Ian Thompson

76 posts

Ian Thompson

Ian Thompson

@uapsciences

Nuclear physicist, philosopher, theologian who takes mind and body seriously as distinct and closely connected.

Maine เข้าร่วม Kasım 2023
126 กำลังติดตาม6 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Ian Thompson
Ian Thompson@uapsciences·
Spielberg shows a way how catastrophic disclosure could take place. Trouble is, neither the movie (nor ANY catastrophic disclosure) answers any of the real questions we all have about motives and responsibility (by us or the others). So most ufo people are intensely dissatisfied. @brycezabel is a perfect example. Myself: I was touched deeply even by the catastrophic disclosure portrayed.
English
0
0
0
268
RICH UNIVERSE
RICH UNIVERSE@RichUniverse_·
@uapsciences Catastrophic disclosure is not the release of secrets by government. It’s the loss of control over the narrative when individuals choose truth over compliance. It’s catastrophic to the government not the people
English
1
0
0
12
Ian Thompson
Ian Thompson@uapsciences·
Spielberg shows a way how catastrophic disclosure could take place. Trouble is, neither the movie (nor ANY catastrophic disclosure) answers any of the real questions we all have about motives and responsibility (by us or the others). Many us yearn for those answers. But catastrophic disclosure does not give them.
English
1
0
1
12
Ian Thompson
Ian Thompson@uapsciences·
@adrianmckinty Would be good for us. But a completely different movie, requiring answers to many questions that are still quite mysterious. Are you complaining that there are no answers to those difficult questions?
English
1
0
1
28
Adrian McKinty
Adrian McKinty@adrianmckinty·
@uapsciences I wonder if what they thought wd add a thriller element actually hurt the project in the end Cd have done: act 1 is day 1, act 2 is the first month, act 3 is the twist 1 year later? I dunno
English
1
0
0
24
Adrian McKinty
Adrian McKinty@adrianmckinty·
Disclosure Day feels underwritten. The entire film cd have been Act 1 of a more interesting story. Act 2 cd have been the existential consequences of Act 1 & Act 3 has a cool twist we dont see coming s/f knows how to do this: Childhood's End Roadside Picnic Stories of Your Life
Adrian McKinty tweet media
English
7
1
25
1.8K
Ian Thompson
Ian Thompson@uapsciences·
@gweter2105 @JillianChili Spielberg shows a way how catastrophic disclosure could take place. As you say. We see that the movie, like ANY catastrophic disclosure, does not answer any of the real questions we all have about motives and responsibility (by us or the others).
English
0
0
0
45
gweter🏳️‍🌈
gweter🏳️‍🌈@gweter2105·
@JillianChili I lowkey thought (just like one of the reviews said on lb) I was experiencing disclosure day instead of watching the film
English
2
0
12
431
Interstellar
Interstellar@InterstellarUAP·
Daniel O'Connor: "Steven Spielberg has groomed you for decades over the great alien deception" 👽😱 "Spielberg says his alien movie will leave Christians questioning their faith in GOD" "It's something the Antichrist would do" "You should not watch Disclosure Day" "This film is the last assault after decades of grooming" Strong words from The Catholic Philosophy Professor. The war between religious leaders & the UFO disclosure movement intensifies.
English
103
65
309
38.3K
Ian Thompson
Ian Thompson@uapsciences·
@2020defense Nor mine. Both positions on faith were fairly portrayed in the movie. The last position shown was supportive of faith.
English
1
0
1
21
Ian Thompson
Ian Thompson@uapsciences·
Spielberg shows a way how catastrophic disclosure could take place. Trouble is, neither the movie (nor ANY catastrophic disclosure) answers any of the real questions we all have about motives and responsibility (by us or the others). So most ufo people are intensely dissatisfied. @brycezabel is a perfect example. Myself: I was touched deeply even by the catastrophic disclosure portrayed.
English
0
0
0
268
Van Allen Plexico
Van Allen Plexico@VanAllenPlexico·
Overnight I received a LOT of replies about this movie. I’d say they are running about these proportions: 1/4 “it’s an absolute masterpiece” 1/4 “it’s total garbage” 1/4 “it’s all a hundred percent real!!!” 1/4 (some random mean comment, just because a lot of people on social media are crap)
Van Allen Plexico@VanAllenPlexico

Possibly the weirdest major motion picture I've ever seen. I don't even begin to know how to rate it. I have no idea if I liked it or not. It was just really, really strange. Very Spielberg in a lot of ways, but stranger than anything else he's done, I think. Others may see it completely differently. I have no idea. Weird.

