Gorilla violence

@LAZYG0DZ Naw umbra is the cool uncle that has beers with stalker you know Umbra, Stalker, and Hunhow on that king of the hill intro type shi

I can't believe jade, umbra, and stalker polyamory is real

@kawaiibossbaby This image of Rice shower and Haru makes me feel paternal. I need to put in more hours at the office and mow the lawn in my new balances at 7am to provide for my beautiful horse daughters. I gotta pay for their tuition at Tracen

they didn't even say "it's like some kind of backrooms in here" wtf

@VenrisSFO ATENCHUN UMIES IF U DONT LIKE GETTIN KRUMPED DEN WHY IS U SO EASY TO SMASH - DA BOYS

What faction you are going to play first in TW: Warhammer 40K and why Imperial Guard?

ウルフカットカフェ🐺☕

Longhair Wei!

Oguri ballin' 🏀 #umamusume #oguricap

@ferrell_travis @Brady_Gray Show me in the bible where it says Jesus is a brother of satan and where it says God was once a man that now lives near a star called Kolob

@boomerslayer64 @Brady_Gray You can disagree with our theology. Our theology does not contradict the Bible, only your interpretation of the Bible.

This is a red herring. No one was questioning whether Latter-day Saints believe in Jesus Christ. Even demons believe Jesus is the Son of God and know who He is (James 2:19). The question is whether LDS doctrine teaches the same Jesus and the same gospel revealed in Scripture. The answer is no.

@jonathanplumb @HarrisonGarlic1 Other translations directly mention angels Remember demons are fallen angels and can appear as angels of life to decieve. Even muhammed thought he encountered an angel

@HarrisonGarlic1 Notice what else is in 1:8 — “WE” It’s not a warning of angels declaring the gospel as found in Revelation. No, it’s a warning against MAN distorting what has been said. He was warning about YOU. 😂

The Bible literally says don’t do this.⬇️

@AshtonVandy @stephenehorn Trinitarian doctrine can be biblically backed and was only formalized to more fully understand what we see in scripture Inventing whole new scripture nearly 2000 years later and basing your theology on that is heretical

@stephenehorn Blasphemous “revelation”. Kind of like the Creeds and the idea of the Trinity?

Mormons are as Christian as Muslims Each religion nominally incorporates the Old and New Testaments into their holy texts, but adds a new blasphemous "revelation" on top

@ferrell_travis @Brady_Gray Your theology also relies on a new false book written nearly 2000 years later. Everything apostolic Christianity teaches can be biblically defended. Find Jesus being the brother of Satan and God living near a start called Kolob in actual scripture and come back to me

Be honest. Our theology contradicts your interpretation of scripture, not scripture. We fully embrace the Bible. There is no conflict other than the conflicts you read into it. You are free to disagree with our beliefs, but you aren’t free to declare definitively that your interpretation of scripture is the only correct interpretation.

@sp1fffX @Brady_Gray And trinitarian belief which can be defended biblically is more heretical than 19th century fanfiction that makes new wild claims about God incompatible with scripture? Go back in time and tell the apostles that God was just a man previously and theyd beat you with sticks

@Brady_Gray We literally do teach and worship the same Jesus Christ that is in the Bible. Where we differ are the unbiblical, fourth-century creeds that Paul warned against in Galatians 1:8. Yeah, we reject those.

@YouSpooneeBard @SocialNomadRach The trinity can be defended biblically but yall need 1800s fanfiction to explain literally any of your doctrines

@SocialNomadRach We have no problem if you Trins want to keep following your post-apostolic creeds, we just ask that you stop pretending to be Christians, that’s all.

Following the nonsense over the Nicene Creed

@1099Levant @JoelWebbon if you went back in time and told the apostle Paul that God was previously just a man and that satan and Jesus were brothers he would beat you with a stick

@JoelWebbon “Mormons keep exposing holes in my corrupt traditions, so I’m big mad & I’m gonna list everything I don’t like about them, but ignore the actual Bible where Paul gives the real definition of Christ’s gospel & Christianity in Corinthians & not mention Mormons really believe that”

