@RefereeC21621 You say it was accidental but doesn't matter,in Messi one you said he couldn't get cautioned because it was not intentional, he went for the ball,he retracted his foot blah,blah....what is different
@RefereeC21621 why is the attacker rewarded for drawing contact when he’s in behind? the canada player feels the slightest contact and goes down. but when that happens in the box, they say it’s not enough for a foul. you’re gonna benefit a lot more from getting a player sent off than scoring
@notjustdad@BBCSport Pundits base opinions on emotions. They don’t know the laws, guidelines or criteria. They are there for entertainment, not to teach.
@RefereeC21621 How does one balance? This rule defies nature. As a result we have the absurd sight of defenders with arms behind their backs which, frankly, compromises their ability. This ruling hasn’t erased controversy. Pundits on @BBCSport weren’t comfortable with it, although it’s the law.
@RefereeC21621 Unfortunately just like accidentally triping a person on tour to a goal scoring opportunity (which happened to sa in their last game) if the opponent disrupts the opportunity illegally (even if it was a mistake) it’s a foul.
@FutOffsides SAOT isn’t based on the frame freeze. It is based on the chip. The image you see is just for purposes of understanding what they are showing…
🚨❌ SAOT keeps making mistakes with frame selection in the World Cup.
📸 In the frame chosen for Algeria’s disallowed goal there is NO contact with the ball yet.
👉 It’s extremely hard to understand how a VAR official could miss such an obvious issue.
x.com/FootOffsides/s…