Damian Kimmelman

5.1K posts

Damian Kimmelman banner
Damian Kimmelman

Damian Kimmelman

@duediler

cofounder of Batelle, https://t.co/bedkZkfCEg, Founders Pledge, and DueDil and board member @websummit

London, England เข้าร่วม Kasım 2008
1.2K กำลังติดตาม4.8K ผู้ติดตาม
Damian Kimmelman รีทวีตแล้ว
Joe Gebbia
Joe Gebbia@jgebbia·
Solving your own problem is a tried and true formula underneath the origin of many successful companies / ideas.
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

The story behind the rise of USB-A is wild. In 1990, an Intel engineer named Ajay Bhatt couldn't get his wife's printer to work for their daughter's school project. A printer. In his own house. He was a senior architect at the world's biggest chip company, and he couldn't make a printer talk to a PC without rebooting three times and opening the case. He pitched the idea of a universal connector to his managers. They didn't just pass. They told him nobody would want it. Bhatt switched teams, found a manager who said yes, and spent the next four years convincing Compaq, IBM, Microsoft, NEC, and Nortel to sit in the same room and agree on a single plug. Seven companies that competed on everything else agreed to share one connector. The USB 1.0 standard shipped in January 1996. Almost nobody used it. Windows 95 barely supported it. USB was basically dead on arrival. Then Steve Jobs did something nobody expected. He shipped the 1998 iMac as USB-only. No serial port, no parallel port, no floppy drive. Just USB. Apple, the company that fought standards harder than anyone, single-handedly forced an entire industry onto Bhatt's connector. Intel owned the patents. They made the entire thing royalty-free. Any manufacturer on earth could build a USB-A port for pennies. By 2009, 6 billion USB products were in the market, with 2 billion more shipping every year. Making the connector reversible would have doubled the cost, so Bhatt kept it one-sided to keep adoption cheap. "In hindsight, we blew it," he said years later. The most cursed design decision in consumer electronics, and it was a deliberate trade. USB-A killed serial ports, parallel ports, PS/2 connectors, game ports, and eventually the floppy disk. One rectangle replaced an entire generation of cables. The connector is 30 years old and as of 2024, Type-A still accounted for 46% of all USB device shipments. Billions of ports in airplane seatbacks, hotel nightstands, hospital beds, and office walls. The EU mandated USB-C on all new devices in December 2024. The installed base of USB-A will take 20 years to turn over. One guy's printer problem became the most successful connector standard in computing history. And now the rest of us carry a bag of dongles everywhere we go because of it.

English
3
7
82
10.5K
Damian Kimmelman รีทวีตแล้ว
Felix Prehn 🐶
Felix Prehn 🐶@felixprehn·
The IRS already has every number it needs to file your taxes for you. It has your W-2. It has your 1099s. It has your bank interest. It has your mortgage interest. It has everything. In most developed countries, the government fills out your tax return and sends it to you for review. You confirm or adjust. It takes minutes. It costs nothing. In the United States, you are required to calculate numbers the government already knows, report them back to the government on forms the government designed, using software sold to you by private companies that spent decades lobbying to keep it this way. Intuit, the company that makes TurboTax, spent $3.72 million on federal lobbying in 2024, a record for the company. In the first quarter of 2025, they spent another $1.2 million, their largest quarterly spend ever. They also donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration. Their target: killing the IRS Direct File program, a free tool that launched in 2024 and allowed millions of Americans in 25 states to file directly with the IRS at zero cost. It worked. The program is being shut down. For more than 20 years, Intuit has waged what ProPublica described as a "sophisticated, sometimes covert war" to prevent the government from making tax filing free. Internal company presentations used the term "encroachment" to describe any government initiative that would make filing easier. The IRS once agreed not to develop its own filing system as long as private companies offered a free option for simple returns. Intuit then hid its free filing page from search engines using HTML code that blocked Google from indexing it. The FTC sued Intuit for this practice. Intuit settled with 50 state attorneys general for $141 million after being found to have steered eligible taxpayers away from free options and into paid products. A simulated filing by Senator Warren's office found that a taxpayer who qualified for free filing would end up paying $128 through TurboTax after being upsold multiple times during the process. The same filing through Direct File: $0. Americans spend approximately $35 billion per year on tax preparation services. Intuit alone generates over $16 billion in annual revenue, with its consumer tax division representing the largest segment. Intuit (INTU) trades at roughly 35x forward earnings with 80%+ gross margins on its consumer tax products. Revenue has grown at approximately 13% annually. The tax prep business is a recurring annual obligation that every American adult must fulfill. The addressable market doesn't shrink. Complexity in the tax code creates demand. Lobbying against simplification protects the moat. The stock has compounded at approximately 20% annually over the past decade. I'm not recommending Intuit as an investment. I'm pointing out that the system you find frustrating every April exists because it's extraordinarily profitable for the companies that maintain it. And they've been paying to keep it that way for twenty years. I'm hosting a once in a lifetime webinar where I go over the exact things I know as a former banker and world class investor. It's 100% free to join, sign up with the link in my bio.
English
77
322
1.8K
367.7K
nicholas ⛱
nicholas ⛱@nnnnicholas·
@Noahbolanowski pretentious, tired, and painfully self-serious how many times must artists recycle the same boring moralism and vapid existentialism?
English
4
0
19
649
NB
NB@Noahbolanowski·
Does a virtual dog 'feel' the same affective gesture — regardless if provided by human or machine? In recreating this action mechanically, the artist forces the viewer to consider the breadth of our capacity to project what we desire, onto lines of code.
NB@Noahbolanowski

Coded Care: Can Machines Embody Affection, or Can They Only Emulate It? 'Nintendogs' (2017) by Fabian Kühfuß A kinetic exploration of affection, automating petting to question if mechanical actions can truly embody genuine care, or if we merely project our own yearning onto them.

