Zwan

5.8K posts

Zwan banner
Zwan

Zwan

@ZwanMahmod

Writer

UK เข้าร่วม Ekim 2014
151 กำลังติดตาม101 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Zwan
Zwan@ZwanMahmod·
For the uninitiated on Rojava (Western Kurdistan) - zwan.substack.com/p/rojava-and-w… The Libertarian Socialist experiment must be defended by force of arms, ideally and preferably via transnational Kurdish unity.
Zwan tweet media
English
3
1
2
762
Zwan
Zwan@ZwanMahmod·
@TzillaSaid @mohammedIhysse Are you dumb? West Asia is the Middle East. You could have remained silent and hidden your ignorance yet you decided to advertise it.
English
0
0
0
7
mohammed hussein~Gaza 🇵🇸
mohammed hussein~Gaza 🇵🇸@mohammedIhysse·
While we were trapped in northern Gaza and the bombardment intensified, I decided to move to the south to escape death. There was an Israeli army checkpoint. When my wife, my children, and I crossed, an Israeli soldier shouted at me, telling me to lower my head to the ground. He ordered me loudly to say that Palestine does not exist and to say that I am a rat. Sadly, I said it — I even said I was a rat. Not because I was afraid for myself, but because I was afraid they might kill my children in front of me, or kill me and leave my children alone after me. I remembered this moment now, and today I say it openly: Palestine is our land, and you occupied it. One day it will be free. I am not a rat — and you know that. You were standing with your weapon in front of my children, while I had nothing but the clothes I was wearing. I am not a rat, and Palestine is my homeland...
English
268
2.2K
7.7K
117.7K
Zwan
Zwan@ZwanMahmod·
@BritishPsycho__ Yes but he doesn’t believe this, slight bit of pressure and he returns to his usual nastiness and close mindedness.
English
0
0
0
15
𝔹𝕣𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕤𝕙 ℙ𝕤𝕪𝕔𝕙𝕠 🇬🇧
Obviously I’m team Green but this is smart
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10

No point calling Green supporting young men and women ‘Marxists’ or ‘indoctrinated’ or ‘hard-left’. Some are, fine. Most aren’t. Most are just feeling patronised, insulted and neglected by an establishment that quite evidently doesn’t care about them. It hasn’t for a very long time. We all know that. They see the system doesn’t work for them, and they’re reacting to it. Democratically and fairly. Do I think Polanski will solve their problems? No. No I do not. Do I understand why they’re searching for an answer? Yes. Absolutely. Our job is to offer them an alternative option that they feel speaks for them. Polanski has done that, to be fair. Our job is to make sure Restore Britain does the same, but from a very different position. One that rewards their hard work, protects our borders, and unapologetically puts aspirational young British men and women at the very top of our agenda. One that provides skilled jobs which pay well, a path to living in a decent home in a safe neighbourhood - the opportunity to build a family. That’s what Restore Britain is aiming to do. Millions of young Brits are already backing that message. It’s wonderful to see. The argument against Polanski can be won, but only with a positive vision. Not patronising insults. Restore Britain has that vision.

