
Paul Sanders
4.8K posts

Paul Sanders
@PaulSandersSCP
Friendship, Social Skills coach & author at: https://t.co/hecdvUWroX
San Diego, CA เข้าร่วม Eylül 2011
1.5K กำลังติดตาม827 ผู้ติดตาม

@zuess05 This idea you just uttered: what Saas allows you to push it to all comms channels at once? Challenges you, asks you follow up questions then publishes to 17 comms channels?
None. Of course you can build it yeah I know... But will you?
"Everything's already built" is an illusion
English

@PaulSolt @kit Can't wait to dive in.
I heard a lot of unhappy comments about kit's recent pricing changes.
For modern/agent-first email, I'm also looking at @nitrosendx
English

My workflow with GPT-5.5 is completely different from GPT-5.4.
I revived a 9-year-old app and pushed conversion from 0.5% to 7.1% in two weeks.
Wrote up exactly what changed in this week's AI Code Brief.
@kit
super-easy-apps.kit.com/posts/how-i-bu…
English

@davis7 Okay... It's time for a "DavisBench - by Ben Davis"
English

This is one of many reasons I hate the "5.5" name so much. Every single 5 series model has needed at least medium, usually high reasoning to function because the "base" model was pretty bad. Most of it's power came from the insane reasoning stuff they baked in
Should you use GPT-5.5 on low reasoning for everything?
No.
But it's pretty damn close, like 90% of the time, and I'm gonna keep pushing this hard b/c the natural tendency of everyone (self included) is to use the "best" tool always
Always try low first, if it can't do it then bump from there
We now have a good base model, so reasoning often becomes an anti-pattern as the model gets too much time to over think itself into verbose complex solutions when it knew how to just do the thing u wanted
Again, this is not a ".1" bump, this is an entirely new foundation and I'd argue series of models. I know they can't call it GPT-6 because if that model doesn't end up being what mythos is hyped to be and more the entire fucking economy dies, but it's definitely the beginning of GPT-6, much like what 4.5 was last year just way better
I think that's the reasoning behind the ".5" name, it's halfway to the new series which would be fine if we didn't just do 5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 so it feels like another increment. It's not.
Another thing is speed, this thing is fast as hell with low reasoning and feels amazing. Highly recommend trying it out with pi, feels so good
Nathan Spencer@NateSpencerWx
@davis7 For everything?
English

The whole point of shadcn/ui is I don't decide for you.
New: when you create a new project, look for the switch to turn on cursor: pointer for buttons.
Also available via the cli. npx shadcn init --pointer

shadcn@shadcn
I see. How many of you do this? I’d like to get a sense of how common this is.
English

@thsottiaux @TheRealAdamG I already have credits and I'm still able to work back and forth, even if subscription rate limits are exhausted, and I still see this. Somehow it doesn't detect that I have credits and I'm actively consuming them.
As you said, small paper cut.

English

@shadcn 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️ 🙋♂️
every single time. In globals.css. Any button, any role=button element including submit inputs.
English

I see. How many of you do this? I’d like to get a sense of how common this is.
Cristian@iamthatcris
the first thing I do when I install @shadcn is to add cursor pointer on the button
English

Vibe coding has been a thing for over a year.
My friends built:
- Fitness apps
- Marketing tools
- Casual games
- Dashboards
All shipped to TestFlight or GitHub.
Now try this: name one vibe-coded app you actually use.
Not tried. Actually use.
I can't name one. Zero.
They built. They kept adding features.
They never figured out who it was for.
We have more apps than ever.
Fewer users per app than ever.
Vibe coding didn't create a software boom.
It created a software graveyard.
English

@EmerieOnoh If you can detect the pattern, you can prompt against it. :)
English

@thekitze Especially those who would actually pay for creative work. They have neither an idea what to type nor the time to think about it.
There's so much to build on top of a very capable model.
Standards are gonna go up too.
English

@justalexoki They're not afraid Anthropic is gonna eat them and their search business... Now OpenAI on the other hand...
Check the stack of Anthropic: entreprise and coding.
OpenAI: everything: entreprise, media and creative, pro-sumer, ad-funded consumer, voice, realitime, workspace,...
English

wait why is google investing in anthropic isn't that a literal competitor
Watcher.Guru@WatcherGuru
JUST IN: Google $GOOGL to invest up to $40,000,000,000 in Claude AI developer Anthropic.
English

@BoyuanChen0 All I gotta say is good luck! It's an incredible model.
English

@paulg Well he's presenting alternative math, as it is his right under the first amendment.
English

This is who's running the government.
Aaron Rupar@atrupar
RFK Jr: "A Democratic senator claimed it's mathematically impossible to have a drug drop by 600%. I said, 'Well, if the drug was $100 and it raises to $600, that would be a 600% rise. If it drops from $600 to $100, that's a 600% savings.'" Trump: "Right"
English

Confidence-Maxxing Live 20 Zero introspection is good? x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English














