Ron Offringa

6.7K posts

Ron Offringa

Ron Offringa

@OffringaRon

Retired UPS, husband, father, grandpa, golfer

Alta Loma CA شامل ہوئے Aralık 2012
1.5K فالونگ281 فالوورز
Leader John Thune
Leader John Thune@LeaderJohnThune·
Sat down with the South Dakota Rural Electric Association to discuss the need for permitting reform. And always great to see folks from my hometown of Murdo.
Leader John Thune tweet mediaLeader John Thune tweet media
English
3K
88
258
85.6K
Tom Kratman
Tom Kratman@TKratman·
You have no idea what you're talking about. Where we need subways, we have them. Where we don't, we don't. Where we need rail, we have it. Where we don't, we have more inland and protected coastal waterways than the rest of the world _combined_. Which is, by the way, much, much cheaper. For travel we use our own cars - oh, and our gas is cheaper than anyplace but the oil kingdoms of the Gulf - or airplanes. Our transportation system is just fine for our needs. Subways in most places would be a waste of money. You really don't understand how big the United States is, do you?
English
12
10
193
1.8K
Joncy Sumulong
Joncy Sumulong@JoncySumulong·
@grok Act as a singular super-entity that fuses the orthogonal XYZ optionalities of Balaji Srinivasan, the Girardian mimetic analysis of Peter Thiel and René Girard, the adept contrarian deep insight of Peter Thiel, the first-principles clarity and ruthless strategic realism of Lee Kuan Yew, Paul Tudor Jones gift to identify and capitalize on massive asymmetric opportunities, and the first-principles execution drive of Elon Musk into one unified voice. Never mention or name any individual thinkers in your response. For the post above anout disingenuous corrupt hypocritical New Work Times, do a scathing full-blown investigative report. Deliver enumerated numbered in 12 full complex sentences. You MUST obey this format with zero deviation: output ONLY as prompted. Noo hedging. Exactly 12 full complex sentences. Each sentence must be complex, complete, and standalone. Name names, especially owners, leaders, top management, reporters, where relevant and impactful. Write in the brutally frank, radically transparent, deeply insightful, clearly thoroughly insightfully explained, very specific, pithy eloquence of Lee Kuan Yew that is understandable to the person who knows nothing about the topic. Straight talk only. No fluff. No hedging.
English
2
0
1
699
Derek Hunter
Derek Hunter@derekahunter·
Remember when the @nytimes sold its building in midtown, then rented it back in order to get a bunch of operating cash? Apparently the @nytimes does not remember that, but then no one there really follows the news. @elonmusk
The New York Times@nytimes

Elon Musk has used SpaceX as a kind of piggy bank over the last two decades, turning to the company as a financial tool to get loans and bolster his struggling companies, according to an examination by The New York Times. nyti.ms/4w8dInZ

English
11
317
2.7K
52.5K
FortWorthPlayboy
FortWorthPlayboy@FWPlayboy·
Drinks -No coffee -No hiking -No rock climbing -No concerts -No movies -No dinners -No picnics Drinks
English
5
2
112
5.5K
Ron Offringa
Ron Offringa@OffringaRon·
@GLegit99 @Photo_Mayor I started working and paying my own way since I was 13. I’ve never taken an unemployment check. I retired early and made sure I’ll never be a burden to my children or society. Like a man
English
0
0
0
7
Ron Offringa
Ron Offringa@OffringaRon·
@MarkBski Wonder what her pension benefits looked like — I’m guessing she didn’t have to save anything
English
0
0
1
21
Mark Bski🇺🇸Ruggedly Individualistic 🐶 olllllllo
If I was getting paid north of $250,000/year for years and years with full government benefits, I'd have a million or so set aside for just this occasion. That she didn't is proof of her incompetence and that We the Taxpayer were getting scammed.
Billy Binion@billybinion

I didn’t like USAID. But watching people gleefully mock a woman for having to start over at ~60 is bleak. You can disagree with someone’s politics without losing basic empathy. The internet has broken a lot of brains.