Mike Lee's complaint only works if everyone agrees to ignore what Mormonism actually teaches. He wants the public to focus on the label while averting its eyes from the contents. But theology is not judged by branding. If it were, every cult in America could become orthodox by hiring a better marketing department. Mike Lee belongs to a religion that teaches God the Father was once a man who progressed to godhood, that human beings may follow the same path, that Jesus and Lucifer share the same heavenly parentage, and that the highest aspiration of the faithful is not merely to worship God forever but to become gods themselves. These are not minor disagreements within Christianity. These are different answers to the most basic questions Christianity asks. Mike Lee knows this. He was raised in Mormon royalty, educated in Mormon institutions, and formed by Mormon theology. His objection is not that the Pentagon misunderstood Mormonism. His objection is that the Pentagon accidentally described it accurately. What makes the spectacle particularly amusing is that Mormon leaders spent generations insisting they were not what Mike Lee now demands to be called. -Joseph Smith launched his movement by declaring every existing church on earth an abomination. -Brigham Young mocked the God of Christianity as a being who "never did exist." -John Taylor described Christianity as "a perfect pack of nonsense." -Bruce McConkie warned that the doctrines of Christendom would damn men's souls. -Gordon Hinckley openly admitted that the Christ worshiped by Mormons was not the Christ worshiped by traditional Christians. For nearly two centuries Mormon leaders built a theological wall between themselves and Christianity brick by brick, sermon by sermon, book by book. Now Mike Lee appears before that same wall demanding to know who built it. The answer is simple: his own prophets did. The deeper problem for Senator Lee is that Mormonism's truth claims are so spectacularly strange that they force a choice. Either they are true, in which case historic Christianity has been wrong for nearly two thousand years and Joseph Smith really did restore the gospel through golden plates, angelic visitations, sacred underwear, proxy baptisms for the dead, and a seer stone in a hat. Or they are false, in which case Mormonism is one of the most successful religious inventions in American history. What it cannot be is ordinary Christianity. The faith that emerged from Nicaea and Chalcedon has many internal disputes, but none of them involve exalted men becoming gods, planets populated by spirit children, or a deity residing near a star called Kolob. Mike Lee is free to believe every one of those things. What he is not free to do is pretend they are the same religion that produced the Apostles' Creed.

@StealMyPic @Schiavojer @fire_starter457 The last boom written was revelation and that was directly by the apostle john in the first century what fanfiction have you been reading

@Schiavojer @fire_starter457 Most of the Bible is “extra”. Unknown authors who wrote it hundreds of years after Jesus died.

Are Mormons just now figuring out that Evangelicals and Catholics consider them a cult and not Christian? 🤣🤣😂😂

@HardmanSco50996 @tallsnail Reddit is down the hall and to the left

@tallsnail This is why I'm an atheist. It's all made up and the points don't matter.

I was raised Mormon and it took me a long time to understand how fundamentally different it is from historic Christianity. Even as recently as 3 years ago, I didn't get why it was a big deal that we didn't believe in the Trinity Mormon theology does not present God as an "uncaused cause", existence itself, the "Logos". In Mormonism, God *is* a "man in the sky", a created being, someone who was once human but is now exalted within our known universe. This opens up a lot of problems imo. For example: what happens when death and evil are overcome on our planet, and you reach exaltation? You are now a God of a new universe/planet to create a new race of humanity and evil arises all over again and the drama continues into eternity? There is no message of the ultimate overcoming of death/evil as in historic Christianity In all my childhood and young adult instruction in the LDS church, I never learned that Jesus was "God in the flesh" or anything like that. Jesus really was taught as a distinct BEING from God the Father (who again... Is a *created being*). It is a fundamentally different Christ that is believed and worshipped.

@w1lliep @AppyBeard Remember Galatians 1:8, the book of mormon is very blatantly a gospel contrary to what the apostles spoke of. Joseph smith added new contrary lore while all Catholic/Orthodox doctrine can be biblically backed. We dont need a new book from someone with 0 authority to legitimise us

@boomerslayer64 @AppyBeard What did Paul do the entirety of his life? He corrected churches through prophetic council in his epistles why? Becuase the churches weren’t doing what they were supposed to be doing or? Becoming apostate? his letters corrected that. What do you think would happen after he died?

mormons just finding out we don’t consider them christian is kind of surprising. i always thought they knew this.

@w1lliep @AppyBeard Because that claim would require the entire church to become apostate almost instantly and there's zero evidence of that happening. The didache and epistles of St ignatius sound infinitely more catholic/orthodox than they do mormon

@boomerslayer64 @AppyBeard It says in Ephesians 4 that until the unification of the faith he sent prophets apostles pastors teachers evangelists and so forth for the perfecting of the saints so they aren’t swayed by every wind of doctrine. So if there aren’t apostles in the lords timing he’ll call new ones

@w1lliep @AppyBeard So you're saying the gates of hell prevailed against Christs church for 1800 years? Also if you went back to Christians in the first century, lets say 70ad and explained Mormon, Catholic, and orthodox doctrine. You're saying they would recognize mormon doctrine over the rest

@w1lliep @AppyBeard when and where in the bible did it say a random dude 1800 years after the birth of christ would spawn in with a new gospel also obviously bishops dont have the same authority as an apostle but they have authority over the laity and their local diocese

@boomerslayer64 @AppyBeard So when&where in the Bible did any of the apostles say to the bishops they have the same authority&universal jurisdiction like they did to found more churches send epistles? Easy answer they didn’t, the authority of a bishop isn’t the same. They’re distinct&different

@w1lliep @AppyBeard you wont believe a council of 4th century bishops with direct apostolic succession but you'll believe the claims of a random dude with 0 apostolic succession in the 19th century?

@AppyBeard Sorry but the correct term would be credalist. We’re just surprised by ignorance in the difference between that and Christianity.if you believe in a 4th century councils uninspired and non-apostolic definition of the trinity then you’re not a Christian either you’re a creedaliat.