Tim Duy

45.5K posts

Tim Duy banner
Tim Duy

Tim Duy

@TimDuy

Father, Chief U.S. Economist, @sghmacro, former @uoregon economist, Tim Duy's Fed Watch, former columnist for @bopinion

Eugene, OR เข้าร่วม Eylül 2011
730 กำลังติดตาม35.7K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Tim Duy
Tim Duy@TimDuy·
High hopes for this cutting board. Should be 12.5” x 21”.
Tim Duy tweet media
English
37
2
119
0
Tim Duy รีทวีตแล้ว
AB
AB@AdventureSeek3r·
Cat fam, we need your help. Bob needs your help. He needs to know his life matters. That he is loved. 🧵
AB tweet media
English
43
1.2K
5.1K
201.3K
Tim Duy รีทวีตแล้ว
Alec Stapp
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp·
Never deleting this app
Alec Stapp tweet media
English
15
85
1.4K
52.4K
Tim Duy รีทวีตแล้ว
Olivier Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard@ojblanchard1·
Larry: Are you becoming chartist? 😀(I kind of remember that something happened at the end of the 1970s, like a trippling of oil prices, which might be vaguely relevant. Do u expect it to happen again?)
Lawrence H. Summers@LHSummers

It is sobering to recall that the shape of the past decade’s inflation curve almost perfectly shadows its path from 1966 to 1976 before it accelerated in the late 1970s.

English
51
198
1.2K
485.6K
Tim Duy รีทวีตแล้ว
BuccoCapital Bloke
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital·
No man has ever tried so hard, repeatedly but unintentionally, to destroy the American economy The fact that he hasn’t succeeded yet is a testament to its resilience
English
78
221
3.6K
168.5K
Matt Hobson
Matt Hobson@MattHobson6·
@TimDuy Maybe not for the US but disaster for many other countries and their economies.
English
1
0
0
226
James Wetzler
James Wetzler@JamesWetzler9·
@TimDuy Low energy share of budgets means less elastic demand, which means the price has to rise more to clear the market.
English
1
0
4
346
Tim Duy
Tim Duy@TimDuy·
@kkmaway Then you have a bet, bull flattener on 2s10s. I like the 25-75bps range for no recession, 0-25bps a danger zone. <0 depends on how quickly Fed reacts.
English
0
0
3
531
Krishna Memani
Krishna Memani@kkmaway·
@TimDuy Yes...but it has an impact on their other spendings as well
English
1
0
5
644
Tim Duy
Tim Duy@TimDuy·
@Brad_Setser @M_C_Klein They can’t/shouldn’t hike based on what we have here. But markets had completely closed off that side of the distribution, and now it has to be opened up.
English
0
0
5
331
Brad Setser
Brad Setser@Brad_Setser·
@TimDuy @M_C_Klein hard for the fed to look through high headline inflation right now ... but also hard to hike? so end up with flattish curve?
English
1
0
0
371
Tim Duy
Tim Duy@TimDuy·
@Brad_Setser @M_C_Klein Scaling versus output tells you how likely it is to recreate the 1970s, which people did hate. Of course now confidence surveys tells us people hate the economy no matter what is happening.
English
1
0
2
264
Brad Setser
Brad Setser@Brad_Setser·
$150 was plenty scary in 2013! High oil prices from 2010 were one reason why the US recovery was slow (reduced real incomes) and folks didn't like the economy (conversely low oil prices in Trump 1 did improve sentiment ... ). Scaling v income is useful but not determinative. Folks hated the 70s economy
English
3
0
2
490
Tim Duy รีทวีตแล้ว
Tommaso Monacelli
Tommaso Monacelli@monacelt·
Should monetary policy "look-through" the current energy price shock? ➡️Old debate: energy shocks are "temporary" in nature. Central banks should look them through ➡️We argue in our work that the look-through doctrine does not hold when *supply chain uncertainty * is elevated👇
Tommaso Monacelli tweet media
English
6
49
203
17.6K
Tim Duy รีทวีตแล้ว
*Walter Bloomberg
*Walter Bloomberg@DeItaone·
FED'S BOWMAN: I HAVE WRITTEN IN THREE CUTS FOR THIS YEAR
English
57
77
730
150.7K
Tim Duy
Tim Duy@TimDuy·
@federalreserve really being outclassed by other CBs. *ECB FORECASTS ASSUME 2026 OIL PRICE OF $81.3/BARREL *ECB OFFICIALS SEE POSSIBILITY OF RATE HIKE AT APRIL MEETING *RBNZ SAYS GOVERNOR SPEECH TO ADDRESS IMPACTS OF IRAN WAR
English
0
0
5
1.3K
Tim Duy
Tim Duy@TimDuy·
“He”
Riccardo Trezzi@RiccardoTrezzi

🇺🇸 #FOMC I never do this but this time let me say it straight. The FOMC member who wrote down 2.3% as a forecast for headline PCE in 2026 (revised up 1 tenth from Dec) has absolutely NO CLUE whatsoever what he/she is talking about. And honestly, it’s almost emberassing to watch; no matter who he/she is.

QST
1
2
29
9.2K