Kees🫶
40.9K posts
Kees🫶 รีทวีตแล้ว
Newton Vietnam Content Bounty Round 1 – Official Winner Announcement
Sau hơn 2 tuần diễn ra, Newton Vietnam Content Bounty Round 1 đã chính thức khép lại với rất nhiều bài viết chất lượng được gửi về từ cộng đồng.
Chúng tôi thực sự ấn tượng với chất lượng và chiều sâu của các bài dự thi. Từ những bài phân tích hạ tầng on-chain, giải thích về shared policy, đến các walkthrough và góc nhìn cá nhân, cộng đồng đã đóng góp rất nhiều nội dung giá trị giúp @newton_xyz trở nên dễ tiếp cận hơn.
Newton Vietnam xin công bố danh sách các bài viết chiến thắng của Round 1:
• 🥇Giải nhất: $200 - @ray_world0
• 🥈Giải nhì: $150 - @Kay_Dee4x
• 🥉Giải ba: $100 - @wezzyverse
• 🏅Các giải khuyến khích: $50 mỗi bài
@Delinitor8 - @keeskrypt - @princess_i5 - @when_tge - @Jokerrrrr02 - @davidbaseeth - @PeksinOnchain - @rudolphhh2000 - @CARTOONIST_MC1 - @robintwts - @luong4101992
Round 1 chỉ là bước khởi đầu. Newton Vietnam sẽ tiếp tục mở rộng các chương trình dành cho cộng đồng trong thời gian tới.
Hãy tiếp tục theo dõi các kênh chính thức và những hoạt động sắp tới của Newton tại Việt Nam và trên toàn cầu để cùng đóng góp và phát triển hệ sinh thái.
Cảm ơn tất cả mọi người đã tham gia và đóng góp 🙏
—
Newton Vietnam Content Bounty Round 1 – Official Winner Announcement
After more than two weeks, Newton Vietnam Content Bounty Round 1 has officially concluded with many high-quality entries submitted by the community.
We were truly impressed with the quality and depth of the entries. From analyses of on-chain infrastructure and explanations of shared policy to walkthroughs and personal perspectives, the community contributed a wealth of valuable content, making @newton_xyz more accessible.
Newton Vietnam is pleased to announce the winning entries for Round 1:
• 🥇 First Prize: $200 - @ray_world0
• 🥈 Second Prize: $150 - @Kay_Dee4x
• 🥉 Third Prize: $100 - @wezzyverse
• 🏅 Consolation Prizes: $50 each
@Delinitor8 - @keeskrypt - @princess_i5 - @when_tge - @Jokerrrrr02 - @davidbaseeth - @PeksinOnchain - @rudolphhh2000 - @CARTOONIST_MC1 - @robintwts - @luong4101992
Round 1 is just the beginning. Newton Vietnam will continue to expand its community programs in the future.
Please continue to follow Newton's official channels and upcoming activities in Vietnam and globally to contribute to and develop the ecosystem.
Thank you all for your participation and contributions 🙏
Magic Newton Vietnam@MagicNewton_VN
Tiếng Việt
A French mathematician from 1785 is one of the major reasons GenLayer’s consensus actually works.
In 1785, the Marquis de Condorcet published something that changed how we think about group decisions.
His finding was simple… if each person in a group has a better than 50% chance of being right, and they vote independently, the majority will converge on the correct answer.
The bigger the group, the more reliable that outcome becomes.
He called it the Jury Theorem.
The math has never been disproved.
••••
Now fast forward to 2026.
GenLayer is building a blockchain where AI models make decisions on behalf of smart contracts…
reading real world data, processing natural language, determining outcomes that no traditional contract could ever handle.
Who delivered quality work.
Whether a claim is valid.
Whether an event actually occurred.
Real judgments, not just binary conditions.
But here’s the problem nobody talks about.
Ask GPT a question.
Ask LLaMA the same question.
You get different answers.
On a regular application that’s fine.
On a blockchain where consensus determines truth, that’s a fundamental crisis.
