Lee Slusher

1.1K posts

Lee Slusher banner
Lee Slusher

Lee Slusher

@LeeSlusherLLC

https://t.co/Snob2XiL4L https://t.co/E0S10MoEWc

United States เข้าร่วม Şubat 2022
423 กำลังติดตาม6.6K ผู้ติดตาม
Lee Slusher
Lee Slusher@LeeSlusherLLC·
@1_1savedbygrace Yes, that system became untenable. It was simply too much. How exactly they'll try to square that circle I don't know, but I think it was leverage for the reordering.
English
0
0
2
131
Daniel 🇺🇸
Daniel 🇺🇸@1_1savedbygrace·
@LeeSlusherLLC My only argument is that debt always ends 1 way, can only pile up 4 so long, & with history having pretty clear examples of the weight of debt on a people, they had 2 have known this need 4 a new system would exist as far back as at Jeckel island no? They’re just caught now no?
English
1
0
2
148
Lee Slusher
Lee Slusher@LeeSlusherLLC·
The US never had the military might to maintain hegemony. Hence the myth of US military supremacy. The real weapon was the cross-border, financialized leviathan capable of crashing the whole system. A new system is being arranged, I think.
English
4
3
24
1.2K
Lee Slusher
Lee Slusher@LeeSlusherLLC·
I think they'll bring this theater to an end when the new global system is ready, particularly the financial and economic components. Until then, it's a rigged game of musical chairs for oligarchs. The losers might not have even known they were playing when the game began.
English
1
5
24
1.8K
Lee Slusher
Lee Slusher@LeeSlusherLLC·
@BurnedOperator Yes. And coincidentally, a war in this particular place was always going to have the very impact we see unfolding.
English
1
0
2
67
Cannoneer Marine
Cannoneer Marine@BurnedOperator·
@LeeSlusherLLC Coincidentally, a war spanning the Middle East catastrophically impacting the global financial system will give all the bankers cover. Their crimes will yet again be buried, in some cases literally by the blame being laid upon the sand people.
English
1
0
2
75
Daniel 🇺🇸
Daniel 🇺🇸@1_1savedbygrace·
@LeeSlusherLLC There are no such thing as coincidences imho. I try explaining this to my wife but it never fits her arguments. lol.
English
1
0
1
60
Lee Slusher
Lee Slusher@LeeSlusherLLC·
@DagnyTaggart963 They're all in on it. The rest is theater for everyone else. Deadly theater.
English
1
1
10
426
T
T@nightwatcherT·
Vrem SUA sa ne apere dar cand sua are nevoie de o pista de aterizare pentru logistica lor intr-un razboi, noua ne e frica ca ne ataca barbosii in slapi. Pai atunci de ce dracu mai suntem in NATO daca nu vreti oricum sa ajutati nici un aliat? Ajutam Ukraina in schimb intr-un razboi, Ukraina care nu e nici un aliat si nici in NATO vs o tara mult mai periculoasa ca Iran. Oameni de paie.
Română
66
4
88
5.1K
Seeji Sundarakshan
Seeji Sundarakshan@Sseeji·
@LeeSlusherLLC Yes, people in the White House, the Military Estbmt and the Bankers are not Dumb. They are all in it, planning together. So, things are not random. The only Question is whether the things would work out the way they planned.
English
1
0
6
260
Lee Slusher
Lee Slusher@LeeSlusherLLC·
We can assume much more than that. As a purely military matter, the US/Israeli war aims were always absurd. Killing the Ayatollah was never going to topple Iran's government, and the missiles and drones Iran would fire in response were always going to cause this sort of precise, devastating damage. The Gulf Sheikdoms were always glass houses, and a real war with Iran was always going to wreak havoc on both the region and the global economy. This should remind us of Ukraine. Kiev was never going to defeat Moscow, regardless of Western weapons and targeting intelligence, and the destruction of Nord Stream was always going to set Europe’s economy adrift (like with Net Zero). The fundamentals in each of these cases were well known—publicly known—for a long time. Is it a coincidence that the US has been preparing National Guard quick reaction forces in all fifty states, or that these troops are to be ready by next month? Similar story with push for ID requirements, crypto, AI surveillance, and other things. The White House Press Secretary just hinted at a draft for God’s sake. Everyone knows that would cause backlash. How many of these things can be coincidences?
Collingwood 🇬🇧@admcollingwood

At this stage, can we start to assume that the US is deliberately escalating the war? We had the attack on the water desalinisation plant, and now this. Two things almost guaranteed to garner an Iranian tit-for-tat response.

English
5
26
96
7.6K
Dog of the bay
Dog of the bay@KaeptnKuerk·
@knightman0207 @YousefMunayyer @LeeSlusherLLC Maybe that's just so because he knows that together with Netanjahu he's started an illegal war of aggression. According to the @UN charter any other nation can now perfectly legal help Iran against Israel and the USA with whatever means? But still he fears Nethanjahu.
English
1
0
2
87
Lee Slusher รีทวีตแล้ว
Mohammad Alsaafin
Mohammad Alsaafin@malsaafin·
Seems like reports of Hezbollah’s demise were greatly exaggerated…
English
5
121
1.6K
61.7K
Nostra, House of Gold
Nostra, House of Gold@Nostre_damus·
idk how Trump is going to explain all these casualties to the American public
English
135
189
2.7K
229K
Lee Slusher
Lee Slusher@LeeSlusherLLC·
Many are still in denial about Western defense industrial production. This piece has a longer explanation, but here are a couple of paragraphs: "GDP is but one measure of economic mass, and often a misleading one. For instance, except in extreme comparisons between the richest and poorest nations, GDP says little about the economic wellbeing and day-to-day quality of life of a regular person. It says even less about a country’s capacity to make war. Again, what matters in combat is the force that can be brought to bear and at the specific time and place it is needed. A similar logic applies to the production and distribution of armaments. In Western nations, GDP consists largely of things like professional services, real estate, and non-military government spending. In other words, collective GDP cannot be loaded into a howitzer and fired at the enemy. The relationship between GDP and military power exists only to the extent a nation can turn wealth into weapons. The height of America’s ability to do this was during World War II, a conflict from which incorrectly-derived lessons continue to plague us. The US turned Detroit into a massive armaments factory, and did much the same throughout the rest of the country. Not only did the US have the factories at the time to do this, it also had the know-how. With the loss of domestic manufacturing came the disappearance of many of its necessary skill-sets. Then there are the supply-chain realities, which are just as stark. Those who claim the US could fight a war against China need to explain how the country could produce sufficient weapons and ammunition while also relying on its enemy for so many of the necessary material inputs. Then, of course, there is the question of how to pay for all of this."
Lee Slusher@LeeSlusherLLC

x.com/i/article/2022…

English
4
32
117
8.5K
Lee Slusher
Lee Slusher@LeeSlusherLLC·
The US couldn't even launch a NEO in Sudan, but it's going to win a war against Iran?
English
2
2
26
1.1K
Lee Slusher
Lee Slusher@LeeSlusherLLC·
No disagreement with those who note that American civilians should have left long ago. I'm talking about an overall lack of capability, not only for noncombatant evacuation operations but for everything else the US is trying to do here.
English
1
1
23
1.1K