Dysfunctional Screenpass

3K posts

Dysfunctional Screenpass banner
Dysfunctional Screenpass

Dysfunctional Screenpass

@ScreenpassInt

I am your average Seahawks screen pass

Sumali Ağustos 2023
93 Sinusundan27 Mga Tagasunod
Dysfunctional Screenpass
Dysfunctional Screenpass@ScreenpassInt·
@amorriscode @sahiln123 Can you make this diff have the option to see staged and unstated changes like codex? It doesn’t seem like a big thing and it is so useful for little worktrees where I don’t really want to even open vscode
English
0
0
0
8
Sahil Naikwadi
Sahil Naikwadi@sahiln123·
loved using the new Claude mac app today but just updated it and now my skills/commands don't show up @amorriscode
Sahil Naikwadi tweet media
English
1
0
0
156
Yashas
Yashas@YashasGunderia·
@VictorTaelin Opus 4.6 might just be sonnet 5. Now that mythos is done, I think opus 4.7 could be a huge jump
English
1
0
4
1.2K
Taelin
Taelin@VictorTaelin·
Seems like we get Opus 4.7 today? Is this the first time a lab announces a more powerful model exists and ships a less powerful variant? I wonder if Opus 4.7 is a smaller variant of the same Mythos pre-train, or just a continuation of the 4.6 we have...
English
59
7
464
34.8K
Dysfunctional Screenpass
Dysfunctional Screenpass@ScreenpassInt·
@Lentils80 I kinda doubt it is because I’ve heard zero hype at all from the anthropic people. Maybe that doesn’t mean anything though
English
0
0
0
21
Dysfunctional Screenpass
Dysfunctional Screenpass@ScreenpassInt·
@rsuyoy Yeah I get considerably better limits in Claude right now than codex. I don’t know what everyone is on about
English
0
0
0
26
Yousr
Yousr@rsuyoy·
Why is everyone okay with OpenAI cutting Codex limits by a huge amount and not publicly communicating it? It’s shocking, the limits are now on par with Claude’s code if not stricter, and there’s no formal communication on it.
English
146
21
679
65.1K
サメQCU
サメQCU@sameQCU·
dwarkesh comes off as simple and intellectually disengaged when huang describes the history of networking and interconnect hardware becoming totally ceded to chinese organizations over the last 20 years and dwarkesh tries to introduce a point about 'what if china...' anyways
English
37
22
995
83.4K
Crab
Crab@Taxi8o·
@tenobrus dwarkesh seemed a little annoying during this segment
English
3
0
11
1.5K
Tenobrus
Tenobrus@tenobrus·
anyone notice Jensen feels quantized recently ?
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp

Distilled recap of the back-and-forth with Jensen on export controls: Dwarkesh: Wouldn’t selling Nvidia chips to China enable them to train models like Claude Mythos with cyber offensive capabilities that would be threats to American companies and national security? Jensen: First of all, Mythos was trained on fairly mundane capacity and a fairly mundane amount of it by an extraordinary company. The amount of capacity and the type of compute it was trained on is abundantly available in China. Dwarkesh: With that, could they eventually train a model like Mythos? Yes. But the question is, because we have more FLOPs, American labs are able to get to this level of capabilities first. Furthermore, even if they trained a model like this, the ability to deploy it at scale matters. If you had a cyber hacker, it's much more dangerous if they have a million of them versus a thousand of them. Jensen: Your premise is just wrong. The fact of the matter is their AI development is going just fine. The best AI researchers in the world, because they are limited in compute, also come up with extremely smart algorithms. DeepSeek is not an inconsequential advance. The day that DeepSeek comes out on Huawei first, that is a horrible outcome for our nation. Dwarkesh: Currently, you can have a model like DeepSeek that can run on any accelerator if it's open source. Why would that stop being the case in the future? Jensen: Suppose it optimizes for Huawei. Suppose it optimizes for their architecture. It would put others at a disadvantage. As AI diffuses out into the rest of the world, their standards and their tech stack will become superior to ours because their models are open. Dwarkesh: Tesla sold extremely good electric vehicles to China for a long time. iPhones are sold in China. They didn't cause some lock-in. China will still make their version of EVs, and they're dominating, or smartphones, they're dominating. Jensen: We are not a car. The fact that I can buy this car brand one day and use another car brand another day is easy. Computing is not like that. There's a reason why x86 still exists. There's a reason why Arm is so sticky. These ecosystems are hard to replace. Dwarkesh: It's just hard to imagine that there's a long-term lock-in to the Chinese ecosystem, even if they have this slightly better open-source model for a while. American labs port across accelerators constantly. Anthropic's models are run on GPUs, they're run on Trainium, they're run on TPUs. There are so many things you can do, from distilling to a model that's well fit for your chips. Jensen: China is the largest contributor to open source software in the world. China's the largest contributor to open models in the world. Today it's built on the American tech stack, Nvidia’s. Fact. All five layers of the tech stack for AI are important. The United States ought to go win all five of them. in a few years time, I'm making you the prediction that when we want American technology to be diffused around the world—out to India, out to the Middle East, out to Africa, out to Southeast Asia—on that day, I will tell you exactly about today's conversation, about how your policy ... caused the United States to concede the second largest market in the world for no good reason at all.

