Summer Cook

America: A Nation Without Kings — Under God’s Authority by Summer Cook America was founded without kings—but never without authority. From Scripture to history, this book traces a single, unbroken truth: When God’s order is honored, a land is preserved. When responsibility is abandoned, authority becomes control. This is not a call to rebellion. It is a call to obedience. Written for readers ages 15 and up, America: A Nation Without Kings explores why authority is always conditional, why the people bear responsibility under God, and why healing comes only when obedience returns. God remains King. The people remain accountable. And the duty has never been removed. 📖 Now available. 🔗 Link in bio.

The governor is to execute the law prescribe by the constitutions. If one of the people that has the power authority and jurisdiction to freedoms of speech and the press to investigate and report to the public when officials are acting outside their grant of powers and not following form is unlawfully convicted because as Pennsylvania constitution states in article 1 Text of Section 7: Freedom of Press and Speech; Libels The printing press shall be free to every person who may undertake to examine the proceedings of the Legislature or any branch of government, and no law shall ever by made to restrain the right thereof. The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of the invaluable rights of man, and every citizen may freely speak, write and print on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty. No conviction shall be had in any prosecution for the publication of papers relating to the official conduct of officers or men in public capacity, or to any other matter proper for public investigation or information, where the fact that such publication was not maliciously or negligently made shall be established to the satisfaction of the jury; and in all indictments for libels the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts, under the direction of the court, as in other cases. She was well within her natural right and power reserved to the people to investigate and report. Being that the governors power to pardon is limited to only being able to pardon those unlawfully accused and held agaisnt their constitutional right when a judgement is made agaisnt them. Not executing his power to pardon in a situation such as this where the person has the right to investigate and report on unlawful acts of public officials would be acting unofficially holding one agaisnt their rights and causing harm to the individual. Maybe that is the discussion that needs to be made.

@JustJenRX OR !! Maybe I’m the only member of our delegation who actually speaks with the one man who has the authority to release her. Stopping by to say “hello” while we’re at the same event directly supports my advocacy for Tina. It’s OK to not assume the worst at all times.

Would you look at that… While a gold star mom with cancer rots in prison for exposing MASSIVE election fraud…. It’s @laurenboebert chumming it up with the very scumbag who’s keeping Tina Peters in prison. That scumbag is none other than DEMOCRAT Governor Jared Polis.

Interesting , I don’t know that constitutional mandates were up for compromise. Where’s it say that in the constitutions? He doesn’t need to compromise when he stands on what is written in the law that others are not following. They all have the duty to uphold what the cosntiutions say there is no provision to compromise but to follow the law as written that’s the oath they took. Our founders may have Made compromises in their debates but once they set and wrote the law it became no longer a debate. Transparency and Justice for harm done to the people (Epstein files or any other crimes done to the people ) is mandatory Supporting farmers or anyone in pursuit of their own industry without interference is mandatory Limiting spending and staying within ordinary expenses to run the country to keep costs low is mandatory. One subject per bill is mandatory A lot of people say they want their government to follow the constitutions but when one does he’s told he needs to compromise

@WayneWaldropW @gdaughtermorris He has no political brains.He doesn’t have to compromise his principles but he needs to learn how to compromise for the good of all. Read how the founding fathers did this. They didn’t always get what they wanted, but they learned how to work with each other to get good.

So let me get this straight. Thomas Massie is the man who: - fought to get the Epstein Files released - spoke out against covid mandates - has a near perfect voting record - wants to decrease government spending - supports small farmers - pushes for single issue bills Yet somehow these "Conservative influencers" think HE is the fraudster? Thomas Massie has been consistent, and be is sticking to the mandate you all pretended to support up until last year. Sounds like he is the most America First member of Congress if you ask me!

@Unclebarney1966 @PaulGoldEagle Thank you

Nice try, but this is recycled sovereign citizen nonsense from the National Liberty Alliance (NLA). That ‘Unified United States Common Law Grand Jury’ with the PO Box in Valhalla, NY? It’s not a real grand jury, not military, and has zero legal power. Courts have tossed their pseudolaw filings for years as frivolous. ‘Valhalla’ is literally just their mailing address in New York — not a secret code for military tribunals. No martial law, no mass arrests of judges/sheriffs/officials triggered by a 2015 paperwork stunt that went nowhere. This is the same old Q-style hopium that’s been circulating for years. Real military tribunals don’t work like fan fiction. If you’re waiting on this ‘storm,’ you might be waiting a long time.

VALHALLA… MILITARY TRIBUNALS 🍿🐸🇺🇸 SHARE!

Attorney General Pam Bondi is out, but my subpoena still stands. She is still required to appear before the House Oversight Committee and answer questions about the Epstein files. It's us against the two-tiered system. The American people deserve the truth. RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES.

Cole slaw down! Dicta and the holdingg are of the same inferior nature with respect to rights of the people secured in the public trusts. Lawyers out here lost naked and losing because they hide and hinder knowledge of the law—and God don’t like that bull.

