Isaac Yonemoto is cooking

17.7K posts

Isaac Yonemoto is cooking

Isaac Yonemoto is cooking

@DNAutics

Prompt charmer, AI pharma founder, former AI infra plumber, former ivory tower biochemist video: https://t.co/5BsV4r5TsH code: https://t.co/d0RaSeegaG

شامل ہوئے Ağustos 2010
252 فالونگ3K فالوورز
پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
Isaac Yonemoto is cooking
Wait, poasting thirst traps works?
Isaac Yonemoto is cooking tweet mediaIsaac Yonemoto is cooking tweet media
English
3
5
52
11.3K
secret eris
secret eris@eris_nerung·
they should make the shapes more interesting i bet it would be easier to memorize if they were all curly and strokey like kanji. could also make composites or something. i wonder how the writing systems influenced this
English
2
0
7
227
secret eris
secret eris@eris_nerung·
reading on cathinone chem class and mania deciding i want to revisit chemistry from the beginning because brain no like to memorize weird symbol with complicated meaning
English
2
0
7
319
Sean Moriarity
Sean Moriarity@sean_moriarity·
I miss the era of social media where everybody was just posting song lyrics. Would enjoy Twitter much more if it was just my friends posting song lyrics
English
4
0
8
347
Madison Kanna
Madison Kanna@Madisonkanna·
X is the best social media app and i will die on this hill
English
26
7
149
6K
bashbunni
bashbunni@sudobunni·
scrolling on Mastodon: feeling inspired to build cool things and learn about interesting problems people are solving scrolling on X: "developers are becoming obsolete", "there's no point in learning to code anymore", "AI is everything"
English
24
16
277
12.8K
Robert J Salvador
Robert J Salvador@RobertJSalvador·
@JTLonsdale @BitcoinPierre I like Balaji & IMO he’s one of the best thinkers out there. But he’s consistently wrong on military takes with China and the US. 2 years ago he put out an in depth article saying our military is 10x less prepared and theirs is 10x more prepared. It was the exact opposite.
English
12
2
53
3.5K
Joe Lonsdale
Joe Lonsdale@JTLonsdale·
Balaji is a bright guy but he fled the USA and has set his mind totally against our future success. He lives in a world where US is losing and China is winning. This is his fixation. It’s dangerous, and it’s wrong. And this war has embarrassed China, destroyed their 100 cargo planes of war materials and their military ally, and frustrates them. It’s fair to disagree about the attack. But saying that its architects are guilty of any downside is childlike nonsense. They should be proud of their work and their courage to take on this evil. If you’re against the war, do you get credit for the last two decades of literal mass torture and mass rape and repression by this regime, and its terror funding and death around the region? Do you get credit for “supporting” the billions it spends on social media bots and information operations to polarize the US against ourselves, and weaken the west? Do you also get credit for what would have been the next twenty years of that? Are you, Balaji, responsible for that side of it? No? But if you are for it, you get zero credit for fixing any of that, but blamed for ALL the possible downsides? Total BS. The mullahs holding the region hostage shouldn’t get your help to blame others for the damage they do. Geopolitics and war is complex and there are risks on all sides. There is risk in acting, and in not acting. I’m really glad we are taking advantage of the massive innovation and competence gap that exists at this moment, and finally eliminating so much evil. I hope for freedom for the Iranian people and know that the situation is hard and complex, but either way it is good to stop the bad guys and eliminate so many of the worst groups, who have done so much damage, from history. Nobody should get away with what those bastards did for so long; this was long overdue.
Balaji@balajis

