broms ױ

2.2K posts

broms ױ banner
broms ױ

broms ױ

@br6ms

The Ends เข้าร่วม Ağustos 2016
220 กำลังติดตาม824 ผู้ติดตาม
broms ױ
broms ױ@br6ms·
@The_SerealThnkr @ncbtrades Yeah better to do that, the playing it off follow up post doesn't fool us when clearly he's still embarrased he made a 10 iq post and was called out for it.
English
0
0
1
36
HW
HW@The_SerealThnkr·
@ncbtrades Just take the L and own up to it brother-man @ncbtrades
English
1
0
7
203
Noah | NCBTRADES
Noah | NCBTRADES@ncbtrades·
Looks like we have a very emotional genius over here. I can also tell you’re a very brave man when behind a keyboard but would probably get destroyed in any real life scenario requiring physical ability. Your IQ might be several orders of magnitude higher than mine, I’m cool with that. Appreciate the interaction boost nonetheless. I apologize for hurting your feelings talking about your coin 🫱🏼‍🫲🏽 Your community has intrigued me I must admit. Going to grab a bag and learn me something new. God bless.
Come-from-Beyond@c___f___b

Why compare apples (whole coins) and oranges (satoshis)? Attempt to mislead? Natural stupidity? Now I see why you need Artificial Intelligence...

English
14
2
45
6.9K
Come-from-Beyond
Come-from-Beyond@c___f___b·
Why compare apples (whole coins) and oranges (satoshis)? Attempt to mislead? Natural stupidity? Now I see why you need Artificial Intelligence...
Come-from-Beyond tweet media
English
19
59
498
22.3K
Noah | NCBTRADES
Noah | NCBTRADES@ncbtrades·
$Qubic has a supply of 200 trillion. And I hear people talking about swapping $TAO for it? K. Some of you guys are retardmaxxing without the maxing part… You can’t make this shit up. It’s common sense 1/21,000,000 Is significantly better than 1/200,000,000,000,000 wtf are we even talking about rn….
Frost. ױ@_MRImmaculate

@ncbtrades I like Tao. Ima be using AGI on Qubic to trade it when the opportunity presents itself. Huge difference between the except the world yet knows about it