A maxim of law states that a judge should declare the law. That means they don’t make the law they look at the constitution and the settled maxims.

Judocal notices sent by the people are giving notice of things trustees are bound to know . Instructing on the fundamental principles and the duties trustees are bound to follow and instructing a demanding the lawful remedy to fix the breach where it is occurring to make trustees right with the people. I would suggest as a trustee you pay very close attention to the bottom of the notices as they tell what can happen for acquiescence to the claims made by the people . I’d look even more closely at the very few but powerful words of acting with full knowledge ,intent and malice by going agaisnt the lawful demands of the people by trespassing their rights and then I would explain that to the rest of the legislature and anyone else in government to ensure everyone stays within the form prescribed

@RealDaveCares4u Ken, I know you don’t write laws to remove or reduce rights. This is why I came to you with my first notice two years ago remember? And there were actually two notices that I sent to you and Rep Bottoms and I sent the second one to Rep Bradley. Do you remember the response you sent me in a text? You didn’t understand why I was sending it to you because you weren’t the one propagating LGBTQ. But I explained to you I sent it to you all because I believed you to be faithful servants of the people and I was asking you to come along side of me to see how God was going to do a new thing and stop all of this. And he has Ken. Within the first month of sending the first lawful notice, transgender flags that were being posted in my daughter‘s school and around the district came down. Staff pronoun usage stopped. And my daughter‘s teacher that was propagating resigned over the summer. Then other forms of LGBTQ around the schools stopped. Shortly after we moved onto the discussion of books that are in our libraries that are pornographic and immoral. The end result of this effort was that my daughter‘s principal who is from the area and was raised here was fired and three weeks later the board (out of Defiance towards me) fired the superintendent who was listening to me. These books defy a Colorado statute, and the books and the transgender propagation all infringe on religious freedom rights in our state constitution Bill of Rights. I showed all of this to Representative Bottoms in the more than eight months that we spent time getting together so I could teach him. Dave Jose has been the one teaching all of us, and he spent personal time out of his life to help Rep Bottoms (Scott) understand how we can fix things in our corrupt government here in Colorado. Scott promised not only Dave and myself, but two other people who were involved in the effort that resulted in two long zoom meetings over a weekend before the special session in the summer of 2025. But Scott didn’t follow through, and he lied to me even more telling me he was still going to do it and never did. Who does that Ken? Is that the integrity of a man who calls himself a pastor? Does God give us permission to lie to each other and deceive each other in matters as important as these? We came alongside of you all to be your shield, and all you could do was disgrace our effort using the excuse there was no enforcement measure to it. The people are the enforcement Ken. We are the authority because we created the government, we are the shield for the “faithful servant” to protect you from being attacked when you choose to be OUR voice, and we are the enforcers of the law when our servants refuse to obey and do what is lawful. What I think you all need to be thinking about, is the fact that I sent two lawful notices to you all, and those notices are evidence that nobody tried to help me. If you are truly a faithful servant of the people and a God-fearing man, why won’t you help me in the way that I’m asking? I don’t understand the rub here. There are lots of ways of getting results in life, and when someone can show you a peaceful and lawful path, but one that might be different than your own thoughts of how to get remedy, why would you be so resistant to supporting and coming alongside of it especially when everything you’ve been doing to protect children has failed? How much longer do our children have to wait? Do you realize not a single entity in the state of Colorado has been able to remove the transgender nonsense, nor one of these books in our school libraries that are sexualizing our kids, yet I have accomplished getting it all out along with 63 of 238 identified books out of one School district. But I didn’t do this by myself. I had help from others, and this is how we fix things in our country Ken. Together. Instead of being so stubborn can you just admit you are frustrated because none of you are getting results?

Stepped off the floor to break this down: SB26-018 isn’t just name changes; it opens the door to unpublished records, identity laundering, and bypassing parental rights. We debated a religious exemption tied to real concerns like camp sleeping & bathing arrangements. Remember: last year’s law nearly forced co-ed facilities until public outrage stopped it. This is happening piece by piece. Parents—stay engaged.

@rtflack7777 @COrepKdeGraaf @ClintKieler @AllnerMatt @LisaintheMtns @mommadj75 I don’t see citizen mentioned in this provision . I do see the people mentioned though.

@COrepKdeGraaf @ClintKieler @AllnerMatt @LisaintheMtns @mommadj75 @gdaughtermorris Sir, honestly, are you drunk?

@COrepKdeGraaf @ClintKieler @AllnerMatt @LisaintheMtns @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 Public trust indenture =public indentured servant of the people

@ClintKieler @AllnerMatt @LisaintheMtns @mommadj75 @gdaughtermorris @rtflack7777 Follow my votes. I’m not your “indentured servant”, I am a citizen elected to represent & secure the rights of citizens. The esoterics of your questions are irrelevant when others are empowered who don’t care and weild power to impose their disregard.

Maxim of Law 51a. The government cannot load a citizen with imposition against his will or consent. 2 Coke, 61. 51b. The government is to be subject to the law, for the law makes the government. C.L.M. 51k. The law is not to be violated by those in government. Jenk. Cent. 7.

