Philippe Rola

Last few days for early bird! Join us in Montreal next september! #HR26 Nothing quite like it... thinkingcriticalcare.com/2026/01/16/fou…

@_Coati_ @Inamanotherapy @khaycock2 @NephroP Absolutely.

@Inamanotherapy @khaycock2 @NephroP @ThinkingCC This is a false dilemma, it’s not either or, you can consider POCUS to be a component of or extension of the physical, not necessarily a replacement of it. That would be like saying getting imaging or labwork of any kind is pointless because the clinical exam is sufficient.

For the Specialist not trained in the Gen Med here is an important but overlooked tip for your patient's Creatinine problems: If the BUN/Creatinine ratio is >20- Give Fluids. The Creatinine will normalize after 24 hours If the BUN/Creatinine ratio is <20- Call the nephrologist. This is not your patinet to treat !

@Inamanotherapy @khaycock2 @NephroP Every time i examine. Pocus is just part of a comprehensive exam. Touch, cap refill, but i won’t use a surrogate (S3/4 or percussing heartt borders) when i can look and see…

@khaycock2 @NephroP @ThinkingCC Okay. Out of curiosity, When was the last time you used clinical skills to Examine a patient?

@azeemrathore_ @wkcmd Never fluid for a dilated RV with septal shift and elevated JVP. I would have norepi on the ready, probably already infusing low dose, have to defend the map, but inotropy is the main tx here, if fails, mcs.

@ThinkingCC @wkcmd If you start dobutamine and get hypotensive, do you go with levo or fluid? Also could you make an argument for milrinone here too? Truthfully, I almost always seem to be started for patients in cardiogenic shock, I rarely see milrinone just anecdotally speaking.

It is terrifying that 33% gave fluid to a struggling RV with an underfilled LV. Terrifying.

@Jorgeheartshock Keep at it!

@ThinkingCC It’s so 🧑‍🔧 in IM or cardiology minds, but that’s why we need to keep physiology and PV loops in mind, as contractility is sometimes an independent measure, as in Ees. I have trouble my self explaining this to our residents RV doesn’t mean fluids. 🔥🫡

@kenza06043531 Hmm ok.

@ThinkingCC Yes

@aribindi @fersaurin Like I said, I love and use swans all the time. But they are very limited diagnostically. You need focus. And elevated wedge can be due to many things in the swan cannot differentiate. Yeah.

@fersaurin @ThinkingCC Swans have their problems, but at least no one can doubt the numbers on the monitor and xray confirming placement.

@aribindi @fersaurin @IM_Crit_ is exceedingly skilled with a probe, I’ve seen this myself. If we were talking about a random person, then the next step would be proper focus confirmation by a skilled practitioner.

@fersaurin @ThinkingCC Because the LV may not be underfilled and RV may not be distended. You often just have someone bad at POCUS getting a bad view, or mixing up the ventricles, and are making decisions with bad data.

@hossamelbahrawy This RV needs help. Interface 4 is completely uncoupled, and this has resulted in secondary failure of interface 1. This needs inotropic support, inhaled vasodilators ok, but given the pathology, this is unlikely to help because the primary problem is not pulm htn.

in reality, that can't be an “either/ or” situation. In the abscence of Milrinone, dobutamine + fluids ±norepi are sufficient in many scenarios

@wkcmd We don’t have profoundly depressed aortic pressure in this case. DBP is 70. Indeed they may or may not result in improved RV function, but then its time for MCS. This is cardiogenic shock.

@ThinkingCC Pure inotropes like dobutamine and milrinone, while effective in some cases, may not reliably augment profoundly depressed aortic pressure and can worsen hypotension by failing to increase LV preload.

@aribindi With the info we were given with septal shift, the RV is at its limit. Additional fluid will only shift septum more, decrease LV preload and congest organs. Love swans and would use to monitor therapy, but pressure readings won’t give you the pathophysiology-just hints.

@ThinkingCC I deal with this situation literally all the time. Volume actually sometimes is the right answer, and actually MAY be the right answer here: because none of you are as good at POCUS as you think you are. I would place a swan, for reliable, repeatable data to guide therapy.

@philosoph25 Yeah pretty sad

@ThinkingCC All of it spawns from medical school training saying “the RV is preload dependent!” Lol.

@derekedsmith I would start here mdpi.com/2075-4426/15/5…

@ThinkingCC What’s the “first course” in the series of these conferences you’d recommend to introduce someone to hemodynamic interfaces, POCUS, etc.?

Last few days for early bird! Join us in Montreal next september! #HR26 Nothing quite like it... thinkingcriticalcare.com/2026/01/16/fou…

@AegonTargaryene Am of course biased, but we think this is a good startpoint. mdpi.com/2075-4426/15/5…

@ThinkingCC Any ressources to learn more about hemodynamics?

@AlexLawandi Exactly.

@ThinkingCC Too much rote learning. Someone hears rv and immediately defaults to fluids.

@AegonTargaryene Follow @icmteaching @khaycock2 for starters🙂

@kenza06043531 You mean fluids is the correct answer?

@ThinkingCC Which is the correct answer for an RV infarct. If that fails, consider inotropes.

If you considered fluids in this case, please come to HR and help save some of your future patients. thinkingcriticalcare.com/2026/01/16/fou…

@nickmmark Have you ever had to call in a plumber at night for an emergency?😳 no chance they move for double that.

This is insanely low for a cardiologist, especially without benefits and in LA.

Christ is Risen! Happy Easter. Joyeuses Pâques.