
Julian Luttrell
15.4K posts

Julian Luttrell
@JulianLuttrell
Sceptical technologist, cook, lapsed cosmologist (-+++), genealogist, parent. Ignorant know-it-all. Born at 313ppm. All opinions are my own.








What is going on?!? Wow!



🎯 LLMs are very useful, but they are completely data-based and data is by definition only ever about the past. To write something new, you have to go beyond, and on your own.

🚨Joe Rogan: Eric Weinstein "The successor to spacetime is the Observerse" 🤯 Overcoming the spacetime speed limit... "The successor to spacetime, I'm happy to predict this on your show, will be named the observerse, which is a combination of not just using a four-dimensional space-time manifold, but a 14 and a four-dimensional space simultaneously." #ufotwitter #uapX Source: youtube.com/watch?v=4OKNS5…




So glad Reform is running several massive local government budgets for vital services. Please stop voting for these utter imbeciles.


Eric Weinstein says after the last episode on @AmericanALCHMY with Eric Davis he was officially contacted by many inside the gov. It created a lot of chatter.. Says there was a group looking for help with disclosure..

I am getting tired of reading 'experts' like LeCun repeatedly claiming that our AIs are nowhere near human-level intelligence. Let us look at the evidence. US universities rank students based on standardized tests like the SAT. Current AIs achieve near-perfect SAT scores. They also beat tests like the GRE. A few years ago, it was notable when early ChatGPT scored ~120 on an IQ test, a common measure of human intelligence. An IQ of 120 is well above average. Current AIs reportedly have IQ scores similar to those of leading scientists. It is not just in tests. I can ask an AI to produce a science paper that looks undistinguishable from what a PhD level student could do. I just have to give it the data. Better yet, from a prompt, agents can run the experiments and collect the data, and then write the papers. Those of us who try to get work done with AI know what is possible. You can't possibly just say 'this is nowhere near human-level intelligence'. In software, good AIs show a greater mastery of, say, C++, than your average software engineering professor. You could just build a formal test to prove it. The difficulty is that the professors would refuse to take your tests. At this point point, someone will object 'yeah, but your AI can't do this simple thing that we can all do'. Fine. These AIs do not have *human* intelligence. They are very much not human beings. They are something like alien intelligence. They can code straight in assembly language, but have trouble counting characters in words. But that's the result of trade-offs. A dog or a monkey can solve some problems faster than you can. But let us be fair. As a species, these AIs have definitively 'human-level intelligence'. You can't spend decades setting up cognitive tests for human beings, have these AIs beat us in these tests and then say 'well, that's not real intelligence'. Come on !


It's easier to find a salad in the US than it is in the UK... I wish I was joking but salads are standard in most US restaurants including McDonald's. In the UK it's rare to find a salad of any kind in a pub or restaurant.





You don't have to believe me when I say the Casimir effect does not allow you to extract energy from the vacuum. You could just do the maths. You must first change the boundary condition which, guess what, requires that you put in the energy which you can then extract again.












