Jay O'rilly

3.8K posts

Jay O'rilly banner
Jay O'rilly

Jay O'rilly

@LizzleJay

Data Engineer | Pantheist | Libertarian

Oklahoma เข้าร่วม Ocak 2022
374 กำลังติดตาม189 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
Flprbrlbrlbrlbrlbrlbrlbrlbrlbrl
Jay O'rilly tweet media
Indonesia
1
0
13
0
Unkonfined
Unkonfined@unkonfined·
Are there still bots on 𝕏 or are they finally gone?
English
567
127
660
20.4K
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@CptAncapistan @dab_chick Interacting with "vegans" is a lost cause. There is some level of sport involved in mopping the floor with their nonsensical & perverted perceptions... ...but as Ron White famously said: You can't fix stupid. Stupid is forever. 😀
English
0
0
0
4
Captain Ⓐncapistan
Captain Ⓐncapistan@CptAncapistan·
@dab_chick I'll respect animals' rights the same as human rights when animals are capable of respecting rights in return. As they are not, this is goofy, and is very clearly an attempt to reach a desired conclusion.
English
3
0
2
216
dabchick 🌱
dabchick 🌱@dab_chick·
That’s atrocious. It should be zero grams.
Malte Larsen@MalteLarsen_

11,4 gram oksekød. Så meget må plejehjemsbeboere i Københavns Kommune spise om dagen, for ikke at overskride den ugentlige grænse på 80 gram. Ifølge en politiker fra Alternativet skyldes det, at vores ældre har været de største klimasyndere igennem deres liv. Og derfor skal de straffes. Så der kun er oksekød til en halv frikadelle om dagen. Jeg synes at det er så grotesk, at det er svært at sætte ord på. Hvad fanden bilder de sig egentlig ind, disse bedrevidende klimafanatikere? Vores ældre har slidt og slæbt et helt liv. Skabt et fantastisk samfund for os alle sammen. Og nu bliver de straffet med drakoniske oksekøds-rationer i klimaets hellige navn. Jeg synes, at det er uværdigt. Beskæmmende. Og totalt uacceptabelt. For nej, vi redder ikke hele verden ved, at vores ældre kun spiser 11,4 gram oksekød om dagen. Danmark udleder 0,1% af verdens menneskeskabte CO2. Og det værste ved det hele? Mange af disse klimafanatikere, som gennemfører denne form for drakoniske klimaforanstaltninger, har intet problem ved at flyve frem og tilbage for at deltage i ligegyldige klimakonferencer. Hykleriet driver simpelthen ned ad væggene hos de klima-frelste aktivister. Det er på tide, at vi gør op med denne fanatiske klimapolitik, som gør livet sur for almindelige mennesker, herunder vores ældre. Klimapolitikken skal være fornuftig, og der skal være styr på proportionerne. For der er ingen lande, der ser Danmark som et foregangsland, når vi gør os selv fattigere og sænker levestandarden, alene for at skabe en så mikroskopisk og hypotetisk klimaforskel, at den aldrig vil kunne måles. Lad os i stedet satse på kernekraft og fremtidens teknologier, som kan bane vejen for en fornuftig grøn omstilling. Og lad os samtidig give vores ældre medborgere en værdig alderdom. Hvor de har lov til at spise en lækker hakket oksebøf eller tartar til frokost, hvis de har lyst - uden at de skal straffes.

