Shaun Roselt
24K posts









CS2 performance AG2 vs AG when getting peeked in a 1 v 1 (identical peeks simulated via hotkey) 13–14% improvement in stutter zones for ag2 1% FPS: +64 FPS for ag2 1% Low: +55 FPS for ag2









If Valve’s 30% transaction fee is so outrageous (it’s not), then others can simply provide alternatives and charge less. If players still don’t want those alternatives, it’s for a reason: the higher prices they see are worthwhile for the various services involved. So, the alternatives need to also compete on quality. That isn’t an “unlawful monopoly”, that is a competitive service provided at an acceptable rate for developers and players alike. A competitor can undercut that price, but they have to actually do a good job providing an alternative. It is completely absurd to involve the government to punish Valve.


