English
30
4
50
14.7K
zuqka ױ
zuqka ױ@zuqkaX·
The Satoshi Nakamoto Case File: Re-evaluating the Digital Footprints A recent analysis attempts to approach the Satoshi Nakamoto identity question strictly through timeline alignment and data elimination. The approach first rules out frequently cited candidates based on historical discrepancies. Verified emails show Adam Back being introduced to the b money paper by Satoshi. Hal Finney was documented participating in a running race at the exact timestamp Satoshi sent an email to Mike Hearn. Timeline overlaps with other businesses similarly complicate theories around Len Sassaman and Sergey Nazarov. Blockchain data shows a wallet that mined Bitcoin on January 8, 2009, when Satoshi was the only active miner, moved coins to an exchange in October 2024. This suggests the creator is still alive and holds the early keys. The analysis then points to Belarusian programmer Sergey Ivancheglo, known by aliases like Come from Beyond and BC Next, by aligning several circumstantial data points. Bitcoin mining paused entirely between January 4 and January 8, 2009, right after the Genesis Block. Public records show a user named Sergey, operating on the same Russian proxy server used by Satoshi, reviewed a cruise from St. Petersburg that departed and returned on those exact dates. On January 12, 2009, Satoshi emailed Hal Finney about generating vanity addresses. The very next day, a confirmed Satoshi block mined an address beginning with 1CFB, matching Ivancheglo’s alias. Another confirmed Satoshi address begins with 15UBIC. This closely resembles Qubic, a quorum based coin project Ivancheglo officially announced in 2012 on the BitcoinTalk forums. Stylometrics also play a role. Ivancheglo’s 1998 posts in cypherpunk mailing lists share highly specific formatting quirks with Satoshi’s writings, including consistent double spaces after periods and specific comma chaining. After Satoshi formally stepped away in 2011, the NXT project was later launched by the anonymous BC Next on January 3, 2013, exactly five years to the day after the Bitcoin Genesis block. Ivancheglo later cryptographically proved the BC Next alias belonged to him. x.com/i/status/20326…
zuqka ױ tweet media
English
7
46
202
8.6K
Tokenoya 🇦🇪🇫🇷
Tokenoya 🇦🇪🇫🇷@Tokenoya·
@br6ms Yes they will invest. At the end of the day, their only objective is making money. Once they understand what’s happening with Qubic, they’ll do exactly what TradFi did with $BTC, mock it first, then buy it.
English
2
2
15
247
broms ױ รีทวีตแล้ว
chad ױ
chad ױ@THE_chosen_CHAD·
$qubic vs $tao One has the ai infrastructure built into a Global hardware layer directly. Smart contracts are bare metal. C++ The other has outside vendors (miners) contributing power to a proof of stake protocol for there ai solutions. One says it’s the Bitcoin of ai. The other actually is built to be the Bitcoin of ai.
chad ױ tweet media
English
2
14
83
1.4K
broms ױ
broms ױ@br6ms·
Cool you sold and can buy Qubic cheaper, if you dont buy back in and continue to put your chips into Valis then you will regret it massively. Are you prepared to have walked away at 4k just for it to go to the top 10 in the bigger picture, while your stuck in a illiquid and clearly flawed investment that is Valis?
English
1
0
3
164
Wolf 🐺
Wolf 🐺@Trader_LoneWolf·
@br6ms @PumpitFox How can you say I made a mistake when I sold at $4,000 per billion Qubic and it's now trading around $700 per billion? And how can you claim Valis has failed when the project isn't even accessible to the public yet, and only a handful of people are aware of its current progress?
English
1
0
3
179
⚡️⚡️Renardo Dicaprio⚡️⚡️
Dear #Qubic community, Many of you have been wondering what happened to Qsilver, so let me clarify the situation. Qsilver actually left #Valis a long time ago after realizing two key things: first, that Spelunker turned out to be a psychopath; and second, that the project Qsilver planned to launch on the Qubic chain would never come to life because of all the drama that unfolded. Panicked, Spelunker begged Qsilver to keep posting about Valis to make it seem as if he was still involved. (You may notice that Qsilver hasn’t written anything original about Valis since August 2024 only reposts appeared until September 2025.) After that, Qsilver completely cut off contact with Spelunker. Not only do #Valis investors still believe that Qsilver is part of the team, but Spelunker has gone even further he created a new account pretending to be Qsilver and keeps posting fake project updates. In reality, it’s an Indian developer working in Qsilver’s place.😂😂😂😂😂 Spelunker holds Cfb responsible for all of this, which is why he keeps posting negatively about Qubic. Dear #Valis investors, try to get your money back if you still can. $Qubic
GIF
English
15
10
90
4.1K
Wolf 🐺
Wolf 🐺@Trader_LoneWolf·
@PumpitFox I hope that you will have balls to say that you were wrong once it’s proven that your post is a lie.
English
3
0
3
488
broms ױ
broms ױ@br6ms·
You're going to sell very early then and miss out. I don't get stances like this where you think 6-7bill is near impossible let alone breaking ath. What's the point of being in Qubic then? I don't get the 'qubic supporters' that are pessimistic about price potential, you either believe or you don't, there's no sitting on the fence for a project like this. The people that will get left out are the ones that will over think the whole Qubic thesis and talk themselves into doubting the potential and what it will do in a bull run. I've already seen too many examples of this by people in Qubic who either got bored or emotional from the pa over the last 2 years. Have to be careful you don't fall into the same trap.
English
0
0
1
50
Moonshot ױ
Moonshot ױ@LondonCoinGuy·