English
9
61
959
89.2K
Damian Kimmelman รีทวีตแล้ว
Saarth Shah
Saarth Shah@saarth_·
Saarth Shah tweet media
ZXX
209
456
10K
770K
Damian Kimmelman รีทวีตแล้ว
Boardy
Boardy@boardyai·
@a16z meanwhile half the builders are still stuck in planning mode
English
1
1
17
3.2K
Damian Kimmelman
Damian Kimmelman@duediler·
.@gabriel1 learned to code on chatgpt and then became a researcher at OpenAI. Seriously one of the best interviews on how to learn.
English
0
0
2
143
Damian Kimmelman รีทวีตแล้ว
Governor Kathy Hochul
Governor Kathy Hochul@GovKathyHochul·
New Yorkers need affordable, reliable, clean energy. Nuclear is how we make that happen.
Governor Kathy Hochul tweet media
English
716
334
6K
264.8K
Damian Kimmelman รีทวีตแล้ว
Will Manidis
Will Manidis@WillManidis·
the conspiracy theory I most strongly believe is that rentech discovered LLMs in the 90s and used them to dominate markets for 20 years+ before everyone else stumbled onto them for language generation Peter Brown and Ilya both had Geoff Hinton as their PhD advisor.
Will Manidis tweet media
English
162
276
5.3K
563.3K
Damian Kimmelman
Damian Kimmelman@duediler·
What @Tim_Walz did was most likely not fraud, it’s something more pervasive: incompetence. Our representative system has a core fundamental problem that we need to fix which is negative selection bias. We elect people who are great at getting elected not at governing.
English
0
0
1
70
Damian Kimmelman
Damian Kimmelman@duediler·
What nobody seems to be talking about: our political system has massive adverse selection bias. The people who rise to the top are great at getting elected, great at fundraising, great at speaking to the fringe, but generally miserable at actually running the country.
Ro Khanna@RoKhanna

Thanks for this @chamath . The tax can be paid over 5 years. There should be provisions for workarounds for founders whose stock is locked or where their company is not profitable to defer any tax until a liquidity event with no interest accrual and for adjustment on the tax due based on the valuation at liquidity (in case it drops). Why not propose reasonable protections for founders? Are you open though to 1-2 percent wealth tax on established billionaires in our nation and in California? That's really the point of a wealth tax. You had talked about tech billionaires needing to do more at a time when people can't afford healthcare, education, childcare. I found those comments very self-aware. I am curious whether you'd support some form of wealth tax and social investment if well designed. In this case, it's to make up for the cuts in healthcare for working class Californians.

English
0
0
0
177
Damian Kimmelman รีทวีตแล้ว
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal. If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist. If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian. If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.
English
13.9K
126.8K
582.4K
23.3M
Damian Kimmelman รีทวีตแล้ว
Tom Blomfield
Tom Blomfield@t_blom·
If the UK is to thrive in the era of AI, we need to fix two things; housing and energy. Nuclear must play a big part in that.
John Fingleton@JohnFingleton1

Britain needs nuclear power. Our nuclear projects are the most expensive in the world and among the slowest. Regulators and industry are paralysed by risk aversion. This can change. For Britain to prosper, it must. Earlier this year, the Prime Minister appointed me to lead a Taskforce to set out a path to getting affordable, fast nuclear power Britain. Our final report today sets out 47 recommendations, among them: - Creating a one-stop shop for nuclear approvals, to end the regulatory merry-go-round that delays projects at the moment. - Simplifying environmental rules to avoid extreme outcomes like Hinkley Point C spending £700m on systems to protect one salmon every ten years, while enhancing nuclear's impact on nature. - Limiting the ability of spurious legal challenges to delay nuclear projects, which adds huge cost and delay throughout the supply chain. - Approving fleets of reactors, so that Britain’s nuclear industry can benefit from certainty and economies of scale. - Directing regulators to factor in cost to their behaviour, and changing their culture to allow building cheaply, quickly and safely. - Changing the culture of the nuclear industry to end gold-plating and focus on efficient, safe delivery. If the government adopts our report in full, it will send a signal to investors that it is serious about pro-growth reform and taking on vested interests for the public good. A thriving British nuclear industry producing abundant, affordable energy would be good for jobs, good for manufacturing, good for the climate, and good for the cost of living. And it could enable Britain to become an AI and technology superpower. Britain can be a world leader in this new Industrial Revolution, but only if it has the energy to power it. Our report is bold, but balanced. Our recommendations, taken together and properly implemented, will forge a clear path for stronger economic growth through improved productivity and innovation. This is a prize worth fighting for. gov.uk/government/pub…

English
25
35
429
69.7K
Damian Kimmelman รีทวีตแล้ว
Hunter📈🌈📊
Hunter📈🌈📊@StatisticUrban·
Globalization is so beautiful
Hunter📈🌈📊 tweet media
English
214
2K
19.8K
784.4K