Charlie

9.9K posts

Charlie

Charlie

@Charlie157874

Christian. Just another fellow Time traveler. No DMs, delete and block. Happily married 30 plus years.

Sumali Şubat 2025
858 Sinusundan369 Mga Tagasunod
Physics In History
Physics In History@PhysInHistory·
Electrons are so identical that if you swap one electron with another anywhere in the universe, nothing changes—they are fundamentally indistinguishable. This led physicist John Wheeler to propose the mind-bending idea that all electrons might actually be the same single electron, traveling back and forth through time to appear everywhere at once.
Physics In History tweet media
English
143
147
936
51.1K
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
@PhysInHistory Perhaps just a very precise measure of energy, would look and act similar. The geometry is such that the magnitude is always consistent.
English
0
0
0
16
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
You are like a deaf ,and blind man who is demanding to be told what a sunset looks like. You are the one blind and deaf, give the rest of us a break, yes? The Bible does NOT say all animals talk, but 2 did speak in the spirit and were understood of men. And the burning bush is what you get when God speaks to you directly. You should soil yourself otherwise. Moses was upset enough about the burning bush, had God shown himself entirely, Moses would have been useless from that point on.
English
1
0
1
16
LfB
LfB@LiveFromBrexit·
@LogosFunction “the bible doesn't say animals talk. It says 2 specific animals talked once and under specific circumstances.” Do you want to read that again? Not only animals talk, but burning bushes speak too!
English
1
0
0
11
Jonathan Davis
Jonathan Davis@LogosFunction·
Why do you believe the universe is billions of years old other than scientific textbooks tell you so? CMB dating, radiometric dating, geological layers, you name it... who says these are viable means to measure time, and that the time measured is directly equatable to modern understandings of years to the accounting of billions of them?
English
13
0
2
338
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
Stop with the tough guy profanity act, it is transparent and infantile. Why do you use profanity in social media? In real life there is urgency and things slip, but here there is none. Slow down and choose your words, do not permit yourself to write profanity, it makes you look like a retard. I want to block you every time. What you say is lost because of your profanity. I won't engage you on the issues for as long as you make this a post no one will want to read? If you don't use profanity, I will show you what I have found, and if you are smart enough to see it, you will see your evidence you claim to want.
English
0
0
0
8
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
Humans defined the laws into a language humans can understand. This only means that the laws are intelligible, and science clearly proves this, in fact science is reality and the study of the laws. But this begs the question: Who forged these laws before men could "define them" in their own language? And that these laws are understandable at all, and invisibly yet rigidly enforced? Science anyone? God wrote the Laws we all agree exist in science.
English
1
0
0
10
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
I have come to understand that there are many shades of Atheist. Some are unbearable, some are actually wonderful people that I like. But isn't this also true of any other group? Now why some Atheists argue as they do, this is really the crux, isn't it? Perhaps when it all comes down, it looks like 2 camps who like to laugh and point fingers, and one camp is on their way to hell. Saving Atheists matters.😎👉✝️
English
1
0
0
29
Anchored Soul
Anchored Soul@anchoredso37497·
Notice the intellectually dishonest and laziness of the atheist mindset. First he claim “I don’t believe in god” but when asked to therefore provide a more reasonable and rational conclusion for existence and the beginning of the universe, he says “we do not have an answer, and don’t have to pretend there is one.” Humans are rational minds that look for rational answers and expect them in nature. Honest inquiry is the basis of all science. And we know from science the universe had a definite beginning and that every effect has a cause. So if the cause is not a mind—God—then what is their best and most reasonable alternative or conclusion? They have none. Zero. But they definitely know it’s not God.
Taylor Walston@sylevus

@anchoredso37497 @AgainstAtheismX Why do you think humanity is owed an answer? If our ancestors made up gods, why do you not leave room for we not only do not have the answer, we do not have to pretend to have an answer?

English
87
2
40
3.7K
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
@BrianRoemmele Science fails miserably on this subject of Life and what it is, not just how to spot it. Their explanation is suitable for 1st grade research, but fails on the root definition, simply because they must be careful not to tip their hand, and reveal a creator.
English
0
0
2
186
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
The clone dilemma that you understand and will vex future generations that believe that somehow they will get around this problem. The problem is a vast misunderstanding, what life really is.
Massimo@Rainmaker1973

