Sam Hollingsworth

7.2K posts

Sam Hollingsworth banner
Sam Hollingsworth

Sam Hollingsworth

@SearchMasterGen

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Dad. 📈 SEO @Lead2Conversion. 📝 Writer @sengineland & @SEJournal. 👔 Former VP @Elevation10k & SEO @Acronym_Media. 🏇Racing X: @SpaTurfWriter

New York เข้าร่วม Şubat 2012
3.9K กำลังติดตาม1.4K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Sam Hollingsworth
Sam Hollingsworth@SearchMasterGen·
Wake up and chase your dreams.
Sam Hollingsworth tweet media
English
0
1
7
0
Nathan Gotch
Nathan Gotch@nathangotch·
If your company is not encouraging your employees to use AI every single day, then you're already extremely behind.
English
3
0
6
428
Sam Hollingsworth รีทวีตแล้ว
S.🎧
S.🎧@1ssve·
So nobody notices that Chat GPT is making yall the same flyers?
English
221
2.6K
23.4K
1.9M
Sam Hollingsworth รีทวีตแล้ว
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Sam Altman said people saying “please” and “thank you” to ChatGPT costs OpenAI tens of millions of dollars a year in compute. 67% of Americans do it anyway. Run the math on why. A 2024 Waseda University study tested LLM responses across politeness levels in English, Chinese, and Japanese. Impolite prompts produced measurably worse outputs: more bias, more errors, more refusals. Moderate politeness consistently beat both extremes. The mechanism makes sense once you see it. Polite prompts pattern-match to higher-quality training data. When you write “Could you help me structure this analysis?”, the model pulls from professional, well-reasoned text. When you write “give me the answer,” it pulls from Reddit. Google DeepMind’s Murray Shanahan explained it simply: the model is role-playing a smart intern. Treat the intern like a colleague, you get colleague-quality work. Bark orders, you get minimum-viable compliance. Now look at the cost side. OpenAI handles over a billion queries daily. Each GPT-4 query uses roughly 2.9 watt-hours, ten times a Google search. But OpenAI just raised $40 billion at a $300 billion valuation. Tens of millions in politeness tokens is a rounding error on a rounding error. 67% of users do it anyway, and 55% of them say it’s because it’s “the right thing to do.” They’re maintaining a behavioral habit that governs every other interaction in their life. The parent who teaches their kid to say please to Alexa isn’t doing it for Alexa. They’re doing it because the alternative is raising someone who learns that being rude gets faster results. Telling 900 million people to stop saying thank you so OpenAI can save 0.01% of operating costs is the most engineer-brained optimization take on the internet. You’re training yourself to treat every interaction as a transaction. And that habit doesn’t stay in the chat window.
Venkatesh@Venkydotdev

STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI

English
1.5K
3.3K
28.8K
5.6M
Cyrus SEO
Cyrus SEO@CyrusShepard·
I replaced my entire SEO agency with 8 AI Agents Here's how: I never had an SEO agency
English
43
22
440
37.1K
Joe Youngblood - SEO, Futurology, AI, Marketing
GOOGLE IS GIVING A VALUABLE #1 RANKING TO A VIBE-CODED, 1-PAGE SPA SITE WITH ZERO QUALITY BACKLINKS AND STOCK PHOTOS that are clearly not from the area on a local landscape query that gets up to 1,000 searches per month according to Google Ads: This is absolutely disgusting by @Google and completely defenseless. @Ahrefs says there are 10 linking sites, all spam. 👉 No citations 👉 No actual physical address 👉 A local VOIP number 👉 Hotlinked images from Unsplash 👉 Broken social icons in the footer 👉 "Edit with Loveable" tag visible in bottom right corner 👉 No reviews / testimonials 👉 Broken links / CTAs 👉 No updates in 2-years 👉 Nothing but spam links 👉 No supporting content found anywhere else Literally nothing about this website is remotely good SEO, but Google's head of technology hates SMBs so much he had them build an algorithm where this crap is #1 on a highly competitive, highly valuable keyword. Trash company.
Joe Youngblood - SEO, Futurology, AI, Marketing tweet mediaJoe Youngblood - SEO, Futurology, AI, Marketing tweet mediaJoe Youngblood - SEO, Futurology, AI, Marketing tweet mediaJoe Youngblood - SEO, Futurology, AI, Marketing tweet media
English
34
3
82
21.1K
Doug Kyed
Doug Kyed@DougKyed·
My opinion on the Stefon Diggs release: Felt unlikely that the Patriots would get the same level of production out of him next season, and there was a clean out in the contract. The Patriots feel one of their needs is offensive firepower, however, so they need a plan to replace him.
English
21
12
359
43.9K
Sam Hollingsworth
Sam Hollingsworth@SearchMasterGen·
GIF
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Everyone’s missing the real story here. Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses need human data annotators to train the AI. When you say “Hey Meta” and ask the glasses to analyze something, that video gets sent to Meta’s servers, then routed to Sama, a subcontractor in Nairobi, Kenya. Workers there manually label objects in your footage. They see everything you recorded, intentionally or not. 7 million pairs sold in 2025 alone. Every single pair generates training data that flows through human eyes in Kenya. Workers told Swedish journalists they see people undressing, using bathrooms, having sex, and accidentally filming bank card details. One worker said “we see everything, from living rooms to naked bodies.” Meta’s automatic face anonymization is supposed to protect people in the footage. Workers say it fails in certain lighting. Faces that should be blurred are sometimes fully visible. The person you recorded without knowing? A stranger in Nairobi can identify them. Buried in Meta’s terms of service is one sentence doing enormous legal work: the company reserves the right to conduct “manual (human) review” of your AI interactions. That’s the legal cover for routing intimate footage from Western homes to a $2/hour labor force operating under NDAs, office surveillance cameras, and a strict no-questions policy. Workers say if you raise concerns about what you’re seeing, you’re fired. This is the same company, Sama, that TIME exposed in 2023 for paying Kenyan workers $2/hour to label graphic content for OpenAI while being billed at $12.50/hour per worker. Workers described the experience as torture. Sama ended that contract, then pivoted to labeling Meta’s glasses footage. Same workforce. Same rates. Meta markets these glasses as “designed with your privacy in mind.” The privacy design is a tiny LED light on the frame that most people don’t notice. The data pipeline behind it routes your bedroom footage to a contractor with a documented history of worker exploitation, failed anonymization, and union-busting lawsuits. And the next generation of these glasses? Meta is planning to add facial recognition. The same system that can’t reliably blur faces in training data wants to start identifying them on purpose. The LED light on the frame is doing about as much for your privacy as the terms of service nobody reads.

ZXX
0
0
0
18
Sam Hollingsworth รีทวีตแล้ว
Noah
Noah@NoahKingJr·
Someone should buy LinkedIn and turn it off
English
998
5.5K
63.1K
1.1M