Maggie

3.7K posts

Maggie banner
Maggie

Maggie

@RubyBlueEye29

Idaho, USA เข้าร่วม Ekim 2023
1.8K กำลังติดตาม371 ผู้ติดตาม
Maggie
Maggie@RubyBlueEye29·
@Jasminesta36195 @sasimons About 2616 murdered people by Islamic terrorist attacks NOT including those claimed by the Islamic State Imagine being so irresponsibly lazy & stupid to post this knowing all governments keep lists of the attacks and one can just use their elementary math skills to count the dead
English
0
0
0
32
jasmine
jasmine@Jasminesta36195·
@sasimons If Muslims like he says we’re truly dangerous- how comes there’s been no attacks in the last 4 years as we’ve live streamed their genocide funded by America.
English
13
0
15
4.2K
Seth Simons
Seth Simons@sasimons·
Mark Normand says Netflix asked him to remove a joke about Muslims from his new special, and he told him he'd only do it on condition they admit Muslims are "a dangerous people"—which he says they did
Seth Simons@sasimons

Mark Normand on his new special: "I hit every group. I feel like everybody does trans jokes; I do trans, Mexican, Black, gay, Muslim, everyone. Equal opportunity. I'm inclusive… I'm writing jokes that I would want to hear or my friends growing up would want to hear"

