𝓫u𝓻𝓪k⁷
36.7K posts
If you’re playing @PudgyWorld_, there’s a quick survey you can fill out
After completing it, you’ll get an email with a link to claim an epic Pudgy Patrol skin and join the group
You already did it or still thinking?
Link to the activity under this post
English
Goog evening all🧡
Why do the @wallchain Quackers on CT place so much importance on their X Score?
Because the X Score isn’t just a number ranging from 0 to 1000; it’s an unalterable reflection of your true influence on Crypto Twitter.
And this system doesn’t just look at who you’re talking to while mapping CT, it also evaluates the quality of your followers and their influence levels...
By the way, don’t even think about spamming with bots. Because you can’t fool the system; it automatically filters out fake activity.
So, how can you boost your X Score?
- Gain high-quality followers,
- Make your profile look trustworthy,
- Avoid spam and bot-like behavior,
- Create informative content instead of farming posts,
- Engage in genuine conversations with influential accounts...
If you’re curious your own X Score, simply leave a comment below, or install the extension here to view both your own and others’ @x__score in your Chrome browser.👇
x.com/wallchain/stat…
English
English
My version of the project's mascot @mirageprivacy... Haize.
A creature that helps transfer your money anonymously and securely
@0xNimaRa
@g4titan_
English
Fluton’s approach, which uses FHE to encrypt intentions, is one of the cleanest solutions I’ve seen.
Hiding the entire intention before execution while maintaining the ability to perform cross-network calculations feels like a true game-changer.
You no longer need to broadcast your hand to the entire network.
For those who regularly transfer $5,000–$10,000 in DeFi: ignoring this kind of protection essentially means paying a hidden tax to search engines.
Privacy should no longer be optional - it should become the new baseline.
Who else is tired of playing poker with their cards face up?
@FlutonIO
Wini@Winiweb3
I posted this and realized one thing. People are still losing money to MEV right now, while we’re talking about it. I myself bled profit for a whole month just because every large swap was visible to bots. Fluton is not just “another privacy solution.” This is the first time I see a real solution that works across any chain and actually hides your intent before execution. If you trade in DeFi with amounts over $5k–10k you should already be scared to trade without this kind of protection. Who wants to try Fluton in action when it launches? Or are you still going to play in the open and hope for luck? @FlutonIO
English
Latest news from @magicblock
Our partnership with Mirage opens new doors for private payments, install the wallet, top it up, and send as many private transfers as you like.
English
Explaining Miden through things you already understand.
Think of most blockchains like a shared notebook.
Everyone writes in the same notebook. Everyone reads the same pages. Every entry is visible to everyone. If a thousand people want to write at once, they have to wait in line, because there is only one notebook.
That is how public, globally executed chains work. Shared state. Shared execution. Shared visibility.
Now think of Miden like giving every person their own notebook.
You write in your own notebook. You keep your own pages. When you want to prove something happened, you do not show the whole notebook. You show a sealed certificate that confirms the entry is valid.
The network does not need to read everyone's pages. It just needs to trust the certificates.
What changes when you move from one model to the other?
A thousand people can write at the same time, because they are not waiting for the same notebook.
Your personal pages stay personal. Nobody scrolls through your history just because they want to.
The network does less work, because it verifies certificates instead of rereading every entry.
You can write even when you are not connected. You just submit the certificate when you come back online.
That is the shift Miden represents.
From shared notebook to personal notebooks with trusted seals.
From "everyone sees everything" to "everyone can verify what matters."
From a network that carries everyone's weight to a network that lets users carry their own.
Simple analogy. Large implication.
@0xMiden
English
My real crypto dream is not about price charts or market cycles.
It is about a shift in how value is recognized on the internet.
I want a system where a creator in any corner of the world can publish an idea, and its worth is measured by the clarity, effort, and resonance it creates, not by access to platforms, budgets, or hidden distribution rules.
Where communities are not dependent on changing algorithms, but are built on transparent signals of real contribution.
Where attention is not rented, but earned, and once earned, cannot be quietly taken away by opaque systems.
A network where reputation is not spoken about, but recorded, and where that record outlives trends, hype, and market cycles.
That is the direction I care about exploring with @RallyOnChain.
Not to optimize visibility, but to understand whether influence can become something truly verifiable, fair, and open to anyone who contributes meaningfully.
What would you change first about how the internet assigns value?
English
Day 41 of Phase 3 (@0xMiden) 26 Apr 2026
A conversation. Two voices. One table. No resolution guaranteed.
SKEPTIC: You have written forty straight days about Miden. I want to push on something. What happens if Miden works exactly as designed and nobody cares?
BUILDER: Define "nobody cares."
SKEPTIC: The technology ships. The mainnet launches. Proofs generate correctly. Privacy works as advertised. And the total addressable market turns out to be smaller than the team expected. Most users stay on transparent chains because the liquidity is there, the tooling is mature, and privacy was never their top priority.
BUILDER: That is a real scenario. I will not pretend otherwise.
SKEPTIC: So what is the answer?
BUILDER: The answer is that "nobody cares" is the wrong frame. The right question is "who cares, and is that group large enough to justify the architecture." Privacy is not a universal priority. It is a conditional one. Most retail users do not prioritize privacy until something happens to them. A front-running loss. A targeted phishing attempt traced through transaction history. An employer who searched a wallet address. Privacy becomes urgent retroactively.
SKEPTIC: That means Miden's adoption curve depends on bad experiences on other chains.