I don’t disagree with you on that. One of the issues has been that the people have not shown up to correct and instruct on the fundamental principles to hold their trustees accountable. Although I would also say that those that have sought office to be elected by the people to conduct the people’s business don’t just make a promise but they swore an oath to the people under penalty of perjury to uphold the constitutions. The maxims of law are the original source of jurisdiction that came before the constitutions that state ., An oath cannot be partly true and partly false . So if an individual swears to uphold the constitutions they cannot say yes I swear to uphold it while not upholding it. That’s a huge weight to bear as that comes with the duty to call out the unlawful acts of those they work closely with for the benefit of the people, to take lawful instruction from the people over party politics or coworkers. The duty to read the constitutions and speak the fundamental law to the people and show those they work with the law and point out where unlawful things are being done by always pointing back to what the constitutions prescribe to block breaches in the public trust. The most important part of the oath is to protect and preserve the people’s right power and authority. Another maxim of law states that all power is inherent in the people by decree of God thus none can exist except it be derived from them. And another that states when the superior power is present the lesser power ceases to exist and is merged with the greater. This is important because this maxim declares that all power and jurisdiction is inherent in the people and they have first a final say. Not based on feelings or ideas or votes but by the lawful instruction within the fundamental of law written within the constitutions. Based on those fundamentals in law Would you agree that this is the duty of every Individual that has taken a seat in government by taking an oath and swore to uphold the constitutions despite how the people voted even if they were fed false promises?

@gdaughtermorris @ClintKieler @AllnerMatt @LisaintheMtns @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 There isn’t one, but “we the people” chose apathy over vigilance and (allowed to be) elected those who promise everything in order to take it with the coercive force of the state.

@debate_4Truth I can’t come up tonight just saw you guys stopped in to listen as I prepare for sleep

faith is important / but it better be in the Truth (Jesus) x.com/i/spaces/1vKpP…

Humm she refused to uphold the law and now Trump is talking about a position in the “private sector” for her? She should be prosecuted for not following the law and executing it as it was prescribed within her duty. She did take an oath and she does work as an agent of trumps which would also make Trump liable for her acting in his place and on his behalf. Just saying the law is the law.

Congratulations AG Blanche. Now you have 30 days to release the rest of the files before becoming criminally liable for failure to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Get em Massie!

Attorney: "It's a new world." Chief Justice Roberts: "It is a new word, but it's the same constitution." Constitutions are the law. Their text doesn't change just because time passes or events happen. There is no such thing as "originalism." There is only law and not law. Law schools have wrongly taught attorneys that "case law" and statutes change the text of constitutions, but that goes against the nature of written constitutions as establishing law. Hold frame. Trump v. Barbara

I like what you said there. “ the statutes applies to all persons within the jurisdiction” So let’s look at that … If all statutes are to be in pursuance to the constitutions by follow them in the form the cosntiutions prescribe by the constitutions and the constiutions are what grant jurisdiction then we have to know where one jurisdiction begins and end and where another picks up so as not to cross over into another jurisdiction not belonging to it right? The bills and declaration of rights is in the jurisdiction of the people , the legislature is the jurisdiction of the legislature, likewise the same case as the executive and judicial. While the legislature was granted to write laws it was only to be in pursuance to the constitutions that are both “nessacary and proper” to execute the duties prescribed in the constitutions within the jurisdictional bounds granted. The word “proper” in the context here is that all laws are to be written for the jurisdiction granted, not to extend jurisdiction of one branch into another nor for jurisdiction to be implied or applied to the inherent rights and jurisdiction of the people. Keeping what you said about “statues applies to all persons within the jurisdiction “ you have to look to the cosntiution to see who has the grant of jurisdiction, what is within that jurisdiction and what is not within that jurisdiction to determine what “persons” are under that jurisdiction . Because when you say all persons within the jurisdiction that means there are persons not under that jurisdiction. So with th subject matter at hand over “parental rights” where under the constitutions does the legislature get a grant of jurisdiction over the natural rights of the people over thier children? Jurisdictional grants and limitations are so important in determining if A statutory law, act treaty, or any other rule can be put into effect because if the grant is not there it does not exist. Can you please show the constitutional provision that gives a grant of jurisdiction to any branch of government to regulate any of the natural rights enumerated or unenumnerated by the people?

“In everyday English, "people" is the standard plural form of the singular noun "person". It refers to multiple human beings, often as a collective or group (e.g., "Many people attended the event"). The variant "persons" serves as a more formal or archaic plural, typically reserved for legal, official, or highly precise contexts where the focus is on distinct individuals rather than a collective (e.g., "The statute applies to all persons within the jurisdiction").”

Who told you a statute can be a law when not in pursuance to constitutions and the rights therein? I’m unable to find that written in the law anywhere. Plz help me understand. All I can find is stuff saying the opposite. It’s basic and fundamental that trustees haven’t power we can’t find expressed and granted in the trust documents.