Chief
1.2K posts


Urdu, the language of Indo-Islamicate high culture & theology is the lingua franca of 1.8 billion people (660 million Muslims, 33% of the Ummah).
All Arabic & Persian theological work is recorded in Urdu with giant theological advances.
This Lecture:
👉 youtu.be/XdJAw7VNUM8?si…

YouTube
ຸ@user19612014
Leaning urdu arabic and farsi is basically learning the three most important islamic languages.
English

@z2568656275063 @McBeaner69 duh it is not hateful to Urdu, the language. you're slow
English

@__chief____ @McBeaner69 "mid" doesn't necessitate hatred against the "mid" thing lmao, you guys are inventing new nullifiers of Islam on the go now 😭
English

How’s insulting Urdu a gateway to apostasy?
The One@bangu_librarian
@_Caged_ Calling the lingua franca of south Asian Muslims mid, there are easier gateways for apostasy......
English

@McBeaner69 it is.
objecting to "Urdu is mid" (clearly a hateful and/or indoctrinated laid with inferiority complex stance) is supremacism now?
English

@__chief____ It really isn’t since Islamic scholarship in the subcontinent has existed in local languages
I’m not even anti-Urdu but this Urdu supremacism is just dumb especially in the modern age when Urdu has become even less relevant
English

white people in the replies trying to educate arabs on how to eat shawarma😭😭😭
duck@ExtremeBlitz__
Eating Shawarma #LifeIsGood
English

@abeera_ehsan0 @kaleshiwasp @rorodiaryxo @nineteesgurl if u read closely u'll notice that I objected to one specific thing not to your stance in the wider discussion
yes, anything other than nikah & walimah isn't part of Islam. but it can be permissible. feast given after nikah during barat can be considered (non-sunnah way) walimah
English

@__chief____ @kaleshiwasp @rorodiaryxo @nineteesgurl I will end the discussion on this " Walima is arranged by only groom's side and Barat/nikah arranged by bride's side" so it cannot be seem as a Walima. Only Nikah and a Walime dinner is valid if it is arranged by groom's side.
English

@kaleshiwasp @abeera_ehsan0 @rorodiaryxo @nineteesgurl > "Walima" just means dinner
& Salah just means "to connect". some words become terms, you cannot then literally translate them. so this notion is incorrect.
walimah literally means a banquet, but in Islam it's a term denoting a feast hosted by the groom to celebrate a wedding.
English

@abeera_ehsan0 @rorodiaryxo @nineteesgurl "Walima" just means dinner. You dont have to call the function walima. The emphasis is on giving a DINNER. Do you think the prophet meant you should have a big wedding function like a pakistani walima 😭😭😭 he meant FEEDING people not the actial function
English

@abeera_ehsan0 @rorodiaryxo @kaleshiwasp @nineteesgurl Walimah is sunnah muakkadah. It is also sunnah to hold it after consummation, but it is permissible anytime after nikah (usually this leeway is given to accommodate local customs).
English

Do Wahhabis genuinely believe this occurs?
Or do they see a minbar being empty, fabricate a story, and attribute it to the Sunnis?
Or is it just a pure fabrication, completely out of nowhere?
In my 25 years of celebrating the Mawlid, I have never witnessed such a story.
🌻@h02br
throwback to the one time i accidentally went to mawlid and was told the Prophet SAW was on the empty chair and we all had to cry 👁️👄👁️
English

@mahadnaseermrj @0rion_7 @properstrange 'nowadays' people mix English with Hindi/Urdu, coz sadly our education system is in Eng. But this is completely different than the topic of discussion
in every language, literature is more formal. while people speak a watered down version of it. that doesn't make it 2 languages
English

@0rion_7 @__chief____ @properstrange muhajirs that came from India speak haryanvi, punjabi, bihari, bengali also,
i am using phrase "Pure Urdu" to differ it from the "Spoken Urdu" that we spoke nowadays...
if you are urdu spoken then try to read any old urdu novel or afsana, you will get to know the diff...
English

@mahadnaseermrj @0rion_7 @properstrange are u not comprehending? of course Hindustani/Urdu/hindi and Sanskritised Hindi are two different languages. That's why I gave u a history lesson on actual Hindi
shuddh is not a word in Hindi. This is sanskritised Hindi u're talking about, there's nothing 'pure' about this lang
English

@__chief____ @0rion_7 @properstrange well, lemme give an example !
Lets take the word Pure itself !...
In Urdu, we use word 'khalis' for pure but in hindi, we use word 'shud' for pure !
but, people knows both of the words coz both are languages of the subcontinent BUT, as you can see two diff word, two diff lang...
English

@mahadnaseermrj @0rion_7 @properstrange this "pure hindi" is pure propaganda by India to give credibility to Sanskritised "Hindi". and pakistanis play right into this, knowingly, because they get to keep "Urdu" for themselves.
Hindustani (Hindi-Urdu) is a mixture of Prakritik, Persian and Arabic. now, define "pure"
English

@__chief____ @0rion_7 @properstrange yes, spoken urdu and spoken hindi are same, that is caused by people of sub-continent... but, pure urdu and pure hindi are two diff languages, as i said above !,
English

@abimikaeel "Wahhabi" is not a name of a sect, it's a pejorative.
popularised by westerners, and now, bread and butter of barelvis.
Al-Wahhab is Allah's name BTW. so when barelvis use "wahhabi" as an insult, they're actually insulting Allah. sad thing is many of them know about this.
English

@mahadnaseermrj @0rion_7 @properstrange Urdu and [Spoken] Hindi are the same language.
Official or 'Sanskritised' Hindi is a new (~150yo), completely different language that no one speaks.
The states of Ind and Pak deliberately created this conflation/confusion of names in order to have a separate national identities
English

@0rion_7 @properstrange urdu and hindi are two diff languages with diff history and diff way of formation. for convenience, people of sub-continent have mixed these two and added a lot of words of english e.g. radio, television, etc...! if you listen to pure urdu and pure hindi, you will get the diff !
English

@bas3dp4ki and btw you said "odds" in your original tweet
odds are a different concept than probability or fractions.
probability of 'n to m' odds = n/(n+m)
in your 1 to 0 odds, this becomes p = 1/(1+0) = 1
a perfect probability of 1 denoting absolute certainty!
English

@bas3dp4ki it is not
1/0 is (undefined) infinity
1/1 is 1
read again what I wrote
u said "1 in 0", so that's more than 100% (i.e. 1/1) probability of occurrence. which is against the laws of nature AND probability theory. but rhetorically it may imply certainty beyond absolute certainty!
English

Odds of this being true are around 1 in 0
Voice of Hindus@Voiceofhindus
Finally I’m officially engaged with my muslim girlfriend Inayat Siddiqui after 6 months of relationship 💍 We’re getting married soon on her 22nd birthday 🙌🏻
English

@bas3dp4ki given a franction n/m=x
as m approaches infinity (i.e. as it gets larger), x approaches zero.
as m approaches zero, x approaches infinity.
> 1 in 0
what you're essentially saying is this event happened ONCE even though it should've never happened.
English

@__chief____ how can 1 in 0 be the same as 1 in 1?
essentially, fractions are about division, one third is written 1/3, because it is 1 divided by 3 or 0.333.., one fifth is written 1/5, 1 divided by 5 is 0.2, and therefore because dividing by 0 is always zero, 1/0 equals...zero.
English








