiebidu Hair pulling , like spitting, is never challenging for the ball as it’s not a footballing action. Like a strike with the arm or foot might be. It will always come under violent conduct for that reason.
English
0
0
0
48
Biduuu!
Biduuu!@Jackiebidu·
Fraud imbecile here conveniently ignored - if the player is not going for ball Martinez was constantly looking at ball
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan

@cmwinterburn The official was bang on. Won’t be criticised by the panel. You can disagree with the law, which is IFAB. But the officials did their job.

English
1
0
0
84
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
@_dan14_ @crease_monkey @cmwinterburn Does it obviously mean that if it doesn’t say it? And you said ‘barely a pull’ which means there was a pull👍 Easy solution to this is don’t pull hair. DCL has played against dozens of other players this seasons and they don’t seem to have ‘accidentally’ ‘barely pulled’ his hair
English
0
0
0
18
Danny
Danny@_dan14_·
@JamieGuyan @crease_monkey @cmwinterburn No obviously it means adequate force, which we have seen hair pulls with more force this season that haven’t been given red due into inadequate force. I also didn’t admit there was a pull that’s the point. Stop trying to be a smart ass it doesn’t suit you
English
1
0
0
19
Chris Winterburn
Chris Winterburn@cmwinterburn·
Would imagine there is growing concern about the standard of officiating in the Premier League. Martinez red card this evening was laughably bad, especially when you consider it wasn’t an on-field red card that was required to be checked. They actively looked for a decision.
English
21
120
989
19.5K
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
@ErinGrieve17 Makes you wonder what people think taxes should be spent on. I’d be very happy for a society that feeds its children. If it means some millionaires’ children get fed to make sure we feed kids in poverty then that feels like a better way round than kids in poverty going hungry.
English
1
0
1
394
Erin Grieve
Erin Grieve@ErinGrieve17·
If I was paying taxes I’d be pretty happy for some of that to go towards children getting a slice of toast and an apple because their parents need to get to work before school starts. What a bizarre thing to be angry about.
Julia Hartley-Brewer@JuliaHB1

The breakfasts are not free. They are paid for by taxes - mostly on parents who feed their own kids. Most of these 10,000 children would have had a perfectly healthy breakfast at home without these clubs. This isn't about helping the poorest kids, it's the state taking over the basic job of parenting.

English
469
88
1.4K
96.8K
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
@_dan14_ @crease_monkey @cmwinterburn A. There’s ’force’ in everything. Admitting there’s a pull means it had ‘force’. But - the law doesn’t say that. You’re quoting a screenshot which will be guidance of some description. The law is 12.4 violent conduct para 2.
English
1
0
0
29
Jamie GillGuyan รีทวีตแล้ว
Carl Anka
Carl Anka@Ankaman616·
I'm so sick of football executives saying young people don't have the attention span for 90 minute games and prefer highlights. They absolutely have an appetite for full matches. It's the fact that highlights are free that make them more appealing to the new gen.
Seb Stafford-Bloor@SebSB

The way football is willing to contort itself in a way to appeal to younger people without reducing ticket prices is astounding.

English
36
522
5.3K
178.1K
Chris Winterburn
Chris Winterburn@cmwinterburn·
@JamieGuyan I agree they are badly let down by the laws, but also anyone who looks at that and thinks it’s something worthy of showing a red card for and putting their name/face to that decision shouldn’t be anywhere near football.
English
4
2
16
880
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
@d_andradesport @loogantwit It’s binary, the referee didn’t see a hair pull and there was a hair pull. It doesn’t get clearer or more obvious. You can argue whether you like the rule (long standing rule implemented as recently as January). But clear and obvious doesn’t come into it!
English
0
0
0
27
Daniel Andrade
Daniel Andrade@d_andradesport·
@loogantwit It's just ridiculously soft and highlights once again that the game is going in the wrong direction. They're a CF and CB who want to tussle. Tell DCL to get on with it. Almost like they used it as an opportunity to get involved. Wasn't clear and obvious.
English
1
0
0
18
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
@Millar_Colin @Ankaman616 @JackPittBrooke I find it baffling that anyone would condone hair pulling. It’s never ever an accident and it’s pathetic, childish and completely avoidable. Martinez had 100% control of that situation and whether he pulls his hair. Just because DCL isn’t hurt shouldn’t mean it isn’t a red.
English
1
0
0
89
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
@Millar_Colin @Ankaman616 @JackPittBrooke It’s a totally and utterly different situation. There are categories of violent conduct, hair pull has 0 threshold, it doesn’t have to be colloquial ‘violence’. There are other categories of violent conduct that also have different thresholds. They aren’t squarely comparable.
English
1
0
0
79
Jack Pitt-Brooke
Jack Pitt-Brooke@JackPittBrooke·
Not sure about a system where that is a VAR red card but Brobbey on Romero/Kinsky is not.
English
58
220
2.5K
120K
Colin Millar
Colin Millar@Millar_Colin·
@JackPittBrooke Reflective of an officiating system that is actively removing subjectivity from decision-making. An entirely inconsequential hair pull = clearly categorised red card. A deliberate push resulting in serious injury = not meeting any arbitrary threshold for intervention.
English
21
89
754
52.9K
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
I stand corrected. Seems to be the ‘accidental hair pull’ brigade. You’d think if it was so easily done by accident we’d have seen it a lot more often 👀
English
0
0
0
58
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
Here comes the ‘he hardly even pulled his hair’ brigade!
English
1
0
0
83
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
@FreeNwakali He’s looking at the offside line (rightly) as he takes the shot, which is lightening quick. By the time he turns his head the bounce has happened and he can’t guess. Extremely harsh to criticise that. The subs don’t know at all they’re just screaming for it like the fans were.
English
0
0
0
150
Jamie GillGuyan
Jamie GillGuyan@JamieGuyan·
@geeman909 There’s no way a Lino can see that , he’s looking at the offside line the shot flashes in he needs to change his view and he’s nowhere near in line (rightly ). We need goal line technology. But an assistant cannot ever honestly have said that’s 100% a goal.
English
0
0
0
277