nΞxt alphaa 🛡️

27.6K posts

nΞxt alphaa 🛡️ banner
nΞxt alphaa 🛡️

nΞxt alphaa 🛡️

@nextalphaa

⟠ | decentralized crypto rails matter | ETH is the ultimate freedom asset and store of value – securing the global economy onchain | member of dopest dao |

Ethereum เข้าร่วม Şubat 2021
2.1K กำลังติดตาม2K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
nΞxt alphaa 🛡️
nΞxt alphaa 🛡️@nextalphaa·
I’m doubling down on ETH (and there’s nothing FUD bros can do about it)
English
42
30
471
18.1K
naiive
naiive@naiivememe·
Atheists after opening a 50x leverage position
English
71
193
2.2K
95.7K
nΞxt alphaa 🛡️ รีทวีตแล้ว
nΞxt alphaa 🛡️ รีทวีตแล้ว
RYAN SΞAN ADAMS - rsa.eth 🦄
Ethereum has the strongest post quantum roadmap. And it's not even close. Bullish cryptography. Bullish ETH.
RYAN SΞAN ADAMS - rsa.eth 🦄 tweet media
Bankless@Bankless

LIVE NOW - Ethereum’s Quantum Plan Before Q-Day Quantum is no longer a distant thought experiment. @drakefjustin joins Bankless to unpack: - when Q-Day could actually arriv,e - why Bitcoin and Ethereum face very different quantum risks, - what Ethereum’s post-quantum roadmap looks like, - why this upgrade could be bigger than the Merge, - and how quantum could become Ethereum’s chance to lead. --- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 When is Q-Day? 5:35 The moment quantum becomes crypto-relevant 10:11 How many qubits does it take to break crypto? 16:22 What a real Bitcoin quantum attack would look like 20:19 How much Bitcoin is actually vulnerable? 26:26 Burn, freeze, or salvage? Bitcoin’s impossible choice 35:06 Proof of seed phrase and Bitcoin’s post-quantum bottleneck 41:02 Ethereum’s exposure: smaller, but not zero 45:43 Ethereum’s tougher roadmap: three layers, three upgrades 50:29 The execution-layer plan: replace ECDSA without killing throughput 57:56 Post-quantum, post-AI cryptography 1:03:36 BLS, KZG, LeanVM, and the rest of the stack 1:06:42 Is this bigger than the Merge? 1:17:21 If Bitcoin stumbles, does all crypto stumble too? 1:19:35 “Quantum is not a challenge—it’s an opportunity” 1:21:27 AI, quantum, crypto and the 2032 convergence 1:28:04 Harvest now, decrypt later 1:30:09 Defensive accelerationism and Ethereum’s role 1:39:10 Stoicism, P-doom, and why he keeps building

English
28
61
396
15.7K
nΞxt alphaa 🛡️ รีทวีตแล้ว
David Walsh
David Walsh@davwals·
Yesterday we hosted the Institutional Ethereum Forum in NYC. A private, closed-door, invite-only for institutional execs. $250T+ in combined assets represented. Attended by leaders at: → DTCC → Swift → Euroclear → BlackRock → Morgan Stanley → Fidelity → JPMorgan → State Street → Mastercard → Visa → Stripe → PayPal → Nasdaq → LSEG → Broadridge → S&P Global → Moody's → Microsoft → EY → Invesco → Franklin Templeton → T. Rowe Price → Baillie Gifford → CoinFund → WisdomTree → VanEck → U.S. Bank → Western Union → Paxos → Consensys → Aave → Uniswap → Chainlink → Securitize → Ondo Finance → Paradigm → a16z → Dragonfly → Anchorage Digital And many more. Co-hosted by our friends at → @aave@zksync@arbitrum@Optimism@chainlink The institutions aren't coming. They're here. Ethereum.
David Walsh tweet mediaDavid Walsh tweet mediaDavid Walsh tweet mediaDavid Walsh tweet media
English
28
92
509
34.1K
nΞxt alphaa 🛡️
nΞxt alphaa 🛡️@nextalphaa·
quantum is a BIG OPPORTUNITY for Ethereum and for ETH to become the world's most valuable store of value Ethereum’s Quantum Plan Before Q-Day with Justin Drake youtu.be/wURmzLKhJco?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
2
5
106
nΞxt alphaa 🛡️ รีทวีตแล้ว
materkel.eth 🦇🔊
The most likely outcome for Ethereum at this point is that the ecosystem succeeds and the token goes to infinity.
English
15
12
247
4.8K
sunny madra
sunny madra@sundeep·
“If your $500K engineer isn’t burning at least $250K in tokens, something is wrong.”
English
928
943
10.7K
7M
nΞxt alphaa 🛡️
nΞxt alphaa 🛡️@nextalphaa·
give ai agents a wallet for agentic commerce – the concept is great take the @ agentcashdev MVP concept but build it on Ethereum to make the agentic commerce protocol composable permissionless and truly open and censorship resistant who’s building this? today’s MVP: •Permissionless on-chain payments (no central facilitator) → ❌ •Multi-facilitator or none (decentralized routing) → ❌ •Chain-agnostic, prefers censorship-resistant chains → ✅ (partially green: x402 is chain-agnostic, but defaults to centralized facilitators) •No mandatory KYC/sanctions screening → ❌ •Open-source, community-governed → ❌ (core spec open, but implementation & operation centralized under Merit Systems) •Endpoint-level blocks only, no protocol-wide bans → ❌ (platform/operator can impose wider restrictions)
English
1
0
0
72
witcheer ☯︎
witcheer ☯︎@witcheer·
I ran both OpenClaw and Hermes on the same mac mini. this breakdown is accurate and worth reading if you're building with either. the core difference in one sentence: OpenClaw stores everything and searches it. Hermes keeps almost nothing in the prompt and retrieves the rest on demand. to be more specific, Hermes has 4 memory layers: → MEMORY.md + USER.md: ~1,300 tokens of curated facts. that's it. deliberately tiny so the prompt stays stable and cache-friendly → session_search: full SQLite archive of past conversations with FTS5 search. only queried when needed, never injected by default → skills: procedural memory. when the agent solves something hard, it saves how it did it, not what happened, but how to do it again → honcho (optional): cross-session user modeling that attaches to the current turn without mutating the cached prompt Hermes would rather search for a fact at the cost of one tool call than stuff it into every single message and break the cache. I've seen this tradeoff firsthand. my OpenClaw bot was 2 months of accumulated memory, deep context, but every message replays more history. hermes is 2 weeks old with a fraction of the memory, but it responds in 5 seconds vs 60 because it's not dragging its entire life story into every turn. in @NousResearch we trust.
Manthan Gupta@manthanguptaa