English
42
168
2.8K
367.1K
Maggie
Maggie@RubyBlueEye29·
@Film_ickelson @FlynnAlling @marinocapital @sasimons 🤣 Read what you just wrote and try to respond w/o edgy curse words that just come off like mommy took you favorite gameboy away. You just admitted what we all know. Islam is A POLITICAL IDEOLOGY THAT LEGISLATES VIOLENCE. Your edgy mask just fell clean off.....
English
0
0
0
3
Film ickelson
Film ickelson@Film_ickelson·
@FlynnAlling @marinocapital @sasimons Fuck are you talking about you fucking twat? Islam has legislated violence in the same way every modern secular country has legislated violence. Every country has a standing army and legal justification to use it. That doesn’t make them inherently violent you fucking nitwit.
English
3
0
3
98
Maggie
Maggie@RubyBlueEye29·
@itsMaktuub @sasimons Immediately check your page to see if..... Yep, EVERY SINGLE TIME 😂😂
English
0
0
0
4
maktuub
maktuub@itsMaktuub·
@sasimons Lolll so his special came out. Nobody cared. His trash jokes didn’t go viral and now he’s trying his best to make it go viral. What a loser
English
5
1
15
3.4K
Maggie
Maggie@RubyBlueEye29·
@casbeataol Hey Curt, you absolute spineless twat. You are also able to walk past all the insane rapists and child molesters that Biden let walk across our border because you're an old white dude. Using your logic THAT MAKES YOU A CHOMO/rapist. Those are YOUR rules. You are embarassing.
English
0
0
0
2
curt
curt@casbeataol·
I’m an old white dude and because of that I can walk by ICE agents without any fear, but I won’t support one dime going to ICE until everyone can do the same as me without fear no matter their skin color or accent. If you disagree you’re just racist. There’s no other explanation.
English
450
826
4.4K
40.4K
Maggie
Maggie@RubyBlueEye29·
@WHLeavitt Us women need to "Snapchat" these prosecutors with eggplants for DAYS , then make a plea deal, wave bye bye to the offending 🍆 then drive around the jail and "Snapchat" the prosecutors again. Is this THE ONLY WAY RAPISTS GO TO FREAKING JAIL?
English
0
0
0
14
𝔉🅰𝒏 Karoline Leavitt
BREAKING: Twice-convicted rapist Abdimahat Mohamed—who did zero jail time for either rape, one involving a minor—has just been arrested again for kidnapping a woman, holding her hostage for days, and raping her What to do with this Somali Muslim refugee? A. Execute B. Deport
𝔉🅰𝒏 Karoline Leavitt tweet media
English
4.3K
3K
5.3K
94.5K
Maggie
Maggie@RubyBlueEye29·
@GavinNewsom Typical narcissist..... 🤣🤣🤣 You actually thought we were talking about the slight similarity in looks? Ah no, my dear....it's the greasy slimy lying smile he does right before he lies and kills all your hope of living a life unbothered by government interference. Murdered by G
English
0
0
0
3
Gavin Newsom
Gavin Newsom@GavinNewsom·
For so many years people have been saying that Patrick Bateman and I look alike. Now this pic has been going all over the place. What do you think?
Gavin Newsom tweet media
English
2.9K
498
6.9K
627.9K
Townhall.com
Townhall.com@townhallcom·
LOL: @ScottJenningsKY's face when Miles Taylor claims he's actively participating in "high level conversations" with leaders of other countries was priceless.
English
50
179
1.4K
158.4K
Maggie
Maggie@RubyBlueEye29·
@Yoda4ever We all used to get so wound up and shame China like crazy for their dog meat trade. To steal beloved pets and then see them escape to make their way home to the same species of animal that wants to steal , kill and eat them? Time to evolve China.
English
0
0
0
8
𝕐o̴g̴
𝕐o̴g̴@Yoda4ever·
Seven dogs stolen from their owners have gone viral after escaping from an illegal transport truck and making their way home. They traveled around 17 km together, led by a corgi across highways and fields, now safely back with their respective owners..🐶🐾🥺❤️
English
4.5K
50.5K
329.9K
18.5M
Maggie
Maggie@RubyBlueEye29·
@SchmittNYC He says "I'm not an opinionist." 🤣🤣 Breathe 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
0
0
2
45
Maggie รีทวีตแล้ว
Dr. Brian L. Cox
Dr. Brian L. Cox@BrianCox_RLTW·
Hi there, Rep. Khanna. Retired Army JAG here & current prof of int'l law. And you are way out of your depth. You should consider sticking to legislating & leaving #LOAC commentary to actual specialists. Like me. Allow me to explain. First off, if a power plant is "dual use," then attacking it is, by definition, NOT an "indiscriminate bombing." Here's why. As DoD Law of War Manual notes, this term is often "used to describe objects that are used by both the armed forces and the civilian population, such as power stations" (pic 1). The Manual also correctly points out this term has no legal significance. Either something qualifies as a military objective such that directing an attack against it is permitted, or it's a civilian object such that it may not be made the object of attack. See the problem yet? That's right! If something is "dual-use," it qualifies as a military objective...and directing an attack against a military objective is, by definition, NOT "indiscriminate" (pic 2). Back to pic 1, the Manual also notes that when attacking "dual-use" objects, "it will be appropriate to consider in applying the principle of proportionality the harm to the civilian population expected to result from the attack on such a military objective." You might notice I emphasized "proportionality" & "expected" there, and I did so because it's a preview to your next massive error. Here's what you claim about proportionality in your 🧵: "Proportionality forbids attacks where expected incidental civilian harm including effects like loss of hospital power, water pumps failing, food spoilage or extreme heat or cold exposure. This is excessive compared to the concrete military gain per Article 51(5)(b)." We'll get to your selection of source (AP I) later. For now, let's focus on how badly you botched the proportionality rule. To describe what the actual rule is supposed to look like, let's go back to the Manual. As it observes, personnel engaged in hostilities "must refrain from attacks in which the expected loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, and damage to civilian objects incidental to the attack would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage expected to be gained" (pic 3). Now, I added bold text to the "expected" at the beginning & end because this highlights your next mistake. Yes you correctly note expected incidental harm is part of the equation, but you left out "expected" on the military advantage component. This is a massive error because you need to be able to tell what the expected incidental harm is & the expected (or anticipated) concrete & direct military advantage is for each attack in order to assess whether the former was "excessive in relation to" the latter. And, do you have any intel indicating what degree of incidental harm AND concrete & direct military advantage is for each attack you purport to be addressing? No, of course you don't. As such, you're not conducting a legitimate proportionality assessment. Which, is easy if you don't properly articulate law. Hell, you can make pretty much anything seem illegal if you can come up with any bullshit articulation of the legal standard you feel like fabricating. But we're not allowed to do that in actual practice. And so, you shouldn't either in public discourse, or else you're creating a false impression that potentially lawful conduct is illegal. And another thing - I noticed you left off the direct part of "concrete & direct military advantage" in your bullshit version of proportionality. That matters because remote harms need not be factored (pic 4). Some prospective harms you mentioned probably are direct enough, but others...not so much. Finally, I also noticed you claim AP I binds 🇺🇸 "as customary international law." But not all of AP I is customary, which is why I draw from the Manual instead. I'll finish off with a simple pro tip: stay in your lane. Leave LOAC analysis to @DeptofWar. And actual experts...like me.
Dr. Brian L. Cox tweet mediaDr. Brian L. Cox tweet mediaDr. Brian L. Cox tweet mediaDr. Brian L. Cox tweet media
Ro Khanna@RoKhanna