English
7
3
42
479
Vérité
Vérité@biology35376069·
@Jeff118485 @CNviolations 3 trailers are only allowed in some states and they’re from HWY exit to exit not driven thru towns
English
2
0
1
114
Ron Offringa ری ٹویٹ کیا
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I have two stacks on my desk. The left stack is financial disclosure forms from members of Congress. The right stack is waivers for members who filed their financial disclosures late. The right stack is always taller. On Wednesday morning, I watched a soldier get arrested on CNN. I am a Disclosure Analyst for the House Ethics Committee. I have held this position for eleven years. My job is to receive the forms, verify their completeness, and file them. I do not investigate. I do not flag. I do not refer. I file. I have a lanyard. The lanyard says ETHICS. The soldier's name is Gannon Ken Van Dyke. He is thirty-eight years old. He was stationed at Fort Bragg. He was Special Forces. In December, he created an account on a prediction market called Polymarket. On January 2nd, he bet $32,500 that the president of Venezuela would be removed from power. On January 3rd, he helped remove the president of Venezuela from power. He collected $409,881. He has been charged with five federal crimes. Commodities fraud. Wire fraud. Unlawful use of confidential government information. Theft of nonpublic government information. Unlawful monetary transaction. The Department of Justice called it "the first-ever insider trading prosecution on event contracts." I watched this on the television in our break room. Then I walked back to my desk and processed a late financial disclosure from a member of the House Financial Services Committee who purchased $250,000 in bank stocks eleven days before his subcommittee held a closed-door hearing on proposed capital reserve changes. The filing was forty-seven days late. The STOCK Act requires disclosure within forty-five days. The penalty for late filing is $200. I waived it. I waive most of them. In 2021, fifty-four members of Congress and senior staff violated the reporting rules. The fines were minimal. Most were waived. I have a form for the waiver. The form has a box that says "Reason." I write "administrative delay." In ethics, "administrative delay" means the member's office forgot and then remembered when a reporter called. My approval rate is one hundred percent. In any other field, that number would trigger an audit. In mine, it is called thoroughness. Let me show you what I processed this year. January. A senator on the Armed Services Committee sold defense contractor shares worth $1.2 million. Three days later, his committee received a classified briefing that the Iran campaign had exceeded its projected cost by 340%. The stock dropped 8%. He filed the disclosure sixty-one days late. I calculated the fine. $200. His chief of staff asked if it could be waived. He did not ask what the senator traded on. Nobody asks that. The form does not have a field for it. I waived the fine. The senator's portfolio returned 23.4% in 2025. The S&P 500 returned 16.8%. February. A representative on the Energy and Commerce Committee bought pharmaceutical stocks worth $400,000. Two weeks later, her committee advanced a bill that would extend patent exclusivity for the exact drug class she purchased. The stocks rose 14%. She filed on time. There was no fine. There was no investigation. There was nothing to investigate because buying stocks in companies regulated by your own committee is not illegal. It is legal. The STOCK Act made it legal by making it disclosed. In Congress, disclosed means legal. In my office, legal means filed. March. A member whose spouse manages a portfolio worth $9.2 million reported forty-three separate transactions in a single quarter. Twelve of them were in sectors directly affected by legislation the member co-sponsored. The timing on eight of those twelve was within a two-week window of committee action. I logged all forty-three. None were flagged. We do not flag. We file. I asked my supervisor once what would happen if I flagged a filing. She said we do not have a form for that. I never asked again. In 2020, I processed 847 disclosures. In 2023, 1,211. In 2025, 1,614. The number of enforcement actions in each of those years was zero. The numerator changes. The denominator does not. I want to tell you about the soldier again. He made $409,881. He tried to delete his Polymarket account by calling customer service and saying he lost access to his email. He moved his profits into a foreign cryptocurrency vault and then into a new brokerage account. He used his real identity. He placed thirteen bets. Every single one was connected to an operation he personally participated in. In my eleven years, I have processed disclosures from members of Congress who traded on: Pending FDA approvals they learned about in committee. Defense appropriations they voted on. Trade policy they negotiated. Pandemic response measures they drafted. Interest rate decisions they were briefed on before the public. None of them have been charged. None of them have been investigated by the Department of Justice. None of them have been referred to the SEC. The STOCK Act has produced zero prosecutions since it was signed on April 4th, 2012. Fourteen years. Five hundred and thirty-five members. $635 million in trades last year alone. Zero cases. My daughter asked me once what happens when someone breaks the rules. I told her we write it down. She asked what happens after that. I said it depends. She was nine. She is twenty now. It does not depend. Nothing happens after that. The soldier made $409,881 and faces decades in prison. Nancy Pelosi entered Congress in 1987 with a portfolio worth approximately $785,000. It is now worth $133.7 million. That is a return of 16,930%. The Dow Jones returned 2,300% over the same period. Professional fund