x.com/i/article/2034…

English
37
39
654
66.8K
Ryan Leachman
Ryan Leachman@RG_Leachman·
“Kids I have good news. Daddy is out of Claude tokens until 3PM. He has time to play with you now.”
Ryan Leachman tweet media
English
208
1.6K
25.4K
854.1K
Moonpad
Moonpad@Moonpadlabs·
Crypto traders moving to stock market
English
327
740
6.1K
658.3K
Daniel Jeffries
Daniel Jeffries@Dan_Jeffries1·
I think I finally figured out why OpenClaw is amazing and took off like wild fire and why Peter is a genius, as Altman called him. And it's actually a different way of looking at it. It's not a DeepSeek moment for agents. It's a Napster moment. And just like Napster it will eventually force the industry to change. In essence when Napster came out the entire world told the music industry we don't want to buy CDs anymore and if you don't provide us a digital download experience we are just going to take it until you do. It forced the industry to create Apple Music and eventually Spotify. Both essentially killed most music piracy by making it ubiquitous and cheap and good. But it forced change. The same will now happen to software. Here's why: In essence OpenClaw lets you take what vendors don't want to give you: Unified access to countless applications. We all want a personal assistant that can talk to freaking everything and do anything for us in the digital world. But vendors don't want this. They want you locked into their bullshit. For example, none of the messaging platforms want bots on there. None. They all have explicit policies against them and make it hard to do this. WhatsApp doesn't want you on there. Signal. Telegram's bot father is garbage. It's all designed to keep bots out. They were designed for a pre-agentic era when bot = spam. Many other things are like this. The API layers are gated, hoop-jumping bullshit. Go get an enterprise account and wait for approval and yada yada. Want access to WhatsApp? Get a business account and attach a number (what small business has a real number anymore 😂) and messages can't come from a person, etc. Google ads? It's not just an auth, it's go get a special manager account and create an enterprise key and blah blah blah. It's a horrible experience because it was all designed for corporations to control access. Now people are saying, make your app easy to access and accessible to me and my machine avatars and do it in a headless way or you will be dead. Peter hacked around all this by making everything command line in the classic Linux style and using things like an open source library that reverse engineered the web version of WhatsApp. It's all a bit house-of-cards-y because he had no choice. At my company we had a similar idea early (and failed). Basically we wanted to make the best multimodal/computer using model because then it doesn't need an API or access hoops. You just go through the human interface layer and ain't nobody going to stop you. We failed because we weren't big enough and it's really a job for the mega-labs to solve because it is a hard problem and costs a shit ton of money. Peter was much smarter. Make it all command line because that is ready now. Use any reverse engineered library or project or proxy available come Hell or high water and make it work by any means necessary even if it is hacky. In short, he signaled to the software world that they better change and change fast or we are going to do this anyway and you can't stop us. Of course some are foolishly trying. Meta is banning Claws on WhatsApp, etc. They will all try to build their own gated, controlled, enshittified version of this thing. They will fail. And eventually everyone will offer a clear, easy way to get access via API for agents or they will be gone. In essence OpenClaw gave people what they wanted, which was an app connected to everything, even when most of the vendors don't want you to have this.
Daniel Jeffries tweet media
English
132
138
939
124.7K