Dr John Read

18.9K posts

Dr John Read

Dr John Read

@ReadReadj

Professor, Clinical Psychology, University of East London. Chair, International Institute for Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal https://t.co/LRU5M9fsPz. Opinions my own

London เข้าร่วม Şubat 2014
2K กำลังติดตาม12.7K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Dr John Read
Dr John Read@ReadReadj·
#event=78184084;instance=20260320090000&popup=1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">calendar.time.ly/wskecwur/event…
ZXX
2
2
6
838
Dr John Read รีทวีตแล้ว
James Barnes MSc., MA
James Barnes MSc., MA@psychgeist52·
Here are slides from a talk I gave for a @NottsHealthcare conference this week, in which—at a time of political interest & confusion around 'over-diagnosis'—I critique the psychiatric model & suggest we move to a 'Humanistic-Relational' model. Please share & comments welcome 👍
James Barnes MSc., MA tweet media
English
5
10
28
1.7K
Dr John Read รีทวีตแล้ว
Medicating Normal
Medicating Normal@MedicatingNorm1·
Overdiagnosing allows for Rx-ing of antipsychotics which makes the dementia patients "easier to manage." As even more incentive to overdiagnose, residents on antipsychotics w/ a schizophrenia diagnosis are not counted toward the CMS quality measure which can improve the facility's star rating. medpagetoday.com/geriatrics/dem…
English
1
14
33
1.1K
Dr John Read
Dr John Read@ReadReadj·
@AhmadRehanKhan Do you mean like the fixed delusional belief that there is a thing inside people called “schizophrenia” that makes them hear voices etc.?
English
0
0
1
14
Dr Ahmad Rehan Khan
Dr Ahmad Rehan Khan@AhmadRehanKhan·
If you actually worked in mental health, as a psychologist or psychiatrist, you’d know that delusions are not “different realities.” They are fixed, false beliefs held despite clear contradictory evidence and lack of logical support. This isn’t a philosophical debate, it’s a well-defined clinical concept. As a philosopher this isn’t your area of expertise, it’s important to approach it with caution and avoid presenting inaccurate interpretations as facts.
Justin Garson@justin_garson

I’m starting to question the very concept of ‘delusions’: the very act of labeling you as delusional implies a superiority on my part - that my grasp of reality is superior to yours in a way that does not merit argumentation. Why would that ever be an appropriate stance to adopt?

Matamoras, PA 🇺🇸 English
70
52
464
49.1K
Dr John Read รีทวีตแล้ว
Prof. James Davies (PhD) 💭
It's as if many negative effects of modern life (poor attention, anxiety, social unease) are being swept up into an acceptable & non-stigmatising medical category, to uncourage self-reform rather than serious questioning of the status quo. ADHD is clearly now the label of choice.
English
4
14
65
2.9K
Dr John Read รีทวีตแล้ว
Medicating Normal
Medicating Normal@MedicatingNorm1·
"The purpose, then, of the new DSM is to convince clinicians and the public that unvalidated, hypothetical biological markers prove the validity of psychiatric diagnoses." ARTICLE LINK: madinamerica.substack.com/p/dsm-6-will-b…
Medicating Normal tweet media
English
5
18
49
1.9K
Dr John Read
Dr John Read@ReadReadj·
#event=78184084;instance=20260320090000&popup=1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">calendar.time.ly/wskecwur/event…
ZXX
2
2
6
838
Dr John Read
Dr John Read@ReadReadj·
Psychotherapies of Depth, Insight, and Relationship for Psychosis: Listening with the Intent to Understand the Psychological Meaning of Psychotic Symptoms: Psychoanalytic Inquiry: Vol 46, No 1 tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
English
0
6
16
1.1K
Dr John Read รีทวีตแล้ว
Prof. James Davies (PhD) 💭
Is it ethical to subject the growing fetus to the well-known dangers of SSRIs? The establishment position is alarmist: untreated depression can kill. But is this reasonable given the poor efficacy of SSRIs (vs. placebo) & the existence of more effective non-drug alternatives?
English
10
12
70
3.5K
Dr John Read รีทวีตแล้ว
Mad In America
Mad In America@Mad_In_America·
DSM-6 Will Be Structured Around Biomarkers—Despite Acknowledgment There Aren’t Any by Peter Simons The committee aims to use biomarkers to reorganize the whole project. The problem? They acknowledge that such biomarkers have not yet actually been found. buff.ly/vtgqFfz
Mad In America tweet media
English
21
63
210
19.5K
Dr John Read รีทวีตแล้ว
Dr Joanna Moncrieff
Dr Joanna Moncrieff@joannamoncrieff·
Study finds an association between taking antidepressants and sudden cardiac death, but the authors imply the real culprit may be the underying mental illness. Another attempt to absolve the drugs.
Adam Urato, MD@AdamUrato1

New Study: Antidepressant use is associated with Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) "Compared with the general population, patients treated for 1-5 years had a 41% increased risk of SCD, while those treated for six years or more had a 74% increased risk." heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-…

English
14
39
140
6.7K
Dr John Read รีทวีตแล้ว
A
A@meanharmonic·
@JDaviesPhD It takes a huge leap of faith to believe that psychiatry is a legitimate medical field. Not to mention a special version of reality where normal rules don't apply, blatant COIs aren't a problem, and common sense is disregarded.
English
0
2
6
276
Dr John Read รีทวีตแล้ว
Prof. James Davies (PhD) 💭
55.7% of US psychiatrists accept pharma industry payments. Studies show the pharma industry spends billions per year making payments to clinical trial authors, DSM panel & FDA committee members, creating COIs at every level of the drug approval process. madinamerica.com/2026/03/undisc…
English
5
72
146
4.3K
Dr John Read รีทวีตแล้ว
Gen Z Outcast
Gen Z Outcast@Phuxlea·
How Beliefs About Depression Can Harm | Psychology Today @justin_garson coming forward with his revolutionary views on psychiatry once again. This is a short yet powerful blog arguing the dangers of believing depression is solely biological. As someone who was only diagnosed with depression after being sent away from home multiple times, sent to a now shutdown wilderness therapy Troubled Teen Industry program, and was at a boarding school I hated, of course I was diagnosed with depression and told it was genetic. This is what motivates me to detest this narrative. However I don't fully agree with some of the angles of this article. It repeatedly emphasizes the harms of taking antidepressants and SSRIs for too long, briefly mentions withdrawal, but doesn't have any information on how to safely taper. I worry that people go off their medications too fast which leads them to suffering severe withdrawals, which bring them back into the prison of psychiatry and into a worse cell. This is why whenever we talk about the harms of antidepressants, we must make it clear that one must taper very slowly. psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-bi…
English
0
2
8
480
Dr John Read รีทวีตแล้ว
Antidepressant Risks
Antidepressant Risks@antideprisks·
Richly informative interview about antidepressants with Piia Tuominen (@TuominenPiia) and John Read (@ReadReadj). This series of discussions have been excellent. Piia speaks to the lived experiences of psychiatrised patients, while John explains the evidence (or lack thereof) underpinning them. youtube.com/watch?v=R_vwmd…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
11
16
1.4K