Steve Rosenthal

1.6K posts

Steve Rosenthal

Steve Rosenthal

@stevertax

Tax policy enthusiast.

Washington, DC เข้าร่วม Aralık 2017
490 กำลังติดตาม2.2K ผู้ติดตาม
Kyle Pomerleau
Kyle Pomerleau@kpomerleau·
New piece: raising the corporate tax rate would be economically efficient if corporations were taxed on their cash flow. We are no where near that ideal.
Kyle Pomerleau tweet media
English
2
2
13
4.4K
Jeff Stein
Jeff Stein@JStein_WaPo·
Some personal news: This is my last week at The Washington Post. I’ve loved so much of the last 9 years here, but my faith in the paper’s current leadership is broken beyond repair. Incredibly excited to get to work with the newsroom below (I start in June) & join the extraordinarily talented kickass reporters such as @anna_c_kramer, @OrianaBeLike, @reesejgorman & many more Please get in touch w/ me anytime on Signal: 9178872891
Jeff Stein tweet media
Dana Milbank@Milbank

I am leaving the Washington Post to join a new journalistic venture backed by Politico founder Robert Allbritton that will be both the hometown publication the D.C. region sorely needs and a scrappy and fearless national news organization. I hope you'll join us.

English
313
1.5K
10.1K
900K
Steve Rosenthal
Steve Rosenthal@stevertax·
@johnarnold The polls confused me also. But Talarico is impressive--and I hope we see more of him.
English
0
0
1
204
John Arnold
John Arnold@johnarnold·
Primary polling is complete trash.
John Arnold tweet media
English
15
7
139
26.5K
Steve Rosenthal
Steve Rosenthal@stevertax·
@JessicaBRiedl And think tanks pay too little to compromise your views. More money elsewhere for those willing to compromise.
English
1
0
5
176
Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦
Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦@JessicaBRiedl·
Can confirm that almost no think tank fellows are letting funders dictate their policy positions. Fellows seek organizations that match their beliefs, and organizations seek funders that support their mission. We're all too stubborn to let others determine our policy views.
Austin Ahlman@austinahlman

I’ll take this seriously when Yglesias discloses who is paying for his Niskanen “fellowship” and which corporations have been ponying up tens of thousands of dollars for speeches that I’m sure are very enthralling and worth every dime.

English
3
6
81
9.1K
James Wetzler
James Wetzler@JamesWetzler9·
@kpomerleau Historically, the reason this idea gets rejected is that, if we exempt winnings, taxpayers with unreported income would claim on audit that the resulting assets came from gambling.
English
2
0
5
235
John Iselin
John Iselin@john_iselin·
I am so excited to share that I’ve joined the amazing team at @The_Budget_Lab as an Associate Director of Economic Research! I’ll be working on a wide range of topics related to public finance; namely, taxes, tariffs, and the federal budget.
English
5
7
31
11.7K
Steve Rosenthal
Steve Rosenthal@stevertax·
@jbarro The Republicans wanted to avoid full responsibility for the budget—and sought some Democratic support for the budget (in lieu of extending the exceptions to the filibuster). The Democrats should have forced the Republicans to take full responsibility. And own the resulting mess.
English
0
0
6
280
Josh Barro
Josh Barro@jbarro·
For some reason, Democrats kept pointing out that Republicans didn’t need their help to get the government back open.
Josh Barro tweet media
English
15
12
90
17K
Josh Barro
Josh Barro@jbarro·
If you complain about this column, you are required — by law — to offer your own theory of how the shutdown would have ended in a better way for Democrats using your preferred strategy. nytimes.com/2025/11/11/opi…
English
73
32
370
98.6K
Steve Rosenthal
Steve Rosenthal@stevertax·
@goodtaxtakes Politicians, not tax technicians, manufacture tax complexity. The technicians, left alone, could manage complexity. But, unfortunately, there is a constituency for every tax loophole in the code, but no constituency for simplification.
English
0
0
3
44
Steve Rosenthal
Steve Rosenthal@stevertax·
@DonFSchneider Thanks, Don. I am always happy to chat--or meet for lunch again. I think, where possible, we need simple, not confusing (i.e., you started it, no you started it). The fact is Republicans can end the shutdown today, by limiting the filibuster. And Trump may direct them to do so.
English
0
1
0
51
Donald Schneider
Donald Schneider@DonFSchneider·
@stevertax Hi Steve. Like your tax work. This is one of those occasions where you should talk to more Republicans. If only their motives were always so simple and full of malice! Not passing the ideological Turing test right now.
English
1
0
0
123
Steve Rosenthal
Steve Rosenthal@stevertax·
The Republicans control the Senate (and the House), so blame them for the shutdown. They could easily whittle away further the filibuster rule. So, why don't they? To avoid Republican accountability for shredding our health care system, not to protect Democrat "minority" rights.
English
3
1
0
372
Steve Rosenthal
Steve Rosenthal@stevertax·
@HC_Richardson: "Republicans control the Senate and could end the filibuster for the continuing resolution that would fund the government, thus enabling them to pass it through the Senate with a simple majority if they wanted to. Instead, they want Democratic votes for it. . ."
English
0
0
1
200
Steve Rosenthal
Steve Rosenthal@stevertax·
@JessicaBRiedl I think it’s time for the Democrats to play that card. The Republicans will continue to whittle away at the filibuster as it suits them. Let the Republicans whittle away some more now—and own the health insurance mess.
English
0
0
6
155
Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦
Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦@JessicaBRiedl·
@stevertax They could eliminate the rest of the filibuster. But if I am a Democratic lawmaker there is no way I am taunting Republicans into doing that.
English
1
0
2
590
Steve Rosenthal
Steve Rosenthal@stevertax·
@JaredWalczak Why don’t you give some tax advice: winnings are taxable and losses are nondeductible. They will definitely exclude you next time.
English
0
2
3
86
Jared Walczak
Jared Walczak@JaredWalczak·
I'm joining a few guys for poker and whiskey tasting tonight. I don't drink, and I just googled poker hands to refresh my memory. I'm sure they're already regretting inviting me.
English
2
2
5
567
Mike Fellman
Mike Fellman@MikeFellman·
Wong Kim Ark itself starts with fact that Wong's parents were not diplomats. Gimme a break. (3/3)
English
1
1
2
90
Mike Fellman
Mike Fellman@MikeFellman·
Amy thinks that the 14th Amendment was not a codification of common law jus solis citizenship, in order to extend it to African Americans. Rather, it meant to do that and simultaneously strip it from children born in US to certain classes of immigrants. (1/3)
English
1
2
2
402

ค้นพบ

@kpomerleau @JStein_WaPo @anna_c_kramer @reesejgorman @johnarnold @goodtaxtakes @BDGesq @rooseveltinst