Marc Bernard 🚀

What are you still doing here? Own your social profile, posts, likes, replies, everything. It’s free, it’s better, it’s the future Come on, SAP Community, ABAP devs, and open-source fans… Start here: go.bsky.app/M3Q7Nng

@javilopen Insanely awesome, Javi! What’s the approximate costs for this?

Enjoy, practice your Spanish and feel free to ask me any questions you may have! 💌 x.com/javilopen/stat…

There's no way Hollywood won't be affected by this. 7M views in 24 hours on my ES account 🤯 The most complex AI short I've ever made: a test of how advanced generative video really is. Here's exactly what I used 👇

@Sonos this is just ridiculous What is the reasoning to limit how many favourites I can have?

I will be at taiefy.com in Amsterdam next week! Find me to chat and get a cool sticker 😄 taiefy.com

@arvidkahl No one can limit what you think and dream. No one will be able to stop what you can create and build with AI. But will good win over evil or are we doomed?

I've been thinking about this a lot for many years now. In fact, ever since I watched Star Trek as a young adult. Of course, the holodeck is a great idea. Being able to immerse yourself in a story, in a tale, and become part of it. Any tale, any story. In the show, anyone can conjure up anything and just consume it effectively without compensation. Star Trek does talk about authorship and the right to your own image a couple of times, but conceptually, this technology is a free-for-all. Anything you can envision will be created, and you can interact with it. And I think we're getting to the point where the technology that is capable of doing something like that is going to be a constant lure and constant possibility. Both for personal and commercial use. I'm not sure our understanding of copyright, shaped by a time when authorship and ownership were more easily controlled, can keep pace with these technological advances. As an author, I truly dislike the fact that my books have been part of some training corpus for many years now. But as a reader, I find it extremely empowering to tap into the thoughts of anything that was ever published. This is now shifting into the audiovisual space. I have a strong feeling that being able to see and hear whatever you want will culturally outweigh protecting the revenue potential of an idea, of a face, or of a story.

@euboid Phone call with your super users

I don't believe in feedback boards. They're a fancy place for feedback to go to die. Plus, what users ask for isn't always what they need. But I don't know what the alternative is. Feedback still needs to go somewhere. So if not a feedback board, what are you using?

@Diesol Captivating, loved it, 10/10!

Going out with a bang into 2026 Longest fully AI narrative short I’ve made to date. This is my long-awaited follow-up to my viral AI short "The Cleaner." This time, we follow him to Rome. Featuring an original music score from Emmy-Winning composer Matt Pav. Story first. Tools second. Set your film anywhere. Watch The Cleaner: Swan Song 👇

@DerekDooleyGA @GeorgiaFootball Hell ya! 💯 agree. 👍 That’s my Dawgs!

Some teams are handling the college football playoff better than others… thank goodness for the leadership at @GeorgiaFootball!

@BrooksAustinBA The offense played a major part in the win: time of possession! They kept gt off the field. This is why the Dawgs win over and over again. We OWN the clock

WALK N TALK

@elonmusknews30 A

This video perfectly shows why I have a soft spot in my heart for cupcake games many people complain about. Lotta families get a chance to introduce their kids to the lifetime of dawg love Made by the talented @GiannaRacmedia (instagram)

@UGAFanatic0 Fantastic! Some day it will be a movie 🍿

Anybody up for Stetson Bennett IV highlights? #GoDawgs #DGD

@WashRick @Russ_Ivey @GeorgiaFootball @Cash3Jones There seems to be a huge potential to make kick offs and punts much more entertaining, if we said it’s a live ball when the receiving team doesn’t pick up the ball. 😄

@Russ_Ivey @marcfbe @GeorgiaFootball @Cash3Jones I know that’s the rule , but why?

Cash Jones is a Savage 🔱 #GoDawgs

@treywallace The best!

How can you not love this damn sport. God bless, College Football

@coreyhainesco If pricing is simple, would you add it. If yes, where?

