Terence Brewer

7K posts

Terence Brewer

Terence Brewer

@notsamagain

Distributor of Rubber Bands, and occasionally, letters.

Sumali Kasım 2010
795 Sinusundan229 Mga Tagasunod
Stephen S
Stephen S@SShuchart·
@BarstoolNate And despite all of these advantages, she just doesn’t have it. Mitchum was rude but he wasn’t wrong
English
3
0
79
13.5K
Eric Nathan
Eric Nathan@BarstoolNate·
Think it's kinda silly to think otherwise. Of course Rory had an advantage. She left public school because her grandparents paid for Chilton. They then also paid for her to go to Yale which opened up many more doors for her. Yes Rory worked hard, but obviously had an advantage.
Eric Patterson@EPatGolf

The "Rory had an unfair advantage" discourse may be the most insane I've seen on this app. If you utter those words or believe it to be true, you just don't get it

English
64
156
3.8K
624.3K
Terence Brewer
Terence Brewer@notsamagain·
@McInnispicks Typical click bait comment. Congratulations on achieving your aim, which is to get people to engage with you (me included) to raise your profile!!!
English
0
0
0
14
Andrew McInnis
Andrew McInnis@McInnispicks·
I never really understood why some people didn't like Rory. Now I kind of see it.
English
1.7K
120
4.6K
4.6M
Tron Carter
Tron Carter@TronCarterNLU·
Bob NOT happy on 15. Couple this with the outburst on 12 tee. We just can’t have it!
Tron Carter tweet media
English
298
27
1.7K
361.7K
Jam
Jam@Carefree_Jam·
@journalism_rp Maybe. But not sure he'd play for PSG even so. Not with how they play. Maybe Bayern
English
6
0
2
16K
Jam
Jam@Carefree_Jam·
I can't think of 1 premier league player that gets into the PSG or Bayern Munich starting XIs with their style of football, movement and individual player's ball manipulation. Be objective and no gas, no idea if any do....
English
569
39
1.4K
1.1M
Michael S. Kim
Michael S. Kim@Mike_kim714·
Augusta Diaries Wed -Fina prep day on the course. I played the first nine. It was nice to look at the notes I had written down from Monday and to double check some of them. I made slight adjustments to some of them but I was happy with the homework that I had done. -The wind is out of the NE or thereabouts. It made the first nine very challenging. The only downwind shots were 2 tee, 4 tee and everything else felt into the wind. 2 was almost harder as it was down off the left and super hard to turn it over enough with that wind. It’s going to be way less windy during the tournament but it looks like it’ll be out of that NE most of the week. -Played the Par 3 contest with good friend Si Woo Kim. Actually played the first nine with him today as well. I had my gf caddie for me and we had an awesome time. Temperature and the scenery was perfect. Still looking for that elusive ace though. -I tee off 1139. Will get to the course around 930 to do some warm up and eat some food as well. I have a feeling the greens are going to be really firm and it’s going to play different than last yr. Last yr, there was a ton of rain that softened things up early but not this yr. It’ll be that much more important to hit my numbers.
English
121
35
2.9K
213.4K
Rick Golfs
Rick Golfs@Top100Rick·
Patrick Reed discusses coming back to “traditional golf” after his stint in LIV. The Masters Champ talks specifically about the Shotgun format and how it ruined the intensity and pressure. I know he’s not everyone’s fave, but he’s thoughtful here.
English
45
14
741
162.4K
Terence Brewer
Terence Brewer@notsamagain·
@DPJHodges Lost count of how many times you've said he'd be "gone by the weekend", or something similar! Keep grifting.
English
0
0
0
11
(((Dan Hodges)))
(((Dan Hodges)))@DPJHodges·
Keir Starmer genuinely believed his stance on Iran would save his premiership. In next month’s local elections the British people will show him just how delusional he’s become > Mail Plus > dailymail.co.uk/debate/article…
English
283
740
3.6K
148.3K
Matt Goodwin
Matt Goodwin@GoodwinMJ·
The independent election observer group Democracy Volunteers said it witnessed “concerningly high levels” of family voting in Gorton & Denton. Greater Manchester Police now say “no evidence” it happened. I know which one I believe. I saw it with my own eyes.
English
454
533
2.3K
45K
Alexandra
Alexandra@Alexandr4Denman·
This is the wonderful bishop who wrote and challenged the King recently! Let’s support his words because he has been the only one to stand up for our Christian country and the threat it’s under with a King that’s not acting like the defender of our church! Share his words
English
174
1.8K
4.8K
34.2K
WasAcop
WasAcop@WasAcop·
James McMurdock was 19, served 21 days for a drunken nightclub altercation nearly 20 years ago, has since built a career, married with kids, and been elected by voters who knew. Meanwhile, your party protected grooming gangs for decades, voted against national inquiries into them, and harbours multiple MPs with far more recent scandals. Spare us the selective outrage—focus on fixing Britain's broken streets instead of digging up old stories to smear opponents. Cowards.
Bridget Phillipson@bphillipsonMP

Reform UK said I was 'bullying' when I pointed out their colleague was jailed for beating up his former partner. Now, they're trying to sneak him back into their party. So I'll say it again: James McMurdock was jailed for beating up his former partner. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

English
119
338
1.8K
51.1K
Jim A.
Jim A.@JimAlba23·
NYPD Blue did it as well. Life just moved on, even though Sipowicz was in charge of the squad at the end, the cycle didn't change. Old guys (Medavoy) retired, and the replacements were about the same nationality as John Kelly and Sipowicz , (Irish and Eastern European), who started the show as the main detectives.
English
1
0
1
58
kyle
kyle@RicharlisonSZNx·
Archie Gray needs to be called up for the England squad not the under 21s
English
14
6
252
9.8K
Terence Brewer
Terence Brewer@notsamagain·
@Lloyd_Cole Annoying and unfunny. It's not a problem if people have different opinions. Be well. X
English
0
0
0
28
Terence Brewer
Terence Brewer@notsamagain·
@montie @KemiBadenoch If people wanna believe in fairy stories, let them, alone, or as a group. Your objection is that it's a different fairy story to the one in which you believe!
English
0
0
0
42
Terence Brewer
Terence Brewer@notsamagain·
@Free_ByTheSea It really isn't. Far too many words. Can be summarised as follows, I hate Muslims!!!!
English
0
0
0
21
FreeByTheSea
FreeByTheSea@Free_ByTheSea·
Wow! This letter to the King is superb. I’m sure millions of us would sign it. ‘What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state.’ This is horribly true, and it’s high time the King acted as the Defender of the Faith.
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC@BishopDewar

As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese

English
79
813
3.8K
50.8K
EyMacarena
EyMacarena@macalavin·
@IHPower Orange Juice should be ore famous. They we're amazing. They influenced the smiths too.
English
1
0
1
237
Ian Power
Ian Power@IHPower·
Jarvis Cocker's Pulp were heavily influenced by 80s band Orange Juice, who in turn had been greatly influenced by 70s group Squeeze.
English
48
220
3.2K
94.5K
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC@BishopDewar·
As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese
English
5.6K
18.5K
59.4K
2.2M