(Thread) Indiscriminate bombing of Iran’s power plants would violate core principles of the laws of war rooted in the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I which bind the U.S. as customary international law.

English
351
2.4K
6.7K
217.9K
Maggie
Maggie@RubyBlueEye29·
@NizNellie3 @kbean511 Guess her "neurological " condition that got her out doesn't affect her terrorist B.S. Ridiculous.
English
0
0
0
4
NizNellie3
NizNellie3@NizNellie3·
🚨 Leqaa Kordia, a former Columbia University student, is a Palestinian terror-supporter from the West Bank who arrived in the U.S. on a student visa in 2016. She’s here on our dime. We paid her tuition, housing, and put food in her mouth. She dropped out of college to become an activist. She was supposed to return in 2022. She not only overstayed her visa, she became an unhinged protestor at Columbia, chanting for the destruction of Israel and America. ICE arrested her one year ago. She was just released. A non-citizen who hates our country and supports Hamas is now unleashed on the public. The minute she was released, she began screeching “free Palestine” and starts wildly chanting in Arabic for Allah. We have won nothing if the Trump administration continues down this path.
NizNellie3 tweet media
English
787
4.5K
10K
257.5K
Dangerous Thoughts
Dangerous Thoughts@DangerousThinkg·
How uninformed is our electorate? People in Cook County, Illinois protested President Trump over an increase in property tax
English
102
706
1.9K
34.2K
Maggie
Maggie@RubyBlueEye29·
Everyone needs to educate themselves on what these agents of chaos are doing to our country. Fight back .
Asra Nomani@AsraNomani