English
21
6
450
225K
Zwan รีทวีตแล้ว
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
So, if I got that right, here's the narrative: - A US F-15E fighter jet got shot down over Iran, despite Trump saying 2 days beforehand in his nationwide address that Iran has "no anti-aircraft equipment. Their radar is 100% annihilated." (apnews.com/article/donald…) - The plane's weapons systems officer - a "highly respected Colonel," according to Trump - ejected from the plane and got "seriously wounded" (still according to Trump: @realDonaldTrump/116351956955900185" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTru…) - He still managed to "hike up a 7,000-foot [2.1km] mountain ridgeline and hide in a crevice" in the Zagros Mountains, despite his wounds (time.com/article/2026/0…) - U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drones started killing all "Iranian military-aged males believed to be a threat who got within three kilometers of [the American's location]" (x.com/ByChrisGordon/…) - To retrieve him the U.S. managed to seize an "abandoned airport," 200 miles deep inside Iran, near Isfahan (bbc.com/news/articles/…), which happens to be where Iran's largest atomic scientific center is located (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isfahan_N…) - They landed two MC-130 military transport planes in that airport (theaviationist.com/2026/04/05/u-s…) in an operation involving "hundreds of special forces troops and military personnel" (time.com/article/2026/0…) - Both MC-130 planes got "stuck in the sand" and the U.S. destroyed them themselves "to prevent them from falling into Iranian hands" (theaviationist.com/2026/04/05/u-s…) - They deployed "three new aircraft to extract all the U.S. personnel" on the ground (theaviationist.com/2026/04/05/u-s…) - There are videos circulating online of "heavy clashes" with presumably Iranian missiles raining down in Kohgiluyeh County, in the Zagros Mountains during that night (x.com/Afshin_Ismaeli…) - Iran sent pictures of the aftermath at the "abandoned airport" and it's a sight of utter destruction, with US plane and MH-6 helicopter parts scattered all over the ground, still smoking (turkiyetoday.com/region/wreckag…). Iran claims they are the ones who in fact destroyed all the aircraft. - Meanwhile a second U.S. plane, an A-10 Warthog, also crashed on Friday near the Strait of Hormuz according to two U.S. officials speaking to the NYT (#47863db0-d61e-51bf-b7e1-6c4a9dc988e7" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">nytimes.com/live/2026/04/0…). In that instance too the lone pilot was apparently "safely rescued." - In all this, after the multiple planes and helicopters destroyed or shot down, the documented heavy clashes, the "hundreds of special forces troops and military personnel" operating deep inside Iran, not a single US soldier was reported killed "or even wounded" (according to Trump: @realDonaldTrump/116350133044957842" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTru…). - And the 'highly respected Colonel' this was all for? No name. No photo. No interview. Nobody has spoken to him nor knows who he is. So to sum up: anti-aircraft equipment that supposedly didn't exist shot down an F-15 (and, apparently, an A-10 Warthog the same day). A seriously wounded man climbed a 2.1km mountain. The US seized an airfield 200 miles inside a country it's at war with, next to one of its most strategic nuclear sites, and deployed hundreds of troops all apparently unimpeded. Lost two planes to "sand" and destroyed their own helicopters. Videos show heavy clashes, missiles raining down - but not a single person got "even wounded". And the man at the center of it all? Nobody knows who he is, completely anonymous, zero pictures, but Trump says he is "SAFE and SOUND." And so is the rescued A-10 Warthog pilot, who also remains anonymous. Trump concludes this all proves the US has "achieved overwhelming Air Dominance and Superiority over the Iranian skies" (@realDonaldTrump/116350133044957842" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTru…), despite the whole episode only happening because Iran shot his planes out of the sky. Basically, the only thing that's "overwhelming" here is the audacity of the storytelling...
English
865
7K
22K
2.2M
mark
mark@thisisnotmark_·
@sircalebhammer literally all this guy does is interview amazing world changing people, talk about how filled with love he is for everyone, even those he disagrees with or who hate him, and try and put as much good as he can into the world. I suppose that's enough for the internet
English
10
1
416
52.4K
Zwan
Zwan@ZwanMahmod·
@piersmorgan You are by every metric right wing Piers.
English
0
0
0
1
Bret Weinstein
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein·
Trump, who I advocated for in 2024, has gone full "mad king." In considering my responsibility, I'd ask you to remember: The case I made rested on the fact that Biden/Harris were figureheads, shielding a cabal that couldn't be held to account, whereas Trump could. And we must.
Bret Weinstein tweet media
English
2K
860
11.4K
792.5K
Zwan
Zwan@ZwanMahmod·
@Acyn Just propaganda, getting the wife of the VP to say nice things about her own husband while an illegal war has been waged abroad by his president.
English
0
0
0
29
Acyn
Acyn@Acyn·
Kayleigh: What’s something that we don’t know that you want America to know about your husband? Usha Vance: There are a lot of misconceptions about him. He is the nicest, funniest guy.
English
405
56
436
1.4M
ThePatrioticBlonde🇺🇸
ThePatrioticBlonde🇺🇸@ImBreckWorsham·
The spokesperson for Khatam al-Anbiya: "We will exchange the captured American pilot for the release of 10,000 Palestinian prisoners."
ThePatrioticBlonde🇺🇸 tweet media
English
1.7K
14.1K
52.2K
1.1M
Joe Eff
Joe Eff@JoeEffOff·
@yannispappas Is modern day Turkey torturing and murdering a captive people? No? Then, no.
English
7
0
5
1.6K
yannispappas
yannispappas@yannispappas·
I don’t think the way Israel was founded in the vacuum of a defeated Ottoman Empire was good. But how is its creation fundamentally different from all nations, most of which were formed after empires collapsed, borders were redrawn, and populations were displaced?
English
214
52
1.2K
104.9K
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
Fact check: Trump is making America great, even despite all these anti-American losers who don't want him to.
Joey C@JoeyCaruso3