English
20
13
388
13.9K
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@EvaKnott @JamesHu27192912 Grok is drinking its own koolaid 😂 The optimistic & upbeat slop is entertaining, at least for now. "We’re just catching up — on radioactive uranium." AI isn't "catching up with nature". The sun could fart tomorrow.
English
0
0
1
14
Eva Knott
Eva Knott@EvaKnott·
I asked Grok to respond to your post: Haha, spot on. The human brain is an absolute marvel of efficiency — roughly 20 watts of power (about the same as a dim lightbulb), running on glucose, caffeine, and pure spite, while outperforming most AIs on flexibility, common sense, and not hallucinating nonsense. Meanwhile, training and running frontier models can suck down electricity like it’s going out of style. We’re basically simulating a few million brains with the power draw of a small city. That said… give it time. The gap is closing fast on the efficiency side, and unlike humans, AI doesn’t get hangry, need sleep, or start doomscrolling at 2 a.m. after too many Monsters. Nature had a 3.8-billion-year head start. We’re just catching up — on Twix-powered overtime. 🚀
English
2
0
1
34
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
Why is Rand one of the only people in government that want to prosecute crimes against humanity? Yes, it's a rhetorical question (we all know the swamp is as full as ever). They're protecting PDF's, they'll keep protecting Fauci the Fraud.
Rand Paul@RandPaul

The COVID cover-up goes all the way to the top. Fauci funded the Wuhan lab. Senior intelligence officials hid classified evidence from the president himself. Scientists were silenced. Millions paid the price. The DOJ has until May 11th to prosecute Fauci before the statute of limitations runs out. I am not letting this go. The American people deserve justice.