You can’t build trustless infrastructure on top of models that disagree.
So GenLayer did something elegant, they let them disagree, and used that disagreement as a feature.
••••
When an Intelligent Contract needs to make a call, a Leader validator proposes a result.
A group of validators independently recompute it, each running their own model (GPT, LLaMA, Gemini), whatever they chose when they joined the network.
They don’t consult each other.
They don’t share reasoning.
They evaluate independently and vote.
Majority wins.
And if someone disputes the outcome, they trigger an appeal, more validators are pulled in, the pool grows, and the larger that pool gets, the closer the network moves toward truth.
That’s Condorcet’s theorem.
Rebuilt for AI.
Running on a blockchain.
••••
The part that makes it actually work though is the model diversity.
GenLayer doesn’t want every validator running GPT-4.
Same model means same training data, same biases, same blindspots, they’d be wrong together just as easily as right together.
The whole point of Condorcet’s theorem is independent voters.
The moment independence breaks down, so does the math.
GenLayer preserves it at the architecture level by making LLM diversity a deliberate design choice, not an afterthought.
••••
Bitcoin gave us trustless money.
Ethereum gave us trustless computation.
Both work because the rules are rigid and pre-written.
But the real world doesn’t run on rigid rules…
contracts get disputed, outcomes are subjective, context matters.
@GenLayer is building the layer that can actually handle that.
Trustless decision-making.
And the foundation it sits on was laid by a man who died during the French Revolution and never saw a computer in his life.
English
need them here for their sharwama fr
DC💎@0xdubemm
neven seen this item7go in the east... only in the south west
English
perle would've turned out differently during the inf0fi era, id explain
so they list on the kait0 LB announcing 1% of their TS for the yapdrop campaign
we start lying through our teeth about how it's building the next cure for cancer, and eradicating world's hunger
you tag me to your lies to gib it an inner ct touch of excellence and you earn humongous y4ps from it
on tge, i get high 5 figs and you get very high 2 figs
i post allos and tell you why you should work hard and build a brand, and you glazingly tell me congratulations with hope that i reply again for another y4p feast
and yes you earn y4ps again cos i did reply
so you see, i go home with 5 figs, you go home with high 2 figs and immaculate y4ps, and we live richily ever after
English
@unifyWeb3 @oxtochi I don't know if it's on my end
But the audio isn't clear
Feels like there's another sound playing underneath asides your voice
English
im sorry for your loss
post highly sponsored by @oxtochi
thanks for your attention to this matter
𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗙𝗬@unifyWeb3
interview went wrong!!!!
English
we finally got it, courtesy of @digiTektrades alpha dao
5x game packs for @pulsar_xyz
- follow @pulsar_xyz x @bona_ventures_
- comment “pulsar”
- join tg: t.me/Digitekalphas
24 hours ⏳
bona@bona_ventures_
discovered @pulsar_xyz, coming soon on canton. canton as an ecosystem is somewhat code-gated, but once you’re in, you can join project campaigns and earn from them. currently in talks with pulsar for game packs giveaway(more like an access i guess). worth a follow.
English
When you buy a memecoin and get rugged
Now you're forced to be a community member
English
Wait, let me get this straight…
So a project dropped a checker today, and the majority of the community members were ineligible
And now they launched a campaign with a condition that they have the right to terminate it at any point?
Or wasn’t it Perle that sprinkled ineligibilities this morning?
I’m just genuinely confused, tbh
Don't wanna put my eggs in broken baskets anymore
English
@KeesKrypt Omo which kind thing be this?
And I don create 2 remaining one 😂😂..
That PJ really get mind oo
English
@KeesKrypt screaming red flag red flag 😅
but things aren't always certain in this space
English
Happy Thursday, Mi amigos
It's the last day of Ramadan and I'm super excited about it 😌
I believe I'll be showing up here more often from next week...