I'm going to make some obvious points. (1) Blowing up all the oil infrastructure in the Middle East is an insane idea, and may well result in a global economic crash and humanitarian crisis unrivaled in the lives of those now living. We're talking about the price of everything everywhere rising, from food to gas, at a moment when inflation was already high. All of that will be laid at the feet of the authors of this war. (2) The antebellum status quo of Feb 27, 2026 was just not that bad, but we're unlikely to return to it. Expect indefinite, long-term, ongoing disruptions to everything out of the Middle East. (3) Also assume tech financing crashes for the indefinite future. The genius plan to get the Gulf states caught in the crossfire has incinerated much of the funding for LPs, for datacenters, and for IPOs. Anyone in tech who supported this war may soon learn the meaning of "force majeure" as funding gets yanked. (4) Many capital allocators will instead be allocating much further down Maslow's hierarchy of needs, towards useful basic things like food and energy. (5) It's fortunate that all those progressives yelled about the "climate crisis." Yes, their reasoning about timelines was wrong, and much of the money was wasted in graft, but the result was right: we all need energy independence from the Middle East, pronto. It's also fortunate that Elon and China autistically took climate seriously. Now they're going to need to ship a billion solar panels, electric vehicles, batteries, nuclear power plants, and the like to get everyone off oil, immediately. (6) It's not just an oil and gas problem, of course. It's also a fertilizer problem, and a chemical precursor problem. Maybe some new sources will come online at the new prices, but it takes time to dial stuff up, particularly at this scale, so shortages are almost a certainty. That said, China has actually scaled up coal-to-chemicals[a,c] (C2C), and there's also something more sci-fi called Power-to-X[b] which turns arbitrary power + water + air into hydrocarbons. But all of that will need to get accelerated. I have a background in chemical engineering so may start funding things in this area. (7) Ultimately, this war is going to result in tremendous blame for anyone associated with it. It's a no-win scenario to blow up this much infrastructure for so many people. Simply not worth it for whatever objective they thought they were going to attain. But unless you're actually in a position to stop the madness, the pragmatic thing to do is: scramble to mitigate the fallout to yourself, your business, and your people. [a]: reuters.com/business/energ… [b]: alfalaval.com/industries/ene… [c]: reuters.com/sustainability…

English
255
213
2.9K
385.1K
Isaac Yonemoto is cooking
@jrkelly we should also develop a culture of not depending on patents and while we're at it also stealing and working around patents
English
1
0
0
63
Jason Kelly
Jason Kelly@jrkelly·
We need to add biotech to the COINS Act list of strategic technologies asap. Then: 1. Fix FDA regs for phase 1 to match Australia (as fast as China) 2. Automate our bio labs like crazy so we aren’t losing to low cost scientific lab labor in China. Great testimony from Francisco and @DrSynbio 👏👏
Joe Lonsdale@JTLonsdale

My @8VC partner Francisco is giving key testimony today about CCP crushing our ability to develop cures. China has legit innovators - but also a culture of stealing, and working around patents. Our legacy FDA is so slow that they can copy and get to market faster. Let’s fix it.

English
2
6
58
5K
Isaac Yonemoto is cooking
@SynBio1 come now. pare back your claim. for 80B we could have brought back 2 or 3 dinosaur species, not *all* of them
English
1
0
3
85
Anika
Anika@anika_climate·
🚨CLIMATE SCIENTIST ANSWERS PUBLIC QUESTIONS! Q: “Isn’t Carbon Dioxide a dangerous greenhouse gas?”, A: “This is another common misconception, it only comprises 0.04% of Earth’s atmosphere…”
English
78
116
371
40.9K
Battle Beagle
Battle Beagle@HarmlessYardDog·
So anyways, did you know Venezuela is full of the heavy crude that US refineries need to function?
English
44
36
1.1K
39.5K
Isaac Yonemoto is cooking
@skdh @anika_climate > Human activity has no direct influence on the amount of water vapour in the atmosphere idk about that sabine, agriculture moves a lot of water into the atmosphere via transpiration and evaporation
English
4
0
8
947
Sabine Hossenfelder
@anika_climate Human activity has no direct influence on the amount of water vapour in the atmosphere. We influence it indirectly through... carbon dioxide emissions... which increases temperatures which increases, wait for it, the water vapour content of the atmosphere...
English
66
12
465
16.3K
shaggy
shaggy@shaggysurvives·
betting one million dollars i will not win the “who is the most rational” competition
English
4
2
41
989
Jakub Skałecki 🚀 #buildinpublic
Why ~H? 🤔 Simple - all HEEX formatters and highlighters will work. The only thing I'm doing is finding all <.vue> components, and rewriting them to append `shared_props` and `v-socket` automatically. Much better! These two functions are equal to one from the first tweet 😍
Jakub Skałecki 🚀 #buildinpublic tweet mediaJakub Skałecki 🚀 #buildinpublic tweet media
English
2
0
4
206
Abe Murray
Abe Murray@abemurray·
watching Claude fuck up another SQL query it should know how to do makes me feel so much better about all my stupid iterate-until-right screwups in the past it just like me! (dumb) 😅😭 --- also I think Claude Code is <<<< Cursor cheaper, yes - but for output per unit time, Cursor wins all day long - multiple agents, same code base, better context management Cursor (really, VS Code) is just a much better UI / interaction experience too most folks I talk to are still in this world
English
3
0
15
504