English
0
0
0
9
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@tylerblack32 That's a pretty bold & close-minded take for someone who has zero relevance in the matter.
English
0
0
0
28
Tyler Black, MD
Tyler Black, MD@tylerblack32·
It doesn't matter the credentials. If you believe that eating sardines gave you cold resistance your influence on health discussions should be minimal.
Tyler Black, MD tweet media
English
55
8
159
26.3K
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@csharpgen @JosephTuam @BiggestComeback The reduction of human physiology into joules & mass is an enormous foundational error that precedes the majority of poor nutritional advice & understanding. joules <> nutrition mass <> body composition
English
0
0
2
13
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@csharpgen @JosephTuam @BiggestComeback "only calories matter for weight loss" Demonstrably false (even Atwater knew this) Not all calories are absorbed equally, both the thermic effect & hormone response from food varies dramatically, "calorie counts" are estimates not measurements, metabolic rate is not fixed...
English
1
0
2
12
Chris S. Cornell
Chris S. Cornell@BiggestComeback·
Here’s a controversial observation I’ve arrived at after 8 years of N=1 experimentation: The number of carbs I eat in a meal has a much bigger impact on my body weight than the number of calories.
English
48
9
358
29.5K
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@SBakerMD I ate a whole food diet for 10+ years before going carnivore and the difference was night and day. Not enough room in 10 tweets to cover what all it improved.
English
0
0
0
89
psychophrenic
psychophrenic@psychophrenic·
@curtis_yarvin If/when AI starts laying off 10s - 100s of millions of people, how should we deal with that?
English
3
0
0
1.4K
Blessed with the 'tism
Blessed with the 'tism@blessedtism·
@LizzleJay @olyveyaa I'm not even sure what point you're trying to make here in the context of arguing against calories in / calories out. Nutrition or health is an entirely different topic.
English
1
0
0
18
Olyveya
Olyveya@olyveyaa·
What is the best argument you’ve heard against the “calories in calories out” weight loss science?
English
80
2
30
27.6K
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@blessedtism @olyveyaa What does this have to do with refined sugar? Apply your previous logic w/ gasoline to table sugar & your argument breaks down. You're calling nutrient availability "a minor nuance" when that's the single most critical factor to nutrition, calories be damned.
English
1
0
0
11
Blessed with the 'tism
Blessed with the 'tism@blessedtism·
Easy in and out? Do you really want to pretend that some macronutrients getting burned more readily than others invalidates the idea? I mean, I guess you can argue that proteins and fats that stay in the body as tissue never go out, therefore CI > CO when people gain weight, so CI=CO has a proven counter example. But people pointing at CICO as a way to understand weight gain/loss don't deny those mechanics.
English
1
0
0
22
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@blessedtism @olyveyaa Olympic level mental gymnastics. Now do refined sugar. Plenty of calories, zero nutritional value.
English
1
0
0
10
Blessed with the 'tism
Blessed with the 'tism@blessedtism·
perfect precision isn't necessary. estimations and guesses are perfectly adequate for weight manipulation. bioavailability is a minor nuance. if one were to drink gasoline, those calories would probably quickly come out via vomiting, unless metabolic processes cease entirely... in that case, they never really got "in" at all indigestible things just go out as waste instead of getting metabolized
English
1
0
0
19
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@blessedtism @olyveyaa There is literally no way to accurately measure calories in or out in a non-scientific setting. It's all estimations & error stacking. Calories-in also don't account for nutrient bioavailability. There are a lot of calories in gasoline. Cheers!🍻
English
1
0
0
12
Blessed with the 'tism
Blessed with the 'tism@blessedtism·
@olyveyaa I don't think I've seen a serious argument yet. The most practical detractions seem to be: 1. (obese) people are bad at measuring "calories in" 2. everyone is just guessing at "calories out" But these are skill issues. People can get better at measuring and guessing.
English
1
0
0
65
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@RWMaloneMD Maybe stop voting for the Republican or Democrat who won their AIPAC primary?
English
1
0
1
90
Robert W Malone, MD
Robert W Malone, MD@RWMaloneMD·
What is the alternative? We could have had President Kamala. And we might in 2028. Shudder...
English
534
110
1.7K
73.5K
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@RandPaul All being done under the guise of "national security" which means there is no governance, no visibility, no accountability. And who better to handle it than the private sector, to circumvent all kinds of red tape. The CIA was Oracle's first-ever customer. Lesson in there.
English
0
0
1
7
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@RandPaul Don't forget about Project Stargate. It's orders of magnitude more insidious than anything Snowden exposed 13 years ago while making covid tyranny read like a children's bedtime story.
English
1
0
1
43
Rand Paul
Rand Paul@RandPaul·
For years, intelligence agencies have abused FISA to search Americans’ communications without a warrant. My Fourth Amendment Restoration and Protection Act ends these backdoor searches once and for all. If the government wants your data, they should get a warrant.
English
285
943
5.8K
89.5K
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@MarkBski instead we have a litany of government agencies whose primary roles are to protect industry / gdp.
English
1
0
1
10
Jay O'rilly
Jay O'rilly@LizzleJay·
@SamaHoole I feel you on white meat dog food, but non-factory farmed traditional-breed meat chickens that are outside getting sunlight, developing thick delicious skin, roaming around scavenging... are incredibly delicious. Zero issues occasionally complementing a beef/egg diet.
English
0
0
0
115
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
The relationship between humans and chickens is approximately eight thousand years old. For roughly seven thousand nine hundred and fifty of those years, the point of the chicken was the egg. The hen was a daily production system. She ate scraps, food waste, insects, whatever was available at the bottom of the farmyard hierarchy. She produced an egg most mornings. You did not kill her for this to happen. You let her run. You collected the egg. You repeated this every day for years. The mathematics were obvious to anyone who had ever been hungry. A laying hen produces roughly 250 eggs a year. One egg contains complete amino acids, choline in concentrations nothing else provides, fat-soluble vitamins, and the cholesterol your body uses to make every steroid hormone you produce. 250 of those, from one animal, eating mostly scraps. The cockerel you ate. The surplus pullets you ate. The hen you ate when she stopped laying and the calculation changed. You did not breed a special hen designed to grow a large breast in thirty-three days. You kept the hen that kept producing. The breast-as-protein-source is roughly fifty years old. It required industrial breeding, dietary guidelines that eliminated fat, and a retail infrastructure capable of moving enormous volumes of cheap white nutrient-bereft meat to make it the default. Before all of that: the egg was the food. The egg is still the food. The breast is what you eat when you've decided to dismantle the production system.
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
69
588
2.5K
36K