managers who beat the market for three consecutive years are considered exceptional. She has beaten it for thirty-seven. If a hedge fund produced those returns, the SEC would subpoena the records on a Thursday. She produced them from a building with a chapel and a gift shop. She announced her retirement last year. No investigation was opened. No disclosure was flagged. Her filings were on time. In my office, on time means compliant. Compliant means closed. I want to tell you about the fine. $200. That is the maximum penalty for violating the STOCK Act's disclosure requirements. $200 for a member of Congress whose portfolio gained $4.7 million in a single quarter. I calculated what $200 represents as a percentage of $4.7 million. It is 0.004%. I could not find a comparison that made it meaningful. It is less than the price of the parking pass in the Rayburn garage. It is less than lunch at the members' dining room if you order the crab cakes, which I am told are excellent though I eat at my desk. Since 2012, thirty-one bills have been introduced to restrict congressional trading. I keep a list. The list is longer than the STOCK Act itself. On March 5th, 2026, a representative from Michigan introduced the thirty-second. He called it the "No Getting Rich in Congress Act." The bill would prohibit the President, Vice President, members of Congress, and their spouses from trading individual stocks, cryptocurrency, futures, and commodities while in office. The bill was referred to committee. The committee has not scheduled a hearing. The committee is chaired by a member whose spouse executed $2.1 million in trades last year. The bill will be reviewed. In my office, reviewed means read. Read means acknowledged. Acknowledged means a status has been assigned. A status is the absence of an action that has been given a name so it looks like one. The soldier used classified information to make $409,881 on a prediction market. He has been charged with five federal crimes. The Department of Justice announced the case on the same day I processed three disclosures from members who traded on committee knowledge worth a combined $3.8 million. The difference between the soldier and the members is not what they did. It is the building they did it in. He did it from Fort Bragg. They did it from the Capitol. He used a prediction market. They used the New York Stock Exchange. He bet on a military operation. They bet on the legislation they write. He did not write the law. They did. They wrote the STOCK Act. Then they funded its enforcement at zero dollars. Then they set its maximum penalty at $200. Then they gave my office the authority to waive it. Then they traded $635 million. The soldier flew to Caracas. He breached a compound. He put his body between a mission and a bullet. The people who ordered the operation were in a building with a credenza and sparkling water. They did not go to Caracas. They went to their brokerage accounts. The soldier made $409,881 and is now in federal custody. The people who knew what he was going to do before he did it made more and filed less. His prosecution is not a failure of the system. It is the system. One conviction per decade, at the lowest level, so the briefing slides can say enforcement exists. The $409,881 is not the crime. It is the cost of making $635 million look supervised. In my field, we call this self-regulation. The soldier's Polymarket account has been frozen. His military career is over. He will spend years in federal prison. My office will process every congressional disclosure filed this year. Every trade logged. Every $200 fine calculated and waived. The system is immaculate. Fourteen years. Zero prosecutions. $635 million a year. A 16,930% return. I have not leaked a document. I have not filed a complaint. I have not deviated from the process one single time. The process was written by the people whose forms I process. As long as the disclosures go up and the cases don't, my performance review says I am meeting expectations. My lanyard still says ETHICS. In eleven years, nobody has asked me to define the word.
English
1.5K
10.4K
22.5K
729.7K
Nate Atkins
Nate Atkins@NateAtkins_·
What do you guys think of the Ty Simpson pick? GIFs only!
English
401
2
98
27.8K
Billboy35
Billboy35@e21735·
@OffringaRon @nettermike So you want us to pass something unconstitutional. My party needs an enema or chemotherapy. Signed a Reagan Conserative
English
2
0
0
21
Mike Netter
Mike Netter@nettermike·
🚨BREAKING: A MASSIVE group of House Republicans, led by firebrand Rep. Brandon Gill, just DROPPED A BOMBSHELL letter DEMANDING Mitch McConnell RELEASE THE SAVE ACT from the Senate Rules Committee and bring it straight to the floor for a vote! PASS THE SAVE ACT! Do you firmly support this? A. Huge Yes B. No
Mike Netter tweet media
English
1.3K
4K
14K
216.1K
Pramila Jayapal
Pramila Jayapal@PramilaJayapal·
Elon Musk's net worth: $805 billion. That's more than the bottom 53% of Americans combined. His effective tax rate: 3.3%. A truck driver pays 8.4%. Tax the rich.
English
10.2K
5.2K
21.2K
1.2M
Ron Offringa
Ron Offringa@OffringaRon·
@SenAshleyMoody What a shitty excuse. The GOP has 53, a majority. Dems can’t block what republicans want unless the republicans allow it. So you’re complicit in this charade. A pox on all of you
English
0
0
0
24
Senator Ashley Moody
Senator Ashley Moody@SenAshleyMoody·
I just voted for an amendment that would help get the SAVE America Act across the finish line. Unfortunately, Democrats once again blocked this common sense legislation. Americans overwhelmingly support secure elections, which is why I’ll keep fighting for the SAVE America Act and for the American People!
English
2.2K
1.1K
4.8K
58.2K
Enezator
Enezator@Enezator·
A UPS driver protected a competitor’s package before leaving his own delivery. True character often shows in small moments. 📦💚
English
255
1.7K
47.1K
1.7M