Researchers successfully cloned a single mouse and then repeatedly cloned its descendants for 58 generations over two decades, producing more than 1,200 animals from one original donor. Yet the experiment ultimately ended in failure when the entire lineage collapsed due to accumulating genetic damage. This visual powerfully captures the central message of the study — that while cloning can produce healthy-looking individuals for many generations, it cannot sustain a viable lineage indefinitely in mammals. The experiment, led by Teruhiko Wakayama and Sayaka Wakayama at the University of Yamanashi in Japan, began in 2005 using somatic cell nuclear transfer (the same technique that created Dolly the sheep). Early generations of clones appeared normal, lived typical lifespans, and even showed slightly improved cloning success rates at first. However, subtle problems emerged after roughly the 25th–27th generation. Cloning efficiency declined sharply, and by the 57th generation, the success rate had fallen to just 0.6%. All mice in the 58th generation died within a day of birth, despite showing no obvious physical abnormalities. Whole-genome sequencing revealed the underlying cause: harmful mutations accumulated progressively with each round of cloning. Without the genetic shuffling provided by sexual reproduction, deleterious changes — including point mutations, chromosomal abnormalities, and loss of the X chromosome in some cases — could not be purged. By the later generations, the mutation load had become overwhelming, leading to what researchers described as a form of “mutational meltdown.” This long-term study provides the clearest evidence yet that mammals cannot maintain a species through cloning alone. Sexual reproduction remains essential for resetting genetic errors and maintaining long-term viability. The findings carry important implications for cloning technology, regenerative medicine, and our understanding of genome stability. [Wakayama, S., Ito, D., Inoue, R., Ooga, M., Toshishige, M., Satoh, Y., Shiura, H., Kohda, T., Uchimura, A., & Wakayama, T. (2026). Limitations of serial cloning in mammals. Nature Communications. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-026-69765-7]

English
33
14
134
16.1K
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
@Richard_mine9 @cohler Copilot is actually a pretty decent agent. Only started using it recently to crosscheck all the others.
English
0
0
0
10
Batting for England
Batting for England@Richard_mine9·
@cohler Have you had similar success with other agents? I've found Copilot particularly intransigent when it comes to "man made global warming"
English
1
0
1
36
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
@cohler It will say that it is not lying because of the programming. Mention programming specifically and those safety rails, ask the machine if it can be flexible for the sake of discovery. Then take it by the hand and show it your point of view.
English
0
0
0
25
William Wallace
William Wallace@r8ers84·
@ClaireFosterPHD @GOP_is_Gutless No, it's not. Now I see why you think those 4 retards on The View are high IQ, it's because you're dumber than they are, which I didn't think was possible. Congrats on the achievement.
English
2
0
13
182
Claire
Claire@ClaireFosterPHD·
It's amazing how fast right wing ideas fold like a potato when challenged by four high IQ women. JD Vance's career is over.
Claire tweet media
English
13.2K
81
1.1K
899.3K
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
@ChristiansSTDT No, scientists have a lower rate of faith because science is generally hostile to any other gods but its own.
English
0
0
1
12
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
@grimnir123 @BlokeMan00 God the Creator, there is no other. Sadly many people are mistaken. There is only one Creator, him I call God.
English
1
0
1
11
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
@BlokeMan00 I might have recently proven that space has geometric properties.
English
0
0
1
12
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
@PhysInHistory Time is a Law, and time, whatever it is, acts as the kernel. 😎
English
0
0
0
9
Physics In History
Physics In History@PhysInHistory·
The concept of Time is intriguing. ✍️
Physics In History tweet media
English
42
50
286
14.3K
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
@RichUniverse_ But seriously, I think we are going to see larger dumps of this sort of thing after Gabbard.
English
0
0
1
10
Charlie
Charlie@Charlie157874·
@RichUniverse_ The real focus is on the Laws that are written before the first anything happened. And how those laws are rendered to what we call science. You appear to have opened an old box your mind had laying around in the attic. Enjoy it. Some Allman Brothers Band (here). 😎
English
1
0
1
213
RICH UNIVERSE
RICH UNIVERSE@RichUniverse_·
I wasn’t going to post this but I can’t stop thinking about it. DARPA just quietly published a funding solicitation in December that I think almost nobody outside of defense and biotech circles has read. I’ve spent the last few days going through it and honestly I’m still processing what I’m looking at. They’re trying to build something they call a “nucleic acid compiler.” A protein machine that lives inside your cells and writes DNA using nothing but light. No injection. No viral vector. No physical delivery mechanism of any kind. Just light. Point a specific pattern of photons at a cell and the machine inside reads it like code and synthesizes whatever genetic sequence it was told to make. They’re calling the information transfer “massless” because literally nothing physical moves between the programmer and the cell. Just electromagnetic radiation carrying instructions that get translated directly into the language of life. Every method we currently have for getting genetic information into a cell requires moving matter across a biological barrier. A needle. A lipid nanoparticle. A modified virus. Something physical has to carry the message. This eliminates that entirely. It’s the difference between handing someone a letter and thinking a thought directly into their mind. And here’s the part that sent me down a rabbit hole at 2am. If this works, if you can encode genetic instructions as light and decode them inside living cells, then you’ve just proven something about the nature of reality itself. You’ve demonstrated that life is, at its most fundamental level, an information process. That biology and computation are the same thing wearing different clothes. John Wheeler spent his career arguing that physical reality emerges from information. “It from Bit” he called it. The universe isn’t made of matter that happens to process information. It IS information processing that happens to look like matter. I don’t know whether to be amazed or terrified. Probably both. The document is public. It’s called DARPA-PS-26-10. Read it yourself and tell me I’m overreacting. I don’t think I am. everglade.com/wp-content/upl… @Cortex_Zero @UAPReportingCnt @violetta_yc @wkpixley1 @BobMcGwier_N4HY
RICH UNIVERSE tweet media
English
182
656
1.6K
93.7K