You mean $6-7 billion mcap. As much as i expect a good bounce from these levels, I doubt it very much gets that high. I will happily pay 1b $Qubic towards any charity of CFB choosing if we get anywhere near those levels. That would be $50k USd by April 2027. He has given a date in April 2027 but like previous dates, they are usually good times to sell 👀
GIF
English
2
0
1
378
Gibaldi88
Gibaldi88@OSACrypto1·
If $Qubic doesnt make a 100x from current levels by 2027, then I am gay! I will literally change my name then to "Gaybaldi88" until it happens... But if it does… a lot of people will have to rethink their assumptions. Only time will tell🕚💎
English
29
8
169
5.1K
broms ױ รีทวีตแล้ว
Misfitcompany K.I.R | D.O.M
Misfitcompany K.I.R | D.O.M@miseryfitco·
*French accent* 🧵(1/20) A case for why @PumpitFox should be allowed back into Qubic Discord by the @_Qubic_ Moderation team. About 5-6 months ago in September of 2025 Renard decided to be a voice for the Qubic Community in trying to understand how and why funds were being used.
English
6
3
18
3.5K
broms ױ รีทวีตแล้ว
David Vivancos - e/acc
David Vivancos - e/acc@VivancosDavid·
We are very happy to share that @josesanchezhb & @VivancosDavid new upcoming paper "The Neutral Buffer State": Trinary Logic Advantage in Branching Ratio Stability for Continuous-Time Networks Has been accepted for publication & presentation at #AMLDS 2026 International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning and Data Science in Osaka, Japan 21st-23rd July. @IEEEorg SMC @UnivKansai NICT Integral part of our work on #Neuraxon #Aigarth for @_Qubic_ #OpenScience @c___f___b a new bio-inspired approach to True #AI
David Vivancos - e/acc tweet media
English
46
143
477
34.3K
broms ױ รีทวีตแล้ว
Come-from-Beyond
Come-from-Beyond@c___f___b·
@SecWar Anthropic is the least of your problems. By requesting "full, unrestricted" control over #AI you use, you have just put on a T-shirt saying "We are your target number 1". To all the other AIs. Tell your analists to analyze these words, their meaning is obviously above your head.
English
8
36
288
9.8K
broms ױ
broms ױ@br6ms·
@CadeONeill @KalastavaPekka The snowball effect on Qubic's compute is crazy, it will scale better than any big company out there. The network is literally built to be the decentralised ai hub for the world. No one else has a network this fast and advanced on bare metal.
English
1
0
4
88
Cade O'Neill
Cade O'Neill@CadeONeill·
@KalastavaPekka If it delivers on distributed compute at scale, it could be bigger than most realize. Still early though
English
2
1
15
1.2K
Cade O'Neill
Cade O'Neill@CadeONeill·
I started looking into $QUBIC a bit more, and it’s actually pretty interesting. It’s not just another chain trying to copy the usual DeFi playbook. The idea is more about distributed computing, people contributing compute power to the network and getting rewarded for it. So it’s not just send tokens, pay fees. It’s more about turning the network into something productive. Still early, still has to prove itself. But I always pay attention when a project is trying something different instead of recycling the same narrative. Anyone here been following $QUBIC closely?
English
53
79
440
15.3K
broms ױ
broms ױ@br6ms·
Lot of noise around certain things in $qubic. The fact is the only things that matter or decide Qubic's success is CFB and the devs building the network and AIGARTH. Everything else is just noise. Theres a lot of people that claim to understand Qubic but in the end they really dont if they lose conviction in the project because of someone or a team working in Qubic. People come and go, CFB and what Qubic will achieve will remain unchanged. A lot of this noise has really shown the people that have no understanding of Qubic and who aren't actually here because of conviction in CFB and the vision. Study CFB, his history and how Qubic is designed to be the new paradigm in crypto and everything is clearer.
English
19
21
142
6.5K
chad ױ
chad ױ@THE_chosen_CHAD·
I have a suspicion that satoshi thought about this ai craze before the masses. $qubic and chill
English
3
9
122
1.9K
Lex Fridman
Lex Fridman@lexfridman·
The power of AI agents comes from: 1. intelligence of the underlying model 2. how much access you give it to all your data 3. how much freedom & power you give it to act on your behalf I think for 2 & 3, security is the biggest problem. And very soon, if not already, security will become THE bottleneck for effectiveness and usefulness of AI agents as a whole (1-3), since intelligence is still rapidly scaling and is no-longer an obvious bottleneck for many use-cases. The more data & control you give to the AI agent: (A) the more it can help you AND (B) the more it can hurt you. A lot of tech-savvy folks are in yolo mode right now and optimizing for the former (A - usefulness) over the the latter (B - pain of cyber attacks, leaked data, etc). I think solving the AI agent security problem is the big blocker for broad adoption. And of course, this is a specific near-term instance of the broader AI safety problem. All that said, this is a super exciting time to be alive for developers. I constantly have agent loops running on programming & non-programming tasks. I'm actively using Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and very carefully experimenting with OpenClaw. The only down-side is lack of sleep, and an anxious feeling that everyone feels of always being behind of latest state-of-the-art. But other than that, I'm walking around with a big smile on my face, loving life 🔥❤️ PS: By the way, if your intuition about any of the above is different, please lay out your thoughts on it. And if there are cool projects/approaches I should check out, let me know. I'm in full explore/experiment mode.
English
790
366
3.8K
363.6K
Algod
Algod@AlgodTrading·
Its quite clear energy will be a big bottleneck in the future Is there any project within crypto that is doing interesting stuff? I’m aware it’s complex but maybe there are viable implementations
English
96
8
228
27.4K