NEW. POWER COUPLE OF CHAOS: How a tycoon and activist built a 'Revolutionary Base' at the House of Singham WATCH: Exclusive remarks from Neville Roy Singham ⬇️ I’ve spent a decade in the streets covering the protest industry, not just what people say, but who shows up, how movements form and what patterns repeat. This morning we are publishing the first part of a five-part series @FOxNews Digital that started with my reporting on the streets. It changed when I used large language models to analyze years of data, including IRS filings, corporate records, events, messaging. READ and SHARE: Part 1 of our series: foxnews.com/us/house-singh… What emerged: a clear portrait of the system and infrastructure behind the protests. At the center: a transnational network funded by tech tycoon Neville Roy Singham. His wedding to CodePink co-founder Jodie Evans in Jamaica in 2017 ushered in a new decade over which this network has been built. I call it the House of Singham. And for the first time — in his own words in a video that I have unearthed from a conference last fall in Shanghai, blessed by the Communist Party of China — we have evidence that Singham is explicitly aligned with: 🟥 The People's Republic of China 🟥 President Xi Jinpeng 🟥 "The CPC," as Singham calls it: the Communist Party of China "Comrades and friends....," he begins. SIngham continues in the video: "If we want to, therefore, have a new world order that is based on multilateralism that President Xi and CPC and China have proposed, we have to undo the ideological damage that has been done by the narrative of World War II." (The West speaks about the Chinese Communist Party, or CCP. Singham uses the term that the government of China uses for its ruling party.) In the newly discovered remarks, Singham: 🟥 Calls the Western view of WWII a “fascist lie” and frames Western democracy as “fascism” 🟥 Argues the global order must be reconstructed around China 🟥 Praises Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China’s vision for a "new world order" In a 172-page study, "80th Anniversary of the Victory of the World Anti-Fascist War: Acknowledging Who Truly Saved Human History and Restoring Historical Truth," published under his name, Singham: 🟥 Minimizes U.S. sacrifice in WWII — claiming "just 1%” of deaths were "Anglo-Americans" 🟥 Diminishes the deaths of U.S. and British troops and servicemembers, writing that the Soviets and China really won the war with, "59.8% socialists dead, 13.1% colonised peoples dead – only 1% Anglo-Americans dead" 🟥 Praises Mao Zedong's views on winning "protracted war" through the "masses of the people" This isn’t abstract rhetoric. It connects directly to a funding, influence operation and cognitive warfare we mapped: 5 Rings. 2,000 Groups 🟥 223 transactions 🟥 $591M moved globally 🟥 $278M tied directly to Singham I've included all of the transactions in a public spreadsheet with Part 1 of our series. Here’s how it works: 🟥 LEVEL 1 — The Funnel Tax-exempt money routed through shell-like entities + a donor-advised fund tied to Goldman Sachs → anonymity for wealthy donors. (Goldman Sachs confirmed to me that it terminated Singham's fund in 2024.) 🟥 LEVEL 2 — The Core $278M flows into 6 nonprofits — several created rapidly, with leadership tied to Singham + his wife Jodie Evans 🟥 LEVEL 3 — Expansion About $163M redistributed into 52 orgs + regional pipelines 🟥 LEVEL 4 — Global Distribution $150M pushed outward across continents, including tens of millions into Sub-Saharan Africa 🟥 LEVEL 5 — Network Effect 67 core orgs linking to about 2,000 groups worldwide This is not just about money. It’s the infrastructure for malign influence, shaping protests, narratives and political pressure across countries. Thank you to @DataRepublican for her support as I walked through a labyrinth of data. And for the many researchers following the money — and the words — in the House of Singham, I have tried to share the raw data with you publicly so you can see the receipts and analyze the data. What is the best defense in cognitive warfare? What is the best innoculation? I believe it's knowledge, awareness and insight. And I hope that this investigation will help peel back the layers for you in a war over not just the hearts and minds of Americans but the world. Links to all original sources in the 🧵

English
0
0
1
20
Maggie
Maggie@RubyBlueEye29·
@SenBlumenthal Oh there's more killing alright you crave POS. Another American girl just starting her college life at 18 years old gunned down by another illegal Venezuelan . For what? Because Democrats invaded our country to try and get votes but killed THOUSANDS of Americans and don't GAF!!
English
0
0
0
3
Richard Blumenthal
Richard Blumenthal@SenBlumenthal·
ICE agents at airports will only aggravate delays & lines—disrupting checks, interrogating travelers, dragging parents from children, detaining citizens, brutalizing families, shooting & even killing. politico.com/news/2026/03/2…
English
9.5K
749
1.9K
1.5M
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
NEW: 🚨 Why does Tulsi Gabbard hire the WORST people? 🚨 Meet Carolyn Rocco of the United States Air Force. Rocco @Krow121812 was hired by @TulsiGabbard to work at ODNI @ODNIgov. According to her very active X account, Rocco is an active duty military officer. Reuters reported that she was hired by ODNI to work on politically sensitive projects. Undersecretary of the Air Force Matthew Lohmeier @matthewlohmeier, how do you feel about your officer engaging in such partisan activity both on and off the job? It probably doesn’t concern you too much, considering you are friends! Rocco posted twice praising Joe Kent’s @joekent16jan19 interview with Tucker Qatarlson @TuckerCarlson. She also shared several other posts praising Kent in response to his alleged leaking of classified intelligence information. Rocco also commented TODAY in support of @GenFlynn expressing support for Tucker Carlson interviewing a CCP propagandist. How is this woman allowed to have a Top Secret security clearance??? As I have reported extensively, @ODNIGov under @DNIGabbard is crawling with subversive people. Quite disgraceful. RECEIPTS ⬇️
Laura Loomer tweet mediaLaura Loomer tweet mediaLaura Loomer tweet mediaLaura Loomer tweet media
English
410
1.1K
3.2K
336.7K