There’s a BIG problem with SaaS homepages… … and most companies are guilty of it. (Including me at some point! 🥲) I used to follow the old way of building homepages: 1️⃣ Spend months debating messaging. 2️⃣ Add every possible feature to the page. 3️⃣ Make the design “look cool” first. 4️⃣ Hope it converts. Slow. Bloated. Ineffective. Here’s the thing… Most people have false beliefs about homepages ↓ ❌ “We need a super creative design to stand out.” ✅ No! 90% of high-converting homepages follow a proven structure. Your messaging, branding, and product visuals make you unique. ❌ “We have to explain EVERYTHING on the homepage.” ✅ No! A great homepage builds curiosity to motivate someone to sign up and discover everything for themselves. ❌ “It has to be perfect before launch.” ✅ No! You need to ship, test, and iterate — perfection is a moving target. That’s why I swear by frameworks. Why? ✔ You go live 10X faster — without sacrificing quality. ✔ You don’t waste time on fluff that doesn’t drive conversions. ✔ You keep it simple, so you can tweak and improve easily. Custom, overly designed homepages might feel impressive… But they rarely perform better. The best SaaS homepages follow a battle-tested structure — And I put together a step-by-step framework you can use 👇 Want me to audit your homepage? Comment your website URL below — I’ll show you what’s working and what’s holding you back.

Exciting new Show&Tell video: ABAP package manager (apm) with Marc Bernard. @marcfbe tells the story behind this passion project, what's in it for you, and how you can help. Links in video description. Watch, share, subscribe! 📺 #SAP #ABAP youtube.com/watch?v=DnytaJ…

@arvidkahl @ToolboxOfDesign Hey, that’s @robwalling 🎉

Big shoutout to my wonderful designer @ToolboxOfDesign for creating a kick-ass OpenGraph image for Podscan 🥰 Just wanted to share the amazing stuff I get to work with :D

How to never get angry or bothered by other people... ‼️‼️

@SahilBloom How many people are reaching for a calculator to do 7*11*13? Elementary school knowledge. The world absolutely will get more stupid. The million $ question: will humanity use the freed brain cells for something more valuable?

Is AI going to destroy our ability to think? My brutally honest perspective: (everyone should read this) By now, you’ve probably seen the recent MIT study that found that the use of AI tools for writing tasks is negatively impacting cognitive function. To me, it made sense: What you outsource will atrophy. In a broad sense, I think of most personal AI use cases as being about outsourcing something to the AI. You previously had to use your brain for that thing, but now you can press a button and have the AI do that thing for you. That’s mostly ok when it’s about outsourcing specific things that are lower leverage (this enables you to focus on the point of highest leverage). But what about when the outsourcing slowly extends into more generalized thinking? There’s a funny story about physicist Max Planck and his chauffeur that offers an insight here: After winning his Nobel Prize, Max Planck went on a tour, giving lectures at universities and institutions around the country. His chauffeur, after having heard Planck practice and deliver the talk so many times, had the entire thing memorized. He jokingly asked Planck if he could deliver it at the final lecture. Surprisingly, the physicist agreed. The chauffeur put on a jacket and tie and proceeded to deliver a perfect lecture, word for word, just as Max Planck would have done. But at the end of the talk, a simple follow-up question from the audience stumped him. Quick on his feet, the chauffeur replied, "That question is so easy, I’ll let my chauffeur answer it," and pointed to Planck, who was wearing the chauffeur hat in the back of the crowd. While the story is likely dramatized, it brings to life an important lesson: There are two types of knowledge: 1. Real Knowledge 2. Chauffeur Knowledge Real Knowledge has depth. It is flexible and dynamic. It can be leveraged in different ways, because the topic is truly understood, not just memorized. It is only acquired through hours and hours of working on a specific craft. Chauffeur Knowledge is the opposite. It's the amount of knowledge required to sound smart at a cocktail party or pass an easy exam, but it fails when put under any degree of scrutiny. There’s a big difference between truly knowing something and just sounding smart talking about it. My concern with AI is that as we outsource more and more of our general thinking to the models, all Real Knowledge will atrophy—we will become defined by Chauffeur Knowledge. A lot of problems in the world are the result of people with Chauffeur Knowledge masquerading as people with Real Knowledge. I think AI is going to meaningfully accelerate that trend… What do you think? Is AI going to destroy our ability to think?

@tdinh_me @minniti_ Are you not using Verdaccio as a local repository so you can build offline?

@minniti_ All good until take off and no more internet 😂

Indie hacking from Taipei. Beautiful city 👍