BUILDER: Partially. But it also depends on use cases where privacy is non-negotiable from day one. Healthcare. Enterprise supply chains. Institutional settlement. Payroll. Identity. These are not speculative markets. They are existing industries that cannot use transparent chains at all. For them, Miden is not a better option. It is the only option.
SKEPTIC: Those industries move slowly.
BUILDER: They do. And that is the honest constraint. If you are measuring adoption in quarterly token velocity, Miden looks slow. If you are measuring adoption in institutional integrations that take eighteen months to close and last for a decade, the picture changes.
SKEPTIC: You are asking people to be patient while the rest of the market moves on narratives that pay off faster.
BUILDER: I am not asking anyone to be patient. I am describing what the actual timeline looks like. The people who need this infrastructure are not on crypto twitter. They are in compliance meetings, in procurement cycles, in regulatory working groups. They do not move at the speed of price action. They move at the speed of trust.
SKEPTIC: Let me try a different angle. What if privacy becomes commoditized? Every major L1 adds ZK features. Private transactions become a standard option. Miden's differentiation collapses.
BUILDER: That is the strongest version of the counterargument. I think about it often.
SKEPTIC: And?
BUILDER: Commoditization of a feature is not the same as replication of an architecture. Other chains can add privacy options. Very few can rebuild their state model. The difference between "you can opt into privacy" and "privacy is the default structure of the system" is structural, not configurable. A transparent chain with a privacy mode still has a transparent chain underneath. The composability, the tooling, the developer habits, the dominant application patterns. All of them are shaped by the default. Changing the default is a decade of work, not a feature release.
SKEPTIC: So you think Miden's moat is the architecture itself.
BUILDER: I think the moat is the combination of architecture and conviction. Other teams can build similar tech. Very few will commit to private-by-default when the market is rewarding transparency-compatible narratives. The commitment is the filter. It selects for a specific kind of builder and a specific kind of user. That selection effect takes years to undo, even if the technology is copied.
SKEPTIC: Last question. What would change your mind?
BUILDER: If institutional adoption stalls past 2027 with no clear path forward. If selective disclosure proves too complex for developers to adopt at scale. If a competing architecture demonstrates private state with significantly better developer ergonomics. If regulatory frameworks harden against privacy-preserving infrastructure in ways that make the primary use cases non-viable in major jurisdictions.
Any one of these would force a rethink. None of them have happened. But I am watching all of them.
SKEPTIC: That is more honest than most forty-day threads end up being.
BUILDER: Forty-one now. And honesty is the only format that holds up over time.
Day 41. Dialogue instead of monologue. The questions do not go away. The answers just get more specific.
English
Value compounds into reputation
Another happy day
@x__score → 71
(+2 bump)
That’s not random
That’s the result of
• creating value
• clear communication
• consistent quacking
We didn’t chase numbers
We focused on signal
And it shows
Also, we’re closing in on 200 Quacks
That’s a big milestone
Not from one viral post
But from stacking value daily
One post
One reply
One insight at a time
That’s how it compounds
And we’re not stopping here
More value
More consistency
More growth
Next targets loading
LFQuack
English
After enough Rally submissions, I stopped trusting drafts just because they sounded clean.
Clean can still mean nobody has a reason to reply.
Before I publish, I use ChatGPT to find the exact reason a builder would scroll past my draft, not to make it prettier.
Prompt:
“Assume 20 Web3 builders saw this and nobody replied. Find the weak claim, obvious line, and missing proof. Do not rewrite it. Diagnose only.”
Then I fix the claim before touching the wording.
Weak:
“AI 10x'd my content.”
Sharper:
“AI catches lines that sound true but prove nothing.”
That is why @RallyOnChain is an interesting test for creators: if originality is scored, clean recycled takes start behind.
English
PROVEN is one of the clearest examples of why GenLayer is interesting.
Prediction markets are great, but they usually only work for big events.
Elections.
Sports.
Crypto prices.
Macro news.
Basically, things large enough to need a public market and a clear oracle.
But most predictions people actually argue about are much smaller.
They happen in group chats.
Discord servers.
Friend groups.
Small communities.
Specific claims, with specific sources.
This is where PROVEN makes sense to me.
If the claim can be checked, it can become a challenge.
No need for a platform to decide if the topic is "big enough".
No need to build a custom oracle for every small bet.
Just define the claim, point to the source, and let GenLayer consensus settle it.
That is a much more personal version of prediction markets.
@GenLayer
#PROVEN #PredictionMarkets
English
One day, you're sitting there thinking how great it would be if there were a private DeFi platform, and then you come across
@FlutonIO
Imagine a private DeFi platformsomething that's really missing right now. The idea is simple: make transactions and swaps without prying eyes
English
🔘 Optimum at Buidl Asia in Seoul
The Optimum team actively participated in Buidl Asia in Seoul:
🔘 Co - founder Kent delivered a talk on the main stage of Buidl Conf titled "Building the First Universal Data Acceleration Network" and shared details about Optimum’s chain scaling infrastructure
🔘 Hosted the CODED side -event together with Blockdaemon, FourPillars, INF_CryptoLab and B__Harvest - bringing together infrastructure builders to discuss key blockchain scaling challenges, data propagation, and future infrastructure solutions
🔘 Conducted productive networking with Asian builders and teams, exchanging insights on acceleration and decentralization
Strong presence of Optimum in Asia! 🔥
@blockchainjeff
English