English
24
12
540
35.2K
Dysfunctional Screenpass
Dysfunctional Screenpass@ScreenpassInt·
@Presidentlin I think he is just frustrated by anthropic on so many levels. It came out in several ways on the podcast. Half of it is wanting to kick himself and half of it is wanting to kick Dario
English
0
0
3
70
Zach Krall
Zach Krall@zachkrall·
ok i still dont understand why chat, cowork, code are even separate tabs to begin with
English
118
21
1.5K
141.7K
Dysfunctional Screenpass
Dysfunctional Screenpass@ScreenpassInt·
@dwarkesh_sp Man I like that you’re willing to drill in on questions they don’t like. Hopefully Jensen’s China takes don’t age like Dario’s compute spend takes
English
0
0
0
539
Dwarkesh Patel
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp·
The Jensen Huang episode. 0:00:00 – Is Nvidia’s biggest moat its grip on scarce supply chains? 0:16:25 – Will TPUs break Nvidia’s hold on AI compute? 0:41:06 – Why doesn’t Nvidia become a hyperscaler? 0:57:36 – Should we be selling AI chips to China? 1:35:06 – Why doesn’t Nvidia make multiple different chip architectures? Look up Dwarkesh Podcast on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, etc. Enjoy!
English
277
663
5.2K
2.2M
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
Yep… How did I call out and long. FIFTEEN DIFFERENT STOCKS. 8+7. 9+6. 10+5. After $ALRIB, the $MSFT Quantum supplier went up 113%, that hit 15 different longs. That returned Triple Digits year to date??? No paywall, and I've posted everything before it moved. Hard carrying retail out of the permanent underclass.
Serenity tweet media
Afishyanadoh@afishyanadoh

@aleabitoreddit Was it you that mentioned Riber SA as well? $Alrib? It’s been flying as well.

English
83
21
763
121.6K
Ryan Peterman
Ryan Peterman@ryanlpeterman·
Boris Cherny (Creator of Claude Code): "The one technical book I would recommend to everyone that has had the greatest impact on me as an engineer is functional programming in Scala. You're probably never going to use Scala day today, but the way it teaches you to think about coding problems is just such a change from the way that most people were in coding, either practically or in school. It's just. It's incredible. It's going to completely change the way that you code now. I think in types, when I code, the thing that matters in your code the most is the type signatures. This is more important than the code itself." @bcherny
Ryan Peterman@ryanlpeterman

Boris Cherny ( @bcherny ) created Claude Code, but few know his full career story. Today I'm sharing an interview with him about how he grew as an engineer, we discussed: • Why every engineer needs "side quests" • Why being under leveled is a good thing • The story behind his growth to Principal (IC8) at Meta • Technical book that had the biggest impact on him as an engineer • The most important principle in product engineering • Claude Code stories & competition in AI coding products You can find the full episode here: • YouTube: youtu.be/AmdLVWMdjOk • Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/4toWH5… • Transcript: developing.dev/p/boris-cherny… • Apple: podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/the…

English
40
105
1.5K
322.8K
Ryan Hoover
Ryan Hoover@rrhoover·
Ok, I'll take the bait, Claude
Ryan Hoover tweet media
English
9
2
54
7.8K
ThePrimeagen
ThePrimeagen@ThePrimeagen·
mythos, opus is down, fix immediately, no mistakes, ultrathink ultraplan
English
157
208
5.8K
117.6K
Noah Cat
Noah Cat@Cartidise·
Huawei’s Pura 90 series comes with AI Posture Recommendations for better photos. THIS is how AI is supposed to be used. Yea, it’s way more useful than Google’s camera coach slop.
English
348
4.3K
50.9K
5.7M
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Anthropic just redesigned Claude Code's desktop app. The most revealing detail: there's no code editor anywhere in the interface. The sidebar shows a task list. "Build the alignment grid demo." "Fix race condition in upload queue." "Migrate API client to fetch with retries." Four tasks running in parallel, each on its own git worktree so agents never touch each other's code. The main pane shows a live preview of what's being built. Below it, a prompt bar. Type what you want, watch it appear, dispatch the next task. Claude Code scored 46% "most loved" in the Pragmatic Engineer developer survey earlier this year. Cursor got 19%. Copilot got 9%. That was before this redesign. Anthropic is building the development interface for the agent era around dispatching and reviewing. Watch what Cursor ships in response over the next 90 days.
Felix Rieseberg@felixrieseberg

Today is a big day! We're launching a ~ new ~ version of Claude Code in the desktop app. It's been redesigned from the ground up for parallel work and is a lot faster. It's been my main way to use Claude Code for the last few weeks.

English
6
5
53
9K
pc
pc@pcshipp·
GPT 5.5 Opus 4.7 Gemini 4
Indonesia
64
20
680
69.4K
Dysfunctional Screenpass
Dysfunctional Screenpass@ScreenpassInt·
@amorriscode - Preview mode support for urls other than localhost (I’ve mentioned this before so I assume it’s not easy but at some point I’d like it) -total diff count for whatever references you’ve selected. Maybe I am missing this since it was in the old app.
English
1
0
0
12
Anthony Morris ツ
Anthony Morris ツ@amorriscode·
Today we're launching a rebuilt version of Claude Code on desktop. The app has been redesigned for the ground up to make it easier than ever to parallelize work with Claude. I haven't opened an IDE or terminal in weeks. Excited for you all to give it a shot!
English
451
234
4.2K
675.1K