English
12
0
36
9.8K
Ian Thompson
Ian Thompson@uapsciences·
@Beyondreporter1 Spielberg shows a way how catastrophic disclosure could take place. Made dramatic, but worth the telling!!
English
0
0
1
101
The Beyond Reporter
The Beyond Reporter@Beyondreporter1·
I was going to watch Disclosure Day tonight, but I'm seeing everyone saying the movie is bad.
GIF
English
214
7
189
41.6K
sebastien valiela
sebastien valiela@svaliela·
Spielberg a encore frappé. Disclosure Day donne parfois l’impression troublante d’être plus proche d’un documentaire que d’une fiction. À l’heure où pilotes, militaires, scientifiques et responsables du renseignement réclament davantage de transparence sur le phénomène OVNI, le film semble capturer quelque chose de profondément réel. Comme avec Close Encounters of the Third Kind en 1977, Spielberg paraît avoir plusieurs longueurs d’avance. Fascinant, ambitieux et peut-être plus proche de la vérité qu’on ne l’imagine. 🎬🛸👽
sebastien valiela tweet media
Français
4
6
33
2K
Dan
Dan@DannyPsmith·
@Danimalish Just watched Disclosure Day. I loved it every minute of it, but I can see how a modern viewer, who is used to fast paced action, will find this film a bit boring. If you're a Spielberg and Sci-Fi fan, go see it, you'll appreciate it.
English
2
0
7
256
Dan Marcus
Dan Marcus@Danimalish·
I’m about to see DISCLOSURE DAY and I’m seeing reactions such as “This is Spielberg’s TENET” and “This is the worst in his oeuvre.” I could not be more excited.
Dan Marcus tweet media
English
37
13
404
19.3K
Ian Thompson
Ian Thompson@uapsciences·
@Danimalish Spielberg shows a way how catastrophic disclosure could take place.
English
0
0
0
10
Ian Thompson
Ian Thompson@uapsciences·
This is a collection of videos on Reddit about the Varginha case. What do you think of veracity? Agrees often with descriptions in recent movie. Got from X when posted under title: Izaque OEAV - 😳😱👽🛸 COMPILADO DE REGISTROS DO CASO VARGINHA POSTADO NO REDDIT 19962...
Jesse Michels@AlchemyAmerican

Just interviewed former Brazilian Defense Minister and current Presidential candidate Aldo Rebelo. He’s had access to the highest levels of classified state secrets. And he told me Colares and Varginha (UFO crash involving non-human beings) happened. The U.S. better catch up…

English
0
0
0
87
Ian Thompson
Ian Thompson@uapsciences·
He is talking about biological plasma. Cytoplasm is the interior of cells. That is most likely what Grusch refers to. Then could be assemblies of such cellular organisms. Certainly not high-temperature ionized physics plasmas. (The novelty is the sentience, and presumably the ability to connect psionically??)
Missileman@MinuteofZombie

All naturally occurring plasmas and most artificial plasmas are thermodynamically unstable. They can’t host life for a variety of reasons. - The interior is the equivalent of millions to billions degrees - They require constant energy input to remain in a plasma state and will IMMEDIATELY revert to being a disorganized gas if you stop inputting energy - They generally have to be artificially contained to be a plasma (other than a space plasma which is a very unique and diffuse kind of plasma that’s completely different to every other kind of plasma) either by field lines or an actual structure (think a fluorescent bulb) - The energetic processes inside a plasma are governed by Maxwell’s laws, including magnetohydrodynamics, which is ordinary classical electromagnetism - Some pulsed artificial plasmas, “plasmoids”, that exist in fusion experiments, last for nanoseconds or microseconds, host what are called “self organizing structures”. That just means the plasma creates its own magnetic field that contains itself for like a nanosecond. Basically all the work into plasmoids is just math. Extremely little of it is practical and what is practical is in fusion experiments that last a nanosecond. There’s nothing in the actual science that would give a person any reason to believe these physics result in a living thing, much less a sentient living thing. Like to know if Grusch is getting that from first hand or if it’s coming from “the lore”. The plasmoids in research are not alive. They’re definitely not sentient. “Organized” in this context doesn’t mean “thinking”. It means thermodynamically partitioned.

English
0
0
0
18
Ian Thompson รีทวีตแล้ว
Disclosure Party
Disclosure Party@disclosureorg·
Thank you to everyone who was able to make it out to Washington D.C. today to support David Grusch and all the Members of Congress who are pushing UAP disclosure forward. We sincerely appreciate you.
Disclosure Party tweet media
English
4
20
150
3.3K
Red Panda Koala
Red Panda Koala@RedPandaKoala·
Former AARO Director Sean Kirkpatrick says Jake Barber and Skywatcher produced no evidence of UFOs when investigated “Are you aware of Skywatcher, Jake Barber, and those guys that say they're able to summon a UFO and they've got a dog whistle?” “We've talked to them. I found absolutely nothing credible about it. They weren't able to produce any evidence. They weren't able to produce any pictures, documents, video, data, anything.”
English
76
18
164
34.6K