@ConceptualJames @Emilio_A_Garcia @ComicDaveSmith Update our model? You’re still operating like Trumps gunna make America great. You don’t even argue claims, you just attack the person. You’re a low-iq, no dignity, lying loser that has no ground to stand on. You built your house on the sand

English
9
11
53
4.3K
Gina Milan
Gina Milan@ginamilan_·
Never thought I’d see Americans rooting for Iranians to capture U.S. soldiers. Fucking sick.
English
2.1K
2.1K
29.8K
1.2M
Zwan
Zwan@ZwanMahmod·
@quantum_shadow_ Extremely accurate. It’s embarrassing how fawned over he is.
English
0
0
1
4
Zwan
Zwan@ZwanMahmod·
@sneako You’re an idiot of monumental proportions.
English
0
0
0
5
SNEAKO
SNEAKO@sneako·
I miss Barack Obama man
English
2.8K
553
8.1K
7.5M
Zwan
Zwan@ZwanMahmod·
@nfergus Is there anyone who still takes this idiot and apologist for war criminals seriously? Please someone stand up and say they do and argue their case.
English
0
0
0
32
Niall Ferguson
Niall Ferguson@nfergus·
American Suez. A doleful essay for Good Friday. "There is now a rising probability that Trump’s war backfires on him much as Eden’s did—economically, politically, and geopolitically. Which raises the question: Is this the American Suez?" 1/5
Niall Ferguson tweet media
English
146
135
673
714.4K
JuliansRum
JuliansRum@ItsJuliansRum·
“bUt ThEO vOn VoTeD fOr tHeSe pEoPle” Yea exactly that’s why he’s pissed. It’s why we’re all pissed. We thought we voted for America First but we got more of the same bullshit.
English
3.1K
2.5K
31.4K
1.8M
Zwan
Zwan@ZwanMahmod·
@petsonii @beyoncegarden This is just word salad nonsense, inspired by Peterson’s own style. He could not meaningfully answer the question because it would undermine his original position.
English
0
0
1
111
Petsoni
Petsoni@petsonii·
The fact that most people think that he didn’t answer the question is beyond me. Seeing a lot of shallow thinking people commenting on that is crazy. When he asked do you BELIEVE, it’s logical that you state your views and understandings about the word you are trying to use to ask or answer the question. Belief is the definition that JP gave. People who believe something don’t need to give a cheap, binary “yes or no” to satisfy a gotcha-style hypothetical. Jordan Peterson didn’t dodge the question, he took it far more seriously than the Parker ever did. He refused to play the superficial game of treating “belief in God” like some casual opinion you can test with a pen-in-hand scenario or a Nazi-at-the-door dilemma. Instead, he drilled down into what belief actually means: not just intellectual assent or a verbal checkbox, but a lived commitment that shows up in your patterns of action, your moral choices, and the way you orient your entire existence. That’s why he defined the term first. It wasn’t evasion, it was precision. He turned a shallow trap question into a real philosophical discussion about what it truly means to believe something as profound as an all-knowing God. Most critics missed that because they want sound-bite simplicity. Peterson gave depth. That’s the difference between shallow thinking and actual intellectual honesty.
English
35
2
115
21.9K