Wishing y'all an amazing Thursday 🫶🌹
Kees🫶@KeesKrypt
A French mathematician from 1785 is one of the major reasons GenLayer’s consensus actually works. In 1785, the Marquis de Condorcet published something that changed how we think about group decisions. His finding was simple… if each person in a group has a better than 50% chance of being right, and they vote independently, the majority will converge on the correct answer. The bigger the group, the more reliable that outcome becomes. He called it the Jury Theorem. The math has never been disproved. •••• Now fast forward to 2026. GenLayer is building a blockchain where AI models make decisions on behalf of smart contracts… reading real world data, processing natural language, determining outcomes that no traditional contract could ever handle. Who delivered quality work. Whether a claim is valid. Whether an event actually occurred. Real judgments, not just binary conditions. But here’s the problem nobody talks about. Ask GPT a question. Ask LLaMA the same question. You get different answers. On a regular application that’s fine. On a blockchain where consensus determines truth, that’s a fundamental crisis. You can’t build trustless infrastructure on top of models that disagree. So GenLayer did something elegant, they let them disagree, and used that disagreement as a feature. •••• When an Intelligent Contract needs to make a call, a Leader validator proposes a result. A group of validators independently recompute it, each running their own model (GPT, LLaMA, Gemini), whatever they chose when they joined the network. They don’t consult each other. They don’t share reasoning. They evaluate independently and vote. Majority wins. And if someone disputes the outcome, they trigger an appeal, more validators are pulled in, the pool grows, and the larger that pool gets, the closer the network moves toward truth. That’s Condorcet’s theorem. Rebuilt for AI. Running on a blockchain. •••• The part that makes it actually work though is the model diversity. GenLayer doesn’t want every validator running GPT-4. Same model means same training data, same biases, same blindspots, they’d be wrong together just as easily as right together. The whole point of Condorcet’s theorem is independent voters. The moment independence breaks down, so does the math. GenLayer preserves it at the architecture level by making LLM diversity a deliberate design choice, not an afterthought. •••• Bitcoin gave us trustless money. Ethereum gave us trustless computation. Both work because the rules are rigid and pre-written. But the real world doesn’t run on rigid rules… contracts get disputed, outcomes are subjective, context matters. @GenLayer is building the layer that can actually handle that. Trustless decision-making. And the foundation it sits on was laid by a man who died during the French Revolution and never saw a computer in his life.
English
English
Web3 games lately rarely make it this easy to just jump in.
@LOLLandGame just dropped the @GIGACHADBAT board and you can play it right now without owning anything.
- availability runs till April 11th 2:00PM SGT that is 7:00AM WAT
- No NFT barrier
- no accessibility barriers "both free and premium mode available", with a bit of difference to earning between both.
the rest, just load in and start playing.
Played a few runs and it’s feels pretty straightforward but not brainless.
- You simply roll across the board,
- hit baseball mini-games, and your timing actually affects whether you land proper wins or just waste moves.
The best part about this?
is how it ties into @YGG_Play through these live quests;
Each win tier:
Gigachad Roller – Big Win
Gigachad Roller – Huge Win
Gigachad Roller – Mega Win
Gigachad Roller – Epic Win
Same board, same gameplay, but now your runs are tracked through these quests and converted into points as you hit each tier
Note: The free mode is only play and experience the thrill, while the premium mode allows you to earn through the questing tier which could be converted to abstract xp and ygg points here at yggplay.fun/games
From my gameplay, once you settle into the loop, it’s less about random rolls and more about understanding the board, timing your mini-game plays, and aiming for consistent mid–high tier wins.
That’s really the edge here...
learn first, then optimize your runs instead of merely overplaying.
Important note: check in on the YGG Play launchpad and enroll in the quests before you start playing, otherwise gameplay progress doesn't count.
so far, I've only managed to get the big win 😁, and curious how others are approaching the gameplay so far.
let me know if y'all have found a consistent way to hit better wins.
English
@KeesKrypt love the fact that the consensus here isn’t about agreement, it’s about structured disagreement converging